The prognostic implications of tetraploidy/near-Tetraploidy in acute myeloid leukemia: a case series and systematic review of the literature.

The prognostic significance and optimal management of tetraploidy/near-tetraploidy acute myeloid leukemia (T/NT AML) remains unclear given its limited data. This is especially true after factoring in additional chromosomal alterations, which carry their own prognostic weight. Here, we analyze 128 cases of T/NT in AML from the literature along with two additional cases, which is the largest review of this subject to date. Based on our retrospective analysis, we found that regardless of the risk status attributed to cytogenetics, the prognosis of tetraploid or near-tetraploid AML is dismal and should be incorporated within the unfavorable risk group. Complete remission is paramount to survival in this population. Specific induction protocols for high-risk AML appear to have higher rates of complete remission in the T/NT AML population. Moreover, longer overall survival can be achieved with chemotherapy followed by allogeneic stem cell transplantation at first complete remission.

Impact of blinatumomab on patient outcomes in relapsed/refractory acute lymphoblastic leukemia: evidence to date.

Relapsed/refractory (R/R) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is associated with a poor prognosis in both children and adults. Traditionally, there were limited options for salvage therapy, which consisted mostly of conventional chemotherapy. However, in the past 5 years, novel agents have changed our treatment strategies in this population. Blinatumomab, a bispecific CD19 directed CD3 T-cell engager, has shown to be effective in both minimal residual disease and R/R B-cell ALL. In R/R B-cell ALL, blinatumomab was associated with an improved median overall survival of 7.7 months vs 4.0 months with traditional chemotherapy (HR for death, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.55-0.93; P=0.01). It has distinctive side effects as compared to chemotherapy, specifically cytokine release syndrome and neurological toxicities. When compared to standard of care chemotherapy, patients have higher quality of life scores and less financial burden. Using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, blinatumomab-treated patients fared better and had a longer time to deterioration or death (global health status/quality of life subscale: HR 0.66; 95% CI 0.48-0.92; P=0.009) compared to conventional chemotherapy. Using an incremental cost effective ratio threshold of US$150,000 per quality adjusted life year, blinatumomab was determined to be more cost effective compared to chemotherapy with a probability of 73.7%. This review summarizes the current and future data with blinatumomab in R/R B-cell ALL in the adult and pediatric population.