Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Int J Cancer ; 154(9): 1607-1615, 2024 May 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38196128

RESUMEN

The relationships between the therapeutic effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and the intestinal flora have attracted increasing attention. However, the effects of oral probiotics on the efficacies of ICIs used to treat non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remain unclear. We investigated the effects of probiotics on the efficacies of ICIs in patients treated with and without chemotherapy. We investigated patients with advanced NSCLC on ICI monotherapy or combination ICI and chemotherapy using the Okayama Lung Cancer Study Group Immunotherapy Database (OLCSG-ID) and the Okayama Lung Cancer Study Group Immunochemotherapy Database (OLCSG-ICD). In total, 927 patients (482 on ICI monotherapy, 445 on an ICI + chemotherapy) were enrolled. Most were male, of good performance status, smokers, and without epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)/anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) mutations. Probiotics were administered to 19% of patients on ICI monotherapies and 17% of those on ICIs + chemotherapy. Of the former patients, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly better in the probiotics group (PFS 7.9 vs. 2.9 months, hazard ratio [HR] 0.54, p < .001; OS not attained vs. 13.1 months, HR 0.45, p < .001). Among patients receiving ICI and chemotherapy, there were no significant differences in PFS between those on probiotics and not but OS was significantly better in the probiotics group (PFS 8.8 vs. 8.6 months, HR 0.89, p = .43; OS not attained vs. 22.6 months, HR 0.61, p = .03). Patients on probiotics experienced better outcomes following ICI treatment.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Probióticos , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Bases de Datos Factuales , Probióticos/uso terapéutico
2.
Lung ; 202(1): 63-72, 2024 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38265672

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This study investigated the safety and efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) re-administration after recovery from EGFR-TKI-induced interstitial lung disease (ILD). METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study collected data from consecutive advanced NSCLC patients who underwent EGFR-TKI re-administration after recovery from EGFR-TKI-induced ILD. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients were registered. The grades of initial TKI-induced ILD were grade 1 to 4. TKIs used for re-administration were erlotinib for 15 patients, osimertinib for 15, gefitinib for 14, afatinib for 13 patients, and dacomitinib for 1 patient. ILD recurred in 13 patients (22.4%), comprising 3 patients with grade 1, 6 patients with grade 2, and 4 patients with grade 3. No significant associations were found between ILD recurrence and age, smoking history, performance status, time from initial ILD to TKI re-administration, or concomitant corticosteroid use. However, the incidence of ILD recurrence was high in cases of repeated use of gefitinib or erlotinib or first time use of osimertinib at TKI re-administration. The ILD recurrence rate was lowest in patients treated with first time use of gefitinib (8%) or erlotinib (8%), followed by patients treated with repeated use of osimertinib (9%). The response rate, median progression-free survival by TKI re-administration, and median overall survival were 55%, 9.6 and 84.8 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: This study showed that EGFR-TKI re-administration is a feasible and effective treatment for patients who recovered from EGFR-TKI-induced ILD. Our results indicate that re-administration of EGFR-TKI is an important option for long-term prognosis after recovery from EGFR-TKI-induced ILD.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Humanos , Acrilamidas , Compuestos de Anilina , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Receptores ErbB/antagonistas & inhibidores , Clorhidrato de Erlotinib/efectos adversos , Gefitinib/efectos adversos , Indoles , Pulmón , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/inducido químicamente , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Pirimidinas , Estudios Retrospectivos , /uso terapéutico
3.
Gland Surg ; 13(2): 225-235, 2024 Feb 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38455346

RESUMEN

Background and Objective: Thymic epithelial tumors are relatively rare; thus, mostly retrospective studies and a few prospective randomized controlled trials have been conducted on the treatment and the biomarkers, with no standard therapy established. Indications for extended thymectomy, robot-assisted thoracic surgery, and multidisciplinary treatment are controversial. Here, we considered the prospects of surgical treatment and the possibility of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment for thymic epithelial tumors. Methods: This is a narrative review; PubMed was searched using a set of keywords related to thymoma and its proposed treatments over the last 5 years. Key Content and Findings: Thymic epithelial tumors are associated with autoimmune diseases. They are relatively rare, and their pathology remains unclear. Therefore, accumulating more case reports is important. Surgical resection is generally considered for both diagnosis and treatment. If the tumor has a strong tendency to invade surrounding areas, such as thymic carcinoma/thymoma, the diagnosis may be confirmed preoperatively by needle biopsy, and induction chemotherapy may be selected. Surgical resection is the most effective treatment, and complete resection is important. In cases where complete resection is difficult, multidisciplinary treatment is performed. Although there are various obstacles, using ICIs may prove effective for treatment both as preoperative and postoperative chemotherapy in the future, as shown for other cancers. Programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) is an immunoinhibitory molecule that suppresses T cells activation, leading to tumor progression. Overexpression of PD-L1 in some cancers is associated with poor clinical outcomes. However, the role of PD-L1 expression as a prognostic factor remains controversial. Therefore, various biomarkers other than PD-L1 have been identified. Conclusions: We reviewed the latest treatments for thymic epithelial tumors. If new therapeutic agents such as ICIs and molecular-targeted drugs are developed, this review suggests that surgery will become more important not only as therapy but also as part of multidisciplinary treatment that includes tissue collection.

4.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol ; 150(2): 89, 2024 Feb 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38347279

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are ineffective against epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics of patients who were treated or not treated with ICIs, and of those who benefit from immunotherapy in EGFR-mutant NSCLC. METHODS: We analyzed patients with unresectable stage III/IV or recurrent NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations using a prospective umbrella-type lung cancer registry (CS-Lung-003). RESULTS: A total of 303 patients who met the eligibility criteria were analyzed. The median age was 69 years; 116 patients were male, 289 had adenocarcinoma, 273 had major mutations, and 67 were treated with ICIs. The duration of EGFR-TKI treatment was longer in the Non-ICI group than in the ICI group (17.1 vs. 12.7 months, p < 0.001). Patients who received ICIs for more than 6 months were categorized into the durable clinical benefit (DCB) group (24 patients), and those who received ICIs for less than 6 months into the Non-DCB group (43 patients). The overall survival in the DCB group exhibited longer than the Non-DCB group (69.3 vs. 47.1 months), and an equivalent compared to that in the Non-ICI group (69.3 vs. 68.9 months). Multivariate analysis for time to next treatment (TTNT) of ICIs showed that a poor PS was associated with a shorter TTNT [hazard ratio (HR) 3.309; p < 0.001]. Patients who were treated with ICIs and chemotherapy combination were associated with a longer TTNT (HR 0.389; p = 0.003). In addition, minor EGFR mutation was associated with a long TTNT (HR 0.450; p = 0.046). CONCLUSION: ICIs were administered to only 22% of patients with EGFR-mutated lung cancer, and they had shorter TTNT of EGFR-TKI compared to other patients. ICI treatment should be avoided in EGFR mutated lung cancer with poor PS but can be considered for lung cancer with EGFR minor mutations. Pathological biomarker to predict long-term responders to ICI are needed.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Humanos , Masculino , Anciano , Femenino , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/genética , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéutico , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Receptores ErbB/genética , Mutación , Pulmón/patología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA