Quantitative 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET and Clinical Outcomes in Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Following 177Lu-PSMA-617 (VISION Trial).

Background Lutetium 177 [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 (177Lu-PSMA-617) is a prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted radioligand therapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Quantitative PSMA PET/CT analysis could provide information on 177Lu-PSMA-617 treatment benefits. Purpose To explore the association between quantitative baseline gallium 68 [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 (68Ga-PSMA-11) PET/CT parameters and treatment response and outcomes in the VISION trial. Materials and Methods This was an exploratory secondary analysis of the VISION trial. Eligible participants were randomized (June 2018 to October 2019) in a 2:1 ratio to 177Lu-PSMA-617 therapy (7.4 GBq every 6 weeks for up to six cycles) plus standard of care (SOC) or to SOC only. Baseline 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET parameters, including the mean and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmean and SUVmax), PSMA-positive tumor volume, and tumor load, were extracted from five anatomic regions and the whole body. Associations of quantitative PET parameters with radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate, and prostate-specific antigen response were investigated using univariable and multivariable analyses (with treatment as the only other covariate). Outcomes were assessed in subgroups based on SUVmean quartiles. Results Quantitative PET parameters were well balanced between study arms for the 826 participants included. The median whole-body tumor SUVmean was 7.6 (IQR, 5.8-9.9). Whole-body tumor SUVmean was the best predictor of 177Lu-PSMA-617 efficacy, with a hazard ratio (HR) range of 0.86-1.43 for all outcomes (all P < .001). A 1-unit whole-body tumor SUVmean increase was associated with a 12% and 10% decrease in risk of an rPFS event and death, respectively. 177Lu-PSMA-617 plus SOC prolonged rPFS and OS in all SUVmean quartiles versus SOC only, with no identifiable optimum among participants receiving 177Lu-PSMA-617. Higher baseline PSMA-positive tumor volume and tumor load were associated with worse rPFS (HR range, 1.44-1.53 [P < .05] and 1.02-1.03 [P < .001], respectively) and OS (HR range, 1.36-2.12 [P < .006] and 1.04 [P < .001], respectively). Conclusion Baseline 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT whole-body tumor SUVmean was the best predictor of 177Lu-PSMA-617 efficacy in participants in the VISION trial. Improvements in rPFS and OS with 177Lu-PSMA-617 plus SOC were greater among participants with higher whole-body tumor SUVmean, with evidence for benefit at all SUVmean levels. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03511664 Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. Supplemental material is available for this article.

Practical Overview of 123I-Ioflupane Imaging in Parkinsonian Syndromes.

Parkinsonian syndromes are a heterogeneous group of progressive neurodegenerative disorders involving the nigrostriatal dopaminergic pathway and are characterized by a wide spectrum of motor and nonmotor symptoms. These syndromes are quite common and can profoundly impact the lives of patients and their families. In addition to classic Parkinson disease, parkinsonian syndromes include multiple additional disorders known collectively as Parkinson-plus syndromes or atypical parkinsonism. These are characterized by the classic parkinsonian motor symptoms with additional distinguishing clinical features. Dopamine transporter SPECT has been developed as a diagnostic tool to assess the levels of dopamine transporters in the striatum. This imaging assessment, which uses iodine 123 (123I) ioflupane, can be useful to differentiate parkinsonian syndromes caused by nigrostriatal degeneration from other clinical mimics such as essential tremor or psychogenic tremor. Dopamine transporter imaging plays a crucial role in diagnosing parkinsonian syndromes, particularly in patients who do not clearly fulfill the clinical criteria for diagnosis. Diagnostic clarification can allow early treatment in appropriate patients and avoid misdiagnosis. At present, only the qualitative interpretation of dopamine transporter SPECT is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, but quantitative interpretation is often used to supplement qualitative interpretation. The authors provide an overview of patient preparation, common imaging findings, and potential pitfalls that radiologists and nuclear medicine physicians should know when performing and interpreting dopamine transporter examinations. Alternatives to 123I-ioflupane imaging for the evaluation of nigrostriatal degeneration are also briefly discussed. ©RSNA, 2024 Test Your Knowledge questions for this article are available in the supplemental material. See the invited commentary by Intenzo and Colarossi in this issue.

Distinct spatial contributions of amyloid pathology and cerebral small vessel disease to hippocampal morphology.

INTRODUCTION: Cerebral small vessel disease (SVD) and amyloid beta (Aß) pathology frequently co-exist. The impact of concurrent pathology on the pattern of hippocampal atrophy, a key substrate of memory impacted early and extensively in dementia, remains poorly understood. METHODS: In a unique cohort of mixed Alzheimer's disease and moderate-severe SVD, we examined whether total and regional neuroimaging measures of SVD, white matter hyperintensities (WMH), and Aß, as assessed by 18F-AV45 positron emission tomography, exert additive or synergistic effects on hippocampal volume and shape. RESULTS: Frontal WMH, occipital WMH, and Aß were independently associated with smaller hippocampal volume. Frontal WMH had a spatially distinct impact on hippocampal shape relative to Aß. In contrast, hippocampal shape alterations associated with occipital WMH spatially overlapped with Aß-vulnerable subregions. DISCUSSION: Hippocampal degeneration is differentially sensitive to SVD and Aß pathology. The pattern of hippocampal atrophy could serve as a disease-specific biomarker, and thus guide clinical diagnosis and individualized treatment strategies for mixed dementia.

Correction of multiplexing artefacts in multi-pinhole SPECT through temporal shuttering, de-multiplexing of projections, and alternating reconstruction.

Objective.Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) with pinhole collimators can provide high-resolution imaging, but is often limited by low sensitivity. Acquiring projections simultaneously through multiple pinholes affords both high resolution and high sensitivity. However, the overlap of projections from different pinholes on detectors, known as multiplexing, has been shown to cause artefacts which degrade reconstructed images.Approach.Multiplexed projection sets were considered here using an analytic simulation model of AdaptiSPECT-C-a brain-dedicated multi-pinhole SPECT system. AdaptiSPECT-C has fully adaptable aperture shutters, so can acquire projections with a combination of multiplexed and non-multiplexed frames using temporal shuttering. Two strategies for reducing multiplex artefacts were considered: an algorithm to de-multiplex projections, and an alternating reconstruction strategy for projections acquired with a combination of multiplexed and non-multiplexed frames. Geometric and anthropomorphic digital phantoms were used to assess a number of metrics.Main results.Both de-multiplexing strategies showed a significant reduction in image artefacts and improved fidelity, image uniformity, contrast recovery and activity recovery (AR). In all cases, the two de-multiplexing strategies resulted in superior metrics to those from images acquired with only mux-free frames. The de-multiplexing algorithm provided reduced image noise and superior uniformity, whereas the alternating strategy improved contrast and AR.Significance.The use of these de-multiplexing algorithms means that multi-pinhole SPECT systems can acquire projections with more multiplexing without degradation of images.

Quantitative Brain Amyloid PET.

Since the development of amyloid tracers for PET imaging, there has been interest in quantifying amyloid burden in the brains of patients with Alzheimer disease. Quantitative amyloid PET imaging is poised to become a valuable approach in disease staging, theranostics, monitoring, and as an outcome measure for interventional studies. Yet, there are significant challenges and hurdles to overcome before it can be implemented into widespread clinical practice. On November 17, 2022, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, and Medical Imaging and Technology Alliance cosponsored a public workshop comprising experts from academia, industry, and government agencies to discuss the role of quantitative brain amyloid PET imaging in staging, prognosis, and longitudinal assessment of Alzheimer disease. The workshop discussed a range of topics, including available radiopharmaceuticals for amyloid imaging; the methodology, metrics, and analytic validity of quantitative amyloid PET imaging; its use in disease staging, prognosis, and monitoring of progression; and challenges facing the field. This report provides a high-level summary of the presentations and the discussion.

Interreader and Intrareader Reproducibility of 18F-Flotufolastat Image Interpretation in Patients with Newly Diagnosed or Recurrent Prostate Cancer: Data from Two Phase 3 Prospective Multicenter Studies.

Interreader and intrareader reproducibility of 18F-flotufolastat PET/CT scans in newly diagnosed and recurrent prostate cancer patients was assessed from masked image evaluations from two phase 3 studies. Methods: 18F-flotufolastat PET/CT images of newly diagnosed (n = 352) or recurrent (n = 389) patients were evaluated by 3 masked readers. Cohen κ was used to assess pairwise patient- and region-level interreader agreement. Agreement among all readers was assessed using Fleiss κ. Intrareader agreement between the first and repeat read (20% of images, ≥4 wk later) was assessed using Cohen κ. Results: Pairwise interreader agreement was 95% or better (newly diagnosed) and 75% or better (recurrent). The κ coefficients were impacted by the high-agreement-low-κ paradox: Cohen κ ranged from not estimable to 0.55, whereas Fleiss κ was 0.50 (newly diagnosed) and 0.41 (recurrent). Agreement was highest in the prostate of newly diagnosed patients (≥95%) and in the pelvic lymph nodes in recurrent patients (≥87%). Intrareader agreement was 86% or better across both populations. Conclusion: 18F-flotufolastat PET/CT images can be reliably interpreted, with a high degree of inter- and intrareader agreement.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Dizziness and Ataxia: 2023 Update.

Diagnostic evaluation of a patient with dizziness or vertigo is complicated by a lack of standardized nomenclature, significant overlap in symptom descriptions, and the subjective nature of the patient's symptoms. Although dizziness is an imprecise term often used by patients to describe a feeling of being off-balance, in many cases dizziness can be subcategorized based on symptomatology as vertigo (false sense of motion or spinning), disequilibrium (imbalance with gait instability), presyncope (nearly fainting or blacking out), or lightheadedness (nonspecific). As such, current diagnostic paradigms focus on timing, triggers, and associated symptoms rather than subjective descriptions of dizziness type. Regardless, these factors complicate the selection of appropriate diagnostic imaging in patients presenting with dizziness or vertigo. This document serves to aid providers in this selection by using a framework of definable clinical variants. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.