Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 269(12): 2497-503, 2012 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22274692

RESUMEN

Evaluation of the severity of disease and the effectiveness of operative treatment is commonly done by registering pre- and postoperative symptoms. During the preceding decade, greater awareness has focused not only on the symptoms but also on patients' quality of life (QoL). The aim of the study was to determine the effect of septoplasty, as measured by generic and disease-specific QoL questionnaires. The generic 15D and disease-specific SNOT-22 questionnaires were given to patients before the operation and 6 months after the operation. Data analysis consisted originally of 188 septoplasty patients. One-hundred and twenty-six patients (67%) answered the SNOT-22 questions, and in the 15D, the response rate was 76%. In the post-operative SNOT-22, the need to blow the nose, sneezing, runny nose, nasal obstruction, loss of smell or taste, post-nasal discharge, facial pain/pressure, difficulty in falling asleep and waking up at night improved significantly. However in the 15D the mean QoL, i.e., general well-being, became significantly poorer. The QoL became increasingly poor especially in the older age groups and among the patients in which the improvement achieved in nasal symptoms postoperatively was minor. The more nasal symptoms the patients had pre- or postoperatively, the poorer the QoL was in general. Based on our results, critical evaluation of the symptoms and findings in the patients is essential in deciding whether surgery or other treatment should be given to individual patients having nasal blockage symptoms. Especially in patients with mild symptoms or among older patients, adequate medical treatment has to be tried before even considering surgery. The results also encourage the use of a systematic questionnaire to estimate the severity of symptoms in daily clinical practice.


Asunto(s)
Obstrucción Nasal/cirugía , Tabique Nasal/cirugía , Calidad de Vida , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Rinoplastia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 266(8): 1257-66, 2009 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19189114

RESUMEN

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is a relatively new method for the reduction of submucosal tissue. The method has gained increasing popularity in the treatment of snoring, tonsillar hypertrophy, tongue base hypertrophy, and nasal obstruction secondary to non-allergic or allergic rhinitis. We present a systematic literature review of current knowledge on the effectiveness, and complications of nasal radiofrequency thermal ablation (RFA) in the treatment of nasal obstruction. We performed a computerized literature search using several databases to select articles dealing with RFA treatment in the field of otorhinolaryngology. Selected articles were independently appraised by at least two of the authors. Thirty-five articles met the inclusion criteria. Twenty-six articles were reports on uncontrolled patient series. Of the nine included randomized controlled trials only one reported a double-blind comparison. Most of the studies reported an improvement in subjective symptoms after treatment and the number of serious side effects was small. However, the only placebo-controlled trial did not show effectiveness. Nasal-RFA appears to be a safe operative procedure and may reduce inferior turbinate submucosal tissue volume in patients having chronic nasal obstruction and who fail to respond to medical treatment. Based on current knowledge, RFA alters the nasal mucosa only slightly and causes only minor discomfort and risk of side effects for the patient. However, most of the published studies on nasal-RFA are observational and have a relatively short follow-up. Consequently, there is an urgent need for well-planned, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized trials on nasal-RFA treatment.


Asunto(s)
Ablación por Catéter/métodos , Mucosa Nasal/cirugía , Enfermedades Nasales/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Humanos , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
BMJ Open ; 8(10): e022173, 2018 10 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30341122

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) is a common operation typically performed due to chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). There are limited data on the nationwide ESS rate and factors contributing to its regional variation. The aim was to evaluate factors causing variation of ESS rate. DESIGN: Cross-sectional nationwide observational study. SETTING: A ll patients undergoing ESS in Finland 2013-2015. POPULATION: Nationwide Finnish population aged 15 years or over. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: ESS rate per 1000 inhabitants between 2013 and 2015 in all 21 hospital districts and independent factors for multilevel model analyses. METHODS: We used the Finnish register data of all patients with CRS who underwent ESS in 2013-2015. Patients aged under 15 years and those with ESS due to neoplasia were excluded. The age and gender standardised ESS rates were calculated, and multilevel Poisson regression models were used to evaluate variation in ESS in the 21 hospital districts. The likelihood ratio test was applied to assess the statistical significance of random components in the models. RESULTS: The nationwide annual rate of ESS is 0.71 per 1000 people in Finland. Hospital district rates varied from 0.25/1000 (95% CI 0.18 to 0.32) to 1.15/1000 (95% CI 1.09 1.21). Compared with males, females undergo ESS significantly more frequently (57% of the procedures), more often due to CRS without nasal polyps, and at a younger age (mean age 44.2 and 46.2 years, correspondingly). Multilevel analyses showed that lower age (between 24 years and 45 years) and availability/ease of medical services were independently associated with higher ESS rates. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms marked regional variation in the ESS rate in Finland, explained only in part by patients' age and differing availability of medical services. To analyse ESS across different CRS phenotypes or to compare quality registers on ESS properly, more research on regional variation is needed.


Asunto(s)
Endoscopía , Pólipos Nasales/complicaciones , Procedimientos Quírurgicos Nasales/estadística & datos numéricos , Rinitis/cirugía , Sinusitis/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedad Crónica , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Finlandia , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tabique Nasal/cirugía , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Distribución de Poisson , Sistema de Registros , Distribución por Sexo , Adulto Joven
4.
Laryngoscope ; 112(10): 1806-12, 2002 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12368620

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and morbidity of bipolar radiofrequency thermal ablation of the inferior turbinates in patients with nasal obstruction caused by turbinate hypertrophy. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, nonrandomized study and outpatient treatment. METHODS: Twenty patients (age range, 23-77 y; median age, 52 y) enrolled in the study. There was one dropout. All the patients had nasal blockage despite medical treatment. Bipolar radiofrequency thermal ablation was delivered to inferior turbinates at 100 kHz with a voltage root mean square value of 168 to 182. The preoperative and postoperative nasal functions were investigated by immediate and long-term visual analogue scale (VAS) scores of symptom parameters, olfactory thresholds, saccharine transit time, rhinomanometry, and acoustic rhinometry. The follow-up was conducted at 1 week and 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS: The VAS scores of subjective complaints (nasal discharge, itching, sneezing, crusting) decreased, and the VAS scores of evaluation of the effectiveness (frequency of nasal obstruction, degree of nasal obstruction, and patient satisfaction) increased statistically significantly in the 12-month follow-up without relapses. There were no adverse effects on nasal epithelial clearance time and olfactory functions. In rhinomanometry the changes in total nasal resistance and response to the vasoconstrictor agent were not statistically significant. In acoustic rhinometry the change in the sum of both nasal cavity volumes from nostril to 5 cm was statistically significant 6 and 12 months after the treatments. The difference between the preoperative and postoperative vasoconstrictive effect was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The bipolar radiofrequency thermal ablation of inferior turbinates is a promising alternative, which should be considered when planning inferior turbinate interventions.


Asunto(s)
Ablación por Catéter , Cornetes Nasales/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Ablación por Catéter/efectos adversos , Enfermedad Crónica , Femenino , Humanos , Hipertrofia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obstrucción Nasal/etiología , Obstrucción Nasal/fisiopatología , Obstrucción Nasal/cirugía , Satisfacción del Paciente , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Rinitis/complicaciones , Rinomanometría , Rinometría Acústica , Umbral Sensorial , Olfato , Cornetes Nasales/patología
5.
Laryngoscope ; 119(6): 1241-50, 2009 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19365852

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness and adverse effects of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of soft palate (SP) in snoring. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic search of electronic databases. Only articles published in peer-reviewed journals were evaluated. Included were controlled or prospective studies with at least 10 adults (> or =18 years of age) without moderate/severe obstructive sleep apnea. RESULTS: Of the 159 articles identified, 30 met the inclusion criteria: two randomized controlled trials (RCT), four clinical controlled trials, and 24 prospective uncontrolled studies. The only placebo controlled RCT indicated SP RFA to be superior compared to placebo. The other RCT, comparing different radiofrequency ablation generators, showed no evidence of differences in snoring treatment efficacy, and only minor differences in patient discomfort. In two of the controlled trials snoring relief obtained by SP RFA was comparable, and in three of them associated with less postoperative pain than other interventions. Radiologic results were contradictory with some trials reporting significant changes of the upper airways, whereas others did not. Neither long-term side effects nor major adverse events have been reported after. CONCLUSIONS: The review provides evidence that SP RFA is an intervention causing less postoperative pain than others, and the risk of adverse effects for the patient seems to be small. It may reduce symptoms of snoring, at least in the short term. However, most of the published SP RFA literature is based on observational studies with a short follow-up time, which precludes solid conclusions about the effectiveness of the procedure. Laryngoscope, 2009.


Asunto(s)
Electrocoagulación , Paladar Blando/cirugía , Ronquido/cirugía , Adulto , Electrocoagulación/efectos adversos , Humanos , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA