RESUMEN
Background: The impact of KRAS mutation testing on pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) samples by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for reducing the need to repeat EUS-FNA has been demonstrated. Such testing however is not part of standard practice for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB). Objectives: We aim to analyse the proportion of non-contributive samples by EUS-FNB and to evaluate the impact of KRAS mutation testing on the diagnosis, theranostics and survival. Design: In this retrospective study, the impact on diagnosis and survival of KRAS testing for contributive and non-contributive samples by EUS-FNB was analysed. Methods: The EUS-FNB samples, combined with KRAS testing using the Idylla® technique on liquid-based cytology from patients with PDAC between February 2019 and May 2023, were retrospectively reviewed. The cytology results were classified according to the guidelines of the World Health Organization System for Reporting Pancreaticobiliary Cytopathology (WHOSRPC). Results: A total of 85 EUS-FNB specimens were reviewed. In all, 25 EUS-FNB samples did not lead to a formal diagnosis of PDAC according to the WHOSRPC (30.2%). Out of these 25, 11 (44%) could have been considered positive for a PDAC diagnosis thanks to the KRAS mutation test without carrying out further diagnosis procedures. The sensitivity of KRAS mutation testing using the Idylla technique was 98.6%. According to the available data, survival rates were not statistically different depending on the type of mutation. Conclusion: KRAS mutation testing on liquid-based cytology using the Idylla or equivalent technique, combined with the PDAC EUS-FNB sample, should become a standard for diagnosis to avoid delaying treatment by doing another biopsy. Furthermore, knowledge of the KRAS status from treatment initiation could be used to isolate mutations requiring targeted treatments or inclusion in clinical research trials, especially for wild-type KRAS PDAC.
Diagnostic and theranostic interest of searching for a KRAS mutation in echoendoscopic ultrasound biopsies of pancreatic adenocarcinomas The echoendoscopic ultrasound diagnostic of pancreatic adenocarcinomas sometimes remains difficult due to the nature of these tumors with a particular microenvironment. For more than 30 years, several authors have underlined the importance of searching for a KRAS mutation on samples taken by echoendoscopic ultrasound to improve diagnostic performance. However, this research is not common practice. Our retrospective study made it possible to review the files of 85 patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma in whom an echoendoscopic ultrasound biopsy was performed with a search for the KRAS mutation (with second-generation fine needle biopsy). Forty-four percent could have been considered positive for the diagnosis of PDAC thanks to the search for the KRAS mutation without repeating new samples. Furthermore, knowledge of the KRAS mutation type from diagnosis would make it possible to isolate mutations justifying possible targeted treatments.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The impact of local management of pulmonary metastases on the disease course of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer is poorly assessed. METHODS: REPULCO database was a retrospective cohort on 18 years that included all patients treated for lung metastases from colorectal cancer who received local and/or systemic treatments. AIMS: Primary objective was overall survival, secondary were progression-free survival and survival without chemotherapy. RESULTS: Three hundred and fifteen patients were analyzed, 157 with only systemic treatments, 78 with only local treatments, and 80 with local and systemic treatments. Overall survival at 5 years was 26.9% (IC95%: [17.7-36.9]) for systemic treatments only, 61.0% (IC95%: [40.8-76.1]) for local treatments only, and 77.8% (IC95%: [60.1-88.3]) for local and systemic treatments. Progression-free survival at 2 years was 4.8% (IC95%: [2.1-9.2]) for systemic treatment only, 28.3% (IC95%: [17.7-39.9]) for local treatments only, and 21.8% (IC95%: [13.1-31.9]) for local and systemic treatments. Median survival without chemotherapy was 2.99 months (IC95%: [2.33-3.68]) for systemic treatments, 33.97 months (IC95%: [19.06-NA]) for local treatments, and 12.85 months (IC95%: [8.18-21.06]) for local and systemic treatments. CONCLUSION: Local treatments of lung metastasis led to prolonged survival and allowed long periods of time without chemotherapy in this cohort.