Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 29
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Ann Emerg Med ; 81(4): 429-437, 2023 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36669914

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Prescription opioid use is associated with substance-related adverse outcomes among adolescents and young adults through a pathway of prescribing, diversion and misuse, and addiction and overdose. Assessing the effect of current prescription drug monitoring programs (PDMPs) on opioid prescribing and overdoses will further inform strategies to reduce opioid-related harms. METHODS: We performed interrupted time series analyses to measure the association between state-level implementation of PDMPs with annual opioid prescribing and opioid-related overdoses in adolescents (13 to 18 years) and young adults (19 to 25 years) between 2008 and 2019. We focused on PDMPs that included mandatory reviews by providers. Data were obtained from a commercial insurance company. RESULTS: Among 9,344,504 adolescents and young adults, 1,405,382 (15.0%) had a dispensed opioid prescription, and 6,262 (0.1%) received treatment for an opioid-related overdose. Mandated PDMP review was associated with a 4.2% (95% CI, 1.9% to 6.4%) reduction in annual opioid dispensations among adolescents and a 7.8% (95% CI, 4.7% to 10.9%) annual reduction among young adults. For opioid-related overdoses, mandated PDMP review was associated with a 16.1% (95% CI, 3.8 to 26.7) and 15.9% (95% CI, 7.6 to 23.4) reduction in annual opioid overdoses for adolescents and young adults, respectively. CONCLUSION: PDMPs were associated with sustained reductions in opioid prescribing and overdoses in adolescents and young adults. Although these findings support the value of mandated PDMPs as part of ongoing strategies to reduce opioid overdoses, further studies with prospective study designs are needed to characterize the effect of these programs fully.


Asunto(s)
Sobredosis de Droga , Sobredosis de Opiáceos , Mal Uso de Medicamentos de Venta con Receta , Programas de Monitoreo de Medicamentos Recetados , Humanos , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Sobredosis de Opiáceos/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Prospectivos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Sobredosis de Droga/tratamiento farmacológico , Sobredosis de Droga/epidemiología , Sobredosis de Droga/prevención & control , Mal Uso de Medicamentos de Venta con Receta/prevención & control
2.
Am J Emerg Med ; 51: 53-57, 2022 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34673476

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Understanding differences in mortality rate secondary to sepsis between pediatric and general emergency departments (EDs) would help identify strategies to improve pediatric sepsis care. We aimed to determine if pediatric sepsis mortality differs between pediatric and general EDs. METHODS: We performed a nationally representative, retrospective cohort study using the 2008-2017 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS) to examine visits by patients less than 19 years old with a diagnostic code of severe sepsis or septic shock. We generated national estimates of study outcomes using NEDS survey weights. We compared pediatric to general EDs on the outcomes of ED mortality and hospital mortality. We determined adjusted mortality risk using logistic regression, controlling for age, gender, complex care code, and geographic region. RESULTS: There were 54,129 weighted pediatric ED visits during the study period with a diagnosis code of severe sepsis or septic shock. Of these visits, 285 died in the ED (0.58%) and 5065 died during their hospital stay (9.8%). Mortality risk prior to ED disposition in pediatric and general EDs was 0.31% and 0.72%, respectively (adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.36 (0.14-0.93)). Mortality risk prior to hospital discharge in pediatric and general EDs was 7.5% and 10.9%, respectively (aOR, 95% CI: 0.55 (0.41-0.72)). CONCLUSIONS: In a nationally representative sample, pediatric mortality from severe sepsis or septic shock was lower in pediatric EDs than in general EDs. Identifying features of pediatric ED care associated with improved sepsis mortality could translate into improved survival for children wherever they present with sepsis.


Asunto(s)
Sepsis/mortalidad , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios Transversales , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hospitales Pediátricos , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Análisis Multivariante , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sepsis/terapia , Tasa de Supervivencia , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
3.
J Emerg Med ; 63(6): 729-737, 2022 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36289021

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Foreign body ingestions are a common presentation in the emergency department (ED), particularly in young children. OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine whether the COVID-19 pandemic lockdowns had an effect on the proportion of foreign body ingestions. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of the Pediatric Health Information System for patients younger than 19 years who were identified by International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes for foreign body ingestion. We analyzed patients in the following three groups: young children (younger than 5 years), school-aged children (5-12 years), and adolescents (13 years and older), using an interrupted time series analysis. Our primary outcome was the difference in proportion of foreign body ingestions. We compared 1 year after the declaration of the COVID-19 pandemic (March 13, 2020 to March 31, 2021) with the previous 3 years (March 1, 2017 to March 12, 2020). RESULTS: Total pediatric ED encounters decreased in the post period (p < 0.01); 4902 patients per year presented for foreign body ingestion pre-COVID-19 shutdown vs. 5235 patients per year post-COVID-19 shutdown. In all three age groups (young children, school-age children, and adolescents), there was a higher proportion of foreign body ingestions post-COVID-19 shutdown (p < 0.01, p < 0.01, and p = 0.028, respectively), driven primarily by the decrease in total ED encounters. In the youngest age group (younger than 5 years), there was also a significant increase in slope for foreign body ingestions post-COVID-19 (p = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of foreign body ingestions increased after the declaration of the COVID-19 pandemic, primarily driven by an overall decrease in total ED volume.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Cuerpos Extraños , Adolescente , Niño , Humanos , Preescolar , Pandemias , COVID-19/epidemiología , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles , Cuerpos Extraños/epidemiología , Cuerpos Extraños/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Ingestión de Alimentos
4.
J Pediatr ; 236: 276-283.e2, 2021 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33771581

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the trends and hospital variation in the use of pharmacologic restraint among pediatric mental health visits in the emergency department (ED). STUDY DESIGN: We examined ED visits with a mental health diagnosis in patients aged 3-21 years at children's hospital EDs from 2009 to 2019. We calculated the frequency of pharmacologic restraint use and determined visit characteristics associated with restraint use. We calculated cumulative percent change for visits with restraints and for all mental health visits. We used logistic regression to test trends over time and evaluate hospital variation in the frequency of restraint use. RESULTS: We identified 389 885 mental health ED visits (54.9% female, median age 14.3 years) and 13 643 (3.5%) visits with pharmacologic restraint use. Characteristics associated with pharmacologic restraint use were late adolescent age (18-21 years), male sex, Black race, non-Latino ethnicity, public insurance, and admission to the hospital (P < .001). During the study period, both mental health ED visits increased by 268% and mental health ED visits with pharmacologic restraint use increased by 370%. The rate of pharmacologic restraint in this patient population remained constant. Hospital use of pharmacologic restraint for mental health visits varied significantly across hospitals (1.6%-11.8%, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric mental health ED visits with and without pharmacologic restraint are increasing over time. In addition, the overall number of pharmacologic restraint use has increased threefold. Significant hospital variation in pharmacologic restraint use signifies an opportunity for standardization of care and restraint reduction.


Asunto(s)
Antipsicóticos/administración & dosificación , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Hospitales Pediátricos , Servicios de Salud Mental , Adolescente , Factores de Edad , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Inyecciones Intramusculares , Inyecciones Intravenosas , Masculino , Asistencia Médica/estadística & datos numéricos , Admisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores Raciales , Factores Sexuales , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
5.
Am J Emerg Med ; 46: 34-37, 2021 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33714052

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Little is known regarding the differences in microbiology associated with cellulitis or abscess with or without lymphangitic streaking. The objective of our study is to assess whether there are differences in the pathogens identified from wound cultures of patients with paronychia with and without associated lymphangitis. METHODS: Retrospective cross-sectional study at a tertiary pediatric emergency department over 25 years. We opted to assess patients with paronychia of the finger, assuming that these cases will have a greater variety of causative pathogens compared to other cases of cellulitis and soft tissue abscess that are associated with nail biting. Case identification was conducted using a computerized text-screening search that was refined by manual chart review. We included patients from 1 month to 20 years of age who underwent an incision and drainage (I&D) of a paronychia and had a culture obtained. The presence or absence of lymphangitis was determined from the clinical narrative in the medical record. We excluded patients treated with antibiotics prior to I&D as well as immune-compromised patients. We used descriptive statistics for prevalence and χ2 tests for categorical variables. RESULTS: Two hundred sixty-six patients met inclusion criteria. The median age was 9.7 years [IQR 4.7, 15.4] and 45.1% were female. Twenty-two patients (8.3%) had lymphangitic streaking associated with their paronychia. Patients with lymphangitis streaking were similar to those without lymphangitis in terms of age and sex (p = 0.52 and p = 0.82, respectively). Overall, the predominant bacteria was MSSA (40%) followed by MRSA (26%). No significant differences were found between the pathogens in the 22 patients with associated lymphangitis compared to the 244 patients without. CONCLUSION: Staphylococcus aureus represent the majority of pathogens in paronychia, although streptococcal species and gram-negative bacteria were also common. Among patients with paronychia of the finger, there seems to be no association between pathogen type and presence of lymphangitic streaking.


Asunto(s)
Linfangitis/microbiología , Niño , Estudios Transversales , Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Femenino , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/microbiología , Humanos , Linfangitis/etiología , Masculino , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente a Meticilina , Procesamiento de Lenguaje Natural , Paroniquia/complicaciones , Paroniquia/microbiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología
6.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 37(10): 507-512, 2021 Oct 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30624420

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: National guidelines for routine pediatric acute asthma care recommend providing corticosteroids, and discourage routinely obtaining chest radiographs (CXRs) and using antibiotics. We examined rates of adherence to all 3 of these aspects during emergency department (ED) visits and compared performance between pediatric and general EDs. METHODS: Using the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey, we included all nontransfer ED visits for patients younger than 19 years with a diagnosis of asthma and treatment with albuterol from 2005 to 2015. Guideline-based care, defined as (1) corticosteroids, (2) no antibiotics, and (3) no CXR, was assessed for each visit. Hospitals were categorized as pediatric or general and compared according to rates of guideline-based care. Multivariable analyses were used to identify demographic and hospital-level characteristics associated with guideline-based care. RESULTS: More than 7 million ED visits met eligibility criteria. Antibiotic provision and CXR acquisition were significantly higher in general EDs (20% vs 11%, 40% vs 26%, respectively), while steroid provision was similar (63% vs 62%). Overall, 34% of visits involved guideline-based care, with a higher rate for pediatric EDs compared with general EDs (42% to 31%). Visit at a pediatric ED (odds ratio, 1.62 [confidence interval 1.17-2.25]) and black race (odds ratio, 1.48 [confidence interval 1.07-2.02]) were independently associated with guideline-based care in a multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Guideline-based care was more common in pediatric EDs, although only one-third of all pediatric-age visits met the definition of guideline-based care. Future policy and education efforts to reduce unnecessary antibiotic and CXR use for children with asthma are warranted.


Asunto(s)
Asma , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Asma/epidemiología , Niño , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Oportunidad Relativa , Estados Unidos
7.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 36(11): e620-e621, 2020 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29346238

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the incidence and recent trends in serious pediatric emergency conditions. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample from 2008 through 2014, and included patients with age below 18 years with a serious condition, defined as each diagnosis group in the diagnosis grouping system with a severity classification system score of 5. We calculated national incidences for each serious condition using annualized weighted condition counts divided by annual United States census child population counts. We determined the highest-incidence serious conditions over the study period and calculated percentage changes between 2008 and 2014 for each serious condition using a Poisson model. RESULTS: The 2008 incidence of serious conditions across the national child population was 1721 visits per million person-years (95% confidence interval, 1485-1957). This incidence increased to 2020 visits per million person-years (95% confidence interval, 1661-2379) in 2014. The most common serious conditions were serious respiratory diseases, septicemia, and serious neurologic diseases. Anaphylaxis was the condition with the largest change, increasing by 147%, from 101 to 249 visits per million person-years. CONCLUSIONS: The most common serious condition in children presenting to United States emergency departments is serious respiratory disease. Anaphylaxis is the fastest increasing serious condition. Additional research attention to these diagnoses is warranted.


Asunto(s)
Anafilaxia/epidemiología , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Enfermedades Respiratorias/epidemiología , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Precios de Hospital , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
8.
PLoS Med ; 16(11): e1002922, 2019 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31689290

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Prescription opioid misuse has become a leading cause of unintentional injury and death among adolescents and young adults in the United States. However, there is limited information on how adolescents and young adults obtain prescription opioids. There are also inadequate recent data on the prevalence of additional drug abuse among those misusing prescription opioids. In this study, we evaluated past-year prevalence of prescription opioid use and misuse, sources of prescription opioids, and additional substance use among adolescents and young adults. METHODS AND FINDINGS: This was a retrospective analysis of the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) for the years 2015 and 2016. Prevalence of opioid use, misuse, use disorder, and additional substance use were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), stratified by age group and other demographic variables. Sources of prescription opioids were determined for respondents reporting opioid misuse. We calculated past-year prevalence of opioid use and misuse with or without use disorder, sources of prescription opioids, and prevalence of additional substance use. We included 27,857 adolescents (12-17 years of age) and 28,213 young adults (18-25 years of age) in our analyses, corresponding to 119.3 million individuals in the extrapolated national population. There were 15,143 respondents (27.5% [95% CI 27.0-28.0], corresponding to 32.8 million individuals) who used prescription opioids in the previous year, including 21.0% (95% CI 20.4-21.6) of adolescents and 32.2% (95% CI 31.4-33.0) of young adults. Significantly more females than males reported using any prescription opioid (30.3% versus 24.8%, P < 0.001), and non-Hispanic whites and blacks were more likely to have had any opioid use compared to Hispanics (28.9%, 28.1%, and 25.8%, respectively; P < 0.001). Opioid misuse was reported by 1,050 adolescents (3.8%; 95% CI 3.5-4.0) and 2,207 young adults (7.8%; 95% CI 7.3-8.2; P < 0.001). Male respondents using opioids were more likely to have opioid misuse without use disorder compared with females (23.2% versus 15.8%, respectively; P < 0.001), with similar prevalence by race/ethnicity. Among those misusing opioids, 55.7% obtained them from friends or relatives, 25.4% from the healthcare system, and 18.9% through other means. Obtaining opioids free from friends or relatives was the most common source for both adolescents (33.5%) and young adults (41.4%). Those with opioid misuse reported high prevalence of prior cocaine (35.5%), hallucinogen (49.4%), heroin (8.7%), and inhalant (30.4%) use. In addition, at least half had used tobacco (55.5%), alcohol (66.9%), or cannabis (49.9%) in the past month. Potential limitations of the study are that we cannot exclude selection bias in the study design or socially desirable reporting among participants, and that longitudinal data are not available for long-term follow-up of individuals. CONCLUSIONS: Results from this study suggest that the prevalence of prescription opioid use among adolescents and young adults in the US is high despite known risks for future opioid and other drug use disorders. Reported prescription opioid misuse is common among adolescents and young adults and often associated with additional substance abuse, underscoring the importance of drug and alcohol screening programs in this population. Prevention and treatment efforts should take into account that greater than half of youths misusing prescription opioids obtain these medications through friends and relatives.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Encuestas Epidemiológicas , Humanos , Masculino , Medicamentos bajo Prescripción/efectos adversos , Medicamentos bajo Prescripción/uso terapéutico , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
9.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 27(2): 161-167, 2018 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29148107

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Greater than 50% of drugs lack pediatric labeling information, resulting in widespread "off-label" use in children. To increase pediatric prescribing information, the Pediatric Research Equity Act (PREA) was passed in 2003, requiring new drug applications to include pediatric assessments. We evaluated the study of new drugs in children since PREA was implemented. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional analysis of new drug applications submitted to the FDA from December 2003 to July 2012, using publicly available documents at Drugs@FDA. We calculated the proportion of new drugs that included a pediatric assessment at the time of approval and at a final review performed in July 2016. RESULTS: We identified 92 new drugs requiring pediatric assessments. Only 20 (21.7%) had been fully studied in children at the time of approval, while 9 (9.8%) had been partially assessed, and 63 (68.5%) did not have pediatric data. Among drugs approved without pediatric assessments, 4.2% met FDA deferral deadlines and 34.9% eventually submitted pediatric data. At the time of our final review, allowing for a mean of 8.6 years since drug approval, 57.6% of new drugs had not been fully assessed in children. The mean time between approval in adults and availability of pediatric data for drugs approved without pediatric assessments was 6.5 years. CONCLUSIONS: These results represent a comprehensive evaluation of the study of new drugs in children and demonstrate that many drugs continue to be approved without pediatric data. Our findings serve to inform approaches to strengthen adherence to PREA requirements.


Asunto(s)
Aprobación de Drogas/estadística & datos numéricos , Etiquetado de Medicamentos/normas , Difusión de la Información , United States Food and Drug Administration/normas , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Niño , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/normas , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Uso Fuera de lo Indicado/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration/estadística & datos numéricos
10.
Am J Emerg Med ; 36(2): 208-212, 2018 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28774767

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To explore the variation in diagnostic testing and management for males diagnosed with three testicular conditions (testicular torsion, appendix testis torsion, epididymitis/orchitis) using a large pediatric health care database. Diagnostic testing is frequently used in evaluation of the acute scrotum; however, there is likely variability in the use of these tests in the emergency department setting. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of males with the diagnoses of testicular torsion, appendix testis torsion, and epididymitis/orchitis. We identified emergency department patients in the Pediatric Health Information Systems (PHIS) database from 2010 to 2015 using diagnostic and procedure codes from the International Classification of Diseases Codes 9 and 10. Frequencies of diagnoses by demographic characteristics and of procedures and diagnostic testing (ultrasound, urinalysis, urine culture and sexually transmitted infection testing) by age group were calculated. We analyzed testing trends over time. RESULTS: We identified 17,000 males with the diagnoses of testicular torsion (21.7%), appendix testis torsion (17.9%), and epididymitis/orchitis (60.3%) from 2010 to 2015. There was substantial variation among hospitals in all categories of testing for each of the diagnoses. Overall, ultrasound utilization ranged from 33.1-100% and urinalysis testing ranged from 17.0-84.9% for all conditions. Only urine culture testing decreased over time for all three diagnoses (40.6% in 2010 to 31.5 in 2015). CONCLUSIONS: There was wide variation in the use of diagnostic testing across pediatric hospitals for males with common testicular conditions. Development of evaluation guidelines for the acute scrotum could decrease variation in testing.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/normas , Epididimitis/diagnóstico , Orquitis/diagnóstico , Torsión del Cordón Espermático/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios Transversales , Epididimitis/terapia , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Orquitis/terapia , Examen Físico/métodos , Torsión del Cordón Espermático/terapia , Ultrasonografía , Estados Unidos , Urinálisis/estadística & datos numéricos
11.
J Pediatr ; 186: 145-149.e1, 2017 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28396022

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare the complexity and severity of presentation of children in general vs pediatric emergency departments (EDs). STUDY DESIGN: We performed a cross-sectional study of pediatric ED visits using the National Emergency Department Sample from 2008 to 2012. We classified EDs as "pediatric" if >75% of patients were <18 years old; all other EDs were classified as "general." The presence of an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision code for a complex chronic condition was used as an indicator of patient complexity. Patient severity was evaluated with the severity classification system. In addition, rates of critical procedures and hospitalization were assessed. RESULTS: We identified 9.6 million encounters to pediatric EDs and 169 million to general EDs. Younger children account for a greater proportion of visits at pediatric EDs than general EDs; children <1 year of age account for 18% of visits to a pediatric ED compared with 9% of visits to a general ED (P < .01). Encounters at pediatric EDs had greater complexity (5% vs 2%; P < .01). Although severity classification system scores did not significantly differ by ED type, pediatric EDs had greater rates of hospitalization (10% vs 4%). CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric EDs provided care to a greater proportion of medically complex children than general EDs and had greater rates of hospitalization. This information may inform educational efforts in residency or postgraduate training to ensure high-quality care for children with complex health care needs.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crónica/epidemiología , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Pediátricos/estadística & datos numéricos , Heridas y Lesiones/epidemiología , Adolescente , Factores de Edad , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
12.
Pediatrics ; 151(1)2023 01 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36541052

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Recent studies have reported increasing eating disorder incidence and severity following the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. In a diverse cohort of pediatric hospitals, we examined trends in the volume of emergency visits and inpatient admissions for eating disorders before and during the pandemic. METHODS: We examined monthly trends in volume of patients with eating disorders (identified by principal International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, diagnosis codes) across 38 hospitals in the Pediatric Health Information System pre- (January 2018-March 2020) and post-COVID-19 onset (April 2020-June 2022). Using interrupted time series analysis, we examined the pre- and post monthly trends in eating disorder emergency and inpatient volume. RESULTS: Before the pandemic, eating disorder emergency visit volume was increasing by 1.50 visits per month (P = .006), whereas in the first year postonset, visits increased by 12.9 per month (P < .001), followed by a 6.3 per month decrease in the second year postonset (P < .001). Pre-COVID-19, eating disorder inpatient volume was increasing by 1.70 admissions per month (P = .01). In the first year postonset, inpatient volume increased by 11.9 per month (P < .001), followed by a 7.6 per month decrease in the second year postonset (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The volume of patients seeking emergency and inpatient eating disorder care at pediatric hospitals has increased dramatically since the pandemic onset and has not returned to prepandemic levels despite a decline in the second year postonset, with important implications for hospital capacity.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Trastornos de Alimentación y de la Ingestión de Alimentos , Humanos , Niño , Pandemias , COVID-19/epidemiología , Hospitalización , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Trastornos de Alimentación y de la Ingestión de Alimentos/epidemiología , Trastornos de Alimentación y de la Ingestión de Alimentos/terapia , Hospitales Pediátricos , Estudios Retrospectivos
13.
J Adolesc Health ; 73(3): 486-493, 2023 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37294253

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This study aimed to explore the health outcomes of adolescent survivors of sexual assault, as measured by subsequent emergency department (ED) utilization for mental and sexual health concerns. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database. We included patients aged 11-18 years seen at a PHIS hospital with a primary diagnosis of sexual assault. The control group included age- and sex-matched patients seen for an injury. Participants were followed in PHIS for 3-10 years; subsequent ED visits for suicidality, sexually transmitted infection, pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), or pregnancy were identified, and likelihoods of each were compared using Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: The study population included 19,706 patients. ED return visit rates in the sexual assault and control groups were 7.9% versus 4.1% for suicidality, 1.8% versus 1.4% for sexually transmitted infection, 2.2% versus 0.8% for PID, and 1.7% versus 1.0% for pregnancy, respectively. Compared to controls, sexual assault patients were significantly more likely to return to the ED for suicidality throughout the follow-up period, with the highest hazard ratio of 6.31 (95% confidence interval 4.46-8.94) during the first 4 months. Sexual assault patients also had higher likelihood of returning for PID (hazard ratio 3.80, 95% confidence interval 3.07-4.71) throughout the follow-up period. DISCUSSION: Adolescents seen in the ED for sexual assault were significantly more likely to return to the ED for suicidality and sexual health concerns, highlighting the need for increased allocation of research and clinical resources to improve their care.


Asunto(s)
Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Delitos Sexuales , Salud Sexual , Enfermedades de Transmisión Sexual , Femenino , Embarazo , Humanos , Niño , Adolescente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital
14.
Pediatrics ; 151(1)2023 01 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36530158

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Emergency department (ED) utilization by children with mental and behavioral health (MBH) conditions is increasing. During these visits, pharmacologic restraint may be used to manage acute agitation. Factors associated with pharmacologic restraint use are not well described. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of ED visits from the Pediatric Health Information System database, 2010-2020. We included visits by children 3-21 years with a primary MBH diagnosis and identified visits with pharmacologic restraint. Regression models were used to analyze the association between patient- and hospital-level factors and restraint. RESULTS: Of 545 800 ED MBH visits over the study period, 22 194 visits (4.1%) involved pharmacologic restraint use. In multivariable analysis, restraint was associated with ages 18-21 years (odds ratio [OR], 1.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.59-2.22), male sex (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.16-1.34), Black race (OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.09-1.35), visits starting overnight (OR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.45-1.96), or the weekend (OR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.22-1.30), and repeat ED visits (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.17-1.47). Every 100-visit increase in average annual MBH volume was associated with a 0.09% decrease in restraint (95% CI, -0.15 to -0.04) with no significant association between average annual ED volume and restraint (95% CI, -0.25 to 0.25). CONCLUSIONS: For children in the ED with MBH conditions, ages 18-21 years, male sex, Black race, visits starting overnight or the weekend, and repeat ED visits were associated with pharmacologic restraint. These results can inform strategies to reduce restraint use and ensure safe and equitable ED care.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Mentales , Humanos , Niño , Masculino , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Hospitales , Oportunidad Relativa
15.
Clin Toxicol (Phila) ; 61(4): 234-240, 2023 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36919488

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Prescription drug monitoring programs are state-run databases designed to support safe prescribing of controlled substances and reduce prescription drug misuse. We analyzed healthcare claims data to determine the association between prescription drug monitoring programs with mandated provider review and adolescent and young adult benzodiazepine prescription dispensing and overdose. METHODS: We performed a state-level retrospective cohort study to evaluate the association between implementation of prescription drug monitoring programs with mandated provider review and benzodiazepine prescription dispensing and benzodiazepine-related overdoses among adolescents (13-18 years) and young adults (19-25 years) between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2019. Data were obtained from a United States commercial health insurance company. RESULTS: There were 74,539 (1.8%) adolescents and 246,760 (4.0%) young adults with at least one benzodiazepine prescription dispensed. Benzodiazepine overdoses occurred among 1,569 (0.04%) and 3,202 (0.05%) adolescents and young adults, respectively. Implementation of a prescription drug monitoring program with mandated provider review was associated with a 6.8% (95% CI, 1.6-11.8) yearly reduction in benzodiazepine prescription dispensing among adolescents and a 12.5% (95% CI, 9.3-15.5) yearly reduction among young adults. There was no decrease in benzodiazepine overdoses in either age group (-15.4% [95% CI, -21.5 to 3.0] and -8.0% [95% CI, -18.0 to 3.2] yearly change in adolescents and young adults, respectively). DISCUSSION: Consistent with prior work, our study did not find an association between prescription drug monitoring program implementation and reduction in benzodiazepine-related overdoses among adolescents and young adults. However, the substantial reduction in benzodiazepine prescription dispensing is encouraging. CONCLUSION: Prescription drug monitoring programs were associated with decreases in benzodiazepine prescription dispensing, but not benzodiazepine-related overdoses in this cohort of adolescents and young adults. These findings serve to inform development of further policies to address rising rates of benzodiazepine misuse and overdose in this patient population.


Asunto(s)
Sobredosis de Droga , Programas de Monitoreo de Medicamentos Recetados , Humanos , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Estados Unidos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Benzodiazepinas , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Sobredosis de Droga/epidemiología , Prescripciones de Medicamentos
16.
Clin Toxicol (Phila) ; 60(6): 681-687, 2022 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35025708

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) are increasingly used to treat psychiatric conditions, exposing many children to potentially harmful medications. This includes adolescents, who are at higher risk for self-harm. The purpose of this study was to describe the epidemiology of pediatric AED poisonings and assess which AEDs are associated with more severe clinical outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional analysis examined single-substance AED exposure cases in pre-teens (10-14 years) and adolescents (15-19 years) reported to the National Poison Database System (NPDS) between 2000 and 2020 (cases through 2019 were included for trend analysis due to incomplete population data). We described characteristics of ingestions by age group, including AEDs implicated. RESULTS: There were 74,818 AED exposure cases reported to the NPDS, including 25,928 (34.7%) in pre-teens and 48,890 (65.3%) in adolescents. Among adolescents, 35,570 (72.8%) exposure cases were intentional, with 27,655 (56.6%) specifically related to a suspected suicide attempt. The most common AEDs implicated in poisonings were clonazepam (19.8%), valproic acid (15.3%), and lamotrigine (13.8%). The odds of hospitalization (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.0 [95% confidence interval [CI], 2.0-2.1]), intubation (aOR 2.1 [95% CI, 1.8-2.4]), seizure (aOR 1.6 [95% CI, 1.4-1.9]), and serious outcome (aOR 1.8 [95% CI, 1.7-1.9]) were higher in the adolescent group compared to the pre-teen group. Intentional ingestions increased by a yearly rate of 2.8% (95% CI, 2.3-3.2). Intentional tiagabine exposure was associated with the greatest increased odds of serious outcome (aOR 4.7 [95% CI, 3.6-6.3]). DISCUSSION: In this cross-sectional analysis of pediatric AED exposure cases reported to the NPDS, AED poisonings among pre-teens and adolescents increased significantly between 2000 and 2019. Of particular concern is the large increase in intentional exposure cases related to AEDs. With the population-adjusted rate of epilepsy diagnoses remaining relatively unchanged, these results may indicate that the rise in AED exposure cases may be related to increased prescribing of AEDs for psychiatric indications as opposed to epilepsy. CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric AED poisonings reported to the NPDS are increasing, especially among adolescents engaging in intentional ingestions. These findings provide additional information for consideration in risk-benefit assessments when selecting medications for the treatment of psychiatric conditions in children.


Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes , Epilepsia , Adolescente , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Niño , Estudios Transversales , Epilepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Epilepsia/epidemiología , Humanos , Lamotrigina , Estudios Retrospectivos
17.
Pediatrics ; 150(5)2022 11 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36222092

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Discharge from the emergency department (ED) involves a complex series of steps to ensure a safe transition to home and follow-up care. Preventable, discharge-related serious safety events (SSEs) in our ED highlighted local vulnerabilities. We aimed to improve ED discharge by implementing a standardized discharge process with emphasis on multidisciplinary communication and family engagement. METHODS: At a tertiary children's hospital, we used the model for improvement to revise discharge care. Interventions included a new discharge checklist, a provider huddle emphasizing discharge vital signs, and a scripted discharge review of instructions with families. We used statistical process control to evaluate performance. Primary outcomes included elimination of preventable, discharge-related SSEs and Press Ganey survey results assessing caregiver information for care of child at home. A secondary outcome was number of days between preventable low-level (near-miss, no or minimal harm) events. Process measures included discharge checklist adoption and vital sign acquisition. Balancing measures were length of stay (LOS) and return rates. RESULTS: Over the study period, there were no preventable SSEs and low-level event frequency improved to a peak of >150 days between events. Press Ganey responses regarding quality of discharge information did not change (62%). Checklist use was rapidly adopted, reaching 94%. Vital sign acquisition increased from 67% to 83%. There was no change in the balancing measures of median LOS or return visit rates. CONCLUSIONS: The development and implementation of a standardized discharge process led to the elimination of reported discharge-related events, without increasing LOS or return visits.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Alta del Paciente , Niño , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Signos Vitales , Centros de Atención Terciaria
18.
Pediatrics ; 149(6)2022 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35641470

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Prescription errors are a significant cause of iatrogenic harm in the health care system. Pediatric emergency department (ED) patients are particularly vulnerable to error. We sought to decrease prescription errors in an academic pediatric ED by 20% over a 24-month period by implementing identified national best practice guidelines. METHODS: From 2017 to 2019, a multidisciplinary, fellow-driven quality improvement (QI) project was conducted using the Model for Improvement. Four key drivers were identified including simplifying the electronic order entry into prescription folders, improving knowledge of dosing by indication, increasing error feedback to prescribers, and creating awareness of common prescription pitfalls. Four interventions were subsequently implemented. Outcome measures included prescription errors per 1000 prescriptions written for all medications and top 10 error-prone antibiotics. Process measures included provider awareness and use of prescription folders; the balancing measure was provider satisfaction. Differences in outcome measures were assessed by statistical process control methodology. Process and balancing measures were analyzed using 1-way analysis of variance and χ2 testing. RESULTS: Before our interventions, 8.6 errors per 1000 prescriptions written were identified, with 62% of errors from the top 10 most error-prone antibiotics. After interventions, error rate per 1000 prescriptions decreased from 8.6 to 4.5 overall and from 20.1 to 8.8 for top 10 error-prone antibiotics. Provider awareness of prescription folders was significantly increased. CONCLUSION: QI efforts to implement previously defined best practices, including simplifying and standardizing computerized provider order entry (CPOE), significantly reduced prescription errors. Synergistic effect of educational and technological efforts likely contributed to the measured improvement.


Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Entrada de Órdenes Médicas , Errores de Medicación , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Niño , Prescripciones de Medicamentos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Humanos , Errores de Medicación/prevención & control
19.
Hosp Pediatr ; 11(3): 277-283, 2021 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33536252

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Children with deep neck infections (DNIs) are increasingly being managed nonsurgically with intravenous antibiotics. Our objective was to examine variation in the management of children with DNIs across US children's hospitals. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the Pediatric Health Information System database. Children ≤12 years of age hospitalized for retropharyngeal or parapharyngeal abscesses from 2010 to 2018 were included. Hospital variation in management modality and imaging use was described. Temporal trends in management modality were assessed by using logistic regression. Medical management alone versus a combination of medical and surgical management was assessed, and the characteristics of children in these 2 groups were compared. The relationship between hospital rates of initial medical management and failed medical management was assessed by using linear regression. RESULTS: Hospitals varied widely in their rates of surgical management from 17% to 70%. The overall rate of surgical management decreased from 42.0% to 33.5% over the study period. Children managed surgically had higher rates of ICU admission (11.5% vs 3.2%; P < .001) and higher hospital charges ($25 241 vs $15 088; P < .001) compared with those managed medically alone. Seventy-three percent of children underwent initial medical management, of whom 17.9% went on to undergo surgery. Hospitals with higher rates of initial medical management had lower rates of failed medical management (ß = -.43). CONCLUSIONS: Although rates of surgical management of pediatric DNI are decreasing over time, there remains considerable variation in management across US children's hospitals. Children managed surgically have higher rates of resource use and costs.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Faríngeas , Absceso Retrofaríngeo , Niño , Hospitalización , Humanos , Cuello , Absceso Retrofaríngeo/diagnóstico , Absceso Retrofaríngeo/epidemiología , Absceso Retrofaríngeo/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos
20.
J Am Med Inform Assoc ; 28(8): 1736-1745, 2021 07 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34010406

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy of computer versus physician predictions of hospitalization and to explore the potential synergies of hybrid physician-computer models. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-center prospective observational study in a tertiary pediatric hospital in Boston, Massachusetts, United States. Nine emergency department (ED) attending physicians participated in the study. Physicians predicted the likelihood of admission for patients in the ED whose hospitalization disposition had not yet been decided. In parallel, a random-forest computer model was developed to predict hospitalizations from the ED, based on data available within the first hour of the ED encounter. The model was tested on the same cohort of patients evaluated by the participating physicians. RESULTS: 198 pediatric patients were considered for inclusion. Six patients were excluded due to incomplete or erroneous physician forms. Of the 192 included patients, 54 (28%) were admitted and 138 (72%) were discharged. The positive predictive value for the prediction of admission was 66% for the clinicians, 73% for the computer model, and 86% for a hybrid model combining the two. To predict admission, physicians relied more heavily on the clinical appearance of the patient, while the computer model relied more heavily on technical data-driven features, such as the rate of prior admissions or distance traveled to hospital. DISCUSSION: Computer-generated predictions of patient disposition were more accurate than clinician-generated predictions. A hybrid prediction model improved accuracy over both individual predictions, highlighting the complementary and synergistic effects of both approaches. CONCLUSION: The integration of computer and clinician predictions can yield improved predictive performance.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Hospitalización , Niño , Computadores , Humanos , Alta del Paciente , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estados Unidos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA