A phase II study of UFT with leucovorin administered as a twice daily schedule in the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Prolonged infusions have been shown to be safer and potentially more effective than bolus regimens of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) as treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, infusional 5-FU requires central venous access and costly infusion pumps. Oral fluoropyrimidines enable longer exposures to 5-FU with increased convenience. Tegafur-uracil (UFT) with leucovorin (LV) given thrice daily has improved safety plus comparable survival and response rates to bolus 5-FU/LV. We conducted a phase II clinical study in 98 patients with mCRC to evaluate if UFT with LV given twice daily provided comparable time to progression (TTP), efficacy and tolerability to that reported for thrice daily in two phase III clinical studies. Secondary objectives included overall response rate (ORR) and overall survival (OS). Median TTP was 3.8 months, when compared with 3.5 months for thrice daily. The ORR (11%) and median OS (12.8 months) with twice daily administration were similar to that of thrice daily administration (12% and 12.4 months). The incidence of grade 3/4 treatment-related diarrhoea was 30% on the twice daily and 21% on the thrice daily schedule. These results suggest that twice daily administration has similar efficacy and tolerability to thrice daily administration and is an acceptable alternative for patients who would benefit from UFT with LV therapy.

Schedule dependency of 21-day oral versus 3-day intravenous etoposide in combination with intravenous cisplatin in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: a randomized phase III study of the Cancer and Leukemia Group B.

PURPOSE: This was a randomized phase III study to test the schedule dependency of etoposide given as a conventional 3-day intravenous (IV) regimen versus a prolonged 21-day oral regimen for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Both regimens contained IV cisplatin. The objectives were to compare survival (primary end point) and to establish response rates, failure-free survival, and toxicity (secondary end points). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with untreated measurable or assessable disease and normal organ function were eligible. Randomization was stratified according to performance status 0 versus 1 or 2. Treatment consisted of etoposide 130 mg/m2/d IV for 3 days and cisplatin 25 mg/m2/d IV for 3 days every 21 days for eight courses (schedule 1) versus etoposide 50 mg/m2/d orally for 21 days and cisplatin 33 mg/m2/d IV for 3 days every 28 days for six courses (schedule 2). In 1990, bioavailability of oral etoposide was assumed to be 50%, and the study was designed to deliver the same total doses of etoposide and cisplatin on both regimens over 24 weeks without the use of growth factors. RESULTS: Between December 1990 and October 1993, 306 eligible patients were entered. Of these, 69% were male and 66% were > or = 60 years of age; 21% had a performance status of 0, 47% a performance status of 1, and 32% a performance status of 2; 156 were randomized to receive schedule 1 and 150 to receive schedule 2. Overall median survival estimates were 9.5 and 9.9 months (difference not significant) for schedule 1 and schedule 2, respectively. The 95% confidence interval (CI) for overall survival, 8 to 11 months, was the same for both schedules, with 126 and 117 deaths on schedule 1 and 2, respectively. Both schedules also resulted in the same median failure-free survival estimate of 7 months (95% CI, 6 to 8 months on either schedule). Complete and partial responses were observed in 15% and 42% of patients on schedule 1 and 14% and 47% on schedule 2, respectively. The overall maximal hematologic toxicities grade 3 and 4 for leukocytes, neutrophils, platelets, and hemoglobin were, respectively, as follows: schedule 1, 62%, 85%, 32%, and 32%; schedule 2, 83%, 83%, 52%, and 53%. Lethal toxicity due to neutropenia and infection occurred in 4% of patients on schedule 1 and 10% on schedule 2 (difference not statistically significant). CONCLUSION: The two schedules of etoposide in combination with cisplatin did not result in differences in treatment outcome with respect to tumor response and survival. However, a significantly greater rate of severe or life-threatening hematologic toxicity was noted on the 21-day oral etoposide treatment schedule.

Randomized trial of vinorelbine compared with fluorouracil plus leucovorin in patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: This prospective randomized trial was performed to compare the effectiveness of intravenous vinorelbine tartrate with intravenous fluorouracil and leucovorin (5-FU/LV) on the primary end points of survival, quality of life (QOL), and relief of cancer-related symptoms in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Secondary end points included tumor response rates and time to treatment failure. In addition, the safety of both treatment regimens was evaluated in this multicenter study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred sixteen patients with stage IV NSCLC were enrolled onto this study from 18 centers. Vinorelbine was administered at a dose of 30 mg/m2/wk. 5-FU/LV was administered at a dose of 425 mg/m2 and 20 mg/m2, respectively, for 5 consecutive days every 4 weeks. Patients with progressive disease or toxicity were removed from study while responding and stable patients were continued on therapy. RESULTS: The median survival time of patients who received vinorelbine was 30 weeks, with 25% of patients alive at 1 year, compared with a median survival time of 22 weeks and 16% of patients alive at 1 year for those treated with 5-FU/LV (P = .03, log-rank test). This improvement in survival was associated with a higher objective response rate (12% v 3%) and time to treatment failure (10 weeks v 8 weeks) for vinorelbine versus 5-FU/LV. The dose-limiting toxicity of vinorelbine was granulocytopenia, with 54% of patients experiencing grade 3/4 granulocytopenia. Nonhematologic toxicity of vinorelbine was generally grade 1 or 2. The most common grade 3 toxicities were related to injection-site reactions. CONCLUSION: This trial confirms the efficacy of vinorelbine in patients with advanced NSCLC. The clinical activity and relatively favorable toxicity profile of this agent make it a reasonable and useful treatment option in the management of patients with this disease.

Randomized study of CODE versus alternating CAV/EP for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: an Intergroup Study of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group and the Southwest Oncology Group.

PURPOSE: To determine whether an intensive weekly chemotherapy regimen plus thoracic irradiation is superior to standard chemotherapy in the treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ESCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with ESCLC were considered eligible for the study if they were younger than 68 years, had a performance status of 0 to 2, and were free of brain metastases. Patients were randomized to receive cisplatin, vincristine, doxorubicin, and etoposide (CODE) or alternating cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine/etoposide and cisplatin (CAV/EP). Consolidative thoracic irradiation and prophylactic cranial irradiation were given to patients responding to CODE and according to investigator discretion on the CAV/EP arm. RESULTS: The fidelity of drug delivery on both drug regimens was equal, and more than 70% of all patients received the intended protocol chemotherapy. Although rates of neutropenic fever were similar, nine (8.2%) of 110 patients on the CODE arm died during chemotherapy, whereas one (0.9%) of 109 patients died on the CAV/EP arm. Response rates after chemotherapy were higher (P =.006) with CODE (87%) than with CAV/EP (70%). However, progression-free survival (median of 0.66 years on both arms) and overall survival (median, 0.98 years for CODE and 0. 91 years for CAV/EP) were not statistically different. CONCLUSION: The CODE regimen increased two-fold the received dose-intensity of four of the most active drugs in small-cell lung cancer compared with the standard CAV/EP regimen while maintaining an approximately equal total dose. Despite supportive care (but not routine prophylactic use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor), there was excessive toxic mortality with the CODE regimen. The response rate with CODE was higher than that of CAV/EP, but progression-free and overall survival were not significantly improved. In view of increased toxicity and similar efficacy, the CODE chemotherapy regimen is not recommended for treatment of ESCLC.

Expression of common acute lymphoblastic leukemia-associated antigen on germ cell tumor.

A mediastinal germ cell tumor is described that reacts with the anti-common acute lymphoblastic leukemia-associated antigen antibody J5 using both immunofluorescence and immunoperoxidase techniques. This antigen has been reported recently on various cell lines including melanoma, colon, and breast. It has also been seen on normal fibroblasts and peripheral granulocytes. This is believed to be the first description of a solid nonlymphoid neoplasm possessing this antigen, and the implications regarding prognosis and therapy are discussed.

Docetaxel and Gemcitabine administered on days 1 and 8 for metastatic non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC): a phase II multicenter trial.

Docetaxel and Gemcitabine are active agents in non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). They have different mechanism of action, minimal overlapping toxicity, and are easily administered on an outpatient basis. This phase II study evaluated Docetaxel administered with Gemcitabine on days 1 and 8 in a 3-week cycle, to determine its efficacy, while attempting to lower the regimen's toxicity, especially myelosuppression which can occur when Docetaxel is administered at full dose on day 1 only. Forty-three chemonaive patients, 40 evaluable, were entered in this trial between May 2001 and March 2002. Thirty-seven patients had stage IV and three patients had stage III B NSCLC, median age 58 (ages 32-78), median performance status (PS) 1 (range 0-2). They were treated with Docetaxel 36mg/m(2) and Gemcitabine 1000mg/m(2) intravenously on days 1 and 8 in a 3-week cycle. No growth factors were administered. Of 40 evaluable patients, 4 achieved partial response (10%), 25 stable disease (62.5%) and 11 progressive disease (27.5%). Median time-to-disease progression was 15 weeks. Median survival was 7.75 months. One year survival was 32.5% (13 patients). Hematologic toxicity was minimal, non-hematologic toxicity was easily treatable. Docetaxel, when given with Gemcitabine on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks, is less myelotoxic, yet still an effective treatment for metastatic NSCLC.

A phase I study of recombinant human interferon alpha-2b combined with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin in patients with advanced cancer.

To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of escalating doses of interferon-alpha-2b (IFN, Intron A) with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin (DDP) in patients with advanced cancer, 15 patients were accrued between May 1990 and July 1991. Primary sites were unknown (3), colorectal (3), head and neck (2), lung (2), gynecologic (1), gallbladder (1), sarcoma (1), anal canal (1) and pancreas (1). IFN was given s.c. on days 1-5 and then three times weekly with DDP (75 mg/m2, day 1) and 5-FU [750 mg/m2, days 1-5, continuous infusion (CI) on a 28-day cycle. The first two patients treated at level I (3 x 10(6) U/m2 s.c.) experienced possible neurotoxic deaths [massive cerebrovascular accident (CVA) and metabolic encephalopathy], and patient 3 had a grade 4 toxicity of performance status decline. Analysis of these events led us to exclude the enrollment of patients on i.v. morphine and of those with prior exposure to DDP. This resulted in grade 3 toxicity in terms of nausea, vomiting, fatigue and leukopenia but in no further CNS event. All patients were evaluable for toxicity but only ten were evaluable for response. Only two partial responses were seen, one in a patient with an unknown primary tumour and one in a patient with head and neck cancer. The combination of IFN is possible with 5-FU and DDP. The recommended dose of IFN is 2 x 10(6) U/m2 s.c. in patients with no prior exposure to DDP or i.v. morphine, given together with 5-FU (750 mg/m2, days 1-5, CI) and DDP (75 mg/m2, day 1) on a 28-day cycle.

Using proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging to predict in vivo the response of recurrent malignant gliomas to tamoxifen chemotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: Most patients with a malignant glioma spend considerable time on a treatment protocol before their response (or nonresponse) to the therapy can be determined. Because survival time in the absence of effective therapy is short, the ability to predict the potential chemosensitivity of individual brain tumors noninvasively would represent a significant advance in chemotherapy planning. METHODS: Using proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (1H MRSI), we studied 16 patients with a recurrent malignant glioma before and during treatment with high-dose orally administered tamoxifen. We evaluated whether 1H MRSI data could predict eventual therapeutic response to tamoxifen at the pretreatment and early treatment stages. RESULTS: Seven patients responded to tamoxifen therapy (three with glioblastomas multiforme; four with anaplastic astrocytomas), and nine did not (six with glioblastomas multiforme; three with anaplastic astrocytomas). Responders and nonresponders exhibited no differences in their age, sex, tumor type, mean tumor volume, mean Karnofsky scale score, mean number of weeks postradiotherapy, or mean amount of prior radiation exposure. Resonance profiles across the five metabolites measured on 1H MRSI spectra (choline-containing compounds, creatine and phosphocreatine, N-acetyl groups, lactate, and lipids) differed significantly between these two groups before and during treatment. Furthermore, linear discriminant analyses based on patients' in vivo biochemical information accurately predicted individual response to tamoxifen both before and at very early treatment stages (2 and 4 wk). Similar analyses based on patient sex, age, Karnofsky scale score, tumor type, and tumor volume could not reliably predict the response to tamoxifen treatment at the same time periods. CONCLUSION: It is possible to accurately predict the response of a tumor to tamoxifen on the basis of noninvasively acquired in vivo biochemical information. 1H MRSI has potential as a prognostic tool in the pharmacological treatment of recurrent malignant gliomas.

Marimastat in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a dose-finding study.

Patients with solid tumors, including carcinoma of the pancreas, express high levels of matrix metalloproteinases (MMP), and these enzymes are believed to be important for the growth, spread, and dissemination of most solid malignant tumors. Marimastat is the first orally available MMP inhibitor (MMPI) to be tested in humans and has been shown to inhibit the spread and growth of pancreatic cancer in animal models. The purpose of the present study was to define the toxicities, safety, and tolerance of various doses of marimastat and also to get an early indication of potential biologic activity in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. The authors prospectively studied 64 patients with advanced carcinoma of the pancreas in whom standard treatments had failed. Eligible patients had a progressive rise in CA 19/9 levels of >25% over the 4-week period preceding their entry into the study. Patients were studied in groups of 8 to 10, with each group receiving escalating dosages ranging from 5 mg twice daily to 75 mg twice daily and 10 to 25 mg daily. Patients were considered for long-term (beyond 4 weeks) continuation treatment if clinical benefit, in the view of the investigator, was derived. Study endpoints were safety, tolerance, and changes in the rate of rise of CA 19/9, which were used as surrogate markers for disease progression. Marimastat was well tolerated. Musculoskeletal pain, stiffness, and tenderness emerged as dose-limiting toxicity. No other dose-related toxicities were observed. A reduced rate of rise of CA 19/9 was observed at dose levels of 5, 10, and 25 mg twice daily. The overall median survival was 160 days, with a 1-year survival of 21%. Marimastat was associated with an acceptable toxicity profile, and these preliminary data suggest that long-term oral administration is feasible and safe. Doses of 5, 10, and 25 mg twice daily were identified as the optimal doses to be tested in larger randomized studies.

High dose tamoxifen in the treatment of recurrent high grade glioma: a report of clinical stabilization and tumour regression.

We present a case of recurrent glioma, previously treated with maximal surgery and radiation in which a high dose of tamoxifen has stabilized the tumour clinically and has resulted in it's radiologic regression. Given tamoxifen's relative lack of toxicity, it might serve as a useful adjuvant in the treatment of recurrent glioma.

High dose tamoxifen and radiotherapy in patients with glioblastoma multiforme: a phase IB study.

PURPOSE: To assess the feasibility and the toxicity of adjuvant high dose tamoxifen (TAM) and postoperative brain irradiation for patients with newly-diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twelve patients with histopathologically confirmed GBM entered the study. There were nine males and three females, with median age of 48.8 years (range 30-75 years). Karnofsky performance status (KPS) was 60-70% for four patients and 80-100% for eight patients. Based on the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group recursive partition analysis, there were three class III patients, six class IV, one class V, and two class VI. Eleven patients underwent partial surgical tumor resection and one patient had a near complete resection. Two weeks post surgery, the patients were started on high dose TAM (120 mg/m2 P.O. BID for three months). Two weeks from date of starting TAM, external beam radiotherapy (RT) was given at a dose of 59.4 Gy/33 qd fractions/6.5 weeks. Patients were assessed weekly for toxicity during treatment. Imaging studies were done at the end of two weeks of TAM, then monthly. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 40 weeks (range 22-84 weeks). In one patient, TAM was associated with significant vomiting, necessitating the TAM dose to be decreased at three weeks and then stopped at two months. One other patient had bilateral deep venous thrombosis after 52 weeks on TAM, although the relationship to TAM was not firmly established. There were no radiological responses after two weeks of TAM or at the end of RT. The median time to progression was 17.7 weeks (range 5.1-43.8 weeks). Median survival time was 33.4 weeks (range 10-79.7). Actuarial survival at 48 and 74 weeks was 40% and 15%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that adjuvant high dose TAM is feasible and relatively well-tolerated. Furthermore, the combined use of high dose TAM and RT postoperatively was not associated with any significant increase in radiation-induced neurological toxicity. However, high dose TAM does not appear to improve treatment results.

Relationship between O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase levels and clinical response induced by chloroethylnitrosourea therapy in glioma patients.

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant nitrosourea chemotherapy fails to prolong survival significantly as many tumors demonstrate resistance to these drugs. It has been documented in cell lines that O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) plays an important role in chloroethylnitrosourea (CENU) drug resistance. METHODS: We evaluated MGMT expression in 22 glioma specimens by using an immunofluorescence assay and compared the results with clinical responses of the patients to CENU-based chemotherapy. RESULTS: Eight tumor samples had no detectable MGMT, whereas other samples had from 9,989 to 982,401 molecules/nucleus. In one group (12 patients), the tumor decreased in size or was stable (effective group), whereas in the other group (10 patients), the tumor demonstrated continuous growth during chemotherapy (progressive group). The Mer- patients (MGMT < 60,000 molecules/nucleus) appeared to have more chance of stable disease or response to CENU therapy than the Mer+ patients (MGMT > 60,000 molecules/nucleus) (X2 = 4.791, p = 0.0286). In patients with glioblastomas multiforme (GBMs), the median time to progression (TTP) of Mer+ patient was shorter than that of Mer- patient (t = 2.04, p = 0.049). As a corollary, the MGMT levels were significantly higher in GBM tumors from the progressive group than those from the effective group (t = 2.26, p = 0.029). However, there was no significant correlation between MGMT levels and either the survival time (r = 0.04, p = 0.8595) or TTP (r = 0.107, p = 0.6444). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that being MGMT positive is indicative of a more aggressive disease that progresses more rapidly with CENU therapy. However, MGMT negative tumors are not always sensitive to CENU agents, suggesting that other factors are also important.

Clinical response of O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase levels to 1,3-(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea chemotherapy in glioma patients.

Adjuvant nitrosourea chemotherapy fails to prolong patient survival significantly as many tumors demonstrate resistance to these drugs. It has been documented in cell lines that O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) plays an important role in chloroethylnitrosourea (CENU) drug resistance. The authors evaluated MGMT expression in 22 glioma specimens by using an immunofluorescence assay and compared the results with clinical response of the patients to CENU-based chemotherapy. The patients were treated with CENU after evidence of progressive disease following surgery and radiotherapy. Eight tumor samples had no detectable MGMT, whereas other samples had from 9989 to 982,401 molecules/nucleus. In one group (12 patients), the tumor decreased in size or was stable (effective group), whereas in the other group (10 patients), the tumor demonstrated continuous growth during chemotherapy (progressive group). The median time to progression (TTP) was 6.7 months with a median survival of 13 months. The Mer(-) patients (MGMT < 60,000 molecules/nucleus) appeared to have more chance of stable disease or response to CENU therapy than the Mer(+) patients (MGMT > 60,000 molecules/nucleus) (chi-square = 4.791, p = 0.0286). In patients with glioblastomas multiforme (GBMs), the TTP of Mer(+) patients was shorter than that of Mer(-) patients (t = 2.04, p = 0.049). As a corollary, the MGMT levels were significantly higher in GBM tumors from the progressive group than those from the effective group (t = -2.26, p = 0.029). The TTP and survival time in the effective GBM group were also longer than those in the progressive GBM group. However, there was no significant correlation between MGMT levels and either the survival time (r = 0.04, p = 0.8595) or TTP (r = 0.107, p = 0.6444). Results from this study suggested that MGMT positivity is indicative of more aggressive disease that progresses more rapidly when exposed to CENU therapy. However, MGMT-negative tumors are not always sensitive to CENU agents, suggesting that other factors may also be important.

Case report: management of methotrexate toxicity in an anephric patient.

We describe the case of an anephric woman on chronic hemodialysis who developed breast cancer with positive axillary nodes. After mastectomy, we attempted to treat her with adjuvant chemotherapy. She suffered severe toxicity involving the skin, gastrointestinal tract and bone marrow after a single dose of 15 mg (10 mg m-2) of methotrexate. She received high doses of leukovorin and hemodialysis was continued. Although hemodialysis caused little acute change in the serum methotrexate levels, over a period of 3 weeks the levels did decrease, her symptoms of toxicity subsided, and she recovered. The case demonstrates the limited effectiveness of hemodialysis for treating methotrexate toxicity and suggests that leukovorin is useful for reversing it.

A phase I study of escalating interferon alpha-2a combined with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies.

On the basis of preclinical data showing synergy between 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), leucovorin (LV) and IFN-alpha-2a, a phase I study was carried out to determine the maximum tolerable dose (MTD) of IFN-alpha-2a with this combination in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies. The treatment consisted of 370 mg/m2 5-FU and 200 mg/m2, LV on days 1 to 5, and IFN-alpha-2a on days 1 to 5 of the first week of chemotherapy and on days 1, 3, 5 of each subsequent week, on a 28-day cycle. Six patients with colorectal, 3 with pancreas, 2 with oesophagus, 2 with hepatocellular and one with gastric cancer were treated. At level III (5 x 10(6) U/m2) all patients experienced grade 3 or 4 toxicity during the first 56 days of treatment and the MTD was declared level II. Grade 3 toxicity comprised of anorexia, mucositis, diarrhoea, and fatigue; in one instance, grade 4 neutropenia occurred. Ten patients were evaluable for response, one patient with an oesophageal cancer had a minor response and one patient with rectal cancer and liver metastases had a radiological complete response lasting 3 months. The recommended dose for this schedule in phase II studies is 5-FU 370 mg/m2, LV 200 mg/m2, and IFN-alpha-2a 4 x 10(6) U/m2.

Phase II study of tiazofurin in gliomas in adults. A National Cancer Institute of Canada study.

The National Cancer Institute of Canada conducted a Phase II study of tiazofurin 1100 to 1375 mg/m2 IV daily x 5 days in adults with grade 2, 3, and 4 gliomas. No responses were seen. Five of sixteen evaluable patients had stable disease for 38 to 147 days (median, 75 days). Treatment was generally well tolerated, and hence the dose was escalated from 1100 mg/m2/day to 1375 mg/m2/day after the first twelve patients were entered. Treatment-induced hypertension requiring pharmacological intervention was seen in four patients. Gastrointestinal toxicity was generally mild. Treatment-related headache was seen in thirteen patients, and drowsiness or weakness was seen in seven patients. In summary, tiazofurin on this dose schedule does not have major activity against grade 2, 3, and 4 gliomas.

A randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-finding study of ORG 2766 in the prevention or delay of cisplatin-induced neuropathies in women with ovarian cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to evaluate the efficacy of Org 2766 (a hexapeptide analogue of ACTH) in the prevention or delay of cisplatin-induced neuropathy during chemotherapy in women with ovarian cancer as measured by vibration perception threshold (VPT). METHODS: In this randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 196 women with ovarian cancer were treated with cisplatin 75-100 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 600-1000 mg/m2 plus placebo or two dose levels of Org 2766. The cisplatin-induced neuropathies were monitored by determining the VPT with the Vibratron II. VPT was determined for both the most sensitive great toe and the index finger on a monthly basis during treatment and months 1, 2, and 3 postchemotherapy. Once the blind was broken, it was found that 174 women (59 in placebo, 58 in 2 mg, and 57 in 4 mg) had enough data to allow evaluation. RESULTS: Over the course of follow-up, the VPT was found to increase. This is consistent with the development of cisplatin-induced peripheral neuropathies. The baseline VPT for the index finger was less than that of the great toe (0.65 vs 2.13), but the percentage change in VPT was the same for both (percentage increase in VPT of about 350%). When the VPTs are compared according to the dose of Org 2766 given, there appears to be no difference in the rate of change or degree of neuropathies that developed in these women receiving cisplatin and cyclophosphamide. CONCLUSIONS: The development of cisplatin-induced neuropathies is confirmed by measurement of the VPT. The rate of development of neuropathies seems to accelerate after the sixth course of cisplatin. When the development of neuropathies is evaluated on the basis of Org 2766 dosage, it is found that there is no difference in the rate or degree of neuropathies seen. Instead of providing protection from and delay of onset of peripheral neuropathies caused by cisplatin, these results suggest that the administration of Org 2766 appears to cause an increase in the rate of change and degree of neuropathies (P > 0.05).

Pulmonary blastoma: case report of a patient with a 7-year remission and review of chemotherapy experience in the world literature.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary blastoma is a rare malignant neoplasm for which there currently are no treatment guidelines. METHODS: A patient with locally advanced pulmonary blastoma is described. The treatment modality is discussed and the world literature is reviewed with respect to the use of chemotherapy. RESULTS: A 54-year-old man had a 7-year disease free survival despite subtotal resection. He was treated with adjuvant radiotherapy and combination chemotherapy. Three cycles of cisplatin and etoposide were administered. The world literature was reviewed with regard to the use of adjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of pulmonary blastoma. CONCLUSIONS: Surgery, adjuvant radiotherapy, and combination chemotherapy with cisplatin and etoposide should be considered in the treatment of patients with this rare pulmonary neoplasm.