Serum amyloid A and C-reactive protein positive nodule in alcoholic liver cirrhosis, hard to make definite diagnosis.

We describe a case of serum amyloid A (SAA) and C-reactive protein (CRP) positive nodule detected by immunohistochemical analysis in a 37-year-old woman with alcohol-related cirrhosis. Imaging studies at first admission pointed to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), a dysplastic nodule, an inflammatory pseudotumor or focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH). Ultrasonography-guided biopsy in Segment 2 showed minimal atypical changes, except for a slight increase in cell density and micronodular cirrhosis in the non-nodular portion. gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging carried out after a year and a half revealed hypervascularity in the arterial phase and isointensity in the hepatobiliary phase. Three years thereafter, however, the imaging displayed a change from isointensity to a defect in the hepatobiliary phase, and the nodule demonstrated minimal histological atypia. Immunohistochemical staining of the nodule was positive for SAA, CRP, liver fatty acid-binding protein and glutamine synthetase, but negative for ß-catenin, heat shock protein 70 and Glypican 3. Organic anion transporter (OATP)8 staining was weaker in the nodule than in the non-nodular portion of the alcohol-related micronodular cirrhosis. The nodule was diagnosed as an SAA and CRP positive nodule, and HCC was ruled out. Despite the change from isointensity to a defect in the hepatobiliary phase, no evidence of HCC was found in the biopsy specimen. The change may be explained more by the weak OATP8 staining compared with that of alcohol-related liver cirrhosis than by malignant transformation into HCC.

Diagnostic value of endoscopic ultrasound-guided directional eFLOW in solid pancreatic lesions.

AIM: Ultrasound using microbubble-based contrast agents is useful for vascular imaging. Directional eFLOW (D-eFLOW) is a novel technology for vascular assessment that provides high spatial and temporal resolution. The purpose of this study was to investigate the utility of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided D-eFlow before and after administration of an ultrasound contrast agent (USCA) for assessing the vascularity of solid pancreatic lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: D-eFlow was compared to power Doppler EUS (PD-EUS) or color Doppler EUS (CD-EUS) before and after USCA injection. We also evaluated the Visual Vascular Assessment (ViVA) scale for the estimation of vascularity and investigated its reliability using the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC). From January 2007 to March 2007, 35 patients (mean age, 64.5 years old; age range, 28-81 years) underwent EUS followed by D-eFLOW EUS, PD-EUS, and CD-EUS before and after administration of USCA. The pancreatic parenchymal ViVA score, pancreatic vascular pattern, and ICC were evaluated for all lesions. RESULTS: Concerning the sensitivity for detection of the hypovascular pattern in pancreatic adenocarcinoma, D-eFLOW (before and after USCA) had similar sensitivity to PD-EUS (before and after USCA) and CD-EUS (before and after USCA). D-eFLOW after contrast showed the highest accuracy (82.3 %) and negative predictive value (53.8 %) among all the modalities investigated. There was a good correlation among the ViVA scores for D-eFLOW before contrast, those for D-eFLOW EUS, and those for PD-EUS and CD-EUS. The reliability of the ViVA scale was excellent with an ICC of 0.81. In conclusion, D-eFLOW EUS is a sensitive, reliable, and highly accurate method of assessment of pancreatic vascularity. D-eFLOW EUS with contrast was more sensitive than PD-EUS and CD-EUS for assessment of pancreatic vascularity.

Characterization of small solid tumors in the pancreas: the value of contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography.

OBJECTIVES: Contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography (CH-EUS), a novel technology, visualizes parenchymal perfusion in the pancreas. This study prospectively evaluated how accurately CH-EUS characterizes pancreatic lesions and compared its diagnostic ability with that of contrast-enhanced multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) and endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA). METHODS: A total of 277 consecutive patients with pancreatic solid lesions that were detected by conventional EUS underwent CH-EUS for evaluation of vascularity. After infusing an ultrasound contrast, CH-EUS was performed by using an echoendoscope and a specific mode for contrast harmonic imaging. On the basis of the intensity of enhancement, the lesions were categorized into four patterns: nonenhancement, hypoenhancement, isoenhancement, and hyperenhancement. For comparison, all patients underwent MDCT. The ability of CH-EUS to differentiate ductal carcinomas from the other solid tumors, particularly small lesions (≤2 cm in diameter) was assessed, and compared with the differentiating abilities of MDCT and EUS-FNA. RESULTS: In terms of reading the CH-EUS images, the κ-coefficient of the interobserver agreement test was 0.94 (P<0.001). CH-EUS-depicted hypoenhancement diagnosed ductal carcinomas with a sensitivity and specificity of 95.1% (95% confidence interval (CI) 92.7-96.7%) and 89.0% (95% CI 83.0-93.1%), respectively. For diagnosing small carcinomas by CH-EUS, the sensitivity and specificity were 91.2 % (95% CI 82.5-95.1%) and 94.4% (95% CI 86.2-98.1%), respectively. CH-EUS-depicted hypervascular enhancement diagnosed neuroendocrine tumors with a sensitivity and specificity of 78.9% (95% CI 61.4-89.7%) and 98.7% (95% CI 96.7-98.8%), respectively. Although CH-EUS and MDCT did not differ significantly in diagnostic ability with regard to all lesions, CH-EUS was superior to MDCT in diagnosing small (≤2 cm) carcinomas (P<0.05). In 12 neoplasms that MDCT failed to detect, 7 ductal carcinomas and 2 neuroendocrine tumors had hypoenhancement and hyperenhancement on CH-EUS, respectively. When CH-EUS was combined with EUS-FNA, the sensitivity of EUS-FNA increased from 92.2 to 100%. CONCLUSIONS: CH-EUS is useful for characterizing conventional EUS-detected solid pancreatic lesions. EUS equipped with contrast harmonic imaging may play an important role in the characterization of small tumors that other imaging methods fail to depict and may improve the diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA.

Endoscopic ultrasonography and contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasonography.

Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is superior to all other imaging modalities in detecting small pancreatic cancers. However, its ability to characterize hypoechoic pancreatic masses is limited: most carcinomas, neuroendocrine tumors, and inflammatory pseudotumors are simply depicted as hypoechoic masses. Contrast enhancement helps EUS to characterize such hypoechoic masses. Intravenous ultrasound (US) agents increase the signal from the blood and, thus, act as amplifiers and improve visualization of blood flow in small vessels using Doppler US. Contrast-enhanced Doppler EUS can differentiate small pancreatic carcinomas that cannot be detected by other imaging modalities. The development of second-generation US contrast agents and an EUS system with a broad-band transducer enabled the visualization of microvessels and the parenchymal perfusion in the pancreas. This contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS has shown that most pancreatic cancers exhibit hypovascular heterogeneous enhancement with irregular network-like microvessels. Moreover, it can diagnose pancreatic cancers with a high sensitivity (89-92%).

Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided biliary drainage: evaluation of a choledochoduodenostomy technique.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided choledochoduodenostomy (CDS) is as an alternative to percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) in patients with biliary obstruction when endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage (ERBD) is unsuccessful. PURPOSE: We reviewed our experience and technique in patients undergoing EUS-CDS. PATIENTS: Over a 2-year period to December 2008, 15 patients with unsuccessful ERBD underwent EUS-CDS. METHODS: EUS-guided needle puncture was performed to access the bile duct from the duodenal bulb. After cholangiography, a guidewire was inserted through the needle and directed to the hepatic hilum. The punctured fistula was then dilated with a biliary dilator and a plastic stent was inserted. RESULTS: The technical success rate of EUS-CDS was 93% (14/15 patients); 1 patient underwent an EUS-guided rendezvous approach because the choledochoduodenal fistula could not be dilated. Decompression of the bile duct was achieved in all patients. Complications included cholangitis in 4 patients, self-limiting local peritonitis in 2 and distal stent migration in 1 patient. The median follow-up time was 125 days and the median duration of stent patency was 99 days. CONCLUSION: EUS-CDS may be effective for patients following unsuccessful ERBD and offers an attractive alternative to PTBD.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided neurolysis in pancreatic cancer.

Abdominal pain in patients with pancreatic cancer is a common symptom that is often difficult to manage. Opioids are frequently used in an attempt to mitigate pain; however, side effects may develop. Celiac plexus neurolysis (CPN) affords effective pain control in patients with pancreatic cancer and is not associated with opioid side effects. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided CPN has demonstrated safety and efficacy due to real-time imaging and anterior access to the celiac plexus from the posterior gastric wall, thereby avoiding complications related to the puncture of spinal nerves, arteries and the diaphragm, and is now practiced widely. Furthermore, two new techniques of EUS-guided neurolysis for abdominal pain management in pancreatic cancer patients have recently been developed. The first technique is EUS-guided celiac ganglia neurolysis (EUS-CGN) in which EUS facilitates CGN by enabling direct injection into the individual celiac ganglion, and the second technique is EUS-guided broad plexus neurolysis (EUS-BPN) which extends over the superior mesenteric artery. This review provides evidence for the efficacy of EUS-CPN. Particular attention is paid to the two new techniques of EUS-guided neurolysis, EUS-CGN and EUS-BPN.

Estimation of malignant potential of GI stromal tumors by contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS (with videos).

BACKGROUND: Contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS (CEH-EUS) is a new sonographic technique that uses US contrast agents and depicts intratumoral vessels in real time. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether assessment of tumor vascularity by CEH-EUS can predict the preoperative malignancy risk of GI stromal tumors (GISTs). DESIGN: Prospective study to observe GIST vascularity. SETTING: Kinki University School of Medicine. PATIENTS: Between June 2007 and September 2009, 76 consecutive patients suspected of having subepithelial lesions underwent CEH-EUS. INTERVENTION: CEH-EUS was performed by using a prototype echoendoscope in an extended pure harmonic detection mode. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Resected GIST specimens in 29 patients who underwent surgical resection were divided into high-grade (n=16) and low-grade (n=13) malignancy groups based on mitotic activity. The abilities of EUS-guided FNA and CEH-EUS to diagnose the malignant potential were compared. The sensitivities with which contrast-enhanced multidetector CT, power-Doppler EUS, and CEH-EUS detected intratumoral vessels in high-grade malignancy GISTs also were compared. RESULTS: CEH-EUS identified irregular vessels and thereby predicted GIST malignancies with a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 100%, 63%, and 83%, respectively. Diagnosis of high-grade malignancy GISTs by EUS-guided FNA had a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 63%, 92%, and 81%, respectively. Contrast-enhanced multidetector CT, power-Doppler EUS, and CEH-EUS detected intratumoral vessels in high-grade malignancy GISTs with sensitivities of 31%, 63%, and 100%, respectively (P<.05). LIMITATIONS: A single center was involved in this study. CONCLUSIONS: CEH-EUS successfully visualized intratumoral vessels and may play an important role in predicting the malignancy risk of GISTs.

Correlation between insulin resistance and outcome of pegylated interferon and ribavirin therapy, hepatic steatosis, hepatic fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C-1b and high viral load.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Insulin resistance (IR) has been reported to be an independent predictor of treatment outcome in chronic hepatitis C patients. METHODS: We analyzed the relationship between IR and the outcome of pegylated interferon and ribavirin (PEG-IFN/RBV) therapy, taking into account host factors of body mass index and histological index, such as rate of fatty change and fibrosis. Japanese patients (n = 30; 19 men and 11 women; median age 60.0 ± 8.7 years) with chronic hepatitis C-1b with a high viral load were treated with PEG-IFN-α2b/RBV for 48 weeks. RESULTS: Sustained virological response (SVR) was seen in 60% (18/30) and non-SVR in 40% (12/30). HOMA-IR (homeostasis model of assessment-insulin resistance index) at the start and at 24 weeks of treatment showed no statistical difference between SVR and non-SVR. Correlation was observed between HOMA-IR and body mass index (r = 0.45, p = 0.013). Among 20 patients, steatosis and fibrosis were assessed by biopsy. Correlation was observed between HOMA-IR and steatosis (r = 0.57, p = 0.0093), whereas no correlation was observed between HOMA-IR and fibrosis. CONCLUSION: A larger prospective study is needed to clarify the role of IR in the outcome of PEG-IFN/RBV combination therapy and hepatic fibrosis in Japanese patients.

Double-Filtration Plasmapheresis plus Interferon-ß for HCV-1b Patients with Non-Sustained Virological Response to Previous Combination Therapy.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Double-filtration plasmapheresis (DFPP) together with interferon (IFN) administration produces a substantial reduction in the viral load during the early stages of treatment. METHODS: Based on their responses to previous pegylated IFN and ribavirin (PEG-IFN/RBV) therapy, 20 patients were divided into null virological response (NVR; n = 12) and relapse (n = 8) groups. DFPP was used in combination with IFN-ß/RBV with subsequent administration of PEG-IFN-α2a/RBV therapy (DFPP + IFN-ß/RBV then PEG-IFN/RBV). Early viral dynamics was assessed, focusing especially on complete early virological response (cEVR) associated with sustained virological response. Additionally, the interleukin 28B gene, the IFN/RBV resistance-determining region, the IFN sensitivity-determining region and the core regions were analyzed. RESULTS: Rapid virological response was achieved in 0% (0/12) of NVR and in 75% (6/8) of relapse patients, with a significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.001). Similarly, cEVR was achieved in 8% (1/12) of NVR and in 88% (7/8) of relapse patients, with a significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.037). By multivariate logistic regression analysis, interleukin-28B major was a significant determiner of cEVR (odds ratio = 24.19, p = 0.037). CONCLUSION: DFPP + IFN-ß/RBV then PEG-IFN/RBV therapy is indicated more for relapse than for NVR patients.

New techniques and future perspective of EUS for the differential diagnosis of pancreatic malignancies: contrast harmonic imaging.

Although endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) has the advantage over other imaging methods in that it is possible to obtain high resolution images of the pancreas, it is limited in its ability to characterize pancreatic masses. Contrast-enhanced power Doppler ultrasonography suffers from several limitations such as blooming artifacts, poor spatial resolution, low sensitivity to slow flow and high sensitivity to motion artifacts. Recently, EUS system specific for contrast harmonic imaging has been developed. The use of this EUS system enabled us to observe images of microcirculation and parenchymal perfusion without Doppler-related artifacts in the pancreas. Contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS could diagnose pancreatic carcinomas as hypovascular masses with a high sensitivity (89-96%) and specificity (64-88%). Contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS also discriminates mural nodules from mucous clots in the intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms.

EUS-guided broad plexus neurolysis over the superior mesenteric artery using a 25-gauge needle.

OBJECTIVES: Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided celiac plexus neurolysis (EUS-CPN) is safe and effective but not beneficial for some patients with extended abdominal cancer. We compared the effectiveness of standard EUS-CPN and EUS-guided broad plexus neurolysis (EUS-BPN) that extends over the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) using a 25-gauge needle. METHODS: Consecutive patients referred to our quaternary EUS centers were eligible for inclusion. To evaluate the neurolytic spread, contrast was mixed with the neurolytic agent and post-procedure computed tomography scanning was performed. The regions containing the celiac, superior, and inferior mesenteric arteries were divided on the frontal plane into six areas: upper right and left, middle right and left, and lower right and left. The number of contrast-bearing areas after EUS-CPN and EUS-BPN were related to the degree of pain relief achieved. RESULTS: A total of 67 patients with advanced abdominal cancer were included (34 EUS-CPN and 33 EUS-BPN). The qualitative variables of the two groups did not differ significantly. The EUS-BPN group had more patients with six contrast-bearing areas (42%) than the EUS-CPN group (0%). These patients had significantly better short-term and long-lasting pain relief than patients with less than five contrast-bearing areas. EUS-BPN patients exhibited significantly greater reductions in days 7 and 30 visual analog pain scale scores than EUS-CPN patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary data suggested that EUS-BPN using a 25-gauge needle provides patients with advanced abdominal cancer with better pain relief than standard EUS-CPN, and without incurring serious complications. Moreover, it seems that broad neurolysis over the SMA may provide superior analgesia.

EUS-guided in vivo microdialysis of the pancreas: a novel technique with potential diagnostic and therapeutic application.

BACKGROUND: Microdialysis has been used in vivo to measure dynamic temporal variations in extracellular or interstitial concentrations of non-protein-bound substances that are unstable in the systemic circulation. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the technical feasibility and possible complications of EUS-guided in vivo microdialysis of the pancreas. DESIGN AND INTERVENTION: Under the guidance of an echoendoscope inserted into the stomach of each dog, the pancreatic parenchyma was punctured by using a 19-gauge needle. A specially developed microdialysis probe threaded through the lumen of the 19-gauge needle was positioned in the pancreas. The probe was constantly perfused with saline solution at a flow rate of 1.0 microL/minute. SETTING: Experiments on 8 beagle dogs. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The concentration of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in the microdialysate was measured at 10-minute intervals, once before and for 8 times after a single (20 mg/kg) bolus intravenous infusion of 5-FU. RESULTS: Following the administration of 5-FU, the concentration of 5-FU in all macrodialysate samples exceeded the cut-off value by more than 100-fold. The 5-FU levels in the microdialysate increased rapidly, peaked by 10 minutes (13.9 microg/mL), and gradually declined thereafter. No local bleeding or accumulation of fluid around the pancreas was observed. LIMITATION: Sampling was unsuccessful in 2 of the 8 dogs because the probe broke while being inserted into the pancreatic parenchyma. CONCLUSION: EUS-guided pancreatic microdialysis is feasible and has multiple potential clinical/therapeutic applications, including monitoring pharmacokinetics focally and detecting novel biomarkers that are unstable or undetectable in the plasma.

Characterization of intra-abdominal lesions of undetermined origin by contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS (with videos).

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of intra-abdominal lesions of undetermined origin is often a challenge for endoscopists and radiologists. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the microvasculature of benign and malignant intra-abdominal lesions by contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS (CEH-EUS) and to investigate its usefulness for discriminating between malignant and benign lesions. DESIGN: The vascularity of intra-abdominal lesions of undetermined origin was observed by using CEH-EUS. The lesions were classified according to their vascular patterns. The effectiveness of CEH-EUS in differentiating malignant from benign lesions was evaluated. SETTING: Kinki University School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan. PATIENTS: Forty-three patients, each with a lesion of undetermined origin, were evaluated prospectively by CEH-EUS between March 2007 and March 2009. INTERVENTIONS: CEH-EUS was performed by using a prototype echoendoscope and the extended pure harmonic detection mode (a specific mode for contrast harmonic imaging). MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The lesions were categorized by 2 physicians as having no, homogeneous, or heterogeneous enhancement. A consensus was reached for each case offline. How the benign and malignant groups differed in terms of their enhancement patterns was examined. RESULTS: The kappa coefficient of the interobserver agreement test was 0.953 (P < .001). Of the 27 malignant lesions, 26 (96.3%) exhibited heterogeneous enhancement. The 1 remaining malignant lesion (3.7%) showed homogeneous enhancement. Of the 16 benign lesions, none displayed heterogeneous enhancement, and 12 (75%) and 4 (25%) exhibited homogeneous and no enhancement, respectively. The malignant and benign lesion groups differed significantly in terms of homogeneous and heterogeneous enhancement (P < .001). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy with which CEH-EUS differentiated malignant from benign lesions were 96.3%, 100%, 100%, 94.1%, and 97.6%, respectively. LIMITATIONS: A single medical unit with a limited number of patients. CONCLUSIONS: CEH-EUS depicted the microvasculature of intra-abdominal lesions of undetermined origin very clearly and may be useful for characterizing such lesions.

Pancreatic ductal drainage by endoscopic ultrasound-assisted rendezvous technique for pain caused by ductal stricture with chronic pancreatitis.

With the advances in echoendoscopes, the frontier of therapeutic endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) is expanding. A 50-year-old male presented to us with unrelenting pain following an episode of alcoholic pancreatitis. Imaging studies revealed evidence of pancreatic ductal hypertension with a pseudocyst in the head of the pancreas. Following unsuccessful attempts at drainage of the pancreatic duct (PD) via the minor or major papilla at endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, he underwent endoscopic ductal drainage with the EUS-assisted rendezvous technique. The PD was punctured under the guidance of EUS. A guidewire was then introduced into the PD and was guided into the duodenal lumen through the minor papilla. The tip of the guidewire was grasped with forceps coming out of a duodenoscope introduced instead of the echoendoscope. A pancreatic stent was inserted over the guidewire across the minor papilla. After the endoscopic pancreatic stenting, the patient achieved symptomatic relief.

Small cell carcinoma of the pancreas: role of EUS-FNA and subsequent effective chemotherapy using carboplatin and etoposide.

BACKGROUND: Small cell carcinoma (SCC) of the pancreas is a rare entity, with only a few cases reported in the literature. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of combination chemotherapy with carboplatin and etoposide (CE) in SCC of the pancreas. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of four patients diagnosed with SCC among 279 patients with malignant pancreatic tumors treated between 2000 and 2007. All patients were treated with combination chemotherapy using a schedule consisting of intravenous (IV) carboplatin (150 mg/m(2)) on day 1 and IV etoposide (80 mg/m(2)) on days 1, 2, and 3 every 28 days. RESULTS: Pathological diagnosis was confirmed by endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in all patients. Three patients treated with the combination chemotherapy achieved remission, two with a complete response and one with a partial response. The remaining one patient showed no change. One of the two patients with a complete response survived for 56 months following the diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Combination chemotherapy with CE may be effective for the treatment of SCC of the pancreas; EUS-FNA plays an important role in distinguishing SCC from other pancreatic malignancies, leading to the appropriate treatment being given.

Prospective comparative study of the EUS guided 25-gauge FNA needle with the 19-gauge Trucut needle and 22-gauge FNA needle in patients with solid pancreatic masses.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The aim of this prospective study was to compare fine-needle aspiration guided by endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS-FNA) using 25-gauge and 22-gauge needles with the EUS-guided 19-gauge Trucut needle biopsy (EUS-TNB) in patients with solid pancreatic mass. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-four consecutive patients with pancreatic mass underwent biopsies by both EUS-FNA and EUS-TNB. Three needles were compared with respect to technical success rate, tissue size obtained, overall diagnostic accuracy and accuracy for histological and cytological diagnosis. RESULTS: The 25-gauge EUS-FNA was technically easier and obtained superior overall diagnostic accuracy than the 22-gauge and Trucut needles, especially in lesions of the pancreas head and uncinate process. Overall accuracy for the 25-gauge, 22-gauge and Trucut needle was 91.7%, 79.7% and 54.1%, respectively. Accuracy for cytological diagnosis irrespective the site of lesions with 25-gauge, 22-gauge and Trucut needles was 91.7%, 75.0%, and 45.8%, respectively. For uncinate masses, it was 100%, 33.3%, and 0.0%, respectively. These differences were significant. Among technically successful patients, the accuracy for histological diagnosis using the 25-gauge was significantly inferior (P < 0.05) to 22-gauge and Trucut needles and the rates were 45.8%, 78.9% and 83.3%. CONCLUSIONS: The 25-gauge FNA needle was significantly superior in terms of technical success rate and overall diagnostic accuracy, especially for the head and uncinate lesions, compared to the 22-gauge and Trucut needles and could be considered 'the best choice needle for cytological diagnosis' of solid pancreatic lesions. If histological diagnosis is required, the 22-gauge FNA needle and Trucut needle may be advantageous for use in head/uncinate and body/tail lesions, respectively.

Present status and future perspective of EUS-guided drainage.

Development of the curved linear (convex) array echoendoscope has enabled procedures that utilize interventional endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), such as EUS-guided drainage. EUS-guided pseudocyst drainage creates a fistula between the pseudocyst and the gastric or duodenal lumen. This treatment is superior to conventional endoscopic transmural drainage with respect to prevention from complications such as bleeding, because ultrasonographic observation permits easy visualization of the interposing vessels and real-time visualization of needle procedure. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided drainage can also be applied to pancreatobiliary drainage. In cases where endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is unsuccessful in the treatment of obstructive jaundice and chronic obstructive pancreatitis, transmural drainage of bile and pancreatic juice under EUS guidance may supplant the percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage and the surgical treatment.

[Clinical study of weekly administration of paclitaxel for advanced and metastatic gastric cancer].

Ten cases of advanced and metastatic gastric cancer treated by weekly administration of paclitaxel were studied. The patients were 50-72 years of age, including 9 men and 1 woman. In this study, paclitaxel was administered by 1 hour intravenous infusion at a dose of 50-80 mg/m2 every week. Administration was continued for 3 weeks with 1 week rest. One to four cycles were performed at minimum. Paclitaxel was administered in 5 cases as 1st line treatment, 4 cases as 2nd line treatment and 1 case as 3rd line treatment. There were 2 partial responders and no complete responders, and the overall response rate was 20%. The response rate was 100% in liver, 100% in lung, 16% in lymphnodes, and 0% in peritonial dissemination. The clinical symptoms of pain and jaundice abated in one case, the size of the tumor decreased in one case, and a temporary decrease of ascites due to peritonial dissemination was seen in two cases. The level of tumor marker was decreased in 3 out of 10 cases. Side effects included grade 3/4 leukopenia in 10% of patients, and alopecia in 50%, but peripheral neuropathy was not observed. Weekly administration of paclitaxel appears to be well-tolerated and effective against advanced and metastatic gastric cancer.

[A case of peritoneal metastasis of gastric cancer responding to TS-1, administered for four consecutive weeks with two-week rests].

We treated a patient with gastric cancer considered to be unresectable due to peritoneal metastasis, who responded remarkably to treatment with TS-1. The patient was a 62-year-old male. His diagnosis was gastric cancer, for which he underwent surgery on February 22, 2001. Laparotomy disclosed many nodules measuring 2-3 mm in diameter in the abdominal cavity, so rapid pathological tests were conducted during the operation. The test results indicated peritoneal metastasis from gastric cancer. Therefore, simple laparotomy was employed as the best option. On day 13 after surgery, oral administration of TS-1, bid., at a daily dose of 120 mg was commenced. In our outpatient clinic, he was given 3 courses, each comprising 4 weeks' medication and 2 weeks' discontinuation. Subsequently, upper digestive tract endoscopy was performed but only scars in the gastric vestibular area were observed. Biopsy could not detect any malignant findings. Medication was discontinued due to the patient's preference and he died of gastric cancer 10 months after operation.

Well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma detected as hypovascularity by only CT during hepatic arteriography.

We describe a well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with alcohol-related liver cirrhosis in a 69-year-old man. Ultrasonography (US) disclosed a 10 mm hypoechoic nodule in segment 4; Sonazoid contrast-enhanced US and gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed no defect in either the Kupffer phase or the hepatobiliary phase. Computed tomography during hepatic arteriography (CTHA), however, revealed a hypovascular nodule, but CT during arterial portography showed no perfusion defect. Histological analysis indicated a well-differentiated HCC. Thus, our detection of well-differentiated HCC disclosed by only CTHA attested to the efficiency of this modality, suggesting that it is more sensitive than Gd-EOB-GTPA-enhanced MRI.