Understanding Patients' Perspectives and Educational Needs by Type of Osteoporosis in Men and Women and People with Glucocorticosteroid-Induced Osteoporosis: A Qualitative Study to Improve Disease Management.

The aim of the study was to investigate similarities and differences in health beliefs, experiences and educational needs by type of osteoporosis (OP), particularly in people with glucocorticoid-induced OP (GIOP) and men. A qualitative study was conducted via focus groups involving post-menopausal women with or without osteoporotic fractures, osteoporotic men and people with GIOP. Fifty-three participants were included in eight groups. A wide range of health beliefs was found for all types of OP. Osteoporosis was considered a natural consequence of ageing except in men or conversely a serious disease associated with risk of new fractures and disability. GIOP patients had heterogeneous knowledge of OP and reported fewer prevention behaviours, and their quality of life was affected by the causal illness. Men had difficulties coping with the loss of their functional abilities and felt that OP was a "women's" disease. Beliefs about treatments ranged from confidence to fear of adverse effects or doubt about efficacy in all types of OP. Participants were interested in physical activity, fall prevention and diet, and preferred group sessions. GIOP patients and men had an interest in face-to-face education. Men were also interested in brief information including via the Internet. Patients' beliefs about OP differed by type of OP. Specific populations such as men or people with GIOP need particular care owing to experiences and needs. Offering group sessions in educational interventions is of interest to allow for sharing experiences and also face-to-face education for men and GIOP patients or the Internet for men.

Management of bone fragility in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in France: An analysis of a national health insurance claims database.

OBJECTIVES: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is considered a major risk factor for fragility fractures. We examined the quality of management of bone fragility in RA patients in a real-life setting. METHODS: We performed a longitudinal case-control retrospective study in a 1/97th random sample of French health care claims database from 2014 to 2016 to determine the extent of bone fragility management in patients with RA compared with non-RA matched controls. RESULTS: Compared to their non-RA controls (n=4652), RA patients (n=1008; mean age: 61.1years; methotrexate: 69.7%; other conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (cDMARDs): 26.8%; biologic: 26.0%; corticosteroids: 36.9%) had more reimbursements for bone mineral density (BMD) measurements (21.6 vs. 9.2%; OR=2.7 [2.3; 3.3]; P<0.01) and for bisphosphonates (7.1 vs. 3.6%, OR=2.0 [1.5; 2.7]; P<0.05). In patients exposed to corticosteroids, RA patients underwent more BMD assessments than non-RA controls (28.0 vs. 18.8%; OR=1.7 [1.3; 2.2]; P<0.05). RA patients exposed to corticosteroids were more likely to sustain fracture than non-exposed RA patients (5.7 vs. 2.4%, P<0.01). In addition, only when comparing patients exposed to corticosteroids, was there statistical evidence of an association between RA and an increased fracture rate (6.2 vs. 3.5%, P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Patients with RA exposed to corticosteroids are at high risk of fracture. Patients with RA had more bone fragility management than controls.