RESUMEN
The quest to identify precious metal free hydrogen evolution reaction catalysts has received unprecedented attention in the past decade. In this Review, we focus our attention to recent developments in precious metal free hydrogen evolution reactions in acidic and alkaline electrolyte owing to their relevance to commercial and near-commercial low-temperature electrolyzers. We provide a detailed review and critical analysis of catalyst activity and stability performance measurements and metrics commonly deployed in the literature, as well as review best practices for experimental measurements (both in half-cell three-electrode configurations and in two-electrode device testing). In particular, we discuss the transition from laboratory-scale hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) catalyst measurements to those in single cells, which is a critical aspect crucial for scaling up from laboratory to industrial settings but often overlooked. Furthermore, we review the numerous catalyst design strategies deployed across the precious metal free HER literature. Subsequently, we showcase some of the most commonly investigated families of precious metal free HER catalysts; molybdenum disulfide-based, transition metal phosphides, and transition metal carbides for acidic electrolyte; nickel molybdenum and transition metal phosphides for alkaline. This includes a comprehensive analysis comparing the HER activity between several families of materials highlighting the recent stagnation with regards to enhancing the intrinsic activity of precious metal free hydrogen evolution reaction catalysts. Finally, we summarize future directions and provide recommendations for the field in this area of electrocatalysis.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Balance impairments, that lead to falls, are one of the main symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD). Telerehabilitation is becoming more common for people with PD; however, balance is particularly challenging to assess and treat virtually. The feasibility and efficacy of virtual assessment and virtual treatment of balance in people with PD are unknown. The present study protocol has three aims: I) to determine if a virtual balance and gait assessment (instrumented L-shape mobility test) with wearable sensors can predict a gold-standard, in-person clinical assessment of balance, the Mini Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest); II) to explore the effects of 12 sessions of balance telerehabilitation and unsupervised home exercises on balance, gait, executive function, and clinical scales; and III) to explore if improvements after balance telerehabilitation transfer to daily-life mobility, as measured by instrumented socks with inertial sensors worn for 7 days. METHODS: The TelePD Trial is a prospective, single-center, parallel-group, single-blind, pilot, randomized, controlled trial. This trial will enroll 80 eligible people with PD. Participants will be randomized at a 1:1 ratio into receiving home-based balance exercises in either: 1) balance telerehabilitation (experimental group, n = 40) or 2) unsupervised exercises (control group, n = 40). Both groups will perform 12 sessions of exercise at home that are 60 min long. The primary outcome will be Mini-BESTest. The secondary outcomes will be upper and lower body gait metrics from a prescribed task (instrumented L-shape mobility test); daily-life mobility measures over 7 days with wearable sensors in socks, instrumented executive function tests, and clinical scales. Baseline testing and 7 days of daily-life mobility measurement will occur before and after the intervention period. CONCLUSION: The TelePD Trial will be the first to explore the usefulness of using wearable sensor-based measures of balance and gait remotely to assess balance, the feasibility and efficacy of balance telerehabilitation in people with PD, and the translation of balance improvements after telerehabilitation to daily-life mobility. These results will help to develop a more effective home-based balance telerehabilitation and virtual assessment that can be used remotely in people with balance impairments. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was prospectively registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05680597).
Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Parkinson , Telerrehabilitación , Dispositivos Electrónicos Vestibles , Humanos , Terapia por Ejercicio/métodos , Enfermedad de Parkinson/complicaciones , Equilibrio Postural , Estudios Prospectivos , Método Simple Ciego , Telerrehabilitación/métodos , Proyectos PilotoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The Functional Gait Assessment (FGA) and High Level Mobility Assessment Tool (HiMAT) are clinical batteries used to assess people with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). However, neither assessment was specifically developed for people with mTBI; the FGA was developed to evaluate vestibular deficits, and the HiMAT was developed for individuals with more severe TBI. To maximize the sensitivity and reduce the time burden of these assessments, the purpose of this study was to determine the combination of FGA and HiMAT items that best discriminates persons with persistent symptoms from mTBI from healthy controls. METHODS: Fifty-three symptomatic civilians with persistent symptoms from mTBI (21% male, aged 31 (9.5) years, 328 [267] days since concussion) and 57 healthy adults (28% male, aged 32 (9.6) years) participated across 3 sites. The FGA and HiMAT were evaluated sequentially as part of a larger study. To determine the best combination of items, a lasso-based generalized linear model (glm) was fit to all data. RESULTS: The area under the curve (AUC) for FGA and HiMAT total scores was 0.68 and 0.66, respectively. Lasso regression selected 4 items, including FGA Gait with Horizontal Head Turns and with Pivot Turn, and HiMAT Fast Forward and Backward Walk, and yielded an AUC (95% confidence interval) of 0.71 (0.61-0.79) using standard scoring. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The results provide initial evidence supporting a reduced, 4-Item Hybrid Assessment of Mobility for mTBI (HAM-4-mTBI) for monitoring individuals with mTBI. Future work should validate the HAM-4-mTBI and investigate its utility for tracking progression throughout rehabilitation.Video Abstract available for more insights from the authors (see the Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A409 ).
Asunto(s)
Conmoción Encefálica , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Conmoción Encefálica/diagnóstico , Marcha , Caminata , Limitación de la MovilidadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the relation between cognitive and motor performance in individuals with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and examine differences in both cognitive and motor performance between adults after mTBI and healthy controls. DESIGN: Multi-center, cross-sectional study. SETTING: Three institutional sites (Courage Kenny Research Center, Minneapolis, MN, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, and University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT). PARTICIPANTS: Data were collected from 110 participants (N=110), including those with mTBI and healthy controls, who completed cognitive and physical performance assessments. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. OUTCOME MEASURES: Cognitive assessments involved the Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics to evaluate domains of attention, memory, reaction time, processing speed, and executive function. Physical performance was evaluated through clinical performance assessments, such as the 1-min walk test, the modified Illinois Agility Test, the Functional Gait Assessment Tool, the High-Level Mobility Assessment Tool, a complex turning course, and a 4-Item Hybrid Assessment of Mobility for mTBI. Participants also completed additional trials of the 1-min walk test, modified Illinois Agility Test, and complex turning course with a simultaneous cognitive task. RESULTS: Individuals with mTBI performed worse on cognitive assessments, as well as several of the physical performance assessments compared with healthy controls. Complex tasks were more strongly related to cognitive assessments compared with simple walking tasks. CONCLUSIONS: Combining complex motor tasks with cognitive demands may better demonstrate functional performance in individuals recovering from mTBI. By understanding the relation between cognitive and physical performance in individuals recovering from mTBI, clinicians may be able to improve clinical care and assist in return to activity decision-making.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Unconstrained head motion is necessary to scan for visual cues during navigation, for minimizing threats, and to allow regulation of balance. Following mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) people may experience alterations in head movement kinematics, which may be pronounced during gait tasks. Gait speed may also be impacted by the need to turn the head while walking in these individuals. The aim of this study was to examine head kinematics during dynamic gait tasks and the interaction between kinematics and gait speed in people with persistent symptoms after mTBI. SETTING: A clinical assessment laboratory. DESIGN: A cross-sectional, matched-cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-five individuals with a history of mTBI and 46 age-matched control individuals. MAIN MEASURES: All participants were tested at a single time point and completed the Functional Gait Assessment (FGA) while wearing a suite of body-mounted inertial measurement units (IMUs). Data collected from the IMUs were gait speed, and peak head rotation speed and amplitude in the yaw and pitch planes during the FGA-1, -3, and -4 tasks. RESULTS: Participants with mTBI demonstrated significantly slower head rotations in the yaw ( P = .0008) and pitch ( P = .002) planes. They also demonstrated significantly reduced amplitude of yaw plane head rotations ( P < .0001), but not pitch plane head rotations ( P = .84). Participants with mTBI had significantly slower gait speed during normal gait (FGA-1) ( P < .001) and experienced a significantly greater percent decrease in gait speed than healthy controls when walking with yaw plane head rotations (FGA-3) ( P = .02), but not pitch plane head rotations (FGA-4) ( P = .11). CONCLUSIONS: Participants with mTBI demonstrated smaller amplitudes and slower speeds of yaw plane head rotations and slower speeds of pitch plane head rotations during gait. Additionally, people with mTBI walked slower during normal gait and demonstrated a greater reduction in gait speed while walking with yaw plane head rotations compared with healthy controls.
Asunto(s)
Conmoción Encefálica , Movimientos de la Cabeza , Humanos , Movimientos de la Cabeza/fisiología , Velocidad al Caminar , Conmoción Encefálica/complicaciones , Estudios Transversales , Estudios de Cohortes , Caminata/fisiología , Marcha/fisiologíaRESUMEN
After a mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), dizziness and balance problems are frequently reported, affecting individuals' daily lives and functioning. Vestibular rehabilitation is a standard treatment approach for addressing these issues, but its efficacy in this population remains inconclusive. A potential reason for suboptimal outcomes is the lack of objective monitoring of exercise performance, which is crucial for therapeutic success. This study utilized wearable inertial measurement units (IMUs) to quantify exercise performance in individuals with mTBI during home-based vestibular rehabilitation exercises. Seventy-three people with mTBI and fifty healthy controls were enrolled. Vestibular exercises were performed, and IMUs measured forehead and sternum velocities and range of motions. The mTBI group demonstrated a slower forehead peak angular velocity in all exercises, which may be a compensatory strategy to manage balance issues or symptom exacerbation. Additionally, the mTBI group exhibited a larger forehead range of motion during specific exercises, potentially linked to proprioceptive deficits. These findings emphasize the usefulness of utilizing IMUs to monitor the quality of home-based vestibular exercises for individuals with mTBI and the potential for IMUs improving rehabilitation outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Conmoción Encefálica , Dispositivos Electrónicos Vestibles , Humanos , Conmoción Encefálica/diagnóstico , Ejercicio Físico , Terapia por Ejercicio , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to summarize the results related to the effects of auditory cues on static postural control. METHODS: MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, LILACS, CINAHL, CENTRAL, Web of Science, PEDro, and Google Scholar were searched from inception until September 2020. Risk of bias was evaluated by both reviewers using Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale (NOS). RESULTS: Twelve studies with 403 participants were included in the review and 9 studies with 305 participants in the meta-analysis. Results show that auditory cues have significant effects on postural sway in the anterior-posterior direction (p = 0.001), postural sway in the medial-lateral direction (p = 0.001), and static balance (p = 0.001). A low to high heterogeneity was observed across all comparisons. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this meta-analysis revealed that auditory cues decrease postural sway in the anterior-posterior and medial-lateral direction; it also improves static balance. Thus, it can be concluded that auditory cues improve static postural control. Our results suggest that the auditory system can be a determinant of static postural control along with other sensory systems including visual, vestibular, and proprioception systems. Also, this study implies that auditory cues can be a significant therapeutic approach to improve static postural control.
Asunto(s)
Señales (Psicología) , Vestíbulo del Laberinto , Humanos , Propiocepción , Equilibrio PosturalRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Multimodal physical therapy for mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) has been shown to improve recovery. Due to the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, a clinical trial assessing the timing of multimodal intervention was adapted for telerehabilitation. This pilot study explored feasibility and adoption of an in-person rehabilitation program for subacute mTBI delivered through telerehabilitation. METHODS: Fifty-six in-person participants-9 males; mean (SD) age 34.3 (12.2); 67 (31) days post-injury-and 17 telerehabilitation participants-8 males; age 38.3 (12.7); 61 (37) days post-injury-with subacute mTBI (between 2 and 12 weeks from injury) were enrolled. Intervention included 8, 60-minute visits over 6 weeks and included subcategories that targeted cervical spine, cardiovascular, static balance, and dynamic balance impairments. Telerehabilitation was modified to be safely performed at home with minimal equipment. Outcome measures included feasibility (the number that withdrew from the study, session attendance, home exercise program adherence, adverse events, telerehabilitation satisfaction, and progression of exercises performed), and changes in mTBI symptoms pre- and post-rehabilitation were estimated with Hedges' g effect sizes. RESULTS: In-person and telerehabilitation had a similar study withdrawal rate (13% vs 12%), high session attendance (92% vs 97%), and no adverse events. The telerehabilitation group found the program easy to use (4.2/5), were satisfied with care (4.7/5), and thought it helped recovery (4.7/5). The telerehabilitation intervention was adapted by removing manual therapy and cardiovascular portions and decreasing dynamic balance exercises compared with the in-person group. The in-person group had a large effect size (-0.94) in decreases in symptoms following rehabilitation, while the telerehabilitation group had a moderate effect size (-0.73). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Telerehabilitation may be feasible for subacute mTBI. Limited ability to address cervical spine, cardiovascular, and dynamic balance domains along with underdosage of exercise progression may explain group differences in symptom resolution.Video Abstract available for more insights from the authors (see the Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, available at: http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A392 ).
Asunto(s)
Conmoción Encefálica , COVID-19 , Telerrehabilitación , Adulto , Terapia por Ejercicio , Humanos , Masculino , Proyectos PilotoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to (1) explore differences in vestibular ocular motor screening (VOMS) symptoms between healthy adults and adults with persistent symptoms after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), and (2) explore the relationships between VOMS symptoms and other measures (self-reported vestibular symptoms, clinical measures of balance and gait, and higher-level motor ability tasks). SETTING: Research laboratory setting. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-three persons with persistent symptoms (>3 weeks) following mTBI and 57 healthy controls were recruited. Eligibility for participation included being 18 to 50 years of age and free of medical conditions that may affect balance, with the exception of recent mTBI for the mTBI group. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. MAIN MEASURES: The primary outcomes were the VOMS symptom scores and near point of convergence (NPC) distance. Secondary outcomes included the Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) total and subdomain scores, sway area, Functional Gait Analysis total score, gait speed, and modified Illinois Agility Task completion time, and Revised High-Level Mobility Assessment Tool total score. RESULTS: The mTBI group reported more VOMS symptoms ( z range, -7.28 to -7.89) and a further NPC ( t = -4.16) than healthy controls (all P s < .001). DHI self-reported symptoms (total and all subdomain scores) were strongly associated with the VOMS symptom scores (rho range, 0.53-0.68; all P s < .001). No significant relationships existed between VOMS symptoms and other measures. CONCLUSION: Significant group differences support the relevance of the VOMS for mTBI in an age-diverse sample with persistent symptoms. Furthermore, strong association with DHI symptoms supports the ability of the VOMS to capture vestibular complaints in this population.
Asunto(s)
Conmoción Encefálica , Adulto , Conmoción Encefálica/complicaciones , Conmoción Encefálica/diagnóstico , Estudios Transversales , Mareo/diagnóstico , Mareo/etiología , HumanosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Physical function remains a crucial component of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) assessment and recovery. Traditional approaches to assess mTBI lack sensitivity to detect subtle deficits post-injury, which can impact a patient's quality of life, daily function and can lead to chronic issues. Inertial measurement units (IMU) provide an opportunity for objective assessment of physical function and can be used in any environment. A single waist worn IMU has the potential to provide broad/macro quantity characteristics to estimate gait mobility, as well as more high-resolution micro spatial or temporal gait characteristics (herein, we refer to these as measures of quality). Our recent work showed that quantity measures of mobility were less sensitive than measures of turning quality when comparing the free-living physical function of chronic mTBI patients and healthy controls. However, no studies have examined whether measures of gait quality in free-living conditions can differentiate chronic mTBI patients and healthy controls. This study aimed to determine whether measures of free-living gait quality can differentiate chronic mTBI patients from controls. METHODS: Thirty-two patients with chronic self-reported balance symptoms after mTBI (age: 40.88 ± 11.78 years, median days post-injury: 440.68 days) and 23 healthy controls (age: 48.56 ± 22.56 years) were assessed for ~ 7 days using a single IMU at the waist on a belt. Free-living gait quality metrics were evaluated for chronic mTBI patients and controls using multi-variate analysis. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) and Area Under the Curve (AUC) analysis were used to determine outcome sensitivity to chronic mTBI. RESULTS: Free-living gait quality metrics were not different between chronic mTBI patients and controls (all p > 0.05) whilst controlling for age and sex. ROC and AUC analysis showed stride length (0.63) was the most sensitive measure for differentiating chronic mTBI patients from controls. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that gait quality metrics determined through a free-living assessment were not significantly different between chronic mTBI patients and controls. These results suggest that measures of free-living gait quality were not impaired in our chronic mTBI patients, and/or, that the metrics chosen were not sensitive enough to detect subtle impairments in our sample.
Asunto(s)
Conmoción Encefálica , Adulto , Anciano , Conmoción Encefálica/complicaciones , Conmoción Encefálica/diagnóstico , Marcha , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Calidad de VidaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To examine whether horizontal head turns while seated or while walking, when instrumented with inertial sensors, were sensitive to the acute effects of concussion and whether horizontal head turns had utility for concussion management. SETTING: Applied field setting, athletic training room. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-four collegiate athletes with sports-related concussion and 25 healthy control athletes. DESIGN: Case-control; longitudinal. MAIN MEASURES: Peak head angular velocity and peak head angle (range of motion) when performing head turns toward an auditory cue while seated or walking. Gait speed when walking with and without head turns. RESULTS: Athletes with acute sports-related concussion turned their head slower than healthy control subjects initially (group ß = -49.47; SE = 16.33; P = .003) and gradually recovered to healthy control levels within 10 days postconcussion (group × time ß = 4.80; SE = 1.41; P < .001). Peak head velocity had fair diagnostic accuracy in differentiating subjects with acute concussion compared with controls (areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] = 0.71-0.73). Peak head angle (P = .17) and gait speed (P = .64) were not different between groups and showed poor diagnostic utility (AUC = 0.57-0.62). CONCLUSION: Inertial sensors can improve traditional clinical assessments by quantifying subtle, nonobservable deficits in people following sports-related concussion.
Asunto(s)
Conmoción Encefálica/fisiopatología , Movimientos de la Cabeza/fisiología , Trastornos del Movimiento/fisiopatología , Caminata/fisiología , Traumatismos en Atletas/fisiopatología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Señales (Psicología) , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Síndrome Posconmocional/diagnóstico , Velocidad al Caminar/fisiología , Dispositivos Electrónicos Vestibles , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
The purpose of this study was to conduct an overview of systematic reviews (SRs) to appraise the published evidence related to pharmacological interventions after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Searches were conducted with Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science, PubMed. 780 retrieved SRs underwent a two-level screening to determine inclusion. Data extracted included participant characteristics, TBI severity, study design, pharmacological interventions, and outcomes. SRs were assessed for methodological quality by using the AMSTAR measurement tool. After removing duplicates, 166/780 SRs published between 1990-2017 were reviewed, 62 of which met inclusion criteria. More than 90 drugs and 22 substance-classes were extracted. Most medications were administered during the acute stage. Mild TBI was included in 3% of the SRs. Physiological outcomes comprised 45% of the SRs, primarily mortality. Activities of daily living (ADLs) outcomes constituted 22% of the SRs followed by cognition (13%) and psychological/behavioral outcomes (13%). Only 7% of the SRs assessed adverse events. Inconsistencies in definitions, methods, and heterogeneity of instruments used to measure treatment response were noted. Only a third of the SRs had high methodological quality. Most SRs had heterogeneous TBI samples, outcomes, or methodologies making it difficult to synthesize findings into recommended guidelines. This study demonstrated a need for adequately powered and rigorous randomized clinical trials (RCTs) to provide generalizable evidence on the effectiveness of pharmacologic interventions for TBI. PROSPERO Registration: CRD42015017355.
Asunto(s)
Actividades Cotidianas/psicología , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/tratamiento farmacológico , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/psicología , Metaanálisis como Asunto , Revisiones Sistemáticas como Asunto , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Antifibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/diagnóstico , Bloqueadores de los Canales de Calcio/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Wearable inertial measurement units (IMUs) may provide useful, objective information to clinicians interested in quantifying head movements as patients' progress through vestibular rehabilitation. The purpose of this study was to validate an IMU-based algorithm against criterion data (motion capture) to estimate average head and trunk range of motion (ROM) and average peak velocity. Ten participants completed two trials of standing and walking tasks while moving the head with and without moving the trunk. Validity was assessed using a combination of Intra-class Correlation Coefficients (ICC), root mean square error (RMSE), and percent error. Bland-Altman plots were used to assess bias. Excellent agreement was found between the IMU and criterion data for head ROM and peak rotational velocity (average ICC > 0.9). The trunk showed good agreement for most conditions (average ICC > 0.8). Average RMSE for both ROM (head = 2.64°; trunk = 2.48°) and peak rotational velocity (head = 11.76 °/s; trunk = 7.37 °/s) was low. The average percent error was below 5% for head and trunk ROM and peak rotational velocity. No clear pattern of bias was found for any measure across conditions. Findings suggest IMUs may provide a promising solution for estimating head and trunk movement, and a practical solution for tracking progression throughout rehabilitation or home exercise monitoring.
Asunto(s)
Conmoción Encefálica/fisiopatología , Monitoreo Fisiológico , Dispositivos Electrónicos Vestibles , Adulto , Algoritmos , Conmoción Encefálica/rehabilitación , Femenino , Cabeza/fisiología , Humanos , Masculino , Movimiento/fisiología , Postura/fisiología , Posición de Pie , Pruebas de Función Vestibular/métodos , Caminata/fisiologíaRESUMEN
Cyanine dyes, often used in dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs), form a range of molecular species from monomers to large H and J aggregates in both solution and when adsorbed at a photoelectrode surface. To determine the relative capability of the different dye species to inject photoexcited electrons into a wideband gap oxide semiconductor, sensitization at a single-crystal zinc oxide surface was studied by simultaneous attenuated reflection (ATR) ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis) absorption and photocurrent spectroscopy measurements. ATR measurements enable identification of the dye species populating the surface with simultaneous photocurrent spectroscopy to identify the contribution of the various dye forms to photocurrent signal. We study the dye 2,2'-carboxymethylthiodicarbocyanine bromide that is particularly prone to aggregation both in solution and at the surface of sensitized oxide semiconductors.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Complaints of imbalance are common non-resolving signs in individuals with post-concussive syndrome. Yet, there is no consensus rehabilitation for non-resolving balance complaints following mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). The heterogeneity of balance deficits and varied rates of recovery suggest varied etiologies and a need for interventions that address the underlying causes of poor balance function. Our central hypothesis is that most chronic balance deficits after mTBI result from impairments in central sensorimotor integration that may be helped by rehabilitation. Two studies are described to 1) characterize balance deficits in people with mTBI who have chronic, non-resolving balance deficits compared to healthy control subjects, and 2) determine the efficacy of an augmented vestibular rehabilitation program using auditory biofeedback to improve central sensorimotor integration, static and dynamic balance, and functional activity in patients with chronic mTBI. METHODS: Two studies are described. Study 1 is a cross-sectional study to take place jointly at Oregon Health and Science University and the VA Portland Health Care System. The study participants will be individuals with non-resolving complaints of balance following mTBI and age- and gender-matched controls who meet all inclusion criteria. The primary outcome will be measures of central sensorimotor integration derived from a novel central sensorimotor integration test. Study 2 is a randomized controlled intervention to take place at Oregon Health & Science University. In this study, participants from Study 1 with mTBI and abnormal central sensorimotor integration will be randomized into two rehabilitation interventions. The interventions will be 6 weeks of vestibular rehabilitation 1) with or 2) without the use of an auditory biofeedback device. The primary outcome measure is the daily activity of the participants measured using an inertial sensor. DISCUSSION: The results of these two studies will improve our understanding of the nature of balance deficits in people with mTBI by providing quantitative metrics of central sensorimotor integration, balance, and vestibular and ocular motor function. Study 2 will examine the potential for augmented rehabilitation interventions to improve central sensorimotor integration. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov ( NCT02748109 ).
Asunto(s)
Biorretroalimentación Psicológica/métodos , Conmoción Encefálica/complicaciones , Conmoción Encefálica/rehabilitación , Equilibrio Postural , Trastornos de la Sensación/diagnóstico , Trastornos de la Sensación/rehabilitación , Adolescente , Adulto , Conmoción Encefálica/diagnóstico , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Protocolos Clínicos , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos de la Sensación/complicaciones , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The ability to turn while walking is essential for daily living activities. Turning is slower and more steps are required to complete a turn in people with Parkinson's disease (PD) compared to control subjects but it is unclear whether this altered strategy is pathological or compensatory. The aim of our study is to characterize the dynamics of postural stability during continuous series of turns while walking at various speeds in subjects with PD compared to control subjects. We hypothesize that people with PD slow their turns to compensate for impaired postural stability. METHOD: Motion analysis was used to compare gait kinematics between 12 subjects with PD in their ON state and 19 control subjects while walking continuously on a route composed of short, straight paths interspersed with eleven right and left turns between 30 and 180°. We asked subjects to perform the route at three different speeds: preferred, faster, and slower. Features describing gait spatio-temporal parameters and turning characteristics were extracted from marker trajectories. In addition, to quantify dynamic stability during turns we calculated the distance between the lateral edge of the base of support and the body center of mass, as well as the extrapolated body center of mass. RESULTS: Subjects with PD had slower turns and did not widen the distance between their feet for turning, compared to control subjects. Subjects with PD tended to cut short their turns compared to control subjects, resulting in a shorter walking path. Dynamic stability was smaller in the PD, compared to the healthy group, particularly for fast turning angles of 90°. CONCLUSIONS: The slower turning speeds and larger turning angles in people with PD might reflect a compensatory strategy to prevent dynamic postural instability given their narrow base of support.
Asunto(s)
Marcha/fisiología , Enfermedad de Parkinson/fisiopatología , Equilibrio Postural/fisiología , Anciano , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Comparative studies of exercise interventions for people with Parkinson disease (PD) rarely considered how one should deliver the intervention. The objective of this study was to compare the success of exercise when administered by (1) home exercise program, (2) individualized physical therapy, or (3) a group class. We examined if common comorbidities associated with PD impacted success of each intervention. METHODS: Fifty-eight people (age = 63.9 ± 8 years) with PD participated. People were randomized into (1) home exercise program, (2) individual physical therapy, or (3) group class intervention. All arms were standardized and based on the Agility Boot Camp exercise program for PD, 3 times per week for 4 weeks. The primary outcome measure was the 7-item Physical Performance Test. Other measures of balance, gait, mobility, quality of life, balance confidence, depressions, apathy, self-efficacy and UPDRS-Motor, and activity of daily living scores were included. RESULTS: Only the individual group significantly improved in the Physical Performance Test. The individual exercise showed the most improvements in functional and balance measures, whereas the group class showed the most improvements in gait. The home exercise program improved the least across all outcomes. Several factors effected success, particularly for the home group. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: An unsupervised, home exercise program is the least effective way to deliver exercise to people with PD, and individual and group exercises have differing benefits. Furthermore, people with PD who also have other comorbidities did better in a program directly supervised by a physical therapist.Video Abstract available for additional insights from the authors (see Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A112).
Asunto(s)
Terapia por Ejercicio/organización & administración , Enfermedad de Parkinson/rehabilitación , Anciano , Terapia por Ejercicio/métodos , Terapia por Ejercicio/normas , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To report the frequency, severity, and types of comorbidities in people with Parkinson disease (PD) using a validated self-report comorbidity screening tool, and to determine the relationship between comorbidity and functional mobility. DESIGN: A secondary analysis and cross-sectional observational study design. SETTING: University hospital; outpatient balance disorders laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Persons with mild to moderate idiopathic PD (N=76). INTERVENTION: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The Cumulative Illness Rating Scale-Geriatric (CIRS-G) and a comprehensive mobility assessment including gait (distance walked in 3 min), balance (mini-Balance Evaluation Systems Test), and physical function (Physical Performance Test). RESULTS: All participants reported comorbidities in addition to their diagnosed PD. The average ± SD number of comorbidities was 6.96 ± 2.0 (range, 2-11), and the total CIRS-G score ± SD was 12.7 ± 4.8. The most commonly reported organ systems with comorbidity were eyes and ears (89%), psychiatric (68%), musculoskeletal (64%), lower gastrointestinal (62%), respiratory (60.5%), upper gastrointestinal (59.2%), and genitourinary (53.9%). The total CIRS-G score was significantly related to functional mobility: gait (r=-.53, P=.0001), balance (r=-.43, P=.0003), and physical performance (r=-.36, P=.0041). Of the original 14 organ systems measured, there were 7 systems that, when combined, best predicted gait performance, 6 systems combined that best predicted balance performance, and 4 systems combined that predicted functional performance. CONCLUSIONS: This study reports a high frequency of multiple medical system comorbidity in people with mild to moderate PD. Furthermore, comorbidity scores were associated with mobility disability: gait, balance, and physical function. Early intervention is important to delay mobility disability in PD, and we recommend that people with PD found to have comorbidities should be screened for balance and gait deficits.
Asunto(s)
Marcha/fisiología , Limitación de la Movilidad , Enfermedad de Parkinson/epidemiología , Enfermedad de Parkinson/fisiopatología , Equilibrio Postural/fisiología , Desempeño Psicomotor , Actividades Cotidianas , Anciano , Comorbilidad , Estudios Transversales , Prueba de Esfuerzo , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Índice de Severidad de la EnfermedadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether alterations to the Balance Error Scoring System (BESS), such as modified conditions and/or instrumentation, would improve the ability to correctly classify traumatic brain injury (TBI) status in patients with mild TBI with persistent self-reported balance complaints. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Outpatient clinic. PARTICIPANTS: Subjects (n=13; age, 16.3±2y) with a recent history of concussion (mild TBI group) and demographically matched control subjects (n=13; age, 16.7±2y; control group). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome measures included the BESS, modified BESS, instrumented BESS, and instrumented modified BESS. All subjects were tested on the noninstrumented BESS and modified BESS and were scored by visual observation of instability in 6 and 3 stance conditions, respectively. Instrumentation of these 2 tests used 1 inertial sensor with an accelerometer and gyroscope to quantify bidirectional body sway. RESULTS: Scores from the BESS and the modified BESS tests were similar between groups. However, results from the instrumented measures using the inertial sensor were significantly different between groups. The instrumented modified BESS had superior diagnostic classification and the largest area under the curve when compared with the other balance measures. CONCLUSIONS: A concussion may disrupt the sensory processing required for optimal postural control, which was measured by sway during quiet stance. These results suggest that the use of portable inertial sensors may be useful in the move toward more objective and sensitive measures of balance control postconcussion, but more work is needed to increase sensitivity.