Society of Surgical Oncology Breast Disease Site Working Group Statement on Contralateral Mastectomy: Indications, Outcomes, and Risks.

Rates of contralateral mastectomy (CM) among patients with unilateral breast cancer have been increasing in the United States. In this Society of Surgical Oncology position statement, we review the literature addressing the indications, risks, and benefits of CM since the society's 2017 statement. We held a virtual meeting to outline key topics and then conducted a literature search using PubMed to identify relevant articles. We reviewed the articles and made recommendations based on group consensus. Patients consider CM for many reasons, including concerns regarding the risk of contralateral breast cancer (CBC), desire for improved cosmesis and symmetry, and preferences to avoid ongoing screening, whereas surgeons primarily consider CBC risk when making a recommendation for CM. For patients with a high risk of CBC, CM reduces the risk of new breast cancer, however it is not known to convey an overall survival benefit. Studies evaluating patient satisfaction with CM and reconstruction have yielded mixed results. Imaging with mammography within 12 months before CM is recommended, but routine preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging is not; there is also no evidence to support routine postmastectomy imaging surveillance. Because the likelihood of identifying an occult malignancy during CM is low, routine sentinel lymph node surgery is not recommended. Data on the rates of postoperative complications are conflicting, and such complications may not be directly related to CM. Adjuvant therapy delays due to complications have not been reported. Surgeons can reduce CM rates by encouraging shared decision making and informed discussions incorporating patient preferences.

Factors Associated With Node-Positive Disease in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Larger tumor size and shorter tumor-to-nipple distance at diagnosis are associated with greater risk of lymph node involvement in breast cancer. However, the relationship between receptor subtype status and lymph node metastasis remains unclear. Our objective was to examine the association between primary tumor size, location, and nodal metastasis across estrogen receptor (ER)+/ progesterone receptor (PR)+/ human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-, ER+/PR-/HER2-, ER+/PR+/HER2+, and ER+/PR-/HER2+ tumors. METHODS: A single-institution retrospective chart review was conducted of breast cancer patients diagnosed between 1998 and 2019 who underwent nodal evaluation during primary surgery. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, pure ductal carcinoma in situ, inflammatory, recurrent, metastatic, bilateral, multicentric, and multifocal disease were excluded. Descriptive statistics (proportions and frequencies for categorical variables and medians [Q1-Q3] for continuous variables) were used to summarize patient characteristics. Kruskal-Wallis test was applied to test the association of outcome variables and continuous variables. Chi-square test or Fisher exact test was applied to test the association of outcome variables and categorical variables. RESULTS: Six hundred eighteen ER + patients had a median tumor size of 1.7 cm (1.1-2.5 cm). Two hundred ninety six out of 618 (47.9%) were node-positive and 188/618 (30.4%) had axillary dissection. Eighty four point three percent of patients were ER+/PR+/HER2-, 6.31% were ER+/PR-/HER2-, 6.96% were ER+/PR+/HER2+, and 1.13% were ER+/PR-/HER2+. Median tumor size was significantly larger in node-positive cases compared to node-negative cases in ER+/PR+/HER2-, ER+/PR+/HER2+, and ER+/PR-/HER2- subgroups. In ER+/PR+/HER2-patients, median tumor-nipple distance was significantly shorter in node-positive patients compared to node-negative patients. Upper outer quadrant location was significantly associated with nodal positivity in ER+/PR-/HER2- patients. CONCLUSIONS: Across ER + patients, the significance between tumor size, location, and lymph node positivity varied significantly when differentiating by PR and HER2 status.

Surgical Management of the Axilla in HR+/HER2- Breast Cancer in the Z1071 Era: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of the National Cancer Database.

BACKGROUND: Axillary management varies between sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for patients with clinical N1 (cN1), hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)/neu-negative (HER2-), infiltrative ductal carcinoma (IDC) who achieve a complete clinical response (cCR) to neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST). This study sought to evaluate clinical practice patterns and survival outcomes of SLNB versus ALND in this patient subset. METHODS: Patients with cN1, HR+/HER2-, unilateral IDC demonstrating a cCR to NAST were identified from the 2012-2017 National Cancer Database (NCDB) and stratified based on final axillary surgery management (SLNB vs ALND). After propensity score-matching, overall survival (OS) was compared using a Kaplan-Meier analysis, and significant OS predictors were identified using Cox regression. RESULTS: Of the 1676 patients selected for this study, 593 (35.4%) underwent SLNB and 1083 (64.6%) underwent ALND. Use of SLNB increased by 28 % between 2012 and 2017. Among a total of 584 matched patients, 461 matched ypN0 patients, and 108 matched ypN+ patients, mean OS did not differ between SLNB and ALND (all patients [92.1 ± 0.8 vs 90.2 ± 1.0 months; p = 0.157], ypN0 patients [92.4 ± 0.8 vs 89.9 ± 0.9 months; p = 0.105], ypN+ patients [83.5 ± 2.3 vs 91.7 ± 2.7 months; p ± 0.963). Cox regression identified age, Charlson score, clinical T stage, and pathologic nodal status as significant predictors of OS. CONCLUSION: The final surgical management strategy used for cN1, HR+/HER2- IDC patients who achieved a cCR to NAST did not have a significant impact on survival outcomes in this analysis. Potential opportunities for de-escalation of axillary management among this patient subset exist, and validation studies are needed.

NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian, and Pancreatic, Version 2.2024.

The NCCN Guidelines for Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian, and Pancreatic focus primarily on assessment of pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants associated with increased risk of breast, ovarian, pancreatic, and prostate cancer, including BRCA1, BRCA2, CDH1, PALB2, PTEN, and TP53, and recommended approaches to genetic counseling/testing and care strategies in individuals with these P/LP variants. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize important updates regarding: (1) a new section for transgender, nonbinary and gender diverse people who have a hereditary predisposition to cancer focused on risk reduction strategies for ovarian cancer, uterine cancer, prostate cancer, and breast cancer; and (2) testing criteria and management associated with TP53 P/LP variants and Li-Fraumeni syndrome.

Neoadjuvant systemic therapy in geriatric breast cancer patients: a National Cancer Database (NCDB) analysis.

PURPOSE: Neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) can be an effective treatment option for patients with HER2 + or triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, its use in geriatric patients is largely understudied. Our aim is to investigate the effect of NAST in both septuagenarians and octogenarians with HER2 + or TNBC to better understand its role in the geriatric patient population. METHODS: We utilized the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to analyze female patients with HER2 + or TNBC between 70 and 89 years. We compared the baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of septuagenarians and octogenarians using mixed-effect modeling for continuous variables and conditional logistic regressions for categorical variables. Overall survival (OS) between several subgroups was compared based on a propensity score model. Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate OS between the subgroups, and log-rank test was used to compare OS results. RESULTS: A total of 16,443 patients met inclusion/exclusion criteria, of which 92.9% had infiltrative ductal carcinoma and 73.5% were TNBC. Most patients received NAST as a first course of therapy (58.8%). Septuagenarians were more likely to receive NAST (65.9%), whereas octogenarians were more likely to receive upfront surgical resection (67.7%). Our analysis demonstrated OS benefit with NAST among patients who received surgical resection. However, in patients who received NAST, decline during therapy was associated with a significantly poorer OS outcomes in general. CONCLUSION: When combined with surgical resection, NAST is an effective treatment option in both septuagenarians and octogenarians. Nonetheless, careful selection of NAST recipients in this population remains critical to optimize patient outcome.

Surgical Management of Axilla of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in the Z1071 Era: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of the National Cancer Database.

BACKGROUND: The role of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients who present with clinical N1 (cN1) disease and undergo complete clinical response (cCR) to neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) remains unclear. We aimed to study the outcomes of SLNB versus axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in this setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with cN1 TNBC who showed cCR to NAST were selected from the National Cancer Database (NCDB), and propensity score matched 1:1 between SLNB and ALND in all-comers, ypN0, and ypN1 subgroups. Overall survival (OS) was compared using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression was used to identify predictors of OS. RESULTS: Of the 2953 patients selected. 1062 (36.0%) underwent SLNB and 1891 (64.0%) underwent ALND. There was a chronological increase in national SLNB utilization (from 20% in 2012 to 46% in 2017). One thousand three patients were propensity matched between SLNB and ALND, and no OS difference was noted (81.73 ± 1.04 vs. 80.07 ± 0.70 months; p = 0.127). In the ypN0 subgroup, 884 pairs were matched and no significant OS difference was found (85.29 ± 0.84 vs. 82.60 ± 0.68 months; p = 0.638). In ypN+ patients, 129 pairs were matched and demonstrated a trend toward decreased OS with SLNB (64.37 ± 3.12 vs. 72.45 ± 72.45; p = 0.085). Cox regression identified age, inner tumors, advanced T stage, partial/no in-breast response, and nodal status as unfavorable predictors of OS. Definitive axillary surgical procedure was not a predictor in the final model. CONCLUSION: SLNB and ALND appear to yield comparable OS in cN1 TNBC patients who demonstrate cCR to NAST. Caution should be exercised in ypN1 patients as worse OS could be associated with SLNB.

The psychosocial needs of underserved breast cancer survivors and perspectives of their clinicians and support providers.

PURPOSE: Breast cancer survivors (BrCS) experience many psychosocial difficulties following treatment, leading to an increased risk of psychological distress compared to the general population. This is especially true for underserved BrCS whose unmet supportive care needs can result in worse physical and mental health outcomes. This qualitative study compared healthcare and support providers' perceptions of BrCS' needs to survivors' perceptions of their own needs. METHODS: Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with 25 underserved BrCS and 20 cancer survivorship stakeholders identified using purposeful sampling. Using the constant comparison method and content analysis, data were analyzed via an iterative process of coding and discussion. Data were summarized according to three intermediate and proximal themes mentioned by both stakeholders and survivors: (1) psychosocial needs of cancer survivors, (2) support, and (3) benefit finding/positive feelings about cancer. Demographic data were analyzed by calculating descriptive statistics. RESULTS: There was consistency in providers' and survivors' perceptions of post-treatment mood changes, financial burden, familial stress, and physical changes. Providers and survivors differed in perceptions of BrCS' preferred sources of care and support, effects of cancer treatment on body image, the effects of fear of cancer recurrence on follow-up care, and benefit finding. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides valuable insight into areas in which healthcare and support providers' perceptions may differ from underserved BrCS' lived experiences. Results from this study can be used to develop interventions and inform healthcare and support providers on how to provide high-quality care to underserved BrCS.

Complication Profile of Total Submuscular Versus Prepectoral Tissue Expander Placement: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: We sought to compare the safety profile of prepectoral breast reconstruction with total submuscular tissue expander reconstruction, previously our standard. Primary outcomes of interest in this retrospective cohort study were incidence of infection, hematoma, seroma, mastectomy flap necrosis, and reconstruction loss. METHODS: Total submuscular and prepectoral with acellular dermal matrix reconstructions consecutively performed by a single surgeon (P.D.S.) between January 1, 2016, and December 31, 2019, were compared. Demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as complications and complication types, were extracted for all patients. A t test was used to assess differences in continuous variables. Multivariate logistics regression was used to assess the association between type of reconstruction and complication rate. The statistical significance was set at 0.05 for all comparisons. RESULTS: A total of 133 patients (234 breasts) were included. There was a significantly greater incidence of infection (16.5% vs 5.5%, P < 0.01) in the prepectoral/acellular dermal matrix cohort. However, reconstructive loss was low in both cohorts (2.5% and 3.0%, P = 0.83). Adjusted odds ratio for complications in the prepectoral cohort was 2.26, but this was not statistically significant (adjusted P = 0.24). CONCLUSIONS: Prepectoral breast reconstruction shares an overall complication profile that is not greater than that of total submuscular reconstruction. It is associated with a greater risk of infection; however, the ability to salvage the reconstruction with early, aggressive intervention results in low rates of reconstructive loss, comparable with those of total submuscular reconstruction.

Effect of surgical complications on outcomes in breast cancer patients treated with mastectomy and immediate reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Operative complications affect recurrence in non-breast malignancies. Rising rates of mastectomy with immediate reconstruction and their increased post-operative complications fuel concerns for poorer outcome in breast cancer (BC). We sought to determine the effect of complications on recurrence in BC patients. METHODS: A single-institution retrospective review was conducted of incident BC treated with mastectomy and immediate reconstruction. Overall survival and recurrence were compared between patients with complications to those without. RESULTS: Of 201 patients (350 mastectomies, 86 nipple-sparing), 62 (30.8%) had a surgical complication. Patients with complications were older, but groups were similar for type of reconstruction, tobacco use, hormone receptor status, HER2, lymphovascular invasion, and pathologic stage (all p > 0.05). Twenty-two complications (10.9%) were infection, 5 (2.5%) dehiscence, 14 flap necrosis (7%), 21 hematomas (10.4%), and 8 nipple necroses (9%). Recurrence occurred in 18 (8.9%) patients: 4 local, 2 regional, and 12 distant. After 8.9 years of median follow-up, patients with complications trended towards higher recurrence (hazard ratio (HR) 2.23, log-rank p = 0.08, Cox regression p = 0.05), particularly with nipple necrosis (HR 3.28, log-rank p = 0.09, regression p = 0.06). Patients with other complications had similar recurrence-free survival to those without (all p > 0.05). Higher stage (HR 13.66, log-rank p = 0.03) and adjuvant radiation (HR 2.78, log-rank p = 0.04) cases were more likely to recur. Patients with complications had similar overall survival to those without (log-rank p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: BC patients with surgical complications do not have lower overall survival. This finding may be due to the improved prognosis compared to non-breast malignancies.

Surgical Management of the Axilla of HER2+ Breast Cancer in the Z1071 Era: A Propensity-Score-Matched Analysis of the NCDB.

INTRODUCTION: We aim to analyze survival outcomes for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) versus axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2)+ infiltrative ductal carcinoma (IDC) that demonstrate complete clinical response (cCR) to neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) after initial presentation with clinical N1 (cN1) disease. METHODS: NCDB 2004-2017 was utilized for the analysis. Female patients with unilateral HER2+ IDC, stage cT1-T4 cN1, who demonstrated cCR to NAST with reported definitive axillary surgical management were included. Patients were propensity score matched, and overall survival (OS) was compared. Cox regression analysis was used to identify survival predictors. RESULTS: 6453 patients were selected, of whom 2461 (38.1%) had SLNB and 3992 (69.1%) had ALND as definitive axillary surgical management. The trend of SLNB utilization increased from 20% in 2012 to 50% in 2017. A total of 2454 patients were matched from each group with adequate adjustment for all variables. There was no difference in OS between SLNB versus ALND (84.03 ± 0.36 versus 84.62 ± 0.42 months; p = 0.522). Cox regression identified age, cT stage, primary tumor response to NAST, ypN+, and endocrine therapy as significant OS predictors. In subgroup analysis of patients with ypN+ who had SLNB as a definitive procedure, primary tumor response to NAST and continuation of adjuvant chemotherapy were associated with improved OS. CONCLUSION: In cN1 HER2+ IDC patients who demonstrate cCR to NAST, SLNB is a reasonable definitive procedure for axillary management with comparable OS outcomes to ALND. However, higher-level data are required to determine the appropriate management in the case of ypN+.

Is it Wise to Omit Sentinel Node Biopsy in Elderly Patients with Breast Cancer?

BACKGROUND: The Society of Surgical Oncology's Choosing Wisely® guidelines recommend against routine sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in clinically node-negative (cN0), hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer patients aged ≥ 70 years. We examined the effect of SLNB on treatment and outcomes in this population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-institution retrospective review of consecutive cN0 women ≥ 70 years of age who received SLNB was performed. We collected clinicopathologic characteristics and treatment data. Patients were compared according to SLN status with subset analysis of HR-positive patients. Outcomes were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and univariable analysis, and were compared using log-rank tests. RESULTS: Of 500 patients, 345 (69%) were SLN-negative. Median age was 74 years (range 70-96). Most tumors were T1 (72%), N0 (69%), invasive ductal (77%), without lymphovascular invasion (88%), estrogen receptor-positive (88%) and progesterone receptor-positive (75%), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative (88%) treated with lumpectomy (71%). Median number of SLNs obtained was 2 (range 0-12) and median number of positive SLNs was 0 (range 0-8). Characteristics of the HR-positive subset were similar. In both the overall cohort and the HR-positive subset, SLN status significantly affected the use of adjuvant chemotherapy, although no significant effect on recurrence was observed. SLN-negative patients had better overall survival and less distant recurrence (both p < 0.0001). Adjuvant hormone therapy significantly improved overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: SLNB can be safely omitted in elderly patients with T1, HR-positive, invasive ductal carcinoma tumors, but may still provide important information affecting treatment. Patients who are candidates for adjuvant systemic chemotherapy should still be considered for SLNB.

TARGIT-R (Retrospective): 5-Year Follow-Up Evaluation of Intraoperative Radiation Therapy (IORT) for Breast Cancer Performed in North America.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) has been investigated for patients with low-risk, early-stage breast cancer. The The North American experience was evaluated by TARGIT-R (retrospective) to provide outcomes for patients treated in "real-world" clinical practice with breast IORT. This analysis presents a 5-year follow-up assessment. METHODS: TARGIT-R is a multi-institutional retrospective registry of patients who underwent lumpectomy and IORT between the years 2007 and 2013. The primary outcome of the evaluation was ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR). RESULTS: The evaluation included 667 patients with a median follow-up period of 5.1 years. Primary IORT (IORT at the time of lumpectomy) was performed for 72%, delayed IORT (after lumpectomy) for 3%, intended boost for 8%, and unintended boost (primary IORT followed by whole-breast radiation) for 17% of the patients. At 5 years, IBTR was 6.6% for all the patients, with 8% for the primary IORT cohort and 1.7% for the unintended-boost cohort. No recurrences were identified in the delayed IORT or intended-boost cohorts. Noncompliance with endocrine therapy (ET) was associated with higher IBTR risk (hazard ratio [HR], 3.67). Patients treated with primary IORT who were complaint with ET had a 5-year IBTR rate of 3.9%. CONCLUSION: The local recurrence rates in this series differ slightly from recent results of randomized IORT trials and are notably higher than in previous published studies using whole-breast radiotherapy for similar patients with early-stage breast cancer. Understanding differences in this retrospective series and the prospective trials will be critical to optimizing patient selection and outcomes going forward.

Impact of Axillary Dissection Among Patients With Sentinel Node-Positive Breast Cancer Undergoing Mastectomy.

BACKGROUND: Results of the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ACOSOG) Z0011 trial supports omission of completion axillary lymph node dissection (CLND) after breast-conservation surgery with a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). We hypothesized that CLND also does not impact outcomes in women with clinically node-negative (cN0), pathologically node-positive breast cancer undergoing mastectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-institution retrospective review was performed of patients with SLN-positive breast cancer treated from July 1999 through May 2018. Clinicopathologic and outcome data were collected. Patients with SLNBs were compared with those receiving SLNB and CLND. The Kruskal-Wallis, chi-square, and Fisher exact tests were used to assess for differences between continuous and categorical variables. The log-rank test was used for time-to-event analyses, and Cox proportional hazards models were fit for locoregional and distant recurrence and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Of 329 patients with SLN-positive breast cancer undergoing mastectomy, 60% had CLND (n=201). Median age at diagnosis was 53 years (interquartile range [IQR], 46-62 years). The median number of SLNs sampled was 3 (IQR, 2-4), and the median number of positive SLNs was 1 (IQR, 1-2). Patients receiving CLND had higher tumor grades (P=.02) and a higher proportion of hormone receptor negativity (estrogen receptor, 19%; progesterone receptor, 27%; both P=.007). A total of 44 patients (22%) had increased N stage after CLND. Median follow-up was 51 months (IQR, 29-83 months). No association was found between CLND and change in OS and locoregional or distant recurrence. Completion of postmastectomy radiotherapy was associated with improved OS (P=.04). CONCLUSIONS: CLND is not significantly correlated with reduced recurrence or improved OS among patients who have cN0, SLN-positive breast cancer treated with mastectomy. CLND was significantly correlated with receipt of adjuvant systemic therapy. Completion of postmastectomy radiotherapy was associated with improved OS.

Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian, and Pancreatic, Version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.

The NCCN Guidelines for Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian, and Pancreatic focus primarily on assessment of pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants associated with increased risk of breast, ovarian, and pancreatic cancer and recommended approaches to genetic testing/counseling and management strategies in individuals with these pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants. This manuscript focuses on cancer risk and risk management for BRCA-related breast/ovarian cancer syndrome and Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Carriers of a BRCA1/2 pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant have an excessive risk for both breast and ovarian cancer that warrants consideration of more intensive screening and preventive strategies. There is also evidence that risks of prostate cancer and pancreatic cancer are elevated in these carriers. Li-Fraumeni syndrome is a highly penetrant cancer syndrome associated with a high lifetime risk for cancer, including soft tissue sarcomas, osteosarcomas, premenopausal breast cancer, colon cancer, gastric cancer, adrenocortical carcinoma, and brain tumors.

The Learning Curve: Trends in the First 100 Immediate Lymphatic Reconstructions Performed at a Single Institution.

BACKGROUND: Cancer-related lymphedema will affect 10% to 50% of breast cancer survivors. Early data show that immediate lymphatic reconstruction may help prevent breast cancer lymphedema; however, the details have not been fully elucidated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cohort of our first 100 patients for trends in demographics, treatment, and technique. METHODS: At a tertiary care cancer center, high-risk breast cancer-related lymphedema patients underwent axillary reverse lymphatic mapping and immediate lymphatic reconstruction. After institutional review board approval, demographics, technique, and outcomes were recorded. The first 100 patients were analyzed to compare the differences between the first 50 versus the second 50 patient cohorts. RESULTS: Of the first 100 axillary reverse lymphatic mapping performed, there was a significant difference in neoadjuvant chemotherapy with 81% in the earlier cohort versus 98% in the later cohort (P = 0.01). An arborized technique was used more frequently in the second cohort (82% vs 54%, P = 0.01). The incidence of lymphedema was lower in the latter cohort (7 patients vs 1 patient, P = 0.03). The first cohort was 12.2 times more likely to develop lymphedema despite lymphatic reconstruction than the second cohort (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: The data demonstrate multiple trends in the learning curve associated with immediate lymphatic reconstruction at a single institution including improvements in identifying and dissecting lymphatic structures, performing more anastomoses per patient, using the arborized technique more frequently, performing the operation with shorter operative times, and reducing the incidence of lymphedema.

Pain Management in Breast Surgery: Recommendations of a Multidisciplinary Expert Panel-The American Society of Breast Surgeons.

Opioid overdose accounted for more than 47,000 deaths in the United States in 2018. The risk of new persistent opioid use following breast cancer surgery is significant, with up to 10% of patients continuing to fill opioid prescriptions one year after surgery. Over prescription of opioids is far too common. A recent study suggested that up to 80% of patients receiving a prescription for opioids post-operatively do not need them (either do not fill the prescription or do not use the medication). In order to address this important issue, The American Society of Breast Surgeons empaneled an inter-disciplinary committee to develop a consensus statement on pain control for patients undergoing breast surgery. Representatives were nominated by the American College of Surgeons, the Society of Surgical Oncology, The American Society of Plastic Surgeons, and The American Society of Anesthesiologists. A broad literature review followed by a more focused review was performed by the inter-disciplinary panel which was comprised of 14 experts in the fields of breast surgery, anesthesiology, plastic surgery, rehabilitation medicine, and addiction medicine. Through a process of multiple revisions, a consensus was developed, resulting in the outline for decreased opioid use in patients undergoing breast surgery presented in this manuscript. The final document was reviewed and approved by the Board of Directors of the American Society of Breast Surgeons.

NCCN Guidelines Insights: Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian, and Pancreatic, Version 1.2020.

The NCCN Guidelines for Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian, and Pancreatic provide recommendations for genetic testing and counseling for hereditary cancer syndromes, and risk management recommendations for patients who are diagnosed with syndromes associated with an increased risk of these cancers. The NCCN panel meets at least annually to review comments, examine relevant new data, and reevaluate and update recommendations. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel's discussion and most recent recommendations regarding criteria for high-penetrance genes associated with breast and ovarian cancer beyond BRCA1/2, pancreas screening and genes associated with pancreatic cancer, genetic testing for the purpose of systemic therapy decision-making, and testing for people with Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry.

Characteristics of Microinvasive Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Versus Noninvasive and Invasive Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The present literature is conflicting regarding the management of microinvasive ductal carcinoma in situ (miDCIS) as to following recommendations for DCIS (margin status, surgical axillary staging, and possible observation) versus invasive breast cancer. We hypothesize that miDCIS represents more aggressive disease than pure DCIS. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of female miDCIS patients compared with age-matched cohorts of DCIS and T1b/c patients with invasive breast cancer. We collected demographic, clinicopathologic, treatment, and outcome information. Analysis of variance or Kruskal-Wallis tests were used to analyze continuous variables and chi-square or Fisher's exact tests for categorical variables. Survival outcomes were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves. RESULTS: We included 375 patients (125 in each group) with median age 59 y (range 33-91 y). miDCIS tumors were more likely to be hormone receptor negative and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive compared with DCIS or invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC; all P < 0.001). Subgroup analysis by miDCIS focality demonstrated no significant differences. The number of involved lymph nodes was not significantly different from DCIS patients but was significantly fewer than invasive cancer patients. Of 115 miDCIS patients (88%) staged with sentinel lymph node biopsy, eight (7%) had nodal metastases. Six miDCIS patients (5%) were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. Over a median follow-up of 23.3 mo, there were no significant differences in local or distant recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Based on our results, miDCIS has more aggressive pathologic features compared with DCIS and warrants surgical treatment and nodal staging similar to the management of IDC. In addition, similar to IDC, nodal and receptor status may influence medical management.

Development of Malignancy-Risk Gene Signature Assay for Predicting Breast Cancer Risk.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer (BC) risk assessment models are statistical estimates based on patient characteristics. We developed a gene expression assay to assess BC risk using benign breast biopsy tissue. METHODS: A NanoString-based malignancy risk (MR) gene signature was validated for formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue. It was applied to FFPE benign and BC specimens obtained from women who underwent breast biopsy, some of whom developed BC during follow-up to evaluate diagnostic capability of the MR signature. BC risk was calculated with MR score, Gail risk score, and both tests combined. Logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curves were used to evaluate these 3 models. RESULTS: NanoString MR demonstrated concordance between fresh frozen and FFPE malignant samples (r = 0.99). Within the validation set, 563 women with benign breast biopsies from 2007 to 2011 were identified and followed for at least 5 y; 50 women developed BC (affected) within 5 y from biopsy. Three groups were compared: benign tissue from unaffected and affected patients and malignant tissue from affected patients. Kruskal-Wallis test suggested difference between the groups (P = 0.09) with trend in higher predicted MR score for benign tissue from affected patients before development of BC. Neither the MR signature nor Gail risk score were statistically different between affected and unaffected patients; combining both tests demonstrated best predictive value (AUC = 0.71). CONCLUSIONS: FFPE gene expression assays can be used to develop a predictive test for BC. Further investigation of the combined MR signature and Gail Model is required. Our assay was limited by scant cellularity of archived breast tissue.

Utility of Taking Additional Margins When Performing Breast-Conserving Surgery with Intraoperative Radiation Therapy for Early Breast Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) is an alternative to external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) after lumpectomy, in which radiation is delivered before the final margin analysis. Practices vary regarding excision of close or positive margins pre- and post-IORT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a retrospective cohort of women with hormone receptor-positive, clinically node-negative breast cancer undergoing lumpectomy with IORT and selective EBRT at our institution from 2011 to 2015, we compared the impact of pre- and post-IORT margin excisions on in-breast tumor recurrence. Additional pre-IORT margins were taken at surgical team discretion. Re-excisions post-IORT were performed for positive/close margins. We describe rate of invasive or in situ malignancy in additional pre-IORT and post-IORT re-excised specimens and compare IBTR using Chi-squared tests. RESULTS: There were 195 cases in 193 women (2 bilateral breast cancer). Pre-IORT, ≥1 additional margin was obtained in 139 (71%). The final margin on the initial lumpectomy was positive in 13 (9%) and ≤2 mm in 72 (52%). Additional pre-IORT margins contained in situ/invasive cancer in 16 (12%). Thirty-one patients (16%) underwent post-IORT re-excision and nine (29%) contained invasive/in situ malignancy. Twenty-three (12%) received EBRT. In 45.6-month mean follow-up, 13 had IBTR (7%) with no difference by additional pre-IORT margin excision (5 vs. 11%, p = 0.150), post-IORT margin re-excision (10 vs. 6%, p = 0.464), or EBRT (0 vs. 8%, p = 0.172). Adjuvant endocrine therapy was associated with lower IBTR (4 vs. 17%, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Taking additional pre-IORT margins and re-excising close/positive margins post-IORT improved margin clearance rates but had an unclear effect on IBTR. Adjuvant endocrine therapy significantly reduced IBTR.