Anti-edematous effects of epinastine, cetirizine and its enantiomers in λ-carrageenan-induced edema in rat hind paw.

Urticaria is induced by the histamine released from mast cells which develops wheals (edema) as a visual feature. In clinical practice, second-generation histamine H1 -receptor blockers are routinely used as the first-line symptomatic treatment for urticaria. Nevertheless, not much research has directly examined the second-generation histamine H1-receptor blockers' ability to reduce edema. In this study, we directly evaluated the anti-edematous activities of three second-generation histamine H1-receptor blockers available in the market (epinastine hydrochloride, cetirizine hydrochloride, and levocetirizine hydrochloride) using a λ-carrageenan-induced footpad edema model. One hour before the induction of edema with 1% λ -carrageenan injection, all second-generation histamine H1 -receptor blockers (5, 10, 50 and 100 mg/kg) were subcutaneously administered to rats. At 0.5 and 3 hours after λ -carrageenan administration, the edema volume was evaluated using a Plethysmometer. Epinastine hydrochloride significantly suppressed the edema growth in a dose-dependent manner. Cetirizine hydrochloride showed a slight anti-edematous effect, while levocetirizine significantly inhibited the development of edema in a dose-dependent manner. On the other hand, dextrocetirizine did not prevent edema from growing. In summary, second-generation histamine H1 -receptor blockers, at least those examined in this study, may be able to reduce the clinical symptoms of urticaria associated with edema. Levocetirizine hydrochloride is also anticipated to have stronger anti-edematous effects than cetirizine hydrochloride because levocetirizine is responsible for cetirizine's anti-edematous activity.

Direct comparison of anti-inflammatory effects of 14-, 15-, and 16-membered macrolide antibiotics in experimental inflammation model induced by carrageenan in rats.

Some macrolide antibiotics, which share a basic lactone ring structure, also exhibit anti-inflammatory actions in addition to their antibacterial activities. However, no study has directly compared anti-inflammatory effects on acute inflammation among macrolide antibiotics with the distinct size of the lactone ring. In this study, we evaluated and compared the anti-inflammatory activities of four 14-membered macrolides (erythromycin, clarithromycin, roxithromycin, oleandomycin), one 15-membered macrolide (azithromycin), and three 16-membered macrolides (midecamycin, josamycin, leucomycin) using a rat carrageenan-induced footpad edema model. All macrolide antibiotics were intraperitoneally administered to rats one hour before the induction of inflammatory edema with 1% λ -carrageenan. The anti-inflammatory effects on acute inflammation were evaluated by changing the edema volume. All 14-membered and 15-membered macrolide antibiotics significantly suppressed the development of edema. Conversely, none of the 16-membered macrolide antibiotics inhibited the growth of edema. In conclusion, compared to 16-membered macrolide antibiotics, 14-membered and 15-membered macrolide antibiotics have stronger anti-inflammatory effects. Further research should be done to determine why different lactone ring sizes should have distinct anti-inflammatory effects.

Nephrotoxicity of concomitant use of tacrolimus and teicoplanin in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients.

Both tacrolimus and glycopeptide antibiotics are known to be nephrotoxic, and are often concomitantly given after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) or solid organ transplantation. The aim of this study is to evaluate the nephrotoxicity of concomitant use of tacrolimus and glycopeptide antibiotics in HSCT recipients. We retrospectively evaluated 67 patients who received intravenous tacrolimus and teicoplanin concomitantly for >4 days after allogeneic HSCT for hematologic diseases. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) was performed in all patients for both tacrolimus and teicoplanin. The median age of the patients was 48 years (range: 16-62), and the median duration of the co-administration of tacrolimus and teicoplanin was 11 days (range: 4-40). The mean serum creatinine (sCr) level tended to be elevated after the co-administration (from 0.69 ± 0.26 to 0.75 ± 0.30 mg/dL; P = 0.08); however, a 2-fold or greater increase in sCr was observed only in 2 (3.0%) patients. Increased sCr was reversible, and no patient required hemodialysis. These results suggest that the incidence of clinically significant nephrotoxicity can be minimized if the TDM of each drug is properly applied.

Pharmacokinetics of mizoribine in adult living donor liver transplantation.

We investigated the pharmacokinetics of mizoribine in the acute phase after adult living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). Between February 2004 and October 2009, 16 recipients received immunosuppressive therapy that included mizoribine (100 to 200 mg/d) after undergoing LDLT. We determined the serum levels of mizoribine before (C0) and 3 (C3), 4 (C4), and 10 (C10) hours after administration on postoperative days 3, 7, and 21. We assessed area under the concentration time curve (AUC) (hour · µg/mL), normalized serum concentration (NSC) at C0 [concentration (µg/mL)/dose (mg/kg body weight)], and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). The mizoribine concentration showed increases at C3 and C4 followed by a decrease at C10 on all days. AUC was 4.3, 5.9, and 8.3 in the 200-mg/d dose group on days 3, 7, and 21, respectively. NSC at C0 increased for 3 weeks after LDLT. There was a significant correlation between the NSC at C0 and eGFR on day 21, but not on days 3 and 7. There were no correlations between the NSC at C0 and either aspartate aminotransferase, total bilirubin, albumin, trough cyclosporine, or trough tacrolimus on any day. The pharmacokinetics of mizoribine in the acute phase after LDLT seems to be affected by postoperative day and renal function.