RESUMEN
Deregulation of microRNAs (miRs) contributes to progression and metastasis of prostate and other cancers. miR-23b and -27b, encoded in the same miR cluster (miR-23b/-27b), are downregulated in human metastatic prostate cancer compared with primary tumors and benign tissue. Expression of miR-23b/-27b decreases prostate cancer cell migration, invasion and results in anoikis resistance. Conversely, antagomiR-mediated miR-23b and -27b silencing produces the opposite result in a more indolent prostate cancer cell line. However, neither miR-23b/-27b expression or inhibition impacts prostate cancer cell proliferation suggesting that miR-23b/-27b selectively suppresses metastasis. To examine the effects of miR-23b/-27b on prostate cancer metastasis in vivo, orthotopic prostate xenografts were established using aggressive prostate cancer cells transduced with miR-23b/-27b or non-targeting control miRNA. Although primary tumor formation was similar between miR-23b/-27b-transduced cells and controls, miR-23b/-27b expression in prostate cancer cells decreased seminal vesicle invasion and distant metastases. Gene-expression profiling identified the endocytic adaptor, Huntingtin-interacting protein 1-related (HIP1R) as being downregulated by miR-23b/-27b. Increased HIP1R expression in prostate cancer cells inversely phenocopied the effects of miR-23b/-27b overexpression on migration, invasion and anchorage-independent growth. HIP1R rescued miR-23b/-27b-mediated repression of migration in prostate cancer cells. HIP1R mRNA levels were decreased in seminal vesicle tissue from mice bearing miR-23b/-27b-transduced prostate cancer cell xenografts compared with scrambled controls, suggesting HIP1R is a key functional target of miR-23b/-27b. In addition, depletion of HIP1R led to a more rounded, less mesenchymal-like cell morphology, consistent with decreased metastatic properties. Together, these data demonstrate that the miR-23b/-27b cluster functions as a metastasis-suppressor by decreasing HIP1R levels in pre-clinical models of prostate cancer.
Asunto(s)
MicroARNs/genética , Neoplasias de la Próstata/genética , Proteínas de Transporte Vesicular/genética , Proteínas Adaptadoras Transductoras de Señales , Animales , Línea Celular Tumoral , Movimiento Celular/genética , Regulación Neoplásica de la Expresión Génica , Humanos , Masculino , Ratones , Proteínas de Microfilamentos , Invasividad Neoplásica/genética , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Ensayos Antitumor por Modelo de XenoinjertoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To assess the prevalence of dystrophin defects in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) in male patients and to formulate investigation strategies for their identification. BACKGROUND: Dystrophin defects presenting with predominant or exclusive cardiac involvement may be clinically indistinguishable from "idiopathic" DCM. Diagnosis may be missed, unless specifically investigated. METHODS: Clinical and biochemical evaluation, right ventricular endomyocardial biopsy (EMB), light and electron microscopic and immunohistochemical studies of biopsy samples, six multiplex and two single polymerase chain reactions for 38 exons and automated sequencing of exon 9 and muscle promoter-exon 1 were undertaken in 201 consecutive male patients presenting with DCM, with (n = 14) and without (n = 187) increased serum creatine phosphokinase (sCPK). RESULTS: Dystrophin defects were identified in 13 of the 201 patients (6.5%, age 16-50). Family history was positive in four patients. Serum CPK levels were increased in 11 of 13 patients. Light microscopy examination of EMB was uninformative; ultrastructural study showed multiple membrane defects. Dystrophin immunostain was abnormal. Eight patients, all older than 20, had deletions affecting midrod domain, normal or mildly increased CPK and better outcome than the five remaining cases all younger than 20, with more than five-fold increase of sCPK. Two of these latter had proximal and rod-domain deletions. Sisters of two patients were diagnosed as noncarriers with microsatellite analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Although the overall prevalence of dystrophin defects in our consecutive DCM male series is low (6.5%), immunohistochemical and molecular studies are essential to identify protein and gene defects; screening studies are justified to define prevalence, clinical profile and genotype-phenotype correlation.