A multi-institutional randomized phase III study comparing minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer; Japan Clinical Oncology Group study JCOG2202 (LAPAN study).

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP), including laparoscopic and robotic distal pancreatectomy, has gained widespread acceptance over the last decade owing to its favorable short-term outcomes. However, evidence regarding its oncologic safety is insufficient. In March 2023, a randomized phase III study was launched in Japan to confirm the non-inferiority of overall survival in patients with resectable pancreatic cancer undergoing MIDP compared with that of patients undergoing open distal pancreatectomy (ODP). METHODS: This is a multi-institutional, randomized, phase III study. A total of 370 patients will be enrolled from 40 institutions within 4 years. The primary endpoint of this study is overall survival, and the secondary endpoints include relapse-free survival, proportion of patients undergoing radical resection, proportion of patients undergoing complete laparoscopic surgery, incidence of adverse surgical events, and length of postoperative hospital stay. Only a credentialed surgeon is eligible to perform both ODP and MIDP. All ODP and MIDP procedures will undergo centralized review using intraoperative photographs. The non-inferiority of MIDP to ODP in terms of overall survival will be statistically analyzed. Only if non-inferiority is confirmed will the analysis assess the superiority of MIDP over ODP. DISCUSSION: If our study demonstrates the non-inferiority of MIDP in terms of overall survival, it would validate its short-term advantages and establish its long-term clinical efficacy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered with the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials as jRCT 1,031,220,705 [ https://jrct.niph.go.jp/en-latest-detail/jRCT1031220705 ].

Subcutaneous emphysema associated with laparoscopic or robotic abdominal surgery: a retrospective single-center study.

BACKGROUND: Subcutaneous emphysema (SCE) is a common complication in laparoscopic surgery. However, its precise incidence and impact on the clinical course are partially known. In this study, the incidence and risk factors of SCE were retrospectively analyzed. METHODS: Patients who underwent laparoscopic/robotic abdominal surgery (e.g., gastrointestinal, hepatobiliary, gynecologic, and urologic surgery) between October 2019 and September 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The presence of SCE was confirmed by either conclusive findings obtained through chest/abdominal X-ray examination immediately after operation, or intraoperative palpation conducted by nurses. X-ray examination was performed in the operation room before extubation. RESULTS: A total of 2503 patients treated with laparoscopic/robotic abdominal surgery between October 2019 and September 2022 were identified and all of them were included in the analysis. SCE was confirmed in 23.1% of the patients (i.e., 577/2503). SCE was identified by X-ray examination in 97.6% of the patients. Extubation failure was observed in 10 patients; however, pneumothorax was not observed. Female sex (odds ratio [OR]: 2.09; 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 1.69-2.57), age ≥ 80 years (OR 1.63; 95%CI 1.19-2.22), body mass index < 20 (OR 1.32; 95%CI 1.06-1.65), operation time > 360 min (OR 1.97; 95%CI 1.53-2.54), robotic surgery (OR 2.54; 95%CI 1.91-3.38), maximum intraabdominal pressure with CO2 > 15 mmHg (OR 1.79; 95%CI 1.02-3.16), and endo-tidal CO2 > 50 mmHg (OR 1.32; 95%CI 1.08-1.62)were identified as independent factors of SCE. Regarding the extubation failure due to SCE, age (OR 5.84; 95%CI 1.27-26.8) and maximum intraabdominal pressure with CO2 (OR 21.7; 95%CI 4.76-99.3) were identified as risk factors. CONCLUSION: Although the presence of SCE is associated with a low risk of severe complications, monitoring of the perioperative intraabdominal pressure is essential for performing safe laparoscopic/robotic surgery, particularly in elderly patients.

Surgical Intervention After Lenvatinib Treatment in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The survival and prognostic factors in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who underwent surgical intervention after lenvatinib treatment is not well-understood. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-six patients with advanced HCC who had lenvatinib treatment were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Of 70 patients who were treated with lenvatinib, 14 patients underwent surgical intervention after lenvatinib treatment for 4-28 weeks. Progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly longer in patients who underwent surgical intervention than in patients with non-surgical treatment (median, 8.6 vs. 5.1 months, p=0.019). Non-significantly longer overall survival (OS) was also observed in patients with surgical intervention compared to patients with non-surgical treatment (median, unreached vs. 21.0 months, p=0.206). In patients who underwent surgical intervention, two patients had a partial response, and 12 had stable disease according to RECIST ver. 1.1 criteria. The serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level was significantly lower after lenvatinib treatment than before lenvatinib treatment (median, 19.2 vs. 196.5 ng/ml, p=0.0081). Eleven patients underwent curative surgery with a 14% major postoperative complication (Clavien-Dindo ≥IIIa) rate. Patients who exhibited decreases in AFP levels or maintained AFP levels within the normal range during lenvatinib treatment had significantly longer PFS (median, 8.6 vs. 3.0 months, p=0.0009) and OS (median, unreached vs. 12.4 months, p=0.012) compared to those with persistently elevated AFP levels beyond the normal range. CONCLUSION: Surgical intervention after lenvatinib treatment for advanced HCC was associated with longer PFS. Patients exhibiting decreased AFP levels or maintaining AFP levels within the normal limit may be suitable candidates for surgical intervention after lenvatinib treatment for advanced HCC.

A patient who underwent conversion surgery after atezolizumab plus bevacizumab for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein thrombosis and perihepatic lymph node metastases achieved a pathological complete response.

Here, we present a patient with hepatocellular carcinoma complicated by tumor thrombosis into the main portal trunk and perihepatic lymph node metastases who was treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab. Shrinkage of the main tumor, portal vein thrombosis, and lymph node metastases were achieved; therefore, hepatectomy with lymphadenectomy could be performed. Final pathology indicated a complete pathological response in the main tumor, portal vein thrombosis, and perihepatic lymph nodes. The patient is currently alive with no evidence of recurrence on radiological assessment at 3 months after surgery.