The pivotal role of neurosurgeons in transitional care: A comprehensive tertiary healthcare institution's experience.

PURPOSE: Transitional care (TC) is increasingly crucial, particularly in neurosurgery, where optimal follow-through of patients' care is paramount. Challenges of transition are exacerbated by the complexity of neurosurgical conditions, with pediatric and adult neurosurgery often managed separately by different attending neurosurgeons or in different institutions. While numerous models for transitioning have been proposed, several barriers persist, impeding successful transfer from pediatric to adult settings. Our review focuses on important roles neurosurgeons can play in facilitating successful transition, exploring some existing TC models, with emphasis on the benefits of maintaining a single provider. METHODS: Clinic visits data between 2019 to 2023 of patients between the ages of 16 to 26 was compiled retrospectively. Successful transition was defined as continued follow-up moving from pediatric to adulthood with lost to follow-up being that of unsuccessful transition. Age, diagnosis and whether patients were successfully transitioned or lost to follow-up were documented. RESULTS: 1829 neurosurgical patients between the ages of 16 to 26 were identified over 5 years. A snapshot review identified 78 adolescent patients deemed to require follow-up into adulthood. 13 patients had epilepsy, 32 central nervous system (CNS) tumors, 17 congenital conditions, 14 neurovascular, and 2 patients had idiopathic intracranial hypertension. All 78 were noted to have successfully transited into their adulthood (age 21 and beyond). Having the same providers; having pediatric and adult neurosurgery within the same institution, was the single most important factor in facilitating successful transition. CONCLUSION: Neurosurgeons in institutions, particularly those with experience and competencies in both pediatric and adult care, can serve as crucial anchors during the transitional period. At our institution, the implementation of this continuity of care model has demonstrated remarkable success. Institutions with both pediatric and adult services would be uniquely positioned to develop and implement effective transitional care.

Traumatic cavernous sinus syndrome - A peculiar presentation of multiple cranial nerve neuropathies following a minor head injury: Case report and literature review.

BACKGROUND: In patients with traumatic head injuries, the percentage of cranial nerve injuries (CNI) range from4.3 to 17.6% in which majority are isolated CNI[1-5].In present literature, moderate to severe types of head injuries are often studied which may result in a lack of representation and description of CNI associated with minor head injuries (MHI). Alongside this peculiar case of a traumatic cavernous sinus syndrome (CSS) that is non-thrombotic and non-fistulous in nature, this paper aims to analyse traumatic CNI in non-severe head injuries and the surrounding literature. CASE REPORT: A 65-year-old man who had sustained a minor head injury was found to have CNI of III, IV and VI.Brain imaging showed scattered traumatic subarachnoid haemorrhage and a non-displaced right zygomatic arch fracture. Despite the short course of high dose dexamethasone, he showed only partial recovery of his CNI after one year. CONCLUSION: We present a case of traumatic CSS likely secondary to tractional injury from a MHI. Injury to the extraocular nerves wasfound to be one of the more commonly observed combination of CNI from the literature review conducted. In patients with MHI, multiple CNI is less common. Hence, consideration should be given to work upfor secondary causes such as tumours. There is presently no known clear identifiable pattern of CNI associated with MHI. CT brain findings of skull base fractures and early onset of cranial nerve palsies are generally associated with worse outcomes. More remains to be studied about tractional CNI in non-severe head injuries.

Development of an enhanced acute care surgery service in response to the COVID-19 global pandemic.

BACKGROUND: As the COVID-19 pandemic sweeps across the world, healthcare departments must adapt to meet the challenges of service provision and staff/patient protection. Unlike elective surgery, acute care surgery (ACS) workloads cannot be artificially reduced providing a unique challenge for administrators to balance healthcare resources between the COVID-19 surge and regular patient admissions. METHODS: An enhanced ACS (eACS) model of care is described with the aim of limiting COVID-19 healthcare worker and patient cross-infection as well as providing 24/7 management of emergency general surgical (GS) and trauma patients. The eACS service comprised 5 independent teams covering a rolling 1:5 24-hr call. Attempts to completely separate eACS teams and patients from the elective side were made. The service was compared to the existing ACS service in terms of clinical and efficiency outcomes. Finally, a survey of staff attitudes towards these changes, concerns regarding COVID-19 and psychological well-being was assessed. RESULTS: There were no staff/patient COVID-19 cross-infections. Compared to the ACS service, eACS patients had reduced overall length of stay (2-days), time spent in the Emergency Room (46 min) and time from surgery to discharge (2.4-hours). The eACS model of care saved financial resources and bed-days for the organisation. The changes were well received by team-members who also felt that their safety was prioritised. CONCLUSION: In healthcare systems not overwhelmed by COVID-19, an eACS model may assist in preserving psychological well-being for healthcare staff whilst providing 24/7 care for emergency GS and trauma patients.