Effects of Cuspal Inclination and Luting Agent on Fracture Load Values in Composite Resin CAD/CAM Crowns.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether change in cuspal inclination influences the fracture load values of composite resin computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) crowns. Abutment teeth and CAD/CAM crowns were prepared as they would be for treating a mandibular first premolar with two cusps. The CAD/CAM crowns were designed so that 1) the principal stress lines would be radially distributed from the two points of contact with the indenter to the occlusal area of the abutment (Type I), or 2) the principal stress lines would pass outside the occlusal area of the abutment (Types II and III). The CAD/CAM crowns were mounted on the abutments using one of two types of resin or polycarboxylate cement. Fracture load values were measured using a universal tester. The Type I CAD/CAM crowns exhibited the highest mean fracture load value, followed by the Type II crowns and then the Type III crowns, with significant differences seen between all types (p<0.05). The luting agent used (resin or polycarboxylate cement) showed no effect on the fracture load value. With the Type II and Type III crowns, significant differences in the fracture load value were observed between the Super-Bond and Hy-Bond polycarboxylate cement groups (p<0.05).

Influence of Tooth Mold Materials in Composite Resin CAD/CAM Crown Destructive Test.

A range of experimental designs have been used in destructive testing of composite resin CAD/CAM crowns. Various materials have been adopted for the abutment in such tests, including human or bovine dentin, stainless steel, PMMA, and composite resin, the selection of which is made in accordance with study objective or preference of the researcher. The purpose of this study was to determine how the material selected for the abutment material affected fracture load and maximum displacement. Destructive tests were conducted on composite resin crowns of the same design. Three types of material were used for the abutments together with 2 types of adhesive material. Images of each sample were acquired before destruction using a microfocus X-ray CT scanner to confirm the feasibility of a non-destructive test.The load required to fracture the composite CAD/CAM resin crowns depended on the abutment material used, with a decrease being observed in the order of composite resin, stainless steel, and PMMA. Maximum displacement decreased in the order of PMMA, composite resin, and stainless steel. Differences in the material used for setting (adhesive resin or polycarboxylate cement) showed no effect on fracture load. These results indicate that the load required to achieve destruction of resin CAD/CAM crowns varies according to the abutment material used.