RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Mechanical Ventilation (MV) is an essential life support machine, frequently utilized in an Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Recently, a growing number of clinical trials have investigated the effect of acupuncture treatment on MV outcomes. OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the safety and efficacy of acupuncture treatment for critically ill patients under MV. METHODS: In this systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, the efficacy of acupuncture related interventions was compared to routine ICU treatments, and sham/control acupuncture as control interventions applied to ICU patients undergoing MV. The databases of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were extensively searched in the month of April 2022. The primary outcome measurements were defined as total MV time, ICU length of stay, and mortality. The Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool was employed to analyze the severity of bias. The meta-analysis was conducted using Review Manager 5.3 software. The quality of evidence was evaluated according to the GRADE approach. RESULTS: A total of 10 clinical trials were included in this investigation. When comparing the performance of acupuncture-related interventions to that of the reported control interventions, the results of the meta-analysis revealed a significant reduction in the total number of MV days as well as the duration of ICU length of stay following acupuncture treatment (MD -2.06 [-3.33, -0.79] P = 0.001, I2 = 55 %, MD-1.26 [-2.00, -0.53] P = 0.0008, I2 = 77 %, respectively). A reduction in the total mortality was similarly observed (RR = 0.67 [0.47, 0.94] P = 0.02, I2 = 0 %). CONCLUSION: This systematic review and meta-analysis identified a noteworthy reduction in the total MV days, time spent in the ICU, as well as the total mortality following acupuncture related interventions. However, the small sample size, risk of bias and existing heterogeneity should be taken into consideration. The results of this study are promising and further investigations in this field are warranted.
RESUMEN
Background and purpose: The safety of interventions for critically ill patients is a crucial issue. In recent years, several studies have treated critically ill patients with acupuncture. However, the safety of acupuncture in this setting remains to be systematically measured. Methods: In May 2022, the electronic databases of PubMed and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies comparing acupuncture interventions to control interventions in critically ill patients. Study outcomes examined the incidence of severe adverse events (AEs), minor AEs, adverse reactions, ICU stays, and 28-day mortality. Results: A total of 31 articles were analyzed, and no serious AEs related to acupuncture treatment were identified. No significant differences were found between the groups in the meta-analysis of minor AEs (risk ratio [RR] 5.69 [0.34, 96.60], P = 0.23, I2 = 76%). A reduced risk in the incidence of adverse reactions following acupuncture intervention was evidenced (RR 0.33 [0.22, 0.50], P = 0.00001, I2 = 44%). The patients in the acupuncture arm spent significantly less time in the intensive care unit (ICU) (Mean difference -1.45 [-11.94, -10.97], P = 0.00001, I2 = 56%) and also exhibited lower 28-day mortality rates (odds ratio 0.61 [0.48, 0.78], P = 0.0001, I2 = 0%). Conclusion: There is no evidence to indicate a higher risk of severe or minor AEs in patients who receive acupuncture. Acupuncture demonstrated favorable results in both ICU stay and 28-day mortality measurements, in addition to presenting with fewer adverse reactions compared to routine ICU care. However, the low certainty of the evidence resulting from a high risk of bias in the included studies merits substantial consideration, and further research is still warranted. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=142131, identifier: CRD42020142131.