RESUMEN
Objective This study aims to evaluate the effects of immersion in alcoholic beverages on the surface roughness and color stability of two types of milled zirconia. Materials and methods The sample size included 60 cuboid-shaped samples of two types of zirconia (Z1 and Z2), 30 in each group. Zirconia was milled and sintered at 1,500°C for eight hours. The samples were immersed in artificial saliva (control), red wine, and whiskey three times a day over a 30-day period. After each post-immersion cycle, samples were cleaned ultrasonically. Surface roughness and color parameters were measured using an atomic force microscope (AFM) and spectrophotometer before and after immersion. The collected data was organized into tables, and statistical analysis was conducted using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 27 software (IBM SPSS Statistics, Armonk, NY). For surface roughness, a paired t-test was conducted, while for color change, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's honestly significant difference (HSD) tests were done. Results The mean values of pre- and post-immersion values reveal that whiskey causes the highest difference in surface roughness for Z1 (137.09 nm) and Z2 (86.15 nm) groups, while red wine causes maximum discoloration in both Z1 (2.41) and Z2 (1.94) groups. The paired t-test revealed significant surface roughness changes in Z1 with artificial saliva and red wine, while whiskey (p<0.05), although showing changes, lacked statistical significance (p>0.05). The whiskey group demonstrated a moderate linear association (0.599) between pre- and post-immersion values. For Z2, artificial saliva, red wine, and whiskey (p<0.05) induced statistically significant surface roughness alterations. ANOVA tests indicated significant color changes post-immersion in all three subgroups of Z1 and Z2 (p<0.05 for both). Tukey's HSD test showed significant differences between artificial saliva and red wine (p<0.05), as well as artificial saliva and whiskey (p<0.05) in Z1 and Z2. However, no significant difference was found between red wine and whiskey in both Z1 and Z2 groups (p>0.05). Conclusion Whiskey, red wine, and artificial saliva increased zirconia's surface roughness. Alcoholic solutions altered zirconia's colorimetric parameters, with no significant differences among them.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: 3D printing technology is replacing manual fabrication in all fields. 3D-printed impression trays should be assessed as they could replace conventional impression trays in the future. AIM: In-vitro comparison and evaluation of the dimensional stability and retention strength of impressions to custom impression trays fabricated using conventional method and additive technology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A maxillary edentulous auto-polymerizing acrylic resin model served as the master model. Two moulds were prepared from the master model in order to obtain 12 casts. One cast was scanned for 3D printing digital light processing (DLP) and fused deposition modelling (FDM) 24 impression trays using polylactic acid (PLA). Twelve casts were used to fabricate light cure impression trays. Polyvinyl-siloxane impressions were made on the master model using 36 impression trays and 18 trays each were used to assess dimensional stability and retention strength. RESULTS: In dimensional stability analysis, one sample t-test revealed a statistically significant difference between each group and the master model followed by a one-way ANOVA. There were significant differences, but the difference was less with FDM trays (P < 0.05). In retention strength analysis, one-way Analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed statistically significant difference between each group and post-hoc test revealed specific difference, the highest with FDM trays (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Dimensional changes were observed at 30 minutes and 72 hours. Lesser dimensional changes were observed when impressions were made using FDM trays followed by DLP and light cure trays. The mean retention strength seen in descending order was FDM, followed by DLP and light cure trays. The best retention strength was noticed when impressions were made using FDM trays.