The effect of AZD9567 vs. prednisolone on glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: Results from a phase 2a clinical trial.

AIMS: Corticosteroids are the treatment of choice for many inflammatory diseases but often lead to adverse effects, including hyperglycaemia. This study investigated the mechanisms driving differential effects on glucose control for AZD9567, an oral nonsteroidal selective glucocorticoid receptor modulator vs. prednisolone in 46 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, 2-way cross-over study (NCT04556760), participants received either AZD9567 72 mg and prednisolone 40 mg daily (cohort 1); AZD9567 40 mg and prednisolone 20 mg daily (cohort 2); or placebo and prednisolone 5 mg daily (cohort 3). Treatment duration was 3 days with a 3-week washout between treatment periods. Glycaemic control was assessed after a standardized meal and with continuous glucose monitoring. RESULTS: A significant difference between AZD9567 and prednisolone in favour of AZD9567 was observed for the change from baseline to Day 4 glucose excursions postmeal in cohort 1 (glucose area under the curve from 0 to 4 h -4.54%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -8.88, -0.01; P = .049), but not in cohort 2 (-5.77%; 95% CI: -20.92, 12.29; P = .435). In cohort 1, significant differences between AZD9567 and prednisolone were also seen for the change from baseline to day 4 in insulin and glucagon secretion postmeal (P < .001 and P = .005, respectively) and change from baseline to Day 4 in GLP-1 response (P = .022). Significant differences between AZD9567 and prednisolone for 24-h glucose control were observed for both cohort 1 (-1.507 mmol/L; 95% CI: -2.0820, -0.9314; P < .001) and cohort 2 (-1.110 mmol/L; 95% CI -1.7257, -0.4941; P < .001). CONCLUSION: AZD9567 significantly reduced treatment-induced hyperglycaemia compared with prednisolone.

Characterisation of pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability in a first-in-human study for AZD8154, a novel inhaled selective PI3Kγδ dual inhibitor targeting airway inflammatory disease.

AIMS: This 3-part, randomised, phase 1 first-in-human study (NCT03436316) investigated the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics (PK) of AZD8154, a dual phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) γδ inhibitor developed as a novel inhaled anti-inflammatory treatment for respiratory disease. METHODS: Healthy men, and women of nonchildbearing potential, were enrolled to receive single and multiple ascending inhaled doses of AZD8154 in parts 1 and 3 of the study, respectively, while part 2 characterised the systemic PK after a single intravenous (IV) dose. In part 1, participants received 0.1-7.7 mg AZD8154 in 6 cohorts. In part 2, participants were given 0.15 mg AZD8154 as an IV infusion. In part 3, AZD8154 was given in 3 cohorts of 0.6, 1.8 and 3.1 mg, with a single dose on Day 1 followed by repeated once-daily doses on Days 4-12. RESULTS: In total, 78 volunteers were randomised. All single inhaled, single IV and multiple inhaled doses were shown to be well tolerated without any safety concerns. A population PK model, using nonlinear mixed-effect modelling, was developed to describe the PK of AZD8154. The terminal mean half-life of AZD8154 was 18.0-32.0 hours. The geometric mean of the absolute pulmonary bioavailability of AZD8154 via the inhaled route was 94.1%. CONCLUSION: AZD8154 demonstrated an acceptable safety profile, with no reports of serious adverse events and no clinically significant drug-associated safety concerns reported in healthy volunteers. AZD8154 demonstrated prolonged lung retention and a half-life supporting once-daily dosing.

As-Needed Budesonide-Formoterol versus Maintenance Budesonide in Mild Asthma.

BACKGROUND: Patients with mild asthma often rely on inhaled short-acting ß2-agonists for symptom relief and have poor adherence to maintenance therapy. Another approach might be for patients to receive a fast-acting reliever plus an inhaled glucocorticoid component on an as-needed basis to address symptoms and exacerbation risk. METHODS: We conducted a 52-week, double-blind, multicenter trial involving patients 12 years of age or older who had mild asthma and were eligible for treatment with regular inhaled glucocorticoids. Patients were randomly assigned to receive twice-daily placebo plus budesonide-formoterol (200 µg of budesonide and 6 µg of formoterol) used as needed or budesonide maintenance therapy with twice-daily budesonide (200 µg) plus terbutaline (0.5 mg) used as needed. The primary analysis compared budesonide-formoterol used as needed with budesonide maintenance therapy with regard to the annualized rate of severe exacerbations, with a prespecified noninferiority limit of 1.2. Symptoms were assessed according to scores on the Asthma Control Questionnaire-5 (ACQ-5) on a scale from 0 (no impairment) to 6 (maximum impairment). RESULTS: A total of 4215 patients underwent randomization, and 4176 (2089 in the budesonide-formoterol group and 2087 in the budesonide maintenance group) were included in the full analysis set. Budesonide-formoterol used as needed was noninferior to budesonide maintenance therapy for severe exacerbations; the annualized rate of severe exacerbations was 0.11 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.10 to 0.13) and 0.12 (95% CI, 0.10 to 0.14), respectively (rate ratio, 0.97; upper one-sided 95% confidence limit, 1.16). The median daily metered dose of inhaled glucocorticoid was lower in the budesonide-formoterol group (66 µg) than in the budesonide maintenance group (267 µg). The time to the first exacerbation was similar in the two groups (hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.17). The change in ACQ-5 score showed a difference of 0.11 units (95% CI, 0.07 to 0.15) in favor of budesonide maintenance therapy. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with mild asthma, budesonide-formoterol used as needed was noninferior to twice-daily budesonide with respect to the rate of severe asthma exacerbations during 52 weeks of treatment but was inferior in controlling symptoms. Patients in the budesonide-formoterol group had approximately one quarter of the inhaled glucocorticoid exposure of those in the budesonide maintenance group. (Funded by AstraZeneca; SYGMA 2 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02224157 .).

Inhaled Combined Budesonide-Formoterol as Needed in Mild Asthma.

BACKGROUND: In patients with mild asthma, as-needed use of an inhaled glucocorticoid plus a fast-acting ß2-agonist may be an alternative to conventional treatment strategies. METHODS: We conducted a 52-week, double-blind trial involving patients 12 years of age or older with mild asthma. Patients were randomly assigned to one of three regimens: twice-daily placebo plus terbutaline (0.5 mg) used as needed (terbutaline group), twice-daily placebo plus budesonide-formoterol (200 µg of budesonide and 6 µg of formoterol) used as needed (budesonide-formoterol group), or twice-daily budesonide (200 µg) plus terbutaline used as needed (budesonide maintenance group). The primary objective was to investigate the superiority of as-needed budesonide-formoterol to as-needed terbutaline with regard to electronically recorded weeks with well-controlled asthma. RESULTS: A total of 3849 patients underwent randomization, and 3836 (1277 in the terbutaline group, 1277 in the budesonide-formoterol group, and 1282 in the budesonide maintenance group) were included in the full analysis and safety data sets. With respect to the mean percentage of weeks with well-controlled asthma per patient, budesonide-formoterol was superior to terbutaline (34.4% vs. 31.1% of weeks; odds ratio, 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00 to 1.30; P=0.046) but inferior to budesonide maintenance therapy (34.4% and 44.4%, respectively; odds ratio, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.57 to 0.73). The annual rate of severe exacerbations was 0.20 with terbutaline, 0.07 with budesonide-formoterol, and 0.09 with budesonide maintenance therapy; the rate ratio was 0.36 (95% CI, 0.27 to 0.49) for budesonide-formoterol versus terbutaline and 0.83 (95% CI, 0.59 to 1.16) for budesonide-formoterol versus budesonide maintenance therapy. The rate of adherence in the budesonide maintenance group was 78.9%. The median metered daily dose of inhaled glucocorticoid in the budesonide-formoterol group (57 µg) was 17% of the dose in the budesonide maintenance group (340 µg). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with mild asthma, as-needed budesonide-formoterol provided superior asthma-symptom control to as-needed terbutaline, assessed according to electronically recorded weeks with well-controlled asthma, but was inferior to budesonide maintenance therapy. Exacerbation rates with the two budesonide-containing regimens were similar and were lower than the rate with terbutaline. Budesonide-formoterol used as needed resulted in substantially lower glucocorticoid exposure than budesonide maintenance therapy. (Funded by AstraZeneca; SYGMA 1 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02149199 .).

The effect of a selective CXCR2 antagonist (AZD5069) on human blood neutrophil count and innate immune functions.

AIMS: The aim of the present study was to investigate whether selective antagonism of the cysteine-X-cysteine chemokine receptor-2 (CXCR2) receptor has any adverse effects on the key innate effector functions of human neutrophils for defence against microbial pathogens. METHODS: In a double-blind, crossover study, 30 healthy volunteers were randomized to treatment with the CXCR2 antagonist AZD5069 (100 mg) or placebo, twice daily orally for 6 days. The peripheral blood neutrophil count was assessed at baseline, daily during treatment and in response to exercise challenge and subcutaneous injection of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF). Neutrophil function was evaluated by phagocytosis of Escherichia coli and by the oxidative burst response to E. coli. RESULTS: AZD5069 treatment reversibly reduced circulating neutrophil count from baseline by a mean [standard deviation (SD)] of -1.67 (0.67) ×10(9) l(-1) vs. 0.19 (0.78) ×10(9) l(-1) for placebo on day 2, returning to baseline by day 7 after the last dose. Despite low counts on day 4, a 10-min exercise challenge increased absolute blood neutrophil count, but the effect with AZD5069 was smaller and not sustained, compared with placebo treatment. Subcutaneous G-CSF on day 5 caused a substantial increase in blood neutrophil count in both placebo- and AZD5069-treated subjects. Superoxide anion production in E. coli-stimulated neutrophils and phagocytosis of E. coli were unaffected by AZD5069 (P = 0.375, P = 0.721, respectively vs. baseline, Day 4). AZD5069 was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: CXCR2 antagonism did not appear adversely to affect the mobilization of neutrophils from bone marrow into the peripheral circulation, phagocytosis or the oxidative burst response to bacterial pathogens. This supports the potential of CXCR2 antagonists as a treatment option for diseases in which neutrophils play a pathological role.

AZD9567 versus prednisolone in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: A phase IIa, randomized, double-blind, efficacy, and safety study.

Oral corticosteroid use is limited by side effects, some caused by off-target actions on the mineralocorticoid receptor that disrupt electrolyte balance. AZD9567 is a selective, nonsteroidal glucocorticoid receptor modulator. The efficacy, safety, and tolerability of AZD9567 and prednisolone were assessed in a phase IIa study. Anti-inflammatory mechanism of action was also evaluated in vitro in monocytes from healthy donors. In this randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter study, patients with active rheumatoid arthritis were randomized 1:1 to AZD9567 40 mg or prednisolone 20 mg once daily orally for 14 days. The primary end point was change from baseline in DAS28-CRP at day 15. Secondary end points included components of DAS28-CRP, American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response criteria (ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70), and safety end points, including serum electrolytes. Overall, 21 patients were randomized to AZD9567 (n = 11) or prednisolone (n = 10), and all completed the study. As anticipated, AZD9567 had a similar efficacy profile to prednisolone, with no clinically meaningful (i.e., >1.0) difference in change from baseline to day 15 in DAS28-CRP between AZD9567 and prednisolone (least-squares mean difference: 0.47, 95% confidence interval: -0.49 to 1.43). Similar results were observed for the secondary efficacy end points. In vitro transcriptomic analysis showed that anti-inflammatory responses were similar for AZD9567, prednisolone, and dexamethasone. Unlike prednisolone, AZD9567 had no effect on the serum sodium:potassium ratio. The safety profile was not different from that of prednisolone. Larger studies of longer duration are required to determine whether AZD9567 40 mg may in the future be an alternative to prednisolone in patients with inflammatory disease.

Frequent productive cough: Symptom burden and future exacerbation risk among patients with asthma and/or COPD in the NOVELTY study.

INTRODUCTION: Persistent cough with sputum production is an important clinical trait in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We defined "frequent productive cough" based on 2 questions from the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) and sought to determine its occurrence and associated outcomes in patients with physician-assigned asthma and/or COPD from the NOVELTY study. METHODS: Frequent productive cough was defined as cough and sputum production most or several days/week for the past 3 months (scoring ≥3 for both SGRQ questions). Relationships with baseline disease characteristics and exacerbations over 12 months' follow-up were examined using logistic regression. RESULTS: Baseline SGRQ data were available for 7125 patients, of whom 31.3% had frequent productive cough. It was more common in asthma+COPD (38.8%) and COPD (38.1%) than asthma (25.0%), increasing with physician-assessed severity, and in current versus former and never smokers. Patient-reported symptomatic worsening was more common in patients with versus without frequent productive cough. Reduced post-bronchodilator FEV1 (odds ratio [OR] per 10% decrement 1.14 [95% confidence interval 1.11-1.16]) and history of pollutant exposure at home/work (OR 1.50 [1.33-1.69]) were associated with frequent productive cough in all diagnoses. Patients with baseline frequent productive cough were more likely to have ≥1 exacerbation over the subsequent 12 months (OR 1.71 [1.52-1.93]), including exacerbations requiring hospital admission and those treated with oral corticosteroids. CONCLUSIONS: Frequent productive cough represents an important indicator of adverse clinical outcomes across asthma and/or COPD. Research into the underlying pathologic mechanisms is required to support targeted therapy development. CLINICALTRIALS: GOV: NCT02760329.

AZD5634, an inhaled ENaC inhibitor, in healthy subjects and patients with cystic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Epithelial sodium channel (ENaC) inhibitors may offer clinical benefit in cystic fibrosis (CF); however, data are limited. We report the outcomes of a Phase I (NCT02679729) and a Phase Ib (NCT02950805) study of AZD5634, a novel inhaled ENaC inhibitor. METHODS: A Phase I, first-in-human, single-blind, placebo-controlled, single ascending dose, sequential dose group study assessed the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of AZD5634 in healthy subjects (n=53) in part A following inhaled doses up to 1700 µg, and, in part B, following administration of single inhaled (1700 µg) and intravenous (65 µg) doses. A Phase Ib, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-dose, 2-way cross-over study assessed the effects of a single dose (600 µg) of inhaled AZD5634 on mucociliary clearance (MCC), pharmacokinetics and safety and tolerability in patients with CF (n=11). Nasal potential difference (NPD) was assessed as an in situ target engagement exploratory biomarker. RESULTS: Absolute bioavailability of AZD5634 after inhalation was approximately 3%, indicating minimal distribution into the systemic circulation. Urinary excretion was a minor elimination pathway. Administration of inhaled AZD5634 did not improve MCC in CF patients, but AZD5634 inhibited ENaC in the nasal epithelium, as measured by NPD. AZD5634 was safe and well tolerated in both studies. CONCLUSIONS: AZD5634 showed favorable pharmacokinetics and safety in healthy subjects and patients with CF. However, despite achieving target engagement, proof of mechanism was not achieved after a single dose in patients with CF. Further evaluation into multiple dose studies is warranted to explore its therapeutic potential.

Diurnal variation in DLCO and non-standardized study procedures may cause a false positive safety signal in clinical trials.

Diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) was measured in a phase I single ascending dose study after inhalation of AZD8154 or placebo in healthy participants at baseline (DLCOBaseline) and follow-up (DLCOFollow-up) 6 days after dosing. Initially, DLCOFollow-up timepoint was 2 h earlier than the DLCOBaseline timepoint and clinically significant decreases in DLCOFollow-up (absolute change up to 19% from baseline and DLCO%predicted values less than 70) were observed then. The observed reduction in DLCOFollow-up was confirmed as a false positive finding after alignment of DLCO timings. As a consequence, when DLCO is used in clinical studies, measurements should be strictly standardized in relation to time of the day.

Validation of a diagnosis-agnostic symptom questionnaire for asthma and/or COPD.

Background: The Respiratory Symptoms Questionnaire (RSQ) is a novel, four-item patient-reported diagnosis-agnostic tool designed to assess the frequency of respiratory symptoms and their impact on activity, without specifying a particular diagnosis. Our objective was to examine its validity in patients with asthma and/or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods: Baseline data were randomly sampled from patients who completed the RSQ in the NOVELTY study (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02760329). The total sample (n=1530) comprised three randomly selected samples (n=510 each) from each physician-assigned diagnostic group (asthma, asthma+COPD and COPD). The internal consistency and structural validity of the RSQ were evaluated using exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses; psychometric performance was observed using Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory analyses. Results: For the total sample, the mean±sd RSQ score was 5.6±4.3 (range 0-16). Irrespective of diagnosis, the internal consistency of items was uniformly adequate (Cronbach's α=0.76-0.80). All items had high factor loadings and structural characteristics of the measure were invariant across groups. Using the total sample, RSQ items informatively covered the θ score range of -2.0 to 2.8, with discrimination coefficients for individual items being high to very high (1.7-2.6). Strong convergent correlations were observed between the RSQ and the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (0.77, p<0.001). Conclusions: The RSQ is a valid, brief, patient-reported tool for assessing respiratory symptoms in patients across the whole spectrum of asthma and/or COPD, rather than using different questionnaires for each diagnosis. It can be used for monitoring respiratory symptoms in clinical practice, clinical trials and real-world studies.

Effect of a single day of increased as-needed budesonide-formoterol use on short-term risk of severe exacerbations in patients with mild asthma: a post-hoc analysis of the SYGMA 1 study.

BACKGROUND: In mild asthma, as-needed budesonide-formoterol reduces long-term exacerbation risk compared with as-needed short-acting ß2-agonist (SABA), with a similar or increased reduction versus maintenance with budesonide plus as-needed SABA, despite a lower budesonide dose. In this post-hoc analysis of the SYmbicort Given as needed in Mild Asthma (SYGMA) 1 study, we investigated the short-term risk of severe exacerbations after a single day with various levels of reliever use. METHODS: SYGMA 1 was a 52-week, double-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial, in which patients aged 12 years or older with mild asthma were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to placebo twice daily plus as-needed terbutaline 0·5 mg, placebo twice daily plus as-needed budesonide-formoterol 200-6 µg, or budesonide 200 µg twice daily plus as-needed terbutaline (ie, budesonide maintenance group). In this post-hoc analysis, we assessed the frequency of reliever use and the risk of a severe exacerbation in the 21 days after first use of more than two, four, six, or eight reliever inhalations in 24 h. SYGMA 1 is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02149199, and is now complete. FINDINGS: Of 5721 patients enrolled in SYGMA 1, 3849 were randomly assigned to as-needed terbutaline (n=1280), as-needed budesonide-formoterol (n=1279), or budesonide maintenance (n=1290), of whom 3836 had evaluable data (n=1277 as-needed terbutaline, n=1277 as needed budesonide-formoterol, and n=1282 budesonide maintenance). Median reliever use was 0·32 (IQR 0·08-0·91) inhalations per day for the as-needed terbutaline group, 0·29 (0·07-0·72) for the as-needed budesonide-formoterol group, and 0·16 (0·04-0·52) for the budesonide maintenance group. Compared with as-needed terbutaline, after adjustment for age, sex, randomly assigned treatment, pre-study treatment group, baseline % predicted post-bronchodilator FEV1, and severe exacerbation in the 12 months before enrolment in the study, the hazard ratio (HR) for severe exacerbation in the 21 days after a single day with more than two as-needed inhalations was 0·27 (95% CI 0·12-0·58; p=0·0008) with as-needed budesonide-formoterol and 0·39 (0·19-0·79; p=0·0091) with budesonide maintenance; after a single day of more than four as-needed inhalations the HR was 0·24 (0·10-0·62; p=0·0030) with as-needed budesonide-formoterol and 0·30 (0·13-0·72; p=0·0065) with budesonide maintenance; and after a single day of more than six as-needed inhalations the HR was 0·14 (0·02-1·06; p=0·057) with as-needed budesonide-formoterol and 0·43 (0·14-1·26; p=0·12) with budesonide maintenance. HRs were not calculated for more than eight as-needed inhalations due to the small number of events. INTERPRETATION: In mild asthma, as-needed budesonide-formoterol reduces the short-term risk of severe exacerbations after a single day of higher use (more than two as-needed inhalations), even when overall use is infrequent. Use of an anti-inflammatory reliever might reduce the risk of short-term severe exacerbations by the timely provision of increased doses of as-needed inhaled corticosteroids and formoterol when symptoms occur. These findings should be further assessed in prospective randomised clinical trials. FUNDING: AstraZeneca.

Seven Pillars of Small Airways Disease in Asthma and COPD: Supporting Opportunities for Novel Therapies.

Identification of pathologic changes in early and mild obstructive lung disease has shown the importance of the small airways and their contribution to symptoms. Indeed, significant small airways dysfunction has been found prior to any overt airway obstruction being detectable by conventional spirometry techniques. However, most therapies for the treatment of obstructive lung disease target the physiological changes and associated symptoms that result from chronic lung disease, rather than directly targeting the specific underlying causes of airflow disruption or the drivers of disease progression. In addition, although spirometry is the current standard for diagnosis and monitoring of response to therapy, the most widely used measure, FEV1 , does not align with the pathologic changes in early or mild disease and may not align with symptoms or exacerbation frequency in the individual patient. Newer functional and imaging techniques allow more effective assessment of small airways dysfunction; however, significant gaps in our understanding remain. Improving our knowledge of the role of small airways dysfunction in early disease in the airways, along with the identification of novel end points to measure subclinical changes in this region (ie, those not captured as symptoms or identified through standard FEV1), may lead to the development of novel therapies that directly combat early airways disease processes with a view to slowing disease progression and reversing damage. This expert opinion paper discusses small airways disease in the context of asthma and COPD and highlights gaps in current knowledge that impede earlier identification of obstructive lung disease and the development and standardization of novel small airways-specific end points for use in clinical trials.

Supplementation with fatty acids influences the airway nitric oxide and inflammatory markers in patients with cystic fibrosis.

OBJECTIVES: To obtain a balance in the fatty acid (FA) metabolism is important for the inflammatory response and of special importance in cystic fibrosis (CF), which is characterized by impaired FA metabolism, chronic inflammation, and infection in the airways. Nitric oxide (NO) has antimicrobial properties and low nasal (nNO) and exhaled NO (FENO), commonly reported in CF that may affect bacterial status. The present study investigates the effect of different FA blends on nNO and FENO and immunological markers in patients with CF. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-three patients with CF and "severe" mutations were consecutively enrolled in a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study with 3 FA blends containing mainly n-3 or n-6 FA or saturated FA acting as placebo. FENO, nNO, serum phospholipid concentrations of FA, and biomarkers of inflammation were measured before and after 3 months of supplementation. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients in clinically stable condition completed the study. The serum phospholipid FA pattern changed significantly in all 3 groups. An increase of the n-6 FA, arachidonic acid, was associated with a decrease of FENO and nNO. The inflammatory biomarkers, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and interleukin-8 decreased after supplementation with n-3 FA and erythrocyte sedimentation rate increased after supplementation with n-6 FA. CONCLUSIONS: This small pilot study indicated that the composition of dietary n-3 and n-6 FA influenced the inflammatory markers in CF. FENO and nNO were influenced by changes in the arachidonic acid concentration, supporting previous studies suggesting that both the lipid abnormality and the colonization with Pseudomonas influenced NO in the airways.

Effects of a selective glucocorticoid receptor modulator (AZD9567) versus prednisolone in healthy volunteers: two phase 1, single-blind, randomised controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Glucocorticoids are highly effective and widely used anti-inflammatory drugs, but their use is limited by serious side-effects, including glucocorticoid-induced hyperglycaemia and diabetes. AZD9567 is a non-steroidal, selective glucocorticoid receptor modulator that aims to reduce side-effects. We aimed to assess the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of AZD9567 in healthy volunteers. METHODS: Two phase 1 clinical studies were done. First, a randomised, placebo-controlled, single-blind, single-ascending dose study was done in healthy men who received single oral doses of AZD9567 2 mg, 10 mg, 20 mg, 40 mg, 80 mg, 100 mg, 125 mg, or 155 mg, or prednisolone 60 mg (n=8 per dose group, randomly assigned [6:2] to receive active drug or placebo). Second, a randomised, active-controlled, single-blind, multiple-ascending dose study was done, in which men and women received oral AZD9567 or prednisolone once daily for 5 days. One cohort of volunteers with prediabetes received AZD9567 10 mg (n=7) or prednisolone 20 mg (n=2). All other cohorts comprised healthy volunteers, receiving AZD9567 20 mg, 40 mg, 80 mg, or 125 mg (n=7 per dose group), or prednisolone 5 mg (n=13), 20 mg (n=16), or 40 mg (n=13). Participants and study centre staff were masked to treatment assignment for each cohort, although data were unmasked for safety review between cohorts. The primary outcome of the single-ascending dose study was the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of single ascending doses of AZD9567; for the multiple-ascending dose study it was the safety and tolerability of AZD9567 following multiple ascending doses. As a secondary outcome, effects on glycaemic control were ascertained with oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTTs) done at baseline and on day 1 of the single-ascending dose study, and at baseline and on day 4 of the multiple-ascending dose study. These trials are registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02512575 and NCT02760316. FINDINGS: In the single-ascending dose study, between Nov 18, 2015, and Sept 26, 2016, 72 healthy white men were enrolled, and all completed the study. In the multiple-ascending dose study, between May 2, 2016, and Sept 13, 2017, 77 predominantly white male volunteers (including nine individuals with prediabetes and eight women) were enrolled and 75 completed the study. All doses of AZD9567 and prednisolone were well tolerated, with no serious adverse events or events suggesting adrenal insufficiency. In the single-ascending dose study, nine adverse events of mild intensity were reported (five with AZD9567 and four with placebo); no adverse event was reported by more than one person. In the multiple-ascending dose study, 44 adverse events of mild or moderate intensity were reported (18 with AZD9567 and 26 with prednisolone). The most common were headache and micturition. Apparent clearance, volume of distribution, and half-life of AZD9567 were consistent across doses and for single versus repeated dosing. In the multiple-ascending dose study, OGTTs showed no significant difference with AZD9567 doses up to 80 mg compared with prednisolone 5 mg in glucose area under the curve from 0 h to 4 h post-OGTT (AUC0-4h) from baseline to day 4; the increase in glucose AUC0-4h from baseline to day 4 was significantly lower with all AZD9567 doses versus prednisolone 20 mg (AZD9567 20 mg p<0·0001, 40 mg p=0·0001, 80 mg p=0·0001, and 125 mg p=0·0237). INTERPRETATION: AZD9567 appears to be safe and well tolerated in healthy, predominantly white male volunteers and shows promising initial evidence for improved post-prandial glucose control. Studies of longer duration, with a greater proportion of women and other ethnic groups, and in patients requiring anti-inflammatory treatment are needed to characterise the clinical efficacy and safety profile of AZD9567. FUNDING: AstraZeneca.

Prospective observational study in patients with obstructive lung disease: NOVELTY design.

Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have overlapping clinical features and share pathobiological mechanisms but are often considered distinct disorders. Prospective, observational studies across asthma, COPD and asthma-COPD overlap are limited. NOVELTY is a global, prospective observational 3-year study enrolling ∼12 000 patients ≥12 years of age from primary and specialist clinical practices in 19 countries (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02760329). NOVELTY's primary objectives are to describe patient characteristics, treatment patterns and disease burden over time, and to identify phenotypes and molecular endotypes associated with differential outcomes over time in patients with a diagnosis/suspected diagnosis of asthma and/or COPD. NOVELTY aims to recruit real-world patients, unlike clinical studies with restrictive inclusion/exclusion criteria. Data collected at yearly intervals include clinical assessments, spirometry, biospecimens, patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and healthcare utilisation (HCU). PROs and HCU will also be collected 3-monthly via internet/telephone. Data will be used to identify phenotypes and endotypes associated with different trajectories for symptom burden, clinical progression or remission and HCU. Results may allow patient classification across obstructive lung disease by clinical outcomes and biomarker profile, rather than by conventional diagnostic labels and severity categories. NOVELTY will provide a rich data source on obstructive lung disease, to help improve patient outcomes and aid novel drug development.

Airway nitric oxide in patients with cystic fibrosis is associated with pancreatic function, Pseudomonas infection, and polyunsaturated fatty acids.

BACKGROUND: Airway nitric oxide (NO) is low or normal in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients. This may affect bacterial status since NO has antimicrobial properties. Arachidonic acid (AA), which is increased in the serum and airways of CF patients, has been shown to reduce NO levels. The aim of this study was to investigate whether airway NO level correlates with genotype and pancreatic function, and whether low airway NO level is associated with bacterial infection and increased serum AA level in CF patients. METHOD: Nasal NO (nNO) and exhaled NO (eNO) were measured according to the European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society standard in 59 CF patients aged 7 to 55 years, 80% of whom were pancreatic insufficient (PI) and 51% were chronically infected with Pseudomonas aeruginosa. RESULTS: PI CF patients had significantly lower nNO levels than pancreatic-sufficient (PS) patients. Airway NO level did not correlate with lung function or inflammatory parameters. PI patients chronically infected with P aeruginosa had significantly lower nNO levels than noninfected PI patients. nNO level correlated inversely with the AA/docosahexaenoic acid ratio, and eNO with the essential fatty acid (FA) deficiency index, which is the ratio between mead acid and AA. CONCLUSIONS: CF patients with PI, which is associated with more severe genotypes, had lower airway NO levels than patients with PS. Low NO level was correlated to chronic P aeruginosa infection, and an association was found between airway NO level and the abnormal serum phospholipid FA pattern.

The SYGMA programme of phase 3 trials to evaluate the efficacy and safety of budesonide/formoterol given 'as needed' in mild asthma: study protocols for two randomised controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: In many patients with mild asthma, the low frequency of symptoms and the episodic nature of exacerbations make adherence to regular maintenance treatment difficult. This often leads to over-reliance on short-acting ß2-agonist (SABA) reliever medication and under-treatment of the underlying inflammation, with poor control of asthma symptoms and increased risk of exacerbations. The use of budesonide/formoterol 'as needed' in response to symptoms may represent an alternative treatment option for patients with mild asthma. METHODS/DESIGN: The SYmbicort Given as needed in Mild Asthma (SYGMA) programme consists of two 52-week, double-blind, randomised, multicentre, parallel-group, phase 3 trials of patients aged 12 years and older with a clinical diagnosis of asthma for at least 6 months, who would qualify for treatment with regular inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). SYGMA1 aims to recruit 3750 patients who will be randomised to placebo twice daily (bid) plus as-needed budesonide/formoterol 160/4.5 µg, placebo bid plus as-needed terbutaline 0.4 mg, or budesonide 200 µg bid plus as-needed terbutaline 0.4 mg. The primary objective is to demonstrate the superiority of as-needed budesonide/formoterol over as-needed terbutaline for asthma control, as measured by well-controlled asthma weeks; a secondary objective is to establish the noninferiority of as-needed budesonide/formoterol versus maintenance budesonide plus as-needed terbutaline using the same outcome measure. SYGMA2 aims to recruit 4114 patients who will be randomised to placebo bid plus as-needed budesonide/formoterol 160/4.5 µg, or budesonide 200 µg bid plus as-needed terbutaline 0.4 mg. The primary objective is to demonstrate the noninferiority of as-needed budesonide/formoterol over budesonide bid plus as-needed terbutaline as measured by the annualised severe exacerbation rate. In both studies, use of all blinded study inhalers will be recorded electronically using Turbuhaler® Usage Monitors. DISCUSSION: Given the known risks of mild asthma, and known poor adherence with regular inhaled corticosteroids, the results of the SYGMA programme will help to determine the efficacy and safety of as-needed budesonide/formoterol therapy in mild asthma. Patient recruitment is complete, and completion of the phase 3 studies is planned in 2017. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT02149199 SYGMA1 and NCT02224157 SYGMA2. Registered on 16 May 2014 and 19 August 2014, respectively.

Efficacy and safety of a CXCR2 antagonist, AZD5069, in patients with uncontrolled persistent asthma: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Airway neutrophilic inflammation is a pathological feature in some patients with severe asthma. Stimulation of the chemokine receptor CXCR2 mediates neutrophil migration into the airways. We investigated the safety and efficacy of AZD5069, a CXCR2 antagonist, as an add-on therapy in patients with uncontrolled severe asthma. METHODS: In this multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding trial, we enrolled patients aged 18 years or older with uncontrolled asthma despite combination therapy with long-acting ß2 agonists and medium-dose or high-dose inhaled corticosteroids. Patients were randomised in a 1:1:1:1 ratio via an interactive voice-response or web-response system to receive 5, 15, or 45 mg oral AZD5069 twice daily or matched placebo. The primary endpoint was the number of severe asthma exacerbations in 6 months. Safety was assessed in the 6-month treatment period and an optional 6-month safety extension. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01704495. FINDINGS: 640 patients with a mean age of 52 (SD 11·8) years were randomised, 478 to receive AZD5069 (5 mg n=160, 15 mg n=156, and 45 mg n=162) and 162 placebo. No dose of AZD5069 reduced the rate of severe exacerbations compared with placebo (rate ratio for 5 mg 1·29, 90% CI 0·79-2·11; for 15 mg 1·53, 0·95-2·46; and for 45 mg 1·56, 0·98-2·49). Treatment with AZD5069 was generally well tolerated. The most commonly reported adverse event overall was nasopharyngitis, seen in 18 (11·5%) receiving 5 mg, 13 (8·5%) receiving 15 mg, and 18 (11·2%) receiving 45 mg AZD5069, and 31 (19·5%) of those receiving placebo. INTERPRETATION: Treatment with this selective CXCR2 antagonist did not reduce the frequency of severe exacerbations in patients with uncontrolled severe asthma. These findings bring into question the role of CXCR2-mediated neutrophil recruitment in the pathobiology of exacerbations in severe refractory asthma. FUNDING: AstraZeneca.

Small airway function, exhaled NO and airway hyper-responsiveness in paediatric asthma.

BACKGROUND: Asthma is a chronic inflammatory airway disorder known to involve the peripheral airways. Current guidelines state that diagnosis and treatment should be guided by symptoms and spirometry. FEV(1) is, however, a poor marker of small airway function and correlates poorly with asthma control and airway inflammation. AIMS: To assess the contribution of small airway dysfunction and inflammation in paediatric asthma. A secondary aim was to study the associations between small airway dysfunction, airway inflammation and airway hyper-responsiveness (AHR). METHODS: Small airway function was measured as LCI, S(cond) and S(acin), evaluated with the SF(6) multiple breath inert gas washout (MBW) technique, in 47 asthmatic children and 74 healthy controls. Exhaled NO at multiple exhalation flow rates including 50 mL/s (FENO(50)) was assessed to calculate alveolar NO and bronchial NO flux (a surrogate for airway inflammation). AHR was evaluated with isocapnoic dry air hyperventilation challenge in the asthmatic children. RESULTS: S(cond) was elevated in 31 (66%) and S(acin) in 18 (38%) of the asthmatic subjects. LCI was increased and FEV(1) decreased in 7 (15%) of the subjects with asthma. Individuals with AHR had higher S(cond) (p = 0.001) and FENO(50) (p < 0.0001) than those without AHR. The levels of FENO(50) and bronchial NO flux were elevated in asthmatic subjects compared with healthy controls. In asthma, S(cond) correlated with FENO(50) (r(s) = 0.42, p = 0.003) and alveolar NO (r(s) = 0.40, p = 0.011), and S(acin) correlated with alveolar NO (r(s) = 0.40, p = 0.015). CONCLUSION: Dysfunction of small conducting airways is associated with airway inflammation and hyper-responsiveness in paediatric asthma.