Safety and efficacy of tenofovir alafenamide in liver transplant recipients: A single center experience.

BACKGROUND: Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) is frequently used for treatment of and prophylaxis against reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) after liver transplant (LT). Because TDF can lead to renal impairment and a decrease in bone mineral density (BMD), the prodrug tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) may be considered a viable alternative with fewer adverse effects. Only limited information is available about the use of TAF for LT recipients. We report a European single-center experience with TAF as treatment for LT patients. METHODS: This retrospective analysis involved 29 LT recipients receiving standard immunosuppressants (mainly calcineurin inhibitors). Demographic and clinical data were documented at baseline upon switch to TAF and at various time points thereafter. RESULTS: None of the patients experienced HBV reactivation after the switch to TAF. Liver and renal function remained stable. Drug levels of immunosuppressive agents did not change significantly after the switch. After 1 year, 22 patients were still taking TAF; two patients had been lost to follow-up; one patient had died; and four patients had discontinued therapy because of TAF-related adverse effects. No serious adverse effects were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Tenofovir alafenamide exhibits high antiviral efficacy and a good safety profile for LT recipients. Still, the safety and tolerability of TAF for organ transplant patients should be evaluated in larger cohorts.

Primary sclerosing cholangitis as an independent risk factor for cytomegalovirus infection after liver transplant.

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is one of the most common infectious complications after solid organ transplant; it is associated with morbidity and mortality and with many direct and indirect effects. However, monitoring and therapeutic procedures are very heterogeneous across treatment centers. Additionally, factors that place patients at risk of CMV infection are poorly defined. METHODS: Clinical and demographic data from 833 LT recipients and their donors were retrospectively analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analysis were applied. CMV infection was detected by quantitative nucleic acid testing with a lower limit of detection of 40 IU/mL. RESULTS: In total, 192 of 833 patients (23%) experienced at least one episode of CMV infection after LT; CMV infection occurred to a large extent during the first year after transplant (70%). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that CMV donor-recipient risk constellation (OR 2.05, 95% CI) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) before LT (OR 3.76, 95% CI) are independent risk factors for CMV infection after LT. CONCLUSION: Patients with high-risk serostatus, PSC, or both should be monitored more thoroughly and should receive prolonged prophylaxis against CMV infection.

Dynamics of liver stiffness by transient elastography in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection receiving direct-acting antiviral therapy-Results from the German Hepatitis C-Registry.

The impact of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) therapies on fibrosis regression remains uncertain. In the current study, we prospectively evaluated dynamics of liver stiffness by transient elastography (TE) in patients with chronic HCV infection receiving DAA-based treatment. Patients (260) were enrolled in the German Hepatitis C-Registry (DHC-R), a national multicentre real-world cohort. Liver stiffness (LS) was assessed at baseline, end of treatment (EOT) and 24 weeks after EOT (FU24) by TE. Biochemical, virological and clinical data were obtained in parallel. In patients with SVR, there was a significant improvement of LS between baseline (median [range], 8.6 [1.7-73.5] kPa) and FU24 (7.9 [1.7-75 kPa]; P < .0001) as well as between EOT (8.4 [1.7-73.5 kPa]) and FU24 [P < .0001]. Stratified by fibrosis stage, patients classified into F4 had higher magnitude of LS reduction between BL (median [range], 25.1 [13.5-73.5] kPa) and FU24 (21.5 [3.1-75] kPa; P = .002) compared to those with F2-F3 (8.9 [7.1-12.4] kPa and 8.8 [4.2-29.1]; P = .060) or F0-F1 (5.3 [1.7-7] kPa and 5.2 [1.7-7.7]; P = .064). In cirrhotic patients, low platelets were significantly associated with lack of liver stiffness improvement, both at EOT (P = .018) and at FU24 (P = .012). LS significantly correlated with ALT (r = .371), AST (r = .552), platelets (r = -.499), GGT (r = .250), bilirubin (r = .230), APRI score (r = .512), FIB-4 score (r = .517) and FORNS index (r = .562); P < .0001. Liver elastography improved significantly in our real-world cohort after DAA-based therapy. As LS correlates similarly with transaminase levels and serum fibrosis markers, it might reflect both reduction of necroinflammation and fibrosis regression.

HLA class II donor specific antibodies are associated with graft cirrhosis after liver transplant independent of the mean fluorescence intensity level.

BACKGROUND: The importance of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) after liver transplantation (LT) for graft and patient survival is an ongoing controversy. So far it has not been elucidated when and in how far DSA are harmful for graft and patient survival. Therefore, we had the aim to investigate the association of DSA with complications after LT. METHODS: Data of 430 LT recipients were collected and statistically analyzed. Detection of HLA antibodies (Ab) was performed by Luminex assay. RESULTS: DSA were detected in 81 patients (18.8%). These were mainly HLA class II Ab (81.5%). HLA class II Ab show a higher MFI (median: 5.300) compared to HLA class I Ab (median: 2.300). There is no association between MFI levels and development of complications after LT. However, cirrhosis occurred significantly more often in DSA positive patients (18%) than in patients without detectable DSA (9%, P = 0.027). All DSA positive patients with cirrhosis of the graft showed HLA class II antibodies (OR: 3.028; 95% CI: 1.51-6.075; P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Occurrence of HLA class II DSA after LT is associated with graft cirrhosis and may indicate a higher risk to develop graft damage independent on MFI and requires an individualized risk management.

The Effect of Immunosuppression on Coagulation After Liver Transplantation.

Everolimus (EVR) is a mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor commonly used for immunosuppression (IS) after liver transplantation (LT). However, there are concerns about whether mTOR inhibitors may move the hemostatic balance toward a higher likelihood of thrombosis. The present study aimed to investigate potential coagulation disorders after the administration of EVR. We evaluated 54 patients after conversion to an EVR-based IS regimen (n = 26) and compared those patients with patients who were switched to extended-release tacrolimus (TAC) but had never received EVR (n = 28). At baseline and again at 1 month and 6 months after conversion, we measured international normalized ratio, activated partial thromboplastin time, and anticoagulation and fibrinolysis factors, and we performed rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM). Data were analyzed with a Mann-Whitney U test, a repeated-measure analysis of variance, and a Fisher's exact test. Statistical significance was set at the level of P ≤ 0.05. Plasma levels of von Willebrand factor, fibrinogen, and factor VIII were significantly higher than baseline levels at 1 month and 6 months after conversion of IS to EVR (P < 0.001); plasma levels of protein C, protein S, and plasminogen also increased significantly (P < 0.001). ROTEM confirmed a significant increase in maximum clot firmness in EXTEM, INTEM, and FIBTEM assays (P < 0.001). In all assays, maximum lysis was significantly lower than baseline levels at 1 month and 6 months after conversion to EVR. Patients converted to IS with extended-release TAC exhibited no significant changes in coagulation variables. Retrospective analysis showed a significantly higher incidence of thromboembolic complications among patients treated with EVR-based IS than among those treated with extended-release TAC (P < 0.01). In conclusion, the administration of EVR after LT seems to modify hemostasis to a procoagulant state. Thrombophilia screening before conversion may determine which patients will benefit from conversion to EVR-based IS.

Improving the vaccination status of liver transplant patients: Effectiveness of personally addressing patients and written recommendations to family physicians after 3 years.

BACKGROUND: After documenting insufficient vaccinations in 444 liver transplant (LT) patients, we investigated the effects of a combined strategy (addressing both patients and primary care physicians) on immunization prevalences after a 3-year follow-up. METHODS: The primary care physicians of all adult LT patients from a university center received a written recommendation addressing immunization needs. Patients were asked for their vaccination documents by phone. Changes in immunization rates for vaccine-preventable diseases after the intervention were calculated based on patients' immunization documents from 2014-2016. RESULTS: The study cohort consisted of 401 patients. Prevalence rates for all vaccinations improved during the intervention period compared to the baseline study: tetanus from 88.3% to 92.8%, diphtheria from 80.0% to 89.0%, hepatitis A from 50.1% to 60.8%, hepatitis B from 66.3% to 77.1%, and pneumococci from 62.8% to 76.3%. The influenza vaccination rate improved, but remained at a low level before (2010:13%, 2011:11.5%, 2012:19%) and during the intervention (2014:27.4%, 2015:24.4%, 2016:23.2%). Despite these vaccinations, the prevalence rates of the quality indicators standard vaccinations completed (2013:17.2%; 2016:21.2%), indicated vaccinations completed (2013:2.7%, 2016:4.5%), and all vaccinations completed (2013:1%; 2016 1.5%) improved only slightly. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrated that intensified communication by written information to the primary care physician and phone calls to the patients improved the number of vaccinations. Nonetheless, a potential for further improvement persists, especially with regard to annual influenza vaccinations.

Successful early sofosbuvir-based antiviral treatment after transplantation of kidneys from HCV-viremic donors into HCV-negative recipients.

BACKGROUND: Transplanting kidneys from deceased donors with hepatitis C virus (HCV) viremia has been controversial for some time. Direct-acting antiviral agents have been shown to be highly effective in treating HCV infection. We report our experience with transplanting kidneys from HCV-positive donors with detectable viremia into HCV-negative recipients, followed by early treatment with a sofosbuvir-based antiviral regimen. METHODS: Data were collected from seven HCV-negative recipients receiving kidneys from five deceased HCV-viremic donors. Before transplantation, all intentional transplanted recipients had given informed consent regarding the acceptance of an HCV-viremic kidney. Recipients were closely monitored after transplant with measurements of HCV viremia, liver and renal function, and trough levels of immunosuppressive drugs. RESULTS: Four donors were infected with HCV genotype 1; the other with HCV genotype 3a. HCV viremia was detectable in all seven renal transplant recipients within 3 days after transplant. After determination of HCV genotype, antiviral treatment with a sofosbuvir-based regimen (sofosbuvir/ledipasvir, n = 4; sofosbuvir/velpatasvir, n = 3) was initiated within a median of 7 days after transplantation and was continued for 8 to 12 weeks. For all recipients, viral load was below the level of detection at the end of treatment, and all exhibited a sustained virologic response 12 weeks later. All recipients exhibited normal liver enzyme activity at the end of treatment. Renal allograft function and trough levels of tacrolimus remained stable. CONCLUSIONS: Early administration of a sofosbuvir-based regimen to HCV-negative recipients of kidneys from HCV-viremic donors is feasible and safe. The definition of an optimal therapeutic approach warrants further investigation.

The influence of immunosuppressants on direct-acting antiviral therapy is dependent on the hepatitis C virus genotype.

BACKGROUND: Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) have substantially increased sustained virological response rates after liver transplantation, with improved tolerance compared to interferon-based therapy. The influence of immunosuppressive agents on the efficacy of DAAs has not been clarified. METHODS: Subgenomic hepatitis C virus (HCV) replicons for genotype (GT) 1b, 2b, 3a, and 4a were treated with the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors everolimus and sirolimus or with the calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) cyclosporine or tacrolimus, either alone or in combination with selected DAAs. Cell proliferation-related effects were excluded with MTT assays. HCV replication activity was quantified by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction or luciferase assay. RESULTS: Addition of either mTOR inhibitor to the DAA daclatasvir (DAC) resulted in a 30% increase in antiviral activity compared to DAC alone for HCV GT2a, GT3a, and GT4a (all P ≤ .01). Similar results were obtained using sofosbuvir and ledipasvir. In contrast, addition of either mTOR inhibitor to DAC induced a 30% reduction in antiviral activity in GT1b cells (P ≤ .01 vs DAC alone). Neither CNI affects the antiviral activity of the DAAs in any HCV GT. CONCLUSION: For patients with HCV GT2a, GT3a, or GT4a infection, mTOR-based immunosuppressive therapy may be beneficial. CNI-based therapy may be more efficacious in GT1b patients, as mTOR inhibitors seem to impair antiviral efficacy of DAAs in HCV GT1b infection.

Immunosuppression with mTOR inhibitors prevents the development of donor-specific antibodies after liver transplant.

BACKGROUND: Donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) are an important cause of complications after solid organ transplant. Risk factors and, thus, strategies for preventing DSA development are not well defined. METHODS: The DSA status of 400 patients who underwent liver transplant (LT) at the outpatient clinic of the University Hospital Essen was determined. Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies were detected by single-antigen bead technology. The strength of DSAs was reported as mean fluorescence intensity. RESULTS: Detectable DSAs were found in 74 (18.5%) patients and significantly more often in patients who underwent LT for autoimmune liver disease than for all other indications (29.3%; P=.022), but significantly less often found in patients who underwent LT for hepatocellular carcinoma (7.6%, P=.005). The incidence of DSAs increased with time after LT, and the risk was generally higher for female patients. The frequency of DSA detection was significantly lower (10.6%) for patients receiving immunosuppressive treatment with mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors than for those receiving other regimens (20.5%; P=.025). CONCLUSION: Autoimmune liver diseases, female sex, and time of more than 8 years since LT predispose patients to the development of DSAs. Immunosuppression with the mTOR inhibitor everolimus protects against DSA development after liver transplant.

Real-world experience with daclatasvir plus sofosbuvir ± ribavirin for post-liver transplant HCV recurrence and severe liver disease.

Optimizing therapy of post-transplant HCV recurrence remains important, especially in advanced liver disease. We evaluated daclatasvir (DCV) plus sofosbuvir (SOF), with or without ribavirin (RBV), in patients with post-liver transplant recurrence in a real-world European cohort at high risk of decompensation or death within 12 months. Recommended treatment was DCV 60 mg plus SOF 400 mg once daily for 24 weeks; RBV use/shorter treatment duration was at physicians' discretion. Patients (N = 87) were 70% male, 93% white, and mostly infected with HCV genotypes 1b (48%), 1a (32%), or 3 (9%); 37 (43%) had cirrhosis (16 decompensated), five had fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis. Sustained virologic response at post-treatment week 12 (SVR12) was 94% (80/85) in a modified intention-to-treat analysis: 95% (58/61) without RBV and 92% (22/24) with RBV, with no virologic failures. SVR12 was 100% (80/80) in an as-observed analysis excluding five nonvirologic failures. Four patients (5%) discontinued therapy for adverse events (AEs); 16 (18%) experienced serious AEs. One patient died on treatment and five during follow-up. Most AEs were associated with advanced liver disease and unrelated to therapy. No clinically significant drug-drug interactions were observed. DCV + SOF ± RBV was well tolerated and achieved high SVR12 (94%) in patients with post-transplant HCV recurrence, including patients with severe liver disease.

Efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of simeprevir, daclatasvir, and ribavirin in patients with recurrent hepatitis C virus genotype 1b infection after orthotopic liver transplantation: The Phase II SATURN study.

BACKGROUND: Recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection following liver transplantation is associated with accelerated progression to graft failure and reduced patient survival. METHODS: The Phase II, open-label SATURN study (NCT01938625) investigated the combination of simeprevir (SMV), daclatasvir (DCV), and ribavirin (RBV) administered for 24 weeks in 35 patients with recurrent HCV genotype (GT) 1b infection after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). RESULTS: High rates of both on-treatment and sustained virologic response 12 weeks after end of treatment (SVR12) were achieved in patients who were either treatment-naïve or had failed post-OLT treatment with peginterferon and RBV. Overall, 91% of patients (32/35) achieved SVR12. The combination was generally well tolerated, with an adverse event profile consistent with that observed in previous clinical trials of SMV or DCV separately. Co-administration of SMV with cyclosporine resulted in significantly increased SMV plasma exposures, which was not the case with the co-administration of SMV with tacrolimus. Therefore, the concomitant use of SMV with cyclosporine is not recommended. CONCLUSION: The interferon-free combination of SMV, DCV, and RBV administered for 24 weeks was shown to be effective and well tolerated in the treatment of post-OLT HCV GT1b-infected patients.

Daclatasvir plus sofosbuvir, with or without ribavirin, achieved high sustained virological response rates in patients with HCV infection and advanced liver disease in a real-world cohort.

OBJECTIVE: We assessed the effectiveness and safety of daclatasvir (DCV) plus sofosbuvir (SOF), with or without ribavirin (RBV), in a large real-world cohort, including patients with advanced liver disease. DESIGN: Adults with chronic HCV infection at high risk of decompensation or death within 12 months and with no available treatment options were treated in a European compassionate use programme. The recommended regimen was DCV 60 mg plus SOF 400 mg for 24 weeks; RBV addition or shorter duration was allowed at physicians' discretion. The primary endpoint was sustained virological response at post-treatment week 12 (SVR12). RESULTS: Of the 485 evaluable patients, 359 received DCV+SOF and 126 DCV+SOF+RBV. Most patients were men (66%), white (93%) and treatment-experienced (70%). The most frequent HCV genotypes were 1b (36%), 1a (33%) and 3 (21%), and 80% of patients had cirrhosis (42% Child-Pugh B/C; 46% Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score >10). SVR12 (modified intention-to-treat) was achieved by 91% of patients (419/460); 1 patient had virological breakthrough and 13 patients relapsed. Virological failure was not associated with treatment group (adjusted risk difference DCV+SOF minus DCV+SOF+RBV: 1.06%; 95% CI -2.22% to 4.35%). High SVR12 was observed regardless of HCV genotype or cirrhosis, liver transplant or HIV/HCV coinfection status. Twenty eight patients discontinued treatment due to adverse events (n=18) or death (n=10) and 18 died during follow-up. Deaths and most safety events were associated with advanced liver disease and not considered treatment related. CONCLUSIONS: DCV+SOF with or without RBV achieved high SVR12 and was well tolerated in a diverse cohort of patients with severe liver disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02097966.

Biliary strictures and recurrence after liver transplantation for primary sclerosing cholangitis: A retrospective multicenter analysis.

Liver transplantation (LT) is the only definitive treatment for patients with end-stage liver disease due to primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), but a high rate of biliary strictures (BSs) and of recurrent primary sclerosing cholangitis (recPSC) has been reported. In this multicenter study, we analyzed a large patient cohort with a long follow-up in order to evaluate the incidence of BS and recPSC, to assess the impact on survival after LT, and to identify risk factors. We collected clinical, surgical, and laboratory data and records on inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), immunosuppression, recipient and graft outcome, and biliary complications (based on cholangiography and histology) of all patients who underwent LT for PSC in 10 German transplant centers between January 1990 and December 2006; 335 patients (68.4% men; mean age, 38.9 years; 73.5% with IBD) underwent transplantation 8.8 years after PSC diagnosis with follow-up for 98.8 months. The 1-, 5-, and 10-year recipient and graft survival was 90.7%, 84.8%, 79.4% and 79.1%, 69.0%, 62.4%, respectively. BS was diagnosed in 36.1% after a mean time of 3.9 years, and recPSC was diagnosed in 20.3% after 4.6 years. Both entities had a significant impact on longterm graft and recipient survival. Independent risk factors for BS were donor age, ulcerative colitis, chronic ductopenic rejection, bilirubin, and international normalized ratio (INR) at LT. Independent risk factors for recPSC were donor age, IBD, and INR at LT. These variables were able to categorize patients into risk groups for BS and recPSC. In conclusion, BS and recPSC affect longterm graft and patient survival after LT for PSC. Donor age, IBD, and INR at LT are independent risk factors for BS and recPSC and allow for risk estimation depending on the recipient-donor constellation.

Daclatasvir combined with sofosbuvir or simeprevir in liver transplant recipients with severe recurrent hepatitis C infection.

Daclatasvir (DCV) is a potent, pangenotypic nonstructural protein 5A inhibitor with demonstrated antiviral efficacy when combined with sofosbuvir (SOF) or simeprevir (SMV) with or without ribavirin (RBV) in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Herein, we report efficacy and safety data for DCV-based all-oral antiviral therapy in liver transplantation (LT) recipients with severe recurrent HCV. DCV at 60 mg/day was administered for up to 24 weeks as part of a compassionate use protocol. The study included 97 LT recipients with a mean age of 59.3 ± 8.2 years; 93% had genotype 1 HCV and 31% had biopsy-proven cirrhosis between the time of LT and the initiation of DCV. The mean Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score was 13.0 ± 6.0, and the proportion with Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) A/B/C was 51%/31%/12%, respectively. Mean HCV RNA at DCV initiation was 14.3 × 6 log10 IU/mL, and 37% had severe cholestatic HCV infection. Antiviral regimens were selected by the local investigator and included DCV+SOF (n = 77), DCV+SMV (n = 18), and DCV+SMV+SOF (n = 2); 35% overall received RBV. At the end of treatment (EOT) and 12 weeks after EOT, 88 (91%) and 84 (87%) patients, respectively, were HCV RNA negative or had levels <43 IU/mL. CTP and MELD scores significantly improved between DCV-based treatment initiation and last contact. Three virological breakthroughs and 2 relapses occurred in patients treated with DCV+SMV with or without RBV. None of the 8 patient deaths (6 during and 2 after therapy) were attributed to therapy. In conclusion, DCV-based all-oral antiviral therapy was well tolerated and resulted in a high sustained virological response in LT recipients with severe recurrent HCV infection. Most treated patients experienced stabilization or improvement in their clinical status.

Selection and use of immunosuppressive therapies after liver transplantation: current German practice.

In recent years, immunosuppression (IS) after liver transplantation (LT) has become increasingly diversified as the choice of agents has expanded and clinicians seek to optimize the balance of immunosuppressive potency with the risk of adverse events in individual patients. Calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) are the primary agents used for patients undergoing liver transplantation. Other therapeutic agents like interleukin-2 receptor antagonists are not universally administered, but can be considered for the delay or reduction in CNI exposure. An early addition of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or the mTOR inhibitor everolimus also allows for the reduction in the CNI dose. To reduce the risk of malignancy, in particular of skin tumors, as well as to prevent the deterioration of renal function, everolimus-based therapy may be advantageous. Apart from patients with autoimmune hepatitis, steroids are withdrawn within 3-6 months after transplantation. Overall, immunosuppression can only be standardized in a limited proportion of patients due to specific clinical requirements and risk factors. Future studies should attempt to refine accurate individualization of the immunosuppressive regimen in specific difficult-to-treat patient subpopulations.

Efficacy of telaprevir-based therapy in stable liver transplant patients with chronic genotype 1 hepatitis C.

UNLABELLED:  Background and rationale. The REPLACE study (NCT01571583) investigated telaprevir-based triple therapy in patients who have recurrent genotype 1 hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection following liver transplantation and are on a stable immunosuppressant regimen of tacrolimus or cyclosporin A. Patients received telaprevir 750 mg 8-hourly with pegylated interferon 180 ?g weekly and ribavirin 600 mg daily, followed by a further 36 weeks of pegylated interferon and ribavirin alone and 24 weeks of follow-up. Efficacy (sustained virological response [SVR] 12 weeks after last planned study dose), safety and tolerability of telaprevir throughout the study were assessed. Pharmacokinetics of telaprevir, tacrolimus and cyclosporin A were also examined. RESULTS: In total, 74 patients were recruited. Overall, 72% (53/74; 95% CI: 59.9 to 81.5) of patients achieved SVR at 12 weeks following completion of treatment. Anticipated increases in plasma concentrations of tacrolimus and cyclosporin A occurred during telaprevir treatment and were successfully managed through immunosuppressant dose reduction and, for tacrolimus, reduced dosing frequency. Safety and tolerability of telaprevir-based triple therapy were generally comparable with previous data in non-transplant patients, although rates of reported anemia (55% [41/74]) were higher. Elevated plasma creatinine (46% [34/74]) was observed during REPLACE - consistent with the post-liver transplant population and the co-administered immunosuppressants. CONCLUSION: Telaprevir-based triple therapy in patients with recurrent genotype 1 HCV infection following liver transplantation produced high rates of SVR. Therapeutic concentrations of immunosuppressants were maintained successfully through dose modification during telaprevir treatment.

TRAIL expression levels in human hepatocellular carcinoma have implications for tumor growth, recurrence and survival.

The proapoptotic molecule TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) has earned attention because of its ability to induce apoptosis in liver cancer cells without damaging normal liver cells. It may play an important role in preventing the development and outgrowth of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). TRAIL expression was investigated in a large series of human HCCs. We analyzed liver tissue from 108 patients undergoing partial liver resection (PLR) or liver transplantation (LT) because of either HCC or other indications. TRAIL expression was correlated with the cause of liver disease, demographic and clinical variables and pathologic properties. Our analysis found that in 66% of HCCs TRAIL expression was significantly lower than in the surrounding non-cancerous liver tissue (p≤0.012). Separation by cause of disease showed that HCC TRAIL mRNA expression was lower in almost all groups than in non-cancerous tissue but most significantly lower in NASH-associated liver tumors. Interestingly, low HCC TRAIL expression was found to correlate with tumor size (p≤0.007) and stage, as well as with tumor recurrence after resection and poor survival rates. The results of this study suggest that low TRAIL mRNA levels may be both a dominant feature in HCC development and growth and a predictor of tumor recurrence and poorer survival rates.

(Cleaved) CK18 serum and tissue expression levels differentiate acute HCV reinfection from acute rejection in liver allografts.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is the sole therapeutic option to cure end-stage liver diseases including HCV-related cirrhosis. Timely and precise differentiation of relevant acute HCV reinfection from acute rejection after OLT is vital for appropriate therapy. Aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of (non-) invasive apoptosis (M30) and necrosis (M65) determination in the differential diagnosis of acute (and chronic) HCV reinfection vs. acute rejection in liver allografts. METHODS: Serum samples and liver biopsy tissues were available from 76 patients including a control group (19× NAFL, 19× NASH, 16× acute rejection, 11× acute and 11× chronic HCV reinfection) and were analysed using M30- and M65 ELISAs (M30S, M65S) and M30-immunohistochemistry (M30H). Clinical and serological data were collected. RESULTS: M30S, M65S and M30H were highly correlated with diagnostic groups in the total cohort (all P < 0.0001). M30S, M65S and M30H were independently able to differentiate acute HCV reinfection from acute rejection (P = 0.048, P = 0.001, P = 0.010) with moderate to excellent diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity, specificity, cut-off-value in M30S: 70%, 75%, 1025 U/L; M65S: 100%, 92%, 1308 U/L; M30H: 73%, 88%, 0.3%). CONCLUSIONS: M30-, M65-ELISAs and M30-immunohistochemistry are potential useful tools in differentiating acute HCV reinfection from acute rejection facilitating both speed and accuracy of the diagnostic process for the clinician and hepatopathologist. In this context, M65S provided superior diagnostic characteristics compared to M30-based methods. However, being the first analysis of (cleaved) CK18 serum and tissue expression levels in this context, the results need to be verified in further studies.

Daclatasvir, Simeprevir and Ribavirin as a Promising Interferon-Free Triple Regimen for HCV Recurrence after Liver Transplant.

BACKGROUND: Recurrent hepatitis C infection after liver transplantation (LT) is associated with lower rates of graft and patient survival. METHODS: Here we describe the first use of daclatasvir, simeprevir, and ribavirin (RBV) as an all-oral triple regimen administered to 6 liver transplant recipients with recurrent hepatitis C, one with GT 1a and 5 with GT 1b. All patients were treated for 24 weeks. Trough levels of immunosuppression, laboratory measures, and potential adverse effects were closely monitored. RESULTS: For all patients, viral load became undetectable between treatment weeks 4 and 12. One patient experienced a viral breakthrough at the 10th week of treatment; this was associated with the selection of resistance-associated variants (D168Y in NS3 and ΔP32 in NS5A). For the other 5 patients, end-of-treatment response and for 4 patients SVR24 was achieved. Viremia recurred in one patient 4 weeks after the end of treatment, which was again associated with the selection of resistance-associated variants (D168V in NS3 and ΔP32 in NS5A). Clinical measures of liver function improved substantially for all patients. Adverse events were few and limited to moderate anemia caused by RBV. Importantly, adjustments to the immunosuppressant dosage were not required. CONCLUSIONS: The described regimen appears to be safe and effective for liver transplant patients and will be a promising treatment regimen for post-LT patients.