Fractured Bard Recovery, G2, and G2 express inferior vena cava filters: incidence, clinical consequences, and outcomes of removal attempts.

PURPOSE: To increase the understanding of risks of inferior vena cava (IVC) filter fracture and embolization and the safety of removing fractured filters via retrospective review of a prospectively collected database of fractured IVC filters. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 63 fractured IVC filters were discovered among 548 patients presenting for retrievable filter removal between April 2004 and November 2010 at a single institution. Device type, duration of implantation, component fracture, and embolization events were recorded. Success rates and techniques for removal of components were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 63 fractured Recovery, G2, and G2 Express IVC filters were identified, for an overall fracture rate of 12%. Excluding foot process fractures, the fracture rate for only filter arms and/or legs was 6%. The incidence of fracture increased with longer filter dwell times. Success rates for removal of the nonfractured component (ie, main body) and fractured components (ie, arm or leg) were 98.4% and 53.4%, respectively. The distal embolization rate of fractured filter components was 13%. There were no immediate clinically significant complications associated with fracture component embolization or filter removal. A single patient was encountered with symptoms related to their fractured filter. CONCLUSIONS: IVC filter fracture rates increase with longer dwell times; however, removal of fractured filters and fractured components (ie, arms and legs) can be achieved safely and effectively. Clinically significant complications of IVC filter fracture are rare, and there were no immediate clinical sequelae related to embolization of fracture components.

Large volume paracentesis of 39.5 liters chylous ascites in the setting of high-grade follicular lymphoma.

The American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases recognizes large volume paracentesis as draining greater than 5 liters of ascites and states there is no limit in the amount of ascites drained with appropriate replacement of albumin. For many practitioners performing safe large volume paracentesis between 5 and 10 liters or even 20 liters is not an uncommon practice. However, drainage of higher volumes outside common practice may raise concerns of patient intolerance and complication. The largest volume paracentesis reported in the literature to date is 41 liters. However, few other reports approach this volume. This case report demonstrates patient tolerance of a 39.5-liter paracentesis performed with close monitoring and hypertonic albumin replacement in a patient with chylous ascites due to high-grade follicular lymphoma.