RESUMEN
The UK National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement, and Reduction of Animals in Research (NC3Rs) is reviewing World Health Organization (WHO) manuals, guidelines and recommendations for vaccines and biotherapeutics to identify the extent to which animal-based testing methods are described. The aim is to recommend where updates to these documents can lead to an increased and more harmonised adoption of 3Rs principles (i.e. Replacement, Reduction and Refinement of animal tests) in the quality control and batch release testing requirements for vaccines and biotherapeutics. Improved adoption of 3Rs principles and non-animal testing strategies will help to reduce the delays and costs associated with product release testing. Developing recommendations that are widely applicable by both the manufacturers and national regulatory authorities for vaccines and biological therapeutics globally requires a detailed understanding of how different organisations view the opportunities and barriers to better integration of the 3Rs. To facilitate this, we developed and distributed a survey aimed at individuals who work for national regulatory authorities (NRAs) and/or national control laboratories (NCLs). In this paper, we present the key findings from this survey and how these will help inform the recommendations for wider integration of 3Rs approaches by WHO in their guidance documents applicable to the quality control and batch release testing of vaccines and biotherapeutics.
Asunto(s)
Laboratorios , Vacunas , Humanos , Animales , Factores Biológicos , Control de Calidad , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
The UK National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement, and Reduction of Animals in Research (NC3Rs) has been tasked by the World Health Organization (WHO) to review the extent to which animal-based testing methods are described in their manuals, guidelines and recommendations for vaccines and biotherapeutics. The aim is to identify and recommend where updates to these documents can lead to an increased and more harmonised adoption of 3Rs principles (i.e. Replacement, Reduction and Refinement of animal tests) in the quality control and batch release testing requirements for vaccines and biotherapeutics. Developing recommendations that are widely applicable by both the manufacturers and national regulatory authorities for vaccines and biologicals globally requires a detailed understanding of how different organisations view the opportunities and barriers to better integration of the 3Rs. To facilitate this, we developed and distributed a survey aimed at vaccine and biotherapeutics manufacturers in July 2021. In this paper, we present the key findings from this survey and how these will help inform the recommendations for wider integration of 3Rs approaches by WHO in their guidance documents applicable to the quality control and batch testing of vaccines and biotherapeutics.
Asunto(s)
Vacunas , Animales , Factores Biológicos , Control de Calidad , Organización Mundial de la SaludRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: In many jurisdictions, ethical concerns require surrogate humane endpoints to replace death in small animal models of acute lung injury. Heterogenous selection and reporting of surrogate endpoints render interpretation and generalizability of findings between studies difficult. We aimed to establish expert-guided consensus among preclinical scientists and laboratory animal veterinarians on selection and reporting of surrogate endpoints, monitoring of these models, and the use of analgesia. DESIGN: A three-round consensus process, using modified Delphi methodology, with researchers who use small animal models of acute lung injury and laboratory animal veterinarians who provide care for these animals. Statements on the selection and reporting of surrogate endpoints, monitoring, and analgesia were generated through a systematic search of MEDLINE and Embase. Participants were asked to suggest any additional potential statements for evaluation. SETTING: A web-based survey of participants representing the two stakeholder groups (researchers, laboratory animal veterinarians). Statements were rated on level of evidence and strength of support by participants. A final face-to-face meeting was then held to discuss results. SUBJECTS: None. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Forty-two statements were evaluated, and 29 were rated as important, with varying strength of evidence. The majority of evidence was based on rodent models of acute lung injury. Endpoints with strong support and evidence included temperature changes and body weight loss. Behavioral signs and respiratory distress also received support but were associated with lower levels of evidence. Participants strongly agreed that analgesia affects outcomes in these models and that none may be necessary following nonsurgical induction of acute lung injury. Finally, participants strongly supported transparent reporting of surrogate endpoints. A prototype composite score was also developed based on participant feedback. CONCLUSIONS: We provide a preliminary framework that researchers and animal welfare committees may adapt for their needs. We have identified knowledge gaps that future research should address.
Asunto(s)
Lesión Pulmonar Aguda/fisiopatología , Comités de Atención Animal/organización & administración , Bienestar del Animal/normas , Animales de Laboratorio , Consenso , Animales , Biomarcadores , Humanos , Modelos Animales , Veterinarios/normasRESUMEN
Animal testing has long been integral to the development of biologicals, including vaccines. The use of animals can provide important information on potential toxicity, insights into their mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics and dynamics, physiologic distribution, and potency. However, the use of these same methods is often adopted into the post-licensure phase of the product life cycle for the monitoring of product qualities, such as potency or safety, as part of their routine batch release. The UK National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement, and Reduction of Animals in Research (NC3Rs) and the World Health Organization (WHO) are collaborating on a project to review animal-based testing methods described in WHO manuals, guidelines and recommendations for biologicals to identify where updates can lead to a more harmonised adoption of 3Rs principles (i.e. Replacement, Reduction, and Refinement of animal tests) in batch release testing requirements. An international working group consisting of more than 30 representatives from pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, national control laboratories and regulatory bodies is performing this review. This project aims to address concerns about inconsistencies in the guidance for the scientifically justified use of animal methods required for the post-licensure quality control and batch release testing of biologicals, and the near absence of recommendations for the application of 3Rs principles within the relevant guidelines. Improved adoption of 3Rs principles and non-animal testing strategies will help to reduce the delays and costs associated with product release testing and help support faster access to products by the global communities who need them most urgently.
Asunto(s)
Productos Biológicos , Control de Calidad , Vacunas , Alternativas a las Pruebas en Animales , Animales , Productos Biológicos/normas , Vacunas/normas , Organización Mundial de la SaludRESUMEN
Sepsis is a major worldwide healthcare issue with unmet clinical need. Despite extensive animal research in this area, successful clinical translation has been largely unsuccessful. We propose one reason for this is that, sometimes, the experimental question is misdirected or unrealistic expectations are being made of the animal model. As sepsis models can lead to a rapid and substantial suffering - it is essential that we continually review experimental approaches and undertake a full harm:benefit impact assessment for each study. In some instances, this may require refinement of existing sepsis models. In other cases, it may be replacement to a different experimental system altogether, answering a mechanistic question whilst aligning with the principles of reduction, refinement and replacement (3Rs). We discuss making better use of patient data to identify potentially useful therapeutic targets which can subsequently be validated in preclinical systems. This may be achieved through greater use of construct validity models, from which mechanistic conclusions are drawn. We argue that such models could provide equally useful scientific data as face validity models, but with an improved 3Rs impact. Indeed, construct validity models may not require sepsis to be modelled, per se. We propose that approaches that could support and refine clinical translation of research findings, whilst reducing the overall welfare burden on research animals.
Asunto(s)
Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Sepsis/patología , Investigación Biomédica Traslacional , Animales , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Humanos , Sepsis/fisiopatologíaRESUMEN
Poorly predictive animal models of disease cause avoidable suffering and hamper the discovery of new treatments for patients. A focus on mechanistic modelling has the potential to reduce animal suffering as well as improving translation from the bench to the bedside.
Asunto(s)
Experimentación Animal , Animales , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Descubrimiento de Drogas , Humanos , Investigación Biomédica TraslacionalRESUMEN
Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a painful, chronic disorder and there is currently an unmet need for effective therapies that will benefit a wide range of patients. The research and development process for therapies and treatments currently involves in vivo studies, which have the potential to cause discomfort, pain or distress. This Working Group report focuses on identifying causes of suffering within commonly used mouse and rat 'models' of RA, describing practical refinements to help reduce suffering and improve welfare without compromising the scientific objectives. The report also discusses other, relevant topics including identifying and minimising sources of variation within in vivo RA studies, the potential to provide pain relief including analgesia, welfare assessment, humane endpoints, reporting standards and the potential to replace animals in RA research.
Asunto(s)
Bienestar del Animal , Artritis Reumatoide/fisiopatología , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Alternativas a las Pruebas en Animales/métodos , Animales , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Artritis Reumatoide/patología , Diseño de Fármacos , Humanos , Ratones , RatasRESUMEN
Ending severe suffering is desirable and achievable. In this article we have outlined a 'road map', or series of steps, that can be used to evaluate the extent to which severe suffering occurs within establishments, and some practical principles that can be employed in order to work toward ending it. We urge researchers to act upon these principles, and to begin a journey toward a future where causing severe suffering to animals used in scientific research is a thing of the past.
Asunto(s)
Experimentación Animal , Alternativas al Uso de Animales , AnimalesRESUMEN
On the 26 th January 2023, a free to attend, 'improving in vivo snake venom research: a community discussion' meeting was held virtually. This webinar brought together researchers from around the world to discuss current neutralisation of venom lethality mouse assays that are used globally to assess the efficacy of therapies for snakebite envenoming. The assay's strengths and weaknesses were highlighted, and we discussed what improvements could be made to refine and reduce animal testing, whilst supporting preclinical antivenom and drug discovery for snakebite envenoming. This report summarises the issues highlighted, the discussions held, with additional commentary on key perspectives provided by the authors.
Asunto(s)
Antivenenos , Mordeduras de Serpientes , Venenos de Serpiente , Antivenenos/uso terapéutico , Animales , Venenos de Serpiente/antagonistas & inhibidores , Ratones , Mordeduras de Serpientes/tratamiento farmacológico , HumanosRESUMEN
Scientists who plan to publish in the British Journal of Pharmacology (BJP) should read this article before undertaking studies utilising anaesthetics in mammalian animals. This editorial identifies certain gaps in the reporting of details on the use of anaesthetics in animal research studies published in the BJP. The editorial also provides guidance, based upon current best practices, for performing in vivo experiments that require anaesthesia. In addition, mechanisms of action and physiological impact of specific anaesthetic agents are discussed. Our goal is to identify best practices and to provide guidance on the information required for manuscripts submitted to the BJP that involve the use of anaesthetic agents in studies with experimental animals.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia , Anestésicos , Experimentación Animal , Animales , Anestésicos/farmacología , MamíferosRESUMEN
The therapeutic potential of transient receptor potential vanilloid type 1 (TRPV1) antagonists for chronic pain has been recognized for more than a decade. However, preclinical and clinical data revealed that acute pharmacological blockade of TRPV1 perturbs thermoregulation, resulting in hyperthermia, which is a major hurdle for the clinical development of these drugs. Here, we describe the properties of 7-tert-butyl-6-(4-chloro-phenyl)-2-thioxo-2,3-dihydro-1H-pyrido[2,3-d]pyrimidin-4-one (BCTP), a TRPV1 antagonist with excellent analgesic properties that does not induce significant hyperthermia in rodents at doses providing maximal analgesia. BCTP is a classic polymodal inhibitor of TRPV1, blocking activation of the human channel by capsaicin and low pH with IC(50) values of 65.4 and 26.4 nM, respectively. Similar activity was observed with rat TRPV1, and the inhibition by BCTP was competitive and reversible. BCTP also blocked heat-induced activation of TRPV1. In rats, the inhibition of capsaicin-induced mechanical hyperalgesia was observed with a D(50) value of 2 mg/kg p.o. BCTP also reversed visceral hypersensitivity and somatic inflammatory pain, and using a model of neuropathic pain in TRPV1 null mice we confirmed that its analgesic properties were solely through the inhibition of TRPV1. We were surprised to find that BCTP administered orally induced only a maximal 0.6°C increase in core body temperature at the highest tested doses (30 and 100 mg/kg), contrasting markedly with N-[4-({6-[4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]pyrimidin-4-yl}oxy)-1,3-benzothiazol-2-yl]acetamide (AMG517), a clinically tested TRPV1 antagonist, which induced marked hyperthermia (>1°C) at doses eliciting submaximal reversal of capsaicin-induced hyperalgesia. The combined data indicate that TRPV1 antagonists with a classic polymodal inhibition profile can be identified where the analgesic action is separated from the effects on body temperature.
Asunto(s)
Analgésicos/farmacología , Fiebre/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipersensibilidad/tratamiento farmacológico , Pirimidinonas/farmacología , Canales Catiónicos TRPV/antagonistas & inhibidores , Tionas/farmacología , Canales de Potencial de Receptor Transitorio/antagonistas & inhibidores , Animales , Benzotiazoles/efectos adversos , Temperatura Corporal/efectos de los fármacos , Regulación de la Temperatura Corporal/efectos de los fármacos , Células CHO , Capsaicina/farmacología , Cricetinae , Fiebre/metabolismo , Humanos , Hiperalgesia/inducido químicamente , Hipersensibilidad/metabolismo , Masculino , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos C57BL , Pirimidinas/efectos adversos , Ratas , Ratas Sprague-Dawley , Ratas Wistar , Canales Catiónicos TRPV/metabolismo , Canales de Potencial de Receptor Transitorio/metabolismoRESUMEN
This report was produced by an Expert Working Group (EWG) consisting of UK-based researchers, veterinarians and regulators of animal experiments with specialist knowledge of the use of animal models of spinal cord injury (SCI). It aims to facilitate the implementation of the Three Rs (Replacement, Reduction and Refinement), with an emphasis on refinement. Specific animal welfare issues were identified and discussed, and practical measures proposed, with the aim of reducing animal use and suffering, reducing experimental variability, and increasing translatability within this critically important research field.
Asunto(s)
Bienestar del Animal/normas , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal , Animales , RoedoresRESUMEN
Training in the design of animal experiments focuses all too often on those aspects which can be approached mathematically, such as the number of animals needed to deliver a robust result, allocation of group size, and techniques such as randomization, blocking and statistical analysis. Important as they are, these are only a small part of the process of planning animal experiments. Additional key elements include refinements of housing, husbandry and procedures, health and safety, and attention at all stages to animal welfare. Advances in technology and laboratory animal science have led to improvements in care and husbandry, better provision of anesthetics and analgesics, refined methods of drug administration, greater competence in welfare assessment and application of humane endpoints. These improvements require continual dialogue between scientists, facility managers and technical staff, a practice that is a key feature of what has become known as the culture of care. This embodies a commitment to improving animal welfare, scientific quality, staff care and transparency for all stakeholders. Attention to both the physical and mental health of all those directly or indirectly involved in animal research is now an important part of the process of planning and conducting animal experiments. Efforts during the last 30 years to increase the internal and external validity of animal experiments have tended to concentrate on the production of guidelines to improve the quality of reporting animal experiments, rather than for planning them. Recently, comprehensive guidelines for planning animal studies have been published, to redress this imbalance. These will be described in this paper. Endorsement of this overarching influence of the Three R concept, by all the stakeholders, will not only reduce animal numbers and improve animal welfare, but also lead to more reliable and reproducible research which should improve translation of pre-clinical studies into tangible clinical benefit.
RESUMEN
There is widespread concern about the quality, reproducibility and translatability of studies involving research animals. Although there are a number of reporting guidelines available, there is very little overarching guidance on how to plan animal experiments, despite the fact that this is the logical place to start ensuring quality. In this paper we present the PREPARE guidelines: Planning Research and Experimental Procedures on Animals: Recommendations for Excellence. PREPARE covers the three broad areas which determine the quality of the preparation for animal studies: formulation, dialogue between scientists and the animal facility, and quality control of the various components in the study. Some topics overlap and the PREPARE checklist should be adapted to suit specific needs, for example in field research. Advice on use of the checklist is available on the Norecopa website, with links to guidelines for animal research and testing, at https://norecopa.no/PREPARE .
Asunto(s)
Experimentación Animal/normas , Animales de Laboratorio , Guías como Asunto , Proyectos de Investigación , AnimalesRESUMEN
Starting from a novel, achiral 1,3,4-benzotriazepine-based CCK2 receptor antagonist, a process of optimization has afforded further compounds of this type that maintain the nanomolar affinity for recombinant, human CCK2 receptors and high selectivity over CCK1 receptors observed in the initial lead but display more potent inhibition of pentagastrin-stimulated gastric acid secretion in vivo. Moreover, this has largely been achieved without altering their potency at wild-type canine and rat receptors, as judged by their displacement of [125I]-BH-CCK-8S in a radioligand binding assay and by their activity in an isolated, perfused rat stomach bioassay, respectively. 2-(5-Cyclohexyl-1-(2-cyclopentyl-2-oxo-ethyl)-2-oxo-1,2-dihydro-3H-1,3,4-benzotriazepin-3-yl)-N-(3-(5-oxo-2,5-dihydro- [1,2,4]oxadiazol-3-yl)-phenyl)-acetamide (47) was identified as the most effective compound stemming from this approach, proving to be a potent inhibitor of pentagastrin-stimulated gastric acid secretion in rats and dogs by intravenous bolus as well as by enteral administration.
Asunto(s)
Benzodiazepinas/síntesis química , Ácido Gástrico/metabolismo , Pentagastrina/farmacología , Receptor de Colecistoquinina B/antagonistas & inhibidores , Administración Oral , Animales , Benzodiazepinas/química , Benzodiazepinas/farmacología , Perros , Mucosa Gástrica/metabolismo , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Inyecciones Intravenosas , Ratones , Células 3T3 NIH , Ensayo de Unión Radioligante , Ratas , Proteínas Recombinantes/antagonistas & inhibidores , Relación Estructura-ActividadRESUMEN
Improving laboratory animal science and welfare requires both new scientific research and insights from research in the humanities and social sciences. Whilst scientific research provides evidence to replace, reduce and refine procedures involving laboratory animals (the '3Rs'), work in the humanities and social sciences can help understand the social, economic and cultural processes that enhance or impede humane ways of knowing and working with laboratory animals. However, communication across these disciplinary perspectives is currently limited, and they design research programmes, generate results, engage users, and seek to influence policy in different ways. To facilitate dialogue and future research at this interface, we convened an interdisciplinary group of 45 life scientists, social scientists, humanities scholars, non-governmental organisations and policy-makers to generate a collaborative research agenda. This drew on methods employed by other agenda-setting exercises in science policy, using a collaborative and deliberative approach for the identification of research priorities. Participants were recruited from across the community, invited to submit research questions and vote on their priorities. They then met at an interactive workshop in the UK, discussed all 136 questions submitted, and collectively defined the 30 most important issues for the group. The output is a collaborative future agenda for research in the humanities and social sciences on laboratory animal science and welfare. The questions indicate a demand for new research in the humanities and social sciences to inform emerging discussions and priorities on the governance and practice of laboratory animal research, including on issues around: international harmonisation, openness and public engagement, 'cultures of care', harm-benefit analysis and the future of the 3Rs. The process outlined below underlines the value of interdisciplinary exchange for improving communication across different research cultures and identifies ways of enhancing the effectiveness of future research at the interface between the humanities, social sciences, science and science policy.
Asunto(s)
Bienestar del Animal , Ciencia de los Animales de Laboratorio/métodos , Bienestar del Animal/ética , Animales , Conducta Cooperativa , Humanidades , Humanos , Estudios Interdisciplinarios , Ciencia de los Animales de Laboratorio/ética , Ciencias SocialesRESUMEN
The systematic optimization of the structure of a novel 2,4,5-trisubstituted imidazole-based cholecystokinin-2 (CCK(2)) receptor antagonist afforded analogues with nanomolar receptor affinity. These compounds were now comparable in their potency to the bicyclic heteroaromatic-based compounds 5 (JB93182) and 6 (JB95008), from which the initial examples were designed using a field-point based molecular modeling approach. They were also orally active as judged by their inhibition of pentagastrin stimulated acid secretion in conscious dogs, in contrast to the bicyclic heteroaromatic-based compounds, which were ineffective because of biliary elimination. Increasing the hydrophilicity through replacement of a particular methylene group with an ether oxygen, as in 3-{[5-(adamantan-1-yloxymethyl)-2-cyclohexyl-1H-imidazole-4-carbonyl]amino}benzoic acid (53), had little effect on the receptor affinity but significantly increased the oral potency. Comparison of the plasma pharmacokinetics and the inhibition of pentagastrin-stimulated acid output following bolus intraduodenal administration of both 53 and 6 indicated that 53 was well absorbed, had a longer half-life, and was not subject to the elimination pathways of the earlier series.
Asunto(s)
Imidazoles/síntesis química , Pirroles/síntesis química , Receptor de Colecistoquinina B/antagonistas & inhibidores , Administración Oral , Animales , Disponibilidad Biológica , Corteza Cerebral/metabolismo , Perros , Femenino , Ácido Gástrico/metabolismo , Imidazoles/química , Imidazoles/farmacología , Técnicas In Vitro , Infusiones Intravenosas , Ratones , Modelos Moleculares , Pentagastrina/administración & dosificación , Pentagastrina/farmacología , Pirroles/química , Pirroles/farmacología , Relación Estructura-Actividad Cuantitativa , Ensayo de Unión RadioliganteRESUMEN
The ARRIVE guidelines have been implemented in BJP for 4 years with the aim of increasing transparency in reporting experiments involving animals. BJP has assessed our success in implementing them and concluded that we could do better. This editorial discusses the issues and explains how we are changing our requirements for authors to report their findings in experiments involving animals. This is one of a series of editorials discussing updates to the BJP Instructions to Authors.
Asunto(s)
Experimentación Animal , Políticas Editoriales , Animales , Investigación Biomédica , Adhesión a Directriz , Guías como Asunto , FarmacologíaRESUMEN
This report aims to facilitate the implementation of the Three Rs (replacement, reduction, and refinement) in the use of animal models or procedures involving sepsis and septic shock, an area where there is the potential of high levels of suffering for animals. The emphasis is on refinement because this has the greatest potential for immediate implementation. Specific welfare issues are identified and discussed, and practical measures are proposed to reduce animal use and suffering as well as reducing experimental variability and increasing translatability. The report is based on discussions and submissions from a nonregulatory expert working group consisting of veterinarians, animal technologists, and scientists with expert knowledge relevant to the field.