Predictive value of clinical and laboratory findings in the diagnosis of the enteric fever.

Although the definitive diagnosis of enteric fever requires the isolation of Salmonella enterica serotype typhi or paratyphi, the diagnosis is usually made according to clinical and laboratory findings. There is usually a diagnostic dilemma. The aim of this study was to determine the minimum required parameters that could be valuable in the diagnosis of enteric fever. A retrospective study was performed to compare the clinical and laboratory findings in 60 patients who proved to have enteric fever by cultures and 58 patients with non-enteric fever. Features independently predictive of enteric fever were assessed by multivariate logistic regression. Sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive and negative predictive values were estimated. Significant clinical features of enteric fever were hepatomegaly, splenomegaly, relative bradycardia, rose spots, leucopenia, trombocytopenia, eosinopenia and elevated AST level. Five of these features were found to be predictive for the diagnosis of enteric fever; splenomegaly, relative bradycardia, rose spots and trombocytopenia and elevated AST level. In conclusion, clinical and laboratory findings can help the clinician to diagnose enteric fever in the absence of microbiological confirmation.

Frequency of metabolic syndrome among hemodialysis patients according to NCEP-ATP III and IDF definitions.

Objective. Patients with chronic renal failure (CRF) have an increased risk of death from cardiovascular diseases. The metabolic syndrome is a common risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. In the present study, it was aimed to evaluate the frequency of metabolic syndrome using the National Cholesterol Education Program Adults Treatment Panel III (NCEP-ATP III) and the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) definitions in patients with end-stage CRF undergoing hemodialysis (HD). Materials and Methods. A total of 222 cases undergoing HD were enrolled in the study. After obtaining medical history and physical examination, blood samples were collected from each patient for the measurements of fasting blood glucose, total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, and triglycerides. Results. Among HD patients evaluated according to both IDF and NCEP-ATP III definitions, the diagnosis of metabolic syndrome was confirmed by IDF in 56.5% of those fulfilling the criteria for NCEP-ATP III. Similarly, 86% of the undiagnosed patients according to NCEP-ATP III were confirmed by IDF definitions. The sensitivity and positive predictive value of NCEP-ATP III for metabolic syndrome were 81.25% and 64.8%, respectively. The area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve for NECP-ATP III and IDF was 0.730. False-positive rate and probability ratio for NECP-ATP III were 0.352 and 2.49, respectively. In other words, among the patients who were diagnosed with metabolic syndrome according to NCEP-ATP III definitions, the proportion of subjects whose diagnosis was confirmed by IDF definitions was 2.49-fold higher than those with unconfirmed diagnosis. Conclusion. It is logical to evaluate patients with CRF for metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular risk factors at the time of diagnosis and regularly thereafter due to the high ratio of metabolic syndrome in this population.

[Hepatitis E virus seropositivity in hemodialysis patients in Hatay province, Turkey]. / Hatay'da hemodiyaliz tedavisi alan hastalarda hepatit e virus seropozitifligi.

Hepatitis E virus (HEV) which is mainly transmitted through faecal-oral route, can also be transmitted via parenteral and vertical route. Recent studies suggest zoonotic nature of the virus. The last studies done in Turkey indicate increasing frequency of HEV infection. This study was conducted to determine the rate of anti-HEV seropositivity among patients with terminal stage renal failure undergoing hemodialysis. A total of 92 patients (54 male, 38 female; age range: 22-71 years, mean age: 55 +/- 11 years) who had undergone hemodialysis for a mean period of 66 +/- 18 months, were included to the study. HEV antibodies were analyzed using anti-HEV IgG enzyme immunoassay (ELISA, Dia.Pro Diagnostic Bioprobes, Italy). In order to study the relationship of anti-HEV positivity between hepatitis C virus and hepatitis B virus infections, anti-HCV antibody and HBsAg were also considered. Mean age, duration of hemodialysis, platelet, serum albumin, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels, blood transfusion history were the other evaluated parameters. Anti-HEV IgG positivity was detected in 19 (20.6%) patients, while 7 (7.6%) had anti-HCV positivity and 4 (4.3%) had HBsAg positivity. No statistically significant relation was determined between anti-HEV IgG positive and negative patients in terms of hemodialysis duration, blood transfusion, other laboratory findings and anti-HCV and HBsAg positivity (p > 0.05). While the anti-HEV seropositivity rate (20.6%) determined in this study was higher than the rates determined in the same group of patients in the western part of the country (10-16%), the rate was similar to the rates reported from the southeastern part (23%) of Turkey. It can be concluded that screening of patients before or during hemodialysis in terms of anti-HEV antibodies, seems to be of crucial importance in order to establish necessary precautions to prevent parenteral and/or nosocomial transmission of HEV.

Are the anticardiolipin antibodies a risk factor for coronary artery disease in chronic renal failure patients?

OBJECTIVE: It has been proposed that anticardiolipin (aCL) antibodies are a risk factor for coronary artery disease (CAD) in recently studies. In this study, we aimed to investigate the existence of coronary artery disease in dialysis patients who were aCL positive and undergoing hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis due to end stage renal failure and also to determine its relationship with risk factors in patients with coronary artery disease. METHODS: This study has been conducted in the end stage renal failure in 140 hemodialysis patients, 18 peritoneal dialysis patients, and 38 healthy controls. The urea, creatinine, total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, triglyceride, total protein, and albumin values are obtained. In all cases, aCL levels are investigated with ELISA method. RESULTS: In the HD and CAPD patients, no significant relationship could be found between the age, gender, dialysis time, total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, total protein, and albumin values (p > 0.05). HD and CAPD vs. controls (aCL), 9.2% (13/140), 11.1% (2/18) vs. 2.6% (1/38), p = 0.002. No significant difference was noted between aCL-positive and -negative patients in serum urea, creatinine, total cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, triglyceride, total protein, and albumin levels. The coronary artery disease was determined in three patients out of 16 patients with aCL positivity. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of aCL antibodies positivity in our study was similar to the prevalence of aCL positivity in other studies. Therefore, we do not think aCL antibodies positivity is a risk factor for coronary artery disease.