Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Nat Protoc ; 18(7): 1981-2013, 2023 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37344608

RESUMEN

In image-based profiling, software extracts thousands of morphological features of cells from multi-channel fluorescence microscopy images, yielding single-cell profiles that can be used for basic research and drug discovery. Powerful applications have been proven, including clustering chemical and genetic perturbations on the basis of their similar morphological impact, identifying disease phenotypes by observing differences in profiles between healthy and diseased cells and predicting assay outcomes by using machine learning, among many others. Here, we provide an updated protocol for the most popular assay for image-based profiling, Cell Painting. Introduced in 2013, it uses six stains imaged in five channels and labels eight diverse components of the cell: DNA, cytoplasmic RNA, nucleoli, actin, Golgi apparatus, plasma membrane, endoplasmic reticulum and mitochondria. The original protocol was updated in 2016 on the basis of several years' experience running it at two sites, after optimizing it by visual stain quality. Here, we describe the work of the Joint Undertaking for Morphological Profiling Cell Painting Consortium, to improve upon the assay via quantitative optimization by measuring the assay's ability to detect morphological phenotypes and group similar perturbations together. The assay gives very robust outputs despite various changes to the protocol, and two vendors' dyes work equivalently well. We present Cell Painting version 3, in which some steps are simplified and several stain concentrations can be reduced, saving costs. Cell culture and image acquisition take 1-2 weeks for typically sized batches of ≤20 plates; feature extraction and data analysis take an additional 1-2 weeks.This protocol is an update to Nat. Protoc. 11, 1757-1774 (2016): https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2016.105.


Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Cultivo de Célula , Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador , Procesamiento de Imagen Asistido por Computador/métodos , Microscopía Fluorescente , Mitocondrias , Programas Informáticos
2.
ACS Chem Biol ; 17(7): 1733-1744, 2022 07 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35793809

RESUMEN

PROteolysis TArgeting Chimeras (PROTACs) use the ubiquitin-proteasome system to degrade a protein of interest for therapeutic benefit. Advances made in targeted protein degradation technology have been remarkable, with several molecules having moved into clinical studies. However, robust routes to assess and better understand the safety risks of PROTACs need to be identified, which is an essential step toward delivering efficacious and safe compounds to patients. In this work, we used Cell Painting, an unbiased high-content imaging method, to identify phenotypic signatures of PROTACs. Chemical clustering and model prediction allowed the identification of a mitotoxicity signature that could not be expected by screening the individual PROTAC components. The data highlighted the benefit of unbiased phenotypic methods for identifying toxic signatures and the potential to impact drug design.


Asunto(s)
Ensayos Analíticos de Alto Rendimiento , Proteolisis , Ubiquitina-Proteína Ligasas , Humanos , Complejo de la Endopetidasa Proteasomal/metabolismo , Ubiquitina-Proteína Ligasas/metabolismo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA