Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Fish Shellfish Immunol ; 128: 74-81, 2022 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35843527

RESUMEN

Current treatment strategies for relevant infectious diseases in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) include the use of low salinity or freshwater bathing. However, often availability is restricted, and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) is used as an alternative. The potential impacts of H2O2 on fish mucosal tissues, especially the gills therefore need to be considered. In this study the mucosal and immunological effects of H2O2 treatment on the gills of healthy Atlantic salmon were examined by gene expression (qPCR) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) investigating T-cell, B-cell, and mucin activity. Healthy fish were treated with H2O2 and sampled at different times: 4 h, 24 h and 14 days post-H2O2 treatment (dpt) (total n = 18) to investigate the effect of holding time and H2O2 treatment. Treatment with H2O2 resulted in up-regulation of markers for T-cell activity and anti-inflammatory response and down-regulation of mucin expression in the gills at 14 dpt compared to fish sampled prior to treatment (0h; n = 5 fish). These findings were supported by IHC analysis, which despite being highly variable between samples, showed an increase in the number of CD3+ T cells at 14 dpt in 50% of treated fish compared to pre-treatment fish. The results from this study suggest that H2O2 treatment does not immune compromise healthy Atlantic salmon after 14 dpt (i.e., post-recovery) but modulates gill immune activity and disrupts the mucus covering of the gills. However, further studies are required to determine whether the effects observed are related to H2O2 treatment in isolation or other variables such as holding time or environmental factors.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de los Peces , Salmo salar , Animales , Antiinflamatorios/metabolismo , Branquias , Peróxido de Hidrógeno/metabolismo , Mucinas/metabolismo , Moco/metabolismo
2.
J Fish Dis ; 42(6): 883-894, 2019 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30950084

RESUMEN

Two aqueous fixation methods (modified Davidson's solution and modified Davidson's solution with 2% (w/v) Alcian blue) were compared against two non-aqueous fixation methods (methacarn solution and methacarn solution with 2% (w/v) Alcian blue) along with the standard buffered formalin fixation method to (a) improve preservation of the mucous coat on Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L., gills and (b) to examine the interaction between the amoebae and mucus on the gill during an infection with amoebic gill disease. Aqueous fixatives demonstrated excellent cytological preservation but failed to deliver the preservation of the mucus when compared to the non-aqueous-based fixatives; qualitative and semi-quantitative analysis revealed a greater preservation of the gill mucus using the non-aqueous methacarn solution. A combination of this fixation method and an Alcian blue/Periodic acid-Schiff staining was tested in gills of Atlantic salmon infected with amoebic gill disease; lectin labelling was also used to confirm the mucus preservation in the methacarn-fixed tissue. Amoebae were observed closely associated with the mucus demonstrating that the techniques employed for preservation of the mucous coat can indeed avoid the loss of potential mucus-embedded parasites, thus providing a better understanding of the relationship between the mucus and parasite.


Asunto(s)
Ácido Acético/química , Cloroformo/química , Branquias/parasitología , Metanol/química , Moco , Salmo salar/parasitología , Fijación del Tejido/métodos , Azul Alcián/química , Amoeba/patogenicidad , Animales , Fijadores/química , Formaldehído/química , Branquias/patología , Reacción del Ácido Peryódico de Schiff , Salmo salar/anatomía & histología
3.
Vet Rec ; 187(1): 33, 2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33638517
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA