RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to compare the long-term safety and efficacy of oral busulfan 12 mg/kg plus melphalan 140 mg/m(2) and melphalan 200 mg/m(2) as conditioning regimens for autologous stem cell transplantation in newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma in the GEM2000 study. DESIGN AND METHODS: The first 225 patients received oral busulfan 12 mg/kg plus melphalan 140 mg/m(2); because of a high frequency of veno-occlusive disease, the protocol was amended and a further 542 patients received melphalan 200 mg/m(2). RESULTS: Engraftment and hospitalization times were similar in both groups. Oral busulfan 12 mg/kg plus melphalan 140 mg/m(2) resulted in higher transplant-related mortality (8.4% versus 3.5%; P=0.002) due to the increased frequency of veno-occlusive disease in this group. Response rates were similar in both arms. With respective median follow-ups of 72 and 47 months, the median progression-free survival was significantly longer with busulfan plus melphalan (41 versus 31 months; P=0.009), although survival was similar to that in the melphalan 200 mg/m(2) group. However, access to novel agents as salvage therapy after relapse/progression was significantly lower for patients receiving busulfan plus melphalan (43%) than for those receiving melphalan 200 mg/m(2) (58%; P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Conditioning with oral busulfan 12 mg/kg plus melphalan 140 mg/m(2) was associated with longer progression-free survival but equivalent survival to that achieved with melphalan 200 mg/m(2) but this should be counterbalanced against the higher frequency of veno-occlusive disease-related deaths. This latter fact together with the limited access to novel salvage therapies in patients conditioned with oral busulfan 12 mg/kg plus melphalan 140 mg/m(2) may explain the absence of a survival difference. Oral busulfan was used in the present study; use of the intravenous formulation may reduce toxicity and result in greater efficacy, and warrants further investigation in myeloma patients. (Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00560053).
Asunto(s)
Busulfano , Melfalán , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Agonistas Mieloablativos , Trasplante de Células Madre , Acondicionamiento Pretrasplante , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Busulfano/administración & dosificación , Busulfano/efectos adversos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Melfalán/administración & dosificación , Melfalán/efectos adversos , Mieloma Múltiple/mortalidad , Agonistas Mieloablativos/administración & dosificación , Agonistas Mieloablativos/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Trasplante AutólogoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To compare bone marrow biopsy (BMB) and PET/CT in detecting bone marrow involvement in Hodgkin's lymphoma MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 65 patients with both tests in the initial staging or in relapse with special attention to the PET/CT uptake pattern. RESULTS: In 3 patients (4.6%), the BMB showed bone marrow involvement with the PET/CT being positive in them all: 2 with diffuse+multifocal pattern and one diffuse only. In 11 additional patients (total 14/65, 21%), bone marrow involvement was diagnosed by PET/CT because bone marrow uptake was above hepatic one. The pattern was focal only in 2 cases, multifocal in 5, diffuse in 3 and diffuse+multifocal in one. In these last 4 cases the BMB showed an unspecific myelopathy. CONCLUSIONS: PET/CT detects all cases with BMB affected and many that escape to biopsy, however when the uptake pattern is diffuse it could be by involvement or reactive hyperplasia and in those cases the BMB should be done.
Asunto(s)
Médula Ósea/patología , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/patología , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Biopsia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Fundamento y objetivo: Comparar la biopsia de médula ósea (BMO) y la PET/CT en la detección de la afectación medular en el linfoma de Hodgkin. Material y métodos: Análisis retrospectivo de 65 pacientes con realización de ambas pruebas en la estadificación inicial o en recaída con especial atención al patrón de la PET/CT. Resultados: En 3 pacientes (4,6%) la BMO mostró afectación medular, siendo la PET/CT positiva en todos ellos: 2 con patrón difuso+multifocal y uno solo difuso. En 11 pacientes más (total 14/65, 21%) se estimó que había afectación medular ósea por PET/CT al tener un consumo de médula ósea superior al hepático. El patrón fue focal único en 2 casos, multifocal en 5, difuso en 3 casos y difuso+multifocal en uno. En estos últimos 4 casos la BMO mostró una mielopatía inespecífica. Conclusiones: La PET/CT detecta todos los casos con BMO afectada y muchos que se escapan a la biopsia; sin embargo, cuando el patrón de captación es difuso puede ser por afectación o por hiperplasia reactiva y en esos casos debería mantenerse la BMO (AU)
Background and objectives: To compare bone marrow biopsy (BMB) and PET/CT in detecting bone marrow involvement in Hodgkin's lymphoma. Material and methods: Retrospective analysis of 65 patients with both tests in the initial staging or in relapse with special attention to the PET/CT uptake pattern. Results: In 3 patients (4.6%), the BMB showed bone marrow involvement with the PET/CT being positive in them all: 2 with diffuse+multifocal pattern and one diffuse only. In 11 additional patients (total 14/65, 21%), bone marrow involvement was diagnosed by PET/CT because bone marrow uptake was above hepatic one. The pattern was focal only in 2 cases, multifocal in 5, diffuse in 3 and diffuse+multifocal in one. In these last 4 cases the BMB showed an unspecific myelopathy. Conclusions: PET/CT detects all cases with BMB affected and many that escape to biopsy, however when the uptake pattern is diffuse it could be by involvement or reactive hyperplasia and in those cases the BMB should be done (AU)
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de Hodgkin/cirugía , Médula Ósea/cirugía , Biopsia , Enfermedades de la Médula Espinal/diagnóstico por imagen , Tomografía Computarizada por Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , 28599RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Complete response (CR) is considered an important goal in most hematologic malignancies. However, in multiple myeloma (MM), there is no consensus regarding whether immunofixation (IF)-negative CR, IF-positive near-CR (nCR), and partial response (PR) are associated with different survivals. We evaluated the prognostic influence on event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) of these responses pre- and post-transplantation in newly diagnosed patients with MM. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed 632 patients from the prospective Grupo Español de Mieloma 2000 protocol who were uniformly treated with vincristine, carmustine, cyclophosphamide, melphalan, and predisone/vincristine, carmustine, adryamcine, and dexamethasone induction followed by high-dose therapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation. RESULTS: Post-transplantation response markedly influenced outcomes. Patients achieving CR had significantly longer EFS (median, 61 v 40 months; P < 10(-5)) and OS (medians not reached; P = .01) versus patients achieving nCR, who likewise had somewhat better outcomes compared with patients achieving PR (median EFS, 34 months, P = .07 v nCR; median OS, 61 months, P = .04). EFS and OS and influence of response were similar among older (age 65 to 70 years) and younger (age < 65 years) patients. Similar findings were observed with pretransplantation response, with trends toward EFS (P = .1; P = .05) and OS (P = .1; P = .07) benefit in patients achieving CR versus nCR and PR, respectively. Post-transplantation response was markedly influenced by pretransplantation response; improvements in response were associated with prolonged survival. CONCLUSION: Quality of response post-transplantation, notably CR, is significantly associated with EFS and OS prolongation in newly diagnosed patients with MM. There were trends toward similar associations with pretransplantation response status.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Trasplante de Células Madre , Adulto , Anciano , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/mortalidad , Estudios Prospectivos , Inducción de Remisión , España , Factores de Tiempo , Acondicionamiento Pretrasplante , Trasplante Autólogo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
No disponible