Immediate urinary catheter removal after colorectal surgery with the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol.

PURPOSE: The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol for colorectal surgery recommends early urinary catheter (UC) removal after surgery. However, the optimal timing remains controversial. We aimed to evaluate the safety of immediate UC removal and risk factors of postoperative urinary retention (POUR) after colorectal cancer surgery. METHODS: From November 2019 and April 2022, patients who underwent elective colorectal cancer surgery at Seoul St. Mary's hospital were collected retrospectively. A UC was inserted in the operating room after general anesthesia and removed in the operating room immediately after surgery. The primary outcome was the occurrence of POUR following immediate UC removal after surgery, and the secondary outcomes were the identification of POUR-related risk factors and postoperative complications. RESULTS: Among 737 patients, 81 (10%) had POUR immediately after UC removal. No patient had urinary tract infection. The incidence of POUR was significantly higher in male and in those with a history of urinary disease. However, there were no significant differences in tumor location, surgical procedure, or approach. The mean operative time was significantly longer in the POUR group. Postoperative morbidity and mortality rates did not differ significantly between two groups. Multivariate analysis showed that risk factors for POUR were male, a history of urinary disease, and intrathecal morphine injection. CONCLUSIONS: Immediate removal of UC immediately after colorectal surgery is safe and feasible in the trend of ERAS. Male, a history of benign prostatic hyperplasia, and intrathecal morphine injection were risk factors for POUR.

Clinical effect of rectus sheath block compared to intrathecal morphine injection for minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery: a propensity score-matched study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the postoperative outcomes of a multimodal perioperative pain management protocol with rectus sheath blocks (RSBs) or intrathecal morphine (ITM) injection for minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery. METHODS: A total of 112 patients underwent minimally invasive colorectal surgery. Forty-one patients underwent RSB (group 1), whereas 71 patients underwent ITM (group 2) in addition to multimodal pain management using enhanced recovery after the surgery protocol. To adjust for the baseline differences and selection bias, baseline characteristics and postoperative outcomes were compared using propensity score matching. RESULTS: Forty patients were evaluated in each group. There was no significant difference in the length of hospital stay between the two groups. According to the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) score, the postoperative complication rate was significantly lower in the RSB group (3.0 ± 7.8) than in the ITM group (8.1 ± 10.9; p = 0.016). During the first 24 h after surgery, the median postoperative visual analog scale score was significantly higher in the RSB group than in the ITM group (2.0 ± 1.1 vs. 1.5 ± 1.2; p = 0.048). Postoperative morphine use was also significantly higher in the RSB group than in the ITM group in the first 24 h (23.7 ± 19.8 vs 11.6 ± 15.6%; p = 0.003) and 48 h (16.9 ± 24.8 vs. 7.5 ± 11.9; p = 0.036) after surgery. Significant urinary retention occurred after the in the RSB and ITM groups (5% vs. 45%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Although the RSB group had higher morphine use during the first 48 h after surgery, the length of hospital stay remained the same and the complications were less in terms of the CCI score. Thus, transperitoneal RSB is a safe and feasible approach for postoperative pain management following minimally invasive procedures.

Use of ascitic CEA levels as a predictive value for distant metastasis in high-risk stage II and III colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to analyze the effect of ascitic carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels on the long-term oncologic outcomes of colorectal cancer (CRC) following curative treatment. METHODS: A total of 191 patients with stage II/III CRC were included. CEA was analyzed on the peritoneal fluid samples taken at the start of each surgery. Long-term oncologic outcomes were analyzed using known risk factors for recurrence in CRC. RESULT: Multivariate analysis of recurrence showed that lymphatic invasion (hazards ratio (HR) 2.7, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-7, p = 0.038), vascular invasion (HR 2.8, 95% CI 1.2-6.3, p = 0.013), mucinous cancer (HR 3.6, 95% CI 1.3-10.1, p = 0.017), and peritoneal fluid CEA exceeding 5 ng/dl (odds ratio 3.1, 95% CI 1.2-7.7, p = 0.017) were significant risk factors. There were 14 patients with liver metastasis, 11 of whom had high ascitic CEA levels and no peritoneal metastasis. Additionally, eight had lung metastasis, and seven of them had high ascitic CEA levels. CONCLUSION: High ascitic CEA levels showed significantly lower disease-free survival and were significantly associated with distant metastasis in the lung and liver.

Quantitative evaluation of colon perfusion after high versus low ligation in rectal surgery by indocyanine green: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: In the field of rectal cancer surgery, there remains ongoing debate on the merits of high ligation (HL) and low ligation (LL) of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) in terms of perfusion and anastomosis leakage. Recently, infrared fluorescence of indocyanine green (ICG) imaging has been used to evaluate perfusion status during colorectal surgery. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to compare the changes in perfusion status between HL and LL through quantitative evaluation of ICG. METHODS: Patients with rectosigmoid or rectal cancer were randomized into a high or LL group. ICG was injected before and after IMA ligation, and region of interest (ROI) values were measured by an image analysis program (HSL video©). RESULTS: From February to July 2020, 22 patients were enrolled, and 11 patients were assigned to each group. Basic demographics were similar between the two groups, except for albumin level and cardiac ejection fraction. There were no significant differences in F_max between the two groups, but T_max was significantly higher and Slope_max was significantly lower in the HL group than in the LL group. Anastomosis leakage was significantly associated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation and F_max. CONCLUSION: After IMA ligation, T_max increased and Slope_max decreased significantly in the HL group. However, the intensity of perfusion status (F_max) did not change according to the level of IMA ligation.

Initial experience of laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision with D3 lymph node dissection for right colon cancer using Artisential®, a new laparoscopic articulating instrument.

Background: Laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision (CME) with D3 lymph node dissection for the right colon is becoming popular, but still technically challenging. Several articulating laparoscopic instruments had been introduced to reduce technical difficulties; however, those were not practical. This study aimed to report the first clinical experience of using ArtiSential®, a new laparoscopic articulating instrument in laparoscopic complete mesocolic with D3 lymph node dissection for right colon cancer. Patients and Methods: This was a retrospective, single-institution, consecutive case study. From October 2018 to March 2020, a total of 33 patients underwent laparoscopic right hemicolectomy using ArtiSential®, a new articulating instrument. We compared the short-term outcomes of patients who underwent surgery using ArtiSential® (AG) to the conventional instrument (CG). Results: In total, there were 33 cases in AG and 43 cases in CG. There were no significant differences in operation time (141.0 ± 22.5 vs. 156.0 ± 50.6 min, P = 0.09), mean estimated blood loss (46.8 ± 36.2 vs. 100.8 ± 300.6 ml, P = 0.31) and intra-operative and post-operative complications. However, the number of harvested lymph nodes was higher and the length of hospital stay was shorter in AG than in CG (32.6 ± 12.2 vs. 24.6 ± 7.4, P < 0.01 and 3.0 ± 1.2 vs. 4.1 ± 2.2 days, P = 0.01, respectively). Conclusions: Laparoscopic CME with D3 lymph node dissection for right colon cancer using ArtiSential®, the new articulating laparoscopic instrument is safe and technically feasible.

Surgical rectus sheath block combined with multimodal pain management reduces postoperative pain and analgesic requirement after single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy: a retrospective study.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of multimodal postoperative pain management, performing a surgical rectus sheath (RS) block via ropivacaine injection into the surgical field after single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SILA). METHODS: Patients who underwent single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SILA) for acute appendicitis were divided into three groups and compared: group 1 (multimodal pain management that included intraoperative application of a surgical RS block), group 2 (conventional pain management with intravenous opioids), or group 3 (multimodal pain management without RS block). Forty, 53, and 42 patients were registered, respectively (Table 1). RESULTS: Time to start a liquid (1.2 ± 0.4 h) in group 1 was statistically significantly shorter than that in group 2 (16.3 ± 8.4 h; p < 0.001) and group 3 (4.93 ± 2.3 h; p < 0.001). The median and max postoperative VAS scores in group 1 (1.6 ± 1.2 and 2.2 ± 1.8, respectively) were statistically significantly lower than that in group 2 (3.0 ± 1.2 and 4.2 ± 1.9, respectively; p < 0.001 on both accounts) and group 3 (2.9 ± 0.6 and 3.4 ± 1.2, respectively; p < 0.001 on both accounts). The postoperative hospital stay for group 1 (17.0 ± 9.4 h) was shorter than that for group 2 (44.7 ± 27.9 h; p < 0.001) and group 3 (35.4 ± 20.9 h; p < 0.001). RS block was a significant factor for reducing length of hospital stay and postoperative pain in 24 h. CONCLUSIONS: A surgical RS block combined with multimodal pain management after SILA is a safe and effective method that results in reduced postoperative pain and shorter hospitalization.

Impact of intraoperative zero-balance fluid therapy on the occurrence of acute kidney injury in patients who had undergone colorectal cancer resection within an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol: a propensity score matching analysis.

PURPOSE: An enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol for colorectal cancer resection encourages perioperative euvolemic status, and zero-balance fluid therapy is recommended for low-risk patients. Recently, several studies have reported concerns of increased acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients within an ERAS protocol. In the present study, we investigated the impact of intraoperative zero-balance fluid therapy within an ERAS protocol on postoperative AKI. METHODS: Patients who underwent elective surgery for primary colorectal cancer were divided into zero-balance and non-zero-balance fluid therapy groups according to intraoperative fluid amount and balance. After propensity score (PS) matching, 210 patients from each group were selected. Incidences of AKI were compared between the two groups according to the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes criteria. Postoperative kidney functions and surgical outcomes were also compared. RESULTS: AKI was significantly higher in the zero-balance fluid therapy group compared to the non-zero-balance fluid therapy group (21.4% vs. 13.8%, p = 0.040) in PS-matched patients. The decrease in the estimated glomerular filtration rate on the day of surgery was significantly higher in the zero-balance fluid therapy group (- 5.9 mL/min/1.73 m2 vs. - 1.4 mL/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.005). There were no differences in general morbidity or mortality rate, although surgery-related complications were more common in the zero-balance group. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the proven benefits of zero-balance fluid therapy in colorectal ERAS protocols, care should be taken to monitor for postoperative AKI. Further studies regarding the clinical significance of postoperative AKI occurrence and optimised intraoperative fluid therapy are needed in a colorectal ERAS setting.

Clinical impact of a multimodal pain management protocol for loop ileostomy reversal.

PURPOSE: As introduced, multimodal pain management bundle for ileostomy reversal may be considered to reduce postoperative pain and hospital stay. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical efficacy of perioperative multimodal pain bundle for ileostomy. METHODS: Medical records of patients who underwent ileostomy reversal after rectal cancer surgery from April 2017 to March 2020 were analyzed. Sixty-seven patients received multimodal pain bundle protocol with ileostomy reversal (group A) and 41 patients underwent closure of ileostomy with conventional pain management (group B). RESULTS: Baseline characteristics, including age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, diabetes mellitus, and smoking history, were not significantly different between the groups. The pain score on postoperative day 1 was significant lower in group A (visual analog scale, 2.6 ± 1.3 vs. 3.2 ± 1.2; P = 0.013). Overall consumption of opioid in group A was significant less than group B (9.7 ± 9.5 vs. 21.2 ± 8.8, P < 0.001). Hospital stay was significantly shorter in group A (2.3 ± 1.5 days vs. 4.1 ± 1.5 days, P < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the groups in postoperative complication rate. CONCLUSION: Multimodal pain protocol for ileostomy reversal could reduce postoperative pain, usage of opioid and hospital stay compared to conventional pain management.

How to do a single-port robotic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) inguinal hernia repair using the da Vinci SP platform.

Although 8 years have passed since the introduction of the da Vinci SP robotic system, rTEP surgery using the SP robot has never been introduced due to technical barriers. Through this study, we would like to share the possibility of safe and feasible TEP by da Vinci SP robotic platform beyond the technical barriers. As far as we know, SP robotic TEP implemented in our institution is the first introduced case, and I think it will be good information for surgeons who are thinking about TEP using SP robot.

A comparative study on the short-term clinical outcomes of Da Vinci SP versus Da Vinci Xi for rectal cancer surgery.

PURPOSE: The Da Vinci SP robot system was recently introduced, but its safety and feasibility for rectal cancer compared with the currently used robot system have not been reported. METHODS: This was a single-centre retrospective study. Data from patients who underwent abdominal total mesorectal excision (TME) from October 2015 to October 2022 were analysed. After propensity score matching, the short-term outcomes were compared. RESULTS: A total of 56 patient data were analysed. Intersphincteric resection was more common in the SP group (7 cases (25%) vs. 0 case (0%), p = 0.001). The operation time was significantly shorter in SP (184 vs. 227.5 min, p < 0.0001), but the docking time was similar. The postoperative complications were similar. There were no differences in the postoperative pain score and length of hospital stay. CONCLUSION: The SP robotic system for abdominal TME has acceptable short-term and is safe and technically feasible.

Implementation and improvement of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols for colorectal cancer surgery.

Purpose: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) reduces postoperative complications and shortens hospital stays. We aimed to describe the implementation and improvement of ERAS protocols in our institution through a multidisciplinary team approach. Methods: A multidisciplinary team comprised of colorectal surgeons, anesthesiologists, nurses, pharmacists, nutritionists, and a performance improvement team was launched to develop the ERAS protocol. The ERAS protocol was followed in patients who underwent colonic and rectal surgery between January and November 2017. The ERAS protocol comprised 22 elements in the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative phases. After the initial application, ERAS compliance was monitored and audited every 4-6 months and improvements made as necessary. Results: The length of hospital stay significantly decreased after the application of the ERAS protocols for colon cancer in 2017 and 2018. And there was no significant difference in the duration of hospital stay after applying the rectal cancer ERAS protocol. Moreover, after starting the colon ERAS, there was a significant decrease in the complication rate. Since December 2017, there was a continuous increase in the colorectal ERAS clinical pathway application rate, which remained high (>90%). The patient compliance rate significantly increased between 2017 and 2018, but slightly decreased again in 2019. Conclusion: The application and continual improvement of an ERAS protocol are crucial. Improving compliance may result in better clinical outcomes. Additionally, the basic guidelines of ERAS must be applied and developed according to each hospital's situation based on the team approach.

Serial measurements of body composition using bioelectrical impedance and clinical usefulness of phase angle in colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Although body composition (BC) can be measured easily using bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), there are few studies of serial BC measurements in colorectal cancer (CRC). The purpose of the present study was to observe the serial change of BC in patients with CRC surgery from the initiation to the end of chemotherapy and to evaluate its clinical usefulness. METHODS: From July 2018 to November 2019, patients undergoing elective CRC surgery were enrolled. All clinical data were reviewed retrospectively. BIA data were collected prospectively at four time points (initial, discharge day, first chemotherapy, and 6 months later). BC was measured using a commercial BIA device. RESULTS: A total of 160 patients were enrolled, and 110 (68.8%) patients were followed. Most BC measurements, such as weight, body mass index, skeletal muscle mass, skeletal muscle index, and fat mass index, were lowest at the first chemotherapy and rebounded after 6 months. Phase angle (PhA) and the ratio of extracellular water to total body water (ECW/TBW) were "V" shaped and inverted "V" shaped, respectively, and the peaks were on discharge days. This pattern of BC showed significant difference according to sarcopenia, old age (>70 years), and advanced stage (III or IV). The change of PhA and ECW/TBW sensitively pattern differences according to clinical aspect. CONCLUSIONS: Using BIA, serial BC measurements were taken to establish a pattern based on clinical characteristics. PhA showed the most sensitive change according to the patient's clinical aspect.

High incidence of late anastomosis leakage in patients for rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: A comparative study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical features and risk factors of late anastomotic leakage (AL) in a homogeneous cohort with elective sphincter-sparing surgery (SSS) with ileostomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) for rectal cancer. METHODS: Data from a total of 359 patients who underwent elective rectal cancer surgery between Jan 2017 and May 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were classified into early and late AL groups, referring to onset of AL occurring within or after 30 post-operative days, respectively. We analyzed clinical, pathological, and inflammatory features of both AL and risk factors of stoma reversal failure and late AL. RESULTS: A total of 85 patients with SSS with ileostomy after nCRT were classified into 8 (9.4%) patients of early AL and 16 (18.8%) of late AL. Unlike early AL patients, late AL group showed lower neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (P < 0.001) and did not need an invasive intervention at the time of diagnosis. 50% (5/10) patients needed reformation of ileostomy. (P = 0.048) Failure of stoma reversal is associated with advanced stages, high NLR ratio (≥3), and inflammatory lesions seen around anastomosis in radiologic findings, which was confirmed as the risk factor of late AL. CONCLUSION: Late AL, with different clinical features, showed a higher incidence than early AL in patients who underwent surgery after nCRT and also had a higher stoma reformation rate. Careful evaluation using laboratory and radiological findings before an ileostomy closure is performed to prevent late AL.

Short- and long-term outcomes of local excision with adjuvant radiotherapy in high-risk T1 rectal cancer patients.

PURPOSE: The standard of care for early rectal cancer is radical surgery; however, it carries high postoperative morbidity. This study aimed to assess the short-term and oncological outcomes of local excision and adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with high-risk pathological stage (p) T1 rectal cancer. METHODS: Fifty-five patients underwent local excision with adjuvant radiotherapy or radical resection for high-risk T1 rectal cancer. Patients with adenocarcinoma within 10 cm from the anal verge; pT1 with high-risk features (grade 3-4); a tumor size of ≥3 cm; a positive margin; a lymphovascular or perineural invasion; or a submucosal invasion depth of ≥SM2 were included. RESULTS: The rates of postoperative complications and stoma formation were higher in the radical surgery group (P = 0.021 and P = 0.003, respectively). No significant differences were observed in the overall survival and disease-free survival (DFS) between the 2 groups (P = 0.301 and P = 0.076, respectively). Vascular invasion was a significantly poor prognostic factor for DFS (P = 0.033). The presence of 3 or more high-risk features was associated with a poor DFS (P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Local excision with adjuvant radiotherapy significantly reduces the risk of complications and stoma formation. It is also an alternative option for patients with fewer than 3 high-risk features.

Oncological impact of vascular invasion in colon cancer might differ depending on tumor sidedness.

Purpose: Vascular invasion is a well-known independent prognostic factor in colon cancer and tumor sidedness is also being considered a prognostic factor. The aim of this study was to compare the oncological impact of vascular invasion depending on the tumor location in stages I to III colon cancer. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed using data from patients who underwent curative resection between 2004 and 2015. Patients were divided into right-sided colon cancer (RCC) and left-sided colon cancer (LCC) groups according to the tumor location. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between the RCC and LCC groups, depending on the presence of vascular invasion. Results: A total of 793 patients were included, of which 304 (38.3%) had RCC and 489 (61.7%) had LCC. DFS and OS did not differ significantly between the RCC and LCC groups. Vascular invasion was a poor prognostic factor for DFS in both RCC (hazard ratio [HR], 2.291; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.186-4.425; p = 0.010) and LCC (HR, 1.848; 95% CI, 1.139-2.998; p = 0.011). Additionally, it was associated with significantly worse OS in the RCC (HR, 3.503; 95% CI, 1.681-7.300; p < 0.001), but not in the LCC group (HR, 1.676; 95% CI, 0.885-3.175; p = 0.109). Multivariate analysis revealed that vascular invasion was independently poor prognostic factor for OS in the RCC (HR, 3.186; 95% CI, 1.391-7.300; p = 0.006). Conclusion: This study demonstrated that RCC with vascular invasion had worse OS than LCC with vascular invasion.

Predictive factors of high comprehensive complication index in colorectal cancer patients using Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol: role as a safety net in early discharge.

PURPOSE: This study was performed to evaluate complications using comprehensive complication index (CCI) in colorectal cancer patients with implementation of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol, and to investigate the predictive factors associated with high morbidity rates. It can be used as a safety net in determining the timing of discharge. METHODS: A total of 335 consecutive patients who underwent elective colorectal cancer surgery between January 2017 and December 2017 at a single tertiary center were enrolled. Postoperative complications were defined as occurring within 30 days after surgery. The predictive factor analysis for the high CCI group was also performed. RESULTS: In total, 116 patients experienced postoperative complications. Wound-related complications and postoperative ileus were the most common. The mean CCI for overall colorectal cancer surgery was 9.1 ± 16.7. Patients featuring low CCI (<26.2) were 297 (88.7%) and high CCI were 38 (11.3%). In multivariable analysis, obstructive colorectal cancer (odds ratio, 3.278; 95% confidence interval, 1.217-8.829; P = 0.019) and CRP value on postoperative day (POD) 3-4 (odds ratio, 1.152; 95% confidence interval, 1.036-1.280; P < 0.010) were significant predictors for high CCI. CONCLUSION: The clinical usefulness of CCI in colorectal cancer patients with the ERAS protocol was verified, and it can be used for surgical quality control. More cautious care is needed and the timing of discharge should be carefully determined for patients with obstructive colorectal cancer or POD 3-4 CRP of ≥6.47 mg/dL.

The additional analgesic effects of transverse abdominis plane block in patients receiving low-dose intrathecal morphine for minimally invasive colorectal surgery: a randomized, single-blinded study.

PURPOSE: Intrathecal analgesia (ITA) and transverse abdominis plane block (TAPB) are effective pain control methods in abdominal surgery. However, there is still no gold standard for postoperative pain control in minimally invasive colorectal surgery. This study aimed to investigate whether the analgesic effect could be increased when TAPB, which can further reduce wound somatic pain, was administered in low-dose morphine ITA patients. METHODS: Patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery were randomized into an ITA with TAPB group or an ITA group. Patients were evaluated for pain 0, 8, 16, 24, and 48 hours after surgery. The primary outcome was the total morphine milligram equivalents administered 24 hours after surgery. The secondary outcomes were pain scores, ambulatory variables, inflammation markers, hospital stay duration, and complications within 48 hours after surgery. RESULTS: A total of 64 patients were recruited, and 55 were compared. There was no significant difference in morphine use over the 24 hours after surgery in the 2 groups (ITA with TAPB, 15.3 mg vs. ITA, 10.2 mg; P = 0.270). Also, there was no significant difference in pain scores. In both groups, the average pain score at 24 and 48 hours was 2 points or less, showing effective pain control. CONCLUSION: ITA for pain control in patients with colorectal surgery is an effective pain method, and additional TAPB was not effective.

Enterovesical Fistula From Meckel Diverticulum.

Meckel diverticulum is a common congenital malformation of the gastrointestinal tract and can cause complications such as ulceration, hemorrhage, intussusception, and perforation. This report describes a very rare complication of an enterovesical fistula associated with chronic Meckel diverticulum. A 51-year-old male presented with over 10 years of persistent pyuria. Tests were performed to rule out malignancy, including serum prostate-specific antigen level, urine cytology, bacterial culture, cystoscopy, and bladder computed tomography. An enterovesical fistula was identified, and laparoscopic exploration was performed. The findings suggested enterovesical fistula formation caused by chronic inflammation at the tip of a Meckel diverticulum. Segmental resection of the small bowel including the diverticulum and primary repair of the urinary bladder along with partial cystectomy were performed. The postoperative clinical course was uneventful. An enterovesical fistula is a very rare complication resulting from chronic inflammation of a Meckel diverticulum.

Comparison of Vascular Invasion With Lymph Node Metastasis as a Prognostic Factor in Stage I-III Colon Cancer: An Observational Cohort Study.

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of vascular invasion (VI) in comparison with that of lymph node metastasis (LNM) in non-metastatic colon cancer. Methods: Patients who underwent curative surgery for stage I-III colon cancer were divided into four groups depending on the status of VI and LNM (Group I: VI-/LNM-; Group II: VI+/LNM-; Group III: VI-/LNM+; Group IV: VI+/LNM+). Group III was subdivided according to the nodal (N) stage (Group IIIA: VI-/N1; Group IIIB: VI-/N2). Oncological outcomes were compared between Groups II and III. Results: In total, 793 non-metastatic colon cancer patients were included. Group II [hazard ratio (HR) 2.34, 1.01-5.41] and Group III (HR 1.91, 1.26-2.89) were independently associated with poor disease-free survival (DFS). The 5-year DFS rates were comparable in Groups II (71.6%) and III (72.5%) (P = 0.637). When Group III was subdivided into Groups IIIA and IIIB, DFS deteriorated in the following order: Groups IIIA, II, and IIIB. The 5-year DFS rates were 79.7, 71.6, and 61.4% in Groups IIIA, II, and IIIB, respectively. Group II had a tendency toward early recurrence. The 1- and 2-year DFS rates were 76.3 and 71.6% in Group II and 88.3 and 79.8% in Group III, respectively (P = 0.067 and 0.247). All recurrences in Group II were distant metastases. Conclusion: VI is a prognostic factor as significant as LNM and may be a stronger prognostic factor than N1 stage in non-metastatic colon cancer. Furthermore, a potential association was observed between VI and recurrence patterns, such as early recurrence and distant metastasis.

Clinical effect of multimodal perioperative pain management protocol for minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery: Propensity score matching study.

BACKGROUND: Reducing postoperative pain with less opioid is critical in postoperative care. Author developed our multimodal perioperative pain management protocol and it consists of preoperative medication, intraoperative ultrasound-guided laparoscopic transverse abdominis plane (LTAP) block and postoperative medication. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical effect of the multimodal perioperative pain management protocol for minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery. METHODS: Of 596 colorectal surgery cases for colorectal cancer, 133 patients managed with multimodal perioperative pain protocol (group 1) and 463 patients managed without multimodal perioperative pain protocol (group 2) were enrolled in this study. To adjust for baseline differences and selection bias, operative outcomes and complications were compared after propensity score matching (PSM). RESULTS: After 1:1 propensity score matching, well-matched 133 patients in each group were evaluated. The median VAS scores on post-operative day 1 (2.1 ± 1.1 vs. 3.9 ± 1.8, p < 0.001) and day 2 (2.0 ± 1.2 vs. 3.8 ± 1.7, p < 0.001) was significantly reduced in group 1. The length of postoperative hospital stays was also significantly shorter in Group 1 (4.4 ± 3.0 vs. 5.8 ± 5.6; p = 0.014). CONCLUSION: Implementing multimodal perioperative pain protocols reduced postoperative pain and hospital stay of minimally invasive colorectal surgery.