Muscle insulin resistance in type 1 diabetes with coronary artery disease.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The risk for coronary artery disease (CAD) is substantially increased in type 1 diabetes and it has been postulated that insulin resistance may contribute to this risk. The current study measured insulin resistance in type 1 diabetes with vs without CAD and with a focus upon skeletal muscle, to test the hypothesis that insulin resistance is more severe in participants who have type 1 diabetes and CAD. Additionally, in type 1 diabetes, we examined the hypothesis that insulin resistance is more severe in soleus (an oxidative type muscle) vs tibialis anterior (a more glycolytic type of muscle). METHODS: Insulin resistance was measured in participants with type 1 diabetes with (n = 9, CAD+) and without CAD (n = 10, CAD-) using euglycaemic insulin infusions combined with positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake into soleus and tibialis anterior skeletal muscles. Coronary artery calcium (CAC) score was quantified by electron beam tomography. RESULTS: CAD+ participants with type 1 diabetes had a >100-fold higher CAC score than did CAD- participants with type 1 diabetes but groups did not differ in HbA1c or insulin dose. During clamp studies, CAD+ and CAD- groups had similar glucose disposal but were insulin resistant compared with historical non-diabetic participants (n = 13). FDG uptake by soleus muscle was similarly reduced, overall, in individuals with type 1 diabetes with or without CAD compared with non-diabetic individuals. However, FDG uptake by tibialis anterior muscle was not reduced in CAD- participants with type 1 diabetes while in CAD+ participants with type 1 diabetes it was 75% greater (p < 0.01). Across all participants with type 1 diabetes, FDG uptake by tibialis anterior muscle correlated positively with CAC severity. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: Our study confirms that systemic and skeletal muscle-specific insulin resistance is seen in type 1 diabetes but found that it does not appear to be more severe in the presence of CAD. There were, however, sharp differences between soleus and tibialis anterior muscles in type 1 diabetes: while insulin resistance was clearly manifest in soleus muscle, and was of equal severity in CAD+ and CAD- participants, tibialis anterior did not suggest insulin resistance in participants with type 1 diabetes, as FDG uptake by tibialis anterior correlated positively with CAC severity and was significantly increased in participants with type 1 diabetes and clinical CAD. Graphical abstract.

Mitochondrial capacity in skeletal muscle is not stimulated by weight loss despite increases in insulin action and decreases in intramyocellular lipid content.

OBJECTIVE: In obesity and type 2 diabetes, exercise combined with weight loss increases skeletal muscle mitochondrial capacity. It remains unclear whether mitochondrial capacity increases because of weight loss, improvements in insulin resistance, or physical training. In this study, we examined the effects of an intervention of weight loss induced by diet and compared these with those of a similar intervention of weight loss by diet with exercise. Both are known to improve insulin resistance, and we tested the hypothesis that physical activity, rather than improved insulin resistance, is required to increase mitochondrial capacity of muscle. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Sixteen sedentary overweight/obese volunteers were randomized to a 16-week intervention of diet (n = 7) or diet plus exercise (n = 9). Insulin sensitivity was measured using euglycemic clamps. Mitochondria were examined in muscle biopsies before and after intervention. We measured mitochondrial content and size by electron microscopy, electron transport chain (ETC) activity, cardiolipin content, and mitochondrial DNA content. Intramyocellular content of lipid (IMCL) and fiber-type distribution were determined by histology. RESULTS: The diet-only and diet plus exercise groups achieved similar weight loss (10.8 and 9.2%, respectively); only the diet plus exercise group improved aerobic capacity. Insulin sensitivity improved similarly in both groups. Mitochondrial content and ETC activity increased following the diet plus exercise intervention but remained unchanged following the diet-only intervention, and mitochondrial size decreased with weight loss despite improvement in insulin resistance. IMCL decreased in the diet-only but not in the diet plus exercise intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Despite similar effects to improve insulin resistance, these interventions had differential effects on mitochondria. Clinically significant weight loss in the absence of increased physical activity ameliorates insulin resistance and IMCL but does not increase muscle mitochondrial capacity in obesity.