RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Pharmaceutical presence in oncology allows the clinical pharmacist to integrate tripartite consultations for primary prescription of oral anticancer drugs. The aim of the study is to describe the deployment of the clinical pharmacy activity in 2 oncology departments since its implementation in 2019, to assess the financial gain of the pharmaceutical interventions through the new gradation of outpatient management published on September 10, 2020, and finally to assess their satisfaction following the deployment of this pathway. METHOD: A retrospective study was conducted to collect pricing data for oral therapy interviews in patients between January 2019 and December 2022. To complement this, a satisfaction survey was conducted by the oral therapy pharmaceutical team between 01/01/2022 and 12/31/2022 among patients undergoing treatment. RESULTS: 579 patients received a targeted pharmaceutical interview as part of the oral therapy patient pathway. The average invoiced amount of a pharmaceutical consultation carried out as part of a tripartite first prescription was 355.44 euros. The 579 patients who benefited from a targeted pharmaceutical interview generated a revenue of 87,545 euros for the hospital. In terms of evaluating patient satisfaction, 163 usable responses were received out of 267 patients questioned, representing a response rate of 61%, with an overall score of 9.1/10. CONCLUSION: Pending the introduction of a specific remuneration for clinical pharmacy activities, the valuation of tripartite consultations is a lever for financing clinical pharmacy activities in hospitals.
Asunto(s)
Farmacéuticos , Servicio de Farmacia en Hospital , Humanos , Atención Ambulatoria , Preparaciones Farmacéuticas , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Recent studies demonstrated the benefit of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) plus intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator (IV-tPA) (MT-IV-tPA) in acute ischemic stroke. This study aimed to estimate the cost-utility of MT-IV-tPA compared with IV-tPA alone from the perspective of the French National Health Insurance. METHODS: We developed a decision tree for the first 3 months after stroke onset and a Markov model until 10 years post-stroke. The health states of the Markov model were according to the modified Rankin Scale (mRS): independent (mRS=0-2), dependent (mRS=3-5), dead (mRS=6). Recurrent stroke was the fourth health stage of our model. We conducted systematic literature reviews and meta-analyses to estimate the cost and utility of each health state, and the transition probabilities between health states. A microcosting study was conducted to estimate the cost of MT. We estimated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of MT-IV-tPA and conducted a probabilistic analysis in order to estimate the probability that MT-IV-tPA is cost-effective compared to IV-tPA, the expected value of perfect information (EVPI), and the expected value of partial perfect information (EVPPI), given the uncertainty surrounding the value of our model's parameters. RESULTS: The total mean (standard deviation (SD) cost of MT was 6708.9 (2357.0). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of the strategy using IV-tPA combined to MT costs was 14,715 per QALY gained as compared to a strategy using IV-tPA alone. The probabilistic analysis showed that the probability of MT-IV-TPA being cost-effective was 85.4% at threshold willingness-to-pay of 30,000 per QALY gained, reaching 98% at 50,000 per QALY gained. CONCLUSION: Although there is no universally accepted willingness-to-pay threshold in France, our analysis suggest that MT combined to IV-tPA can be considered a cost-effective treatment compared with IV-tPA alone.