Gastrointestinal quality of life after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP) is a commonly performed bariatric surgical procedure for the treatment of morbid obesity (MO). Obesity-related co-morbidities reduce the quality and expectancy of life. We assessed gastrointestinal quality of life in patients following LRYGBP. METHODS: The Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI test) was used in this study. A higher score correlates with better quality of life. The GIQLI test was administered to 3 non-selected groups: 100 morbidly obese patients (MO group), 100 patients who had undergone LRYGBP (LRYGBP group); and a control group of 100 individuals (CO group). The CO group was composed of healthy individuals with a BMI<30 kg/m2, consecutively recruited among the companions of patients who came for a surgery consultation for obesity or other pathologies. Overall test and specific dimensions scores were evaluated for each group. RESULTS: Overall test and specific dimensions scores were significantly lower in patients with MO when compared to the CO and LRYGBP groups. There were no differences between the CO and LRYGBP groups in the overall score with regard to disease-specific digestive symptoms and the psychological and social dimensions. CONCLUSIONS: The quality of life of morbidly obese patients is worsened not only because of the presence of digestive symptoms but also because of their emotional, physical and social impact. Patients operated on by LRYGBP experience an improvement in their quality of life, with good tolerance of the anatomical changes.

Application of Fast-Track Recovery Protocols in Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery Versus Multiport Laparoscopic Surgery for Colon Resection.

AIM: The aim of this study is to analyze whether fast-track (FT) recovery protocols can be applied to single-port laparoscopic surgery for colon resection, as they are in multiport laparoscopic surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective study comparing single-port laparoscopic surgery (SP-FT) versus multiport laparoscopic surgery (MP-FT) for colon resection, and the applicability of our FT recovery protocol in all patients between 2013 and 2014. Variables evaluated were American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, tumor size, number of nodes, surgery performed, postoperative morbidity, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: A total of 83 patients (28 SP-FT group and 55 MP-FT group) underwent FT recovery. The median age was 62 (11-85) years in SP-FT group and 72 (57-84) in MP-FT group. ASA score showed no significant difference (P = .973). The surgical procedures performed were as follows: SP-FT group 20 right hemicolectomy, 5 left hemicolectomy, and 3 subtotal colectomy and MP-FT group were 26 right hemicolectomy, 28 left hemicolectomy, and 1 subtotal colectomy. Mean operative time (minutes) was shorter in SP-FT group (151 ± 47.9 versus 182 ± 50.7), but no significant difference was observed. Regarding the tumor size (SP-FT 4.2 [2-7] cm versus MP-FT 4 [3-12] cm) and postoperative morbidity Clavien-Dindo ≥2 (SP-FT 10 patients versus MP-FT 20 patients), there were no significant differences (P = .535; P = .383). The median length of hospital stay was statistically significant: SP-FT 4.5 (3-53) days versus MP-FT 7 (4-33) days (P = .005). CONCLUSIONS: FT rehabilitation is safe and reproducible in single-port laparoscopic surgery for colon pathologies, with postoperative results comparable with conventional laparoscopic surgery.