Protocol of a multicentric prospective cohort study for the VALIDation of the IBD-disk instrument for assessing disability in inflammatory bowel diseases: the VALIDate study.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD) affect psychological, family, social and professional dimensions of patients' life, leading to disability which is essential to quantify as part of Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) newly included in the targets to reach in IBD patients. Up to now, the IBD-Disability Index (IBD-DI) was the only validated tool to assess disability, but it is not appropriate for use in clinical practice. The IBD Disk was developed, a shortened and self-administered tool, adapted from the IBD-DI, in order to give immediate representation of patient-reported disability. However, the IBD Disk has not been validated yet in clinical practice. The aims of the VALIDate study are to validate this tool in a large population of IBD patients and to compare it to the already validated IBD-DI. METHODS: The VALIDate study is an ongoing multicentric prospective cohort study launched in April 2018 in 3 French University Hospitals (Nantes, Rennes, Angers), with an objective to reach a sample of 400 patients over a period inclusion of 6 months. Each patient will fill in the two questionnaires IBD Disk and IBD-DI at baseline, then between 3 and 12 months later, during a follow-up visit. Clinical and socio-demographic data will also be collected. During these two consultations, gastroenterologists and patients will evaluate disease activity thanks to a semi-quantitative 4-grade scale, named respectively PGA (Physician Global Assessment) and PtGA (Patient Global Assessment). This cohort will allow to evaluate the validity of the IBD Disk with respect to the IBD-DI in order to generalize its use for clinical practice. Other psychometric criteria of the IBD Disk will also be analysed as its reliability or its discriminant capacity. Close attention will nonetheless be needed to minimize the number of lost to follow-up patients between baseline and follow-up. DISCUSSION: The VALIDate study is the study designed to validate the IBD Disk, a visual tool easily useable in daily practice to assess disability in IBD patients. The results of this trial should enable the diffusion of this tool. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered in ClinicalTrials.Gov with registration number NCT03590639. First posted: July 18, 2018.

Association of severe placental inflammation with death prior to discharge and cerebral palsy in preterm infants.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to identify placental patterns associated with death before discharge or cerebral palsy in a large cohort of preterm infants with a high follow-up rate at 2 years of corrected age. DESIGN: Population-based monocentric study. SETTINGS: Monocentric study in the maternity unit of the University Hospital of Angers, France between 24+0 and 33+6  weeks of gestation, between January 2008 and December 2011. POPULATION: All singleton infants born alive with a placental examination were eligible. METHODS: Clinical data (obstetric and neonatal) were collected prospectively through the LIFT cohort. Placental data were collected retrospectively from medical records. The main outcome measure was death before discharge or cerebral palsy. RESULTS: We did not find any significant association between severe inflammatory lesions on the placenta and death [odds ratio (OR) 1.49; 95% CI 0.55-4.01; P = 0.43] or cerebral palsy (OR 1.41; 95% CI 0.43-4.62; P = 0.57). This lack of significant association persisted even after adjustment (aOR 0.9; 95% CI 0.20-2.30; P = 0.54; aOR 0.98; 95% CI 0.27-3.58; P = 0.97). CONCLUSION: Our results do not provide evidence for a significant association between severe inflammatory placental lesions and either death before discharge or cerebral palsy at 2 years of corrected age in preterm infants born at <34 weeks of gestational age. Further studies remain necessary to confirm this result. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT: We found no significant association between inflammatory placental lesions and death or cerebral palsy.

What is driving the HIV epidemic in French Guiana?

Thirty years after the first HIV case in French Guiana, the drivers of the epidemic are not clearly known, but the epidemic is usually conceptualized as generalized. Cross-linking results from a study in the general population and a study in the HIV-infected population in Cayenne suggests that in the general population of HIV-positive men, 45% of HIV cases are attributable to having sex with someone they paid. Similarly, for HIV-positive women exchanging sex for presents or money, 10.7% of HIV cases are attributable to transactional sex. A surprising finding was that 16.8% of HIV patients had tried crack cocaine before. On the Maroni river, the female-biased sex ratio suggests the drivers in that remote area may be related to cultural polygyny. These observations have important consequences on communication and prevention strategies.

Undulated silicene and germanene freestanding layers: why not?

Silicene and germanene freestanding layers are usually described as a honeycomb lattice formed by two hexagonal sub-lattices presenting a height difference, namely the layer buckling. In this work, first-principles calculations show that silicene and germanene can be rippled at 0 K with various wavelengths, without any compressive strain of the layer. For germanene, the height difference between two Ge atoms from the same sub-lattice can be as high as 4.7 [Formula: see text] for an undulation length of 81 [Formula: see text]. The deformations are related to slight (lower than 1.7°) bond angle modifications, and the energy cost is remarkably low, lying between 0.1 and 0.8 meV per atom. These undulations modify the electronic structure, opening a gap of 15 meV.

[Management of sudden unexpected infant death syndrome (SUIDS) in reference centers in France in 2013]. / Prise en charge des morts inattendues du nourrisson par les centres de référence français : état des lieux des pratiques en 2013.

In France, nearly 500 infants still die unexpectedly every year. In 2009, the French Institute for Public Health Surveillance published a survey showing great heterogeneity in the management of sudden unexpected infant death (SUID) cases. The aim of this study was to evaluate the actual diagnostic approach to SUID in the different reference centers in France and to determine the degree to which the 2007 recommendations of the French National Authority for Health (Haute Autorité de santé [HAS]) are applied. We conducted a multicenter cross-sectional epidemiological study by email sent to the 36 SIDS reference centers with questions on examinations usually performed in SIDS cases. We also submitted six SUID test cases for death classification to the different reference physicians. Twenty-nine of 36 centers (80.5%) responded. Among the recommended tests, only blood cultures, analysis of cerebrospinal fluid, and a proposal to autopsy are done in 100% of the centers. Other investigations are not carried out systematically: skeleton radiography (65.5%), cranial CT scan (58%), eye fundus (20.7%), metabolic analysis (65.5%), and blood toxicology (62%). The main reasons for non-completion of these tests were hospital practices, lack of resources, technical difficulties, cost of tests, and difficulty in interpreting results (50% reported not knowing the postmortem biological standards). None of the institutions apply the HAS recommendations entirely. The classification of causes-of-death test cases also varied between the centers, with a maximum of 62% concordance in their responses. In 2013, in France, there is still substantial heterogeneity in the diagnostic set-up of SUIDS, a non-exhaustive implementation of the recommendations of the French National Authority for Health, and an unsatisfactory SUIDS classification tool because of considerable discordance between physicians. These results explain the current difficulties in obtaining reliable epidemiological data, because many teams do not use all the investigations recommended to find the cause of death. Therefore, the establishment of a national registry would provide accurate and up-to-date epidemiological, environmental, medical, and biological data to identify the events causing death and propose appropriate means of prevention.

[Monitoring network for vulnerable children in the Pays de la Loire ("Grandir ensemble" - Cohort LIFT): 10 years of activity 2003-2013]. / Réseau de suivi des enfants vulnérables dans les Pays de la Loire (Grandir Ensemble - Cohorte LIFT) : dix ans d'activité de 2003 à 2013.

INTRODUCTION: Vulnerable children are at-risk newborns including premature infants and some children with pathologies presented by fear anomalies and deficiencies, most particularly neurological. Monitoring is based on the detection of these abnormalities and their early management. The organization of this monitoring system is based on a network of doctors, mostly pediatricians, trained regularly. The objective of this review was to assess the resources, means, and results of 10 years of follow-up. METHODS: The Pays de la Loire network includes 24 maternity wards and 13 neonatal departments. Annual admissions are around 5000 newborns to approximately 45,000 annual births. Upon discharge of newborns, born prematurely at 34 weeks of gestation (WG) or less, or term infants with neurological problems, parents are asked to have their child monitored by a referring doctor. During the consultation, a reference document is filled out by the doctor and sent to the project manager for data collection and specific compensation for private practitioners. Standardized questionnaires were used such as the ASQ (Ages and Stage Questionnaire) completed by parents, the developmental quotient (DQ) with the Lézine Brunet-Revised test (BLR), the intelligence quotient (IQ) with the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence (WIPPSI III) completed by psychologists employed in the network, and a questionnaire completed by the teacher at 5 years of age. RESULTS: The network started on 1st March 2003, and 28th February 2013, after 10 years of inclusion, 10,800 children had been included. This population accounts for 2.4% of all annual births: 1.1% were included for prematurity less than 33 weeks and 0.25% were term-born infants. The characteristics of children are presented with gestational age, birth weight, and obstetric and neonatal pathologies. The percentage of these children followed was 80% at 2 years and 63% at 5 years. At 2 years, the results are presented according to gestational age with approximately 60% of children without disabilities at 25-26 WG, 73% at 27-28 WG, 77% at 29-30 WG, and 86% at 31-32 WG. Absorptions are diverse and vary according to the age of the child with physical therapy, psychomotor skill work, speech therapy, hearing and vision consultations, and psychology/psychiatry. Assessment tools were refined by specific analyses: the ASQ 24 months (completed by parents) was deemed valid and predictive with respect to IQ (abandoned in 2012), and the grid completed by the teacher was found to predict abnormalities in 5 years. CONCLUSION: The Pays de la Loire monitoring network has met its initial objective, namely to detect disabilities early and provide practical help to parents in a population of vulnerable children. Benefits for professionals and other children not followed in the network were observed, with an increase in pediatricians' skills. The benefits of the evaluation results are more difficult to assess with the care than neonatal care in obstetrics. The sustainability of such a network seems assured for healthcare professionals, provided that funding is maintained by the health authorities.

Is African descent an independent risk factor of peripartum cardiomyopathy?

Risk factors for peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) are controversial. PPCM seems to be more prevalent in women of African descent, the highest observed incidence is in Haiti (1 per 300 live births). Our retrospective study conducted in Martinique showed an incidence of 1 per 5500 live births. This incidence is significantly lower than in Haiti. Women from Martinique and Haiti do not differ for most classical risk factors: African descent, age, pregnancy-associated hypertension, multiple pregnancy and pre-eclampsia. However, the parity rate and the socioeconomic level are different. Thus, African descent could be confounded by high parity rate and socioeconomic status.