Surgical treatment of large volume prostates: a matched pair analysis comparing the open, endoscopic (ThuVEP) and robotic approach.

OBJECTIVE: To compare open simple prostatectomy, endoscopic enucleation and laparoscopic, robot-assisted enucleation of high-volume prostate in terms of operation time, blood loss, transfusion and complication rates and early continence rates. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with BPH treated endoscopically (ThuVEP, Hamburg and Hannover) or robotically (Mainz) were evaluated prospectively for prostate size, free flow and validated questionnaires (IPSS, QoL). 35 patients were matched to patients after open prostatectomy (Mainz) for age, prostate size, IPSS and QoL scores. Operation time was noted from the first cut to the last suture; blood loss was estimated by the drop of haemoglobin preoperatively and one day after surgery. Transfusion rates were documented. Early continence was estimated by pad use over the first 24 h after catheter removal. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 22.0. RESULTS: No significant differences in prostate size, age and preoperative questionnaires were found (p > 0.3). Postoperative flow and the results of the questionnaires were significantly improved (all p < 0.05), without difference between the approaches (p > 0.8). Endoscopic surgery showed superiority in operation time (both p < 0.05); blood loss and transfusion rates were significantly lower compared to open surgery (both p < 0.01) and lower than in robotic surgery without reaching significance (p = 0.18, p = 0.36). Similar results were seen in early continence rates. CONCLUSION: Due to our results, endoscopic surgery should be considered as first-line therapy unless there are comorbidities like diverticula and/or bladder calculi that can be easily treated simultaneously by robotic surgery. Against the background of these findings, indications favouring open surgery are getting sparse.

Initial experiences with the Hemopatch® as a hemostatic agent in zero-ischemia partial nephrectomy.

PURPOSE: Nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) is the gold standard treatment for resectable renal tumors. In the last decade, laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) has evolved in technical, surgical and oncological aspects and is an accepted treatment option for local-stage renal tumors. Improvements in not only surgical techniques, but also potent hemostats have encouraged this evolution. Here, we report our initial experiences with a new hemostatic agent, Hemopatch(®) (polyethylene glycol-coated collagen patch, Baxter), in zero-ischemia LPN. METHODS: Seven patients with confirmed renal masses were enrolled and subjected to zero-ischemia LPN. In all cases, Hemopatch(®) was applied to the tumor resection site after suturing of the renal parenchyma. The following clinical data were captured for analysis: staging information, PADUA and RENAL nephrometry scores, operation time, blood loss, complications, pathology and hospitalization length. RESULTS: The median tumor size was 30.0 mm (range 9.5-72). The median PADUA and RENAL nephrometry scores were 6 (range 6-7) and 4 (range 4-6), respectively. All LPNs were performed with the zero-ischemia technique. In six of the seven patients, parenchymal suturing of the resection site was performed. No uncontrolled bleeding was observed. The median operation duration was 139 min (range 103-194), the median blood loss was 325 cc (range 50-700) and the median hospitalization length was 6 days (range 4-7). Hemopatch(®) provided sufficient hemostasis in all cases. No postoperative complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Although this study is limited to a small set of initial experiences with Hemopatch(®) in LPN, it proves the feasibility and reliability of this new hemostat. Following further evaluation in prospective randomized comparative studies, Hemopatch(®) might represent a promising tool in NSS.

Livestock production systems in developing countries: status, drivers, trends.

This paper describes and assesses the current status of livestock production systems, the drivers of global livestock production, and the major trends in such production. The analysis covers the six major livestock species: cattle and buffaloes, goats and sheep, pigs and chickens. Global drivers of the livestock sector include economic growth and income, demographic and land use changes, dietary adjustments and technological change. The rate of change and direction of livestock development vary greatly among world regions, with Asia showing the most rapid growth and structural change. The paper also examines system dynamics, by analysing the ways livestock production has adjusted to external forces. A brief discussion of how these trends link to food safety concludes the paper.

[Partial Nephrectomy in cT1 Renal Tumours: Conventional Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy Compared with LESS Partial Nephrectomy in SITUS Technique]. / Nierenteilresektion bei cT1 Nierentumoren: Vergleich der konventionellen laparoskopischen Nierenteilresektion mit der LESS Nierenteilresektion in SITUS-Technik.

BACKGROUND: Partial nephrectomy is the treatment of choice for clinical stage 1 renal tumours. Open partial nephrectomy is the standard operative technique. The use of minimally-invasive strategies such as laparoscopic, robot-assisted partial nephrectomy or laparoendoscopic single site (LESS) partial nephrectomy has increased in recent years. PATIENTS/MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, patients undergoing laparoscopic partial nephrectomy between December 2008 and November 2013 were evaluated. All patients presented with renal lesions suspicious for malignancy. Operations were performed as conventional laparoscopic transperitoneal partial nephrectomies (cLPN) or LESS partial nephrectomies (LESS-PN) in SITUS technique (single incision transumbilical surgery). The aim of the study was to compare perioperative outcome parameters such as duration of surgery, time of ischaemia, complications, need for transfusion, conversion rates, changes in renal function and duration of hospital stay in both groups. RESULTS: A total of 85 laparoscopic partial nephrectomies were performed in this study (72 cLPN and 13 LESS-PN). The average tumour size was 2.68±1.47 cm (cLPN) vs. 2.46±1.11 cm (LESS-PN). The mean duration of surgery was 175.17±50.026 min (cLPN) and 185.77±35.991 min (LESS-PN). 45 (62.5%) operations (cLPN) vs. 10 (76.9%) (LESS-PN) were performed in zero-ischaemia technique. There were no significant differences in perioperative outcome parameters between both groups. Postoperative complication rates (Clavien-Dindo≥3) were 11.1% (cLPN) vs. 7.7% (LESS-PN). CONCLUSIONS: LESS partial nephrectomy in SITUS technique is an attractive alternative to conventional laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy.