RESUMEN
In this report, the authors provide comprehensive and up-to-date US data on disparities in cancer occurrence, major risk factors, and access to and utilization of preventive measures and screening by sociodemographic characteristics. They also review programs and resources that have reduced cancer disparities and provide policy recommendations to further mitigate these inequalities. The overall cancer death rate is 19% higher among Black males than among White males. Black females also have a 12% higher overall cancer death rate than their White counterparts despite having an 8% lower incidence rate. There are also substantial variations in death rates for specific cancer types and in stage at diagnosis, survival, exposure to risk factors, and receipt of preventive measures and screening by race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and geographic location. For example, kidney cancer death rates by sex among American Indian/Alaska Native people are ≥64% higher than the corresponding rates in each of the other racial/ethnic groups, and the 5-year relative survival for all cancers combined is 14% lower among residents of poorer counties than among residents of more affluent counties. Broad and equitable implementation of evidence-based interventions, such as increasing health insurance coverage through Medicaid expansion or other initiatives, could substantially reduce cancer disparities. However, progress will require not only equitable local, state, and federal policies but also broad interdisciplinary engagement to elevate and address fundamental social inequities and longstanding systemic racism.
Asunto(s)
Etnicidad , Neoplasias , American Cancer Society , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Medicaid , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Neoplasias/terapia , Grupos Raciales , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Smoking contributes to the top 3 deadliest cancers, cancers of the lung, colon, and pancreas, which account for nearly 40% of all cancer-related deaths in the United States. Despite historicly low smoking rates, substantial disparities remain among people with mental health conditions and substance use disorders (SUDs). METHODS: The study examined the prevalence of smoking among adults from underserved communities who are served at federally qualified health centers through an analysis of the 2014 Health Center Patient Survey. Furthermore, the study assessed associations of smoking with co-occurring mental health conditions and SUDs among adult smokers (n = 1735). RESULTS: The prevalence of smoking among health center patients was 28.1%. Among current smokers, 59.1% had depression and 45.4% had generalized anxiety. Non-Hispanic Black smokers had more than 2 times the odds of reporting SUDs (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-4.30). Individuals at or below 100% of the federal poverty level had more than 2 times the odds of having mental health conditions (aOR, 2.55; 95% CI, 1.58-4.11), and those who were unemployed had more than 3 times the odds for SUDs (aOR, 3.21; 95% CI, 1.27-8.10). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of smoking in underserved communities is nearly double the national prevalence. In addition, the study underscores important socioeconomic determinants of health in smoking cessation behavior and the marked disparities among individuals with mental health conditions and SUDs. Finally, the findings illuminate the unique need for tailored treatments supporting cancer prevention care to address challenges confronted by vulnerable populations.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos Mentales , Neoplasias , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias , Adulto , Humanos , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Salud Mental , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Prevalencia , Fumar/epidemiología , Trastornos Relacionados con Sustancias/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Breast cancer screening utilization steeply dropped at the start of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. However, the effects on breast cancer screening in lower income populations are unknown. This study examined changes in breast cancer screening rates (BCSRs) during the pandemic among 32 community health centers (CHCs) that provided health care to lower income populations. METHODS: Secondary data from 32 CHCs participating in an American Cancer Society grant program to increase breast cancer screening services were used. BCSRs were defined as the percentage of women aged 50 to 74 years who had a medical visit in the past 12 months (142,207 in 2018, 142,003 in 2019, and 150,630 in 2020) and received a screening mammogram within the last 27 months. BCSRs in July 2020, July 2019, and June 2018 were compared with screening rate ratios (SRRs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: BCSRs significantly rose by 18% between 2018 and 2019 (from 45.8% to 53.9%; SRR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.17-1.18) and then declined by 8% between 2019 and 2020 (from 53.9% to 49.6%; SRR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.92-0.93). If the 2018-2019 BCSR trends had continued through 2020, 63.3% of women would have been screened in 2020 in contrast to the 49.6% who were; this potentially translated into 47,517 fewer mammograms and 242 missed breast cancer diagnoses in this population. CONCLUSIONS: In this study of 32 CHCs, BCSRs declined by 8% from July 2019 to 2020, and this reversed an 18% improvement between July 2018 and 2019. Declining BCSRs among CHCs during the COVID-19 pandemic call for policies to support and resources to identify women in need of screening.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , COVID-19 , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Centros Comunitarios de Salud , Femenino , Humanos , Mamografía , Tamizaje Masivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Pandemias , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates are low among underserved populations. High-quality patient-physician communication potentially influences patients' willingness to undergo CRC screening. Community health centers (HCs) provide comprehensive primary health care to underserved populations. This study's objectives were to ascertain national CRC screening rates and to explore the relations between sociodemographic characteristics and patient-provider communication on the receipt of CRC screening among HC patients. METHODS: Using 2014 Health Center Patient Survey data, bivariate and multivariate analyses examined the association of sociodemographic variables (sex, race/ethnicity, age, geography, preferred language, household income, insurance, and employment status) and patient-provider communication with the receipt of CRC screening. RESULTS: Patients between the ages of 65 and 75 years (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.33-4.64) and patients not in the labor force (aOR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.37-3.94) had higher odds of receiving CRC screening, whereas patients who were uninsured (aOR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.18-0.61) and patients who were non-English-speaking (aOR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.18-0.99) had lower odds. Patient-provider communication was not associated with the receipt of CRC screening. CONCLUSIONS: The CRC screening rate for HC patients was 57.9%, whereas the rate was 65.1% according to the 2012 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System and 58.2% according to the 2013 National Health Interview Survey. The high ratings of patient-provider communication, regardless of the screening status, suggest strides toward a patient-centered medical home practice transformation that will assist in a positive patient experience. Addressing the lack of insurance, making culturally and linguistically appropriate patient education materials available, and training clinicians and care teams in cultural competency are critical for increasing future CRC screening rates. Cancer 2017;123:4185-4192. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Colon/diagnóstico , Comunicación , Centros Comunitarios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Tamizaje Masivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Neoplasias del Recto/diagnóstico , Anciano , Neoplasias del Colon/etnología , Femenino , Humanos , Lenguaje , Masculino , Pacientes no Asegurados/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Oportunidad Relativa , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Neoplasias del Recto/etnología , Factores Socioeconómicos , Desempleo/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: In 2006, Illinois established Illinois Health Connect (IHC), a primary care case management program for Medicaid that offered enhanced fee-for-service, capitation payments, performance incentives, and practice support. Illinois also implemented a complementary disease management program, Your Healthcare Plus (YHP). This external evaluation explored outcomes associated with these programs. METHODS: We analyzed Medicaid claims and enrollment data from 2004 to 2010, covering both pre- and post-implementation. The base year was 2006, and 2006-2010 eligibility criteria were applied to 2004-2005 data to allow comparison. We studied costs and utilization trends, overall and by service and setting. We studied quality by incorporating Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set (HEDIS) measures and IHC performance payment criteria. RESULTS: Illinois Medicaid expanded considerably between 2006 (2,095,699 full-year equivalents) and 2010 (2,692,123). Annual savings were 6.5% for IHC and 8.6% for YHP by the fourth year, with cumulative Medicaid savings of $1.46 billion. Per-beneficiary annual costs fell in Illinois over this period compared to those in states with similar Medicaid programs. Quality improved for nearly all metrics under IHC, and most prevention measures more than doubled in frequency. Medicaid inpatient costs fell by 30.3%, and outpatient costs rose by 24.9% to 45.7% across programs. Avoidable hospitalizations fell by 16.8% for YHP, and bed-days fell by 15.6% for IHC. Emergency department visits declined by 5% by 2010. CONCLUSIONS: The Illinois Medicaid IHC and YHP programs were associated with substantial savings, reductions in inpatient and emergency care, and improvements in quality measures. This experience is not typical of other states implementing some, but not all, of these same policies. Although specific features of the Illinois reforms may have accounted for its better outcomes, the limited evaluation design calls for caution in making causal inferences.
Asunto(s)
Manejo de Caso/economía , Gastos en Salud , Medicaid/organización & administración , Atención Primaria de Salud/organización & administración , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Ahorro de Costo , Femenino , Reforma de la Atención de Salud , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Illinois , Masculino , Programas Controlados de Atención en Salud/organización & administración , Desarrollo de Programa , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: We wanted to explore demographic and geographic factors associated with family physicians' provision of care to children. METHODS: We analyzed the proportion of family physicians providing care to children using survey data collected by the American Board of Family Medicine from 2006 to 2009. Using a cross-sectional study design and logistic regression analysis, we examined the association of various physician demographic and geographic factors and providing care of children. RESULTS: Younger age, female sex, and rural location are positive predictors of family physicians providing care to children: odds ratio (OR) = 0.97 (95% CI, 0.97-0.98), 1.19 (1.12-1.25), and 1.50 (1.39-1.62), respectively. Family physicians practicing in a partnership are more likely to provide care to children than those in group practice: OR = 1.53 (95% CI, 1.40-1.68). Family physicians practicing in areas with higher density of children are more likely to provide care to children: OR = 1.04 (95% CI, 1.03-1.05), while those in high-poverty areas are less likely 0.10 (95% CI, 0.10-0.10). Family physicians located in areas with no pediatricians are more likely to provide care to children than those in areas with higher pediatrician density: OR = 1.80 (95% CI, 1.59-2.01). CONCLUSIONS: Various demographic and geographic factors influence the likelihood of family physicians providing care to children, findings that have important implications to policy efforts aimed at ensuring access to care for children.
Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria/organización & administración , Pediatría/organización & administración , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Adulto , Niño , Cuidado del Niño , Intervalos de Confianza , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Relaciones Interprofesionales , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Necesidades , Oportunidad Relativa , Médicos de Familia/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Riesgo , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Family physicians provide access to maternity care for a disproportionate share of rural and urban underserved communities. This paper aims to determine trends in maternity care provision by family physicians and the characteristics of family physicians that provide maternity care. We used American Board of Family Medicine survey data collected from every family physician during application for the Maintenance of Certification Examination to determine the percentage of family physicians that provided maternity care from 2000 to 2010. Using a cross-sectional study design, logistic regression analysis was performed to examine association between maternity care provision and various physician demographic and practice characteristics. Maternity care provision by family physicians declined from 23.3 % in 2000 to 9.7 % in 2010 (p < 0.0001). Family physicians who were female, younger and US medical graduates were more likely to practice maternity care. Practicing in a rural setting (OR = 2.2; 95 % CL 2.1-2.4), an educational setting (OR = 6.4; 95 % CL 5.7-7.1) and in either the Midwest (OR = 2.6; 95 % CL 2.3-2.9) or West (OR = 2.3; 95 % CL 2.1-2.6) were the strongest predictors of higher likelihood of providing maternity care. While family physicians continue to play an important role in providing maternity care in many parts of the United States, the steep decline in the percentage of family physicians providing maternity care is concerning. Formal collaborations with midwives and obstetrician-gynecologists, malpractice reform, payment changes and graduate medical education innovations are potential avenues to explore to ensure access to maternity care.
Asunto(s)
Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/tendencias , Servicios de Salud Materna/tendencias , Médicos de Familia/provisión & distribución , Intervalos de Confianza , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Oportunidad Relativa , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Estados Unidos , Recursos HumanosRESUMEN
The physician workforce has steadily grown faster than the U.S. population over the past 30 years, context that is often absent in conversations anticipating physician scarcity. Policy makers addressing future physician shortages should also direct resources to ensure specialty and geographic distribution that best serves population health .
Asunto(s)
Fuerza Laboral en Salud/tendencias , Médicos/provisión & distribución , Crecimiento Demográfico , Especialización/tendencias , Humanos , Área sin Atención Médica , Médicos/tendencias , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Objectives: Health care settings are ideal for addressing patients' smoking and quitting, but barriers may limit providers' assistance with cessation, including lack of knowledge about newer devices being used by some smokers to quit (e.g., e-cigarettes). Cessation practices among nurse practitioners (NPs) and physician assistants (PAs) are also unknown. Study design: Cross-sectional. Methods: Participants (N = 459) were 151 oncologists, 150 primary care physicians (PCPs), 98 nurse practitioners (NPs), and 60 physician assistants (PAs) recruited from a national online panel who completed an online survey. Results: Four barriers were common across specialties: "patient doesn't want to quit, and it is their decision," "smoking is not reason for patient's visit; must treat the immediate problem first," "patient wants to quit on their own," and "lack of effective methods available." While a majority of oncologists (58%) were aware of free telephone counseling for cessation, only 29% of NPs were aware. Perceived knowledge of e-cigarettes was low. Greater comfort treating patients' smoking predicted greater frequency of engagement in 4 of 5 general cessation practices (ßs = 0.15-0.26, all p ≤ .001). NPs and PAs more frequently asked patients about smoking and e-cigarette use compared to oncologists, but oncologists more frequently referred patients to effective quitting resources (e.g., quitlines). Conclusions: NPs and PAs may be uniquely positioned to provide cessation assistance, but providers need more education on currently available, effective cessation methods, and about e-cigarettes. Addressing patient resistance to offers of cessation services and improving clinical workflows to enhance cessation service provision should be investigated in future research.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Community Health Centers provide comprehensive primary healthcare services to many underserved populations. It is unknown how routine preventive and chronic care services in Community Health Centers may have changed nationwide during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: The 2014-2020 Health Resources and Services Administration Uniform Data System of Community Health Centers was used, and data analysis was conducted from November 2021 to May 2022. Data for clinical quality measures in 2020 were treated as during the pandemic, whereas receipt of care in 2019 and before were treated as before the pandemic. Outcomes included 6 clinical quality measures of being up to date for colorectal cancer screening, cervical cancer screening, tobacco screening and cessation counseling, BMI screening and follow-up, depression screening and follow-up, and aspirin use for ischemic vascular disease. A mixed effects regression model was used to estimate changes in measures by year. RESULTS: Between 2019 and 2020, receipt of preventive services declined for each of the 6 clinical quality measures: from 40.8% to 37.7% for colorectal cancer screening, from 48.8% to 44.9% for cervical cancer screening, from 85.8% to 83.4% for tobacco screening and cessation counseling, from 70.7% to 65.4% for BMI screening and follow-up, from 71.1% to 64.9% for depression screening and follow-up, and from 81.5% to 79.4% for aspirin use for ischemic vascular disease. CONCLUSIONS: Receipt of preventive services in Community Health Centers declined during the COVID-19 pandemic for each of the 6 clinical quality measures considered in the study. Immediate action is required to support ongoing high-quality, primary healthcare services in Community Health Centers across the nation.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Neoplasias Colorrectales , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino , Enfermedades Vasculares , Femenino , Humanos , Pandemias , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/prevención & control , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Servicios Preventivos de Salud , Centros Comunitarios de Salud , Neoplasias Colorrectales/diagnóstico , Aspirina/uso terapéuticoAsunto(s)
Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria , Medicina Interna , Pediatría , Médicos de Atención Primaria/provisión & distribución , Atención Primaria de Salud , Medicina Familiar y Comunitaria/tendencias , Médicos Generales/provisión & distribución , Médicos Generales/tendencias , Humanos , Medicina Interna/tendencias , Pediatría/tendencias , Médicos de Familia/provisión & distribución , Médicos de Familia/tendencias , Médicos de Atención Primaria/tendencias , Atención Primaria de Salud/tendencias , Estados Unidos , Recursos HumanosRESUMEN
Over the last 50 years, the incidence of cervical cancer has dramatically decreased. However, health disparities in cervical cancer screening (CCS) persist for women from racial and ethnic minorities and those residing in rural and poor communities. For more than 45 years, federally funded health centers (HCs) have been providing comprehensive, culturally competent, and quality primary health care services to medically underserved communities and vulnerable populations. To enhance the quality of care and to ensure more women served at HCs are screened for cervical cancer, over eight HCs received funding to support patient-centered medical home (PCMH) transformation with goals to increase CCS rates. The study conducted a qualitative analysis using Atlas.ti software to describe the barriers and challenges to CCS and PCMH transformation, to identify potential solutions and opportunities, and to examine patterns in barriers and solutions proposed by HCs. Interrater reliability was assessed using Cohen's Kappa. The findings indicated that HCs more frequently described patient-level barriers to CCS, including demographic, cultural, and health belief/behavior factors. System-level barriers were the next commonly cited, particularly failure to use the full capability of electronic medical records (EMRs) and problems coordinating with external labs or providers. Provider-level barriers were least frequently cited.
RESUMEN
Family physicians traditionally have played an integral role in delivering babies as a component of the comprehensive care they provide for women. The proportion of family physicians who report providing any maternity care continues to decrease. This trend is particularly concerning because family physicians are the most widely distributed specialty and are essential to health care access in rural areas.
Asunto(s)
Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Servicios de Salud Materna/estadística & datos numéricos , Obstetricia/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos de Familia/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención a la Salud , Femenino , Humanos , Servicios de Salud Materna/normas , Obstetricia/normas , Salud Rural , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Despite continued growth of the primary care workforce, profound maldistribution persists among providers available for the care of children. Family physicians (FPs) spend, on average, approximately 10% of their total practice time caring for children; however, given that, among physician specialties, FPs are geographically distributed most evenly across the US population, the self-reported decline in the share of FPs caring for children should be disturbing to policymakers, especially with the looming insurance expansion in 2014.
Asunto(s)
Servicios de Salud del Niño/tendencias , Atención a la Salud/normas , Atención a la Salud/tendencias , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/tendencias , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/normas , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/tendencias , Médicos de Familia/provisión & distribución , Médicos de Familia/tendencias , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Niño , Predicción , Política de Salud/tendencias , Humanos , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/tendencias , Estados Unidos , Recursos HumanosRESUMEN
Transitioning Family Physicians to continuous Maintenance of Certification (MOC) was intended to support the quality improvement movement nationally, but it also risked decreasing their engagement due to the increased requirements for retaining certification. However, after completing the transition of all family physicians into MOC in 2010, participation appears higher than ever.