Clinical evaluation of a combined regenerative technique with enamel matrix derivative, bone grafts, and guided tissue regeneration.

The goal of this study was to evaluate the clinical changes obtained when intra-bony defects were treated with an enamel matrix derivative (EMD), a bone graft, and guided tissue regeneration. Fifty patients with a periodontal defect not associated with a furcation and with an attachment loss of at least 7.0 mm were included in this study. Full-thickness flaps were reflected, the roots were planed, EMD was applied, a demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft combined with EMD was placed, a bioabsorbable membrane was placed, and more EMD was applied. The defect areas were then sutured. At a mean of 5.3 months after treatment, there was a mean increase in recession of 0.7 mm, a mean reduction in probing depth of 5.7 mm, and a mean gain in attachment level of 5.0 mm. In this study there was more recession in smokers than in nonsmokers and in defects associated with anterior teeth. Additionally, the deeper defects (those with greater probing depths and attachment level loss) had the greatest reductions in probing depth and gains in attachment level. Based on this study, this technique proved itself to be an effective method to improve the clinical situation when treating periodontal defects not involving furcations.

A comparison of three techniques to obtain root coverage on mandibular incisors.

BACKGROUND: Multiple variations on the subepithelial connective tissue graft have been shown to produce good clinical results. The goal of this study was to compare three variations in the treatment of recession on mandibular incisors. METHODS: An a priori analysis was done to determine the sample size. Three groups of patients received root coverage procedures on mandibular incisors. Each group was treated with a different variation of a subepithelial graft. The first group received a connective tissue (CT) graft with a coronally positioned flap (CPF) (CPF + CT). The second group received a connective tissue graft with a double pedicle (DP) graft (DP + CT). The third group received a connective tissue graft with a tunneling (TUN) procedure and a laterally positioned (LAT) pedicle (TUN-LAT + CT). The clinical results of these procedures were compared to determine if one procedure offered an advantage over the other procedures. RESULTS: All of the procedures produced a statistically significant improvement in the clinical parameters. The groups treated with the DP + CT and TUN-LAT + CT had greater mean root coverage (95.5% and 90.5%, respectively) than the CPF + CT group (80.2%). Additionally, DP + CT produced a greater increase in keratinized tissue (3 mm) than CPF + CT (1.4 mm) or TUN-LAT + CT (1.9 mm). There was no statistically significant difference in the mean root coverage of any technique treating defects <3 mm deep (CPF + CT, 90.9%; DP + CT, 96.4%; and TUN-LAT + CT, 92.1%) or the defects >3 mm deep treated with DP + CT (95.4%) or TUN-LAT + CT (88.3%). However, the CPF + CT produced less mean root coverage (68.4%) when treating defects > or =3 mm deep. When defects treated as isolated defects were compared to cases where multiple defects were treated, the cases with multiple defects treated with the CPF + CT had less mean root coverage (77%) than cases where single defects were treated with the CPF + CT (90.3%), DP + CT (isolated, 96.7% and multiple, 95.6%), and TUN-LAT + CT (isolated, 97.2% and multiple, 87.8%). CONCLUSIONS: All three of the procedures were effective in obtaining root coverage and improved clinical parameters on mandibular incisors. Overall, the DP + CT and TUN-LAT + CT procedures had greater mean root coverage than the CPF + CT technique. Based on this study, when treating defects > or =3 mm deep, one should consider using the DP + CT or TUN-LAT + CT rather than the CPF + CT. Additionally, when treating multiple defects at a time, one should consider using the DP + CT or TUN-LAT + CT rather than the CPF + CT. In cases where an increased amount of keratinized tissue is desired, based on this study, the DP + CT may be the best procedure to use.

Accurate and Reliable Gait Cycle Detection in Parkinson's Disease.

There is a growing interest in the use of Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU)-based systems that employ gyroscopes for gait analysis. We describe an improved IMU-based gait analysis processing method that uses gyroscope angular rate reversal to identify the start of each gait cycle during walking. In validation tests with six subjects with Parkinson disease (PD), including those with severe shuffling gait patterns, and seven controls, the probability of True-Positive event detection and False-Positive event detection was 100% and 0%, respectively. Stride time validation tests using high-speed cameras yielded a standard deviation of 6.6 ms for controls and 11.8 ms for those with PD. These data demonstrate that the use of our angular rate reversal algorithm leads to improvements over previous gyroscope-based gait analysis systems. Highly accurate and reliable stride time measurements enabled us to detect subtle changes in stride time variability following a Parkinson's exercise class. We found unacceptable measurement accuracy for stride length when using the Aminian et al gyro-based biomechanical algorithm, with errors as high as 30% in PD subjects. An alternative method, using synchronized infrared timing gates to measure velocity, combined with accurate mean stride time from our angular rate reversal algorithm, more accurately calculates mean stride length.