Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Epilepsia ; 62(10): 2485-2495, 2021 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34418086

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: A Phase 3 open-label safety study (NCT02721069) evaluated long-term safety of diazepam nasal spray (Valtoco) in patients with epilepsy and frequent seizure clusters. METHODS: Patients were 6-65 years old with diagnosed epilepsy and seizure clusters despite stable antiseizure medications. The treatment period was 12 months, with study visits at Day 30 and every 60 days thereafter, after which patients could elect to continue. Doses were based on age and weight. Seizure and treatment information was recorded in diaries. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), nasal irritation, and olfactory changes were recorded. RESULTS: Of 163 patients in the safety population, 117 (71.8%) completed the study. Duration of exposure was ≥12 months for 81.6% of patients. There was one death (sudden unexpected death in epilepsy) and one withdrawal owing to a TEAE (major depression), both considered unlikely to be related to treatment. Diazepam nasal spray was administered 4390 times for 3853 seizure clusters, with 485 clusters treated with a second dose within 24 h; 53.4% of patients had monthly average usage of one to two doses, 41.7% two to five doses, and 4.9% more than five doses. No serious TEAEs were considered to be treatment related. TEAEs possibly or probably related to treatment (n = 30) were most commonly nasal discomfort (6.1%); headache (2.5%); and dysgeusia, epistaxis, and somnolence (1.8% each). Only 13 patients (7.9%) showed nasal irritation, and there were no relevant olfactory changes. The safety profile of diazepam nasal spray was generally similar across subgroups based on age, monthly usage, concomitant benzodiazepine therapy, or seasonal allergy/rhinitis. SIGNIFICANCE: In this large open-label safety study, the safety profile of diazepam nasal spray was consistent with the established profile of rectal diazepam, and the high retention rate supports effectiveness in this population. A second dose was used in only 12.6% of seizure clusters.


Asunto(s)
Epilepsia Generalizada , Epilepsia , Trastornos del Olfato , Administración Intranasal , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anticonvulsivantes/efectos adversos , Daño Encefálico Crónico , Niño , Muerte Súbita , Diazepam/efectos adversos , Epilepsia/inducido químicamente , Epilepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Epilepsia Generalizada/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Rociadores Nasales , Convulsiones/inducido químicamente , Convulsiones/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
2.
Epilepsia Open ; 6(3): 504-512, 2021 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34033266

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Need for rescue therapy differs among patients with seizure clusters. Diazepam nasal spray is approved to treat seizure clusters in patients with epilepsy ≥6 years of age. This analysis used interim data from a phase 3 safety study to assess safety profile and effectiveness of diazepam nasal spray using average number of doses/month as a proxy measurement. METHODS: This phase 3, open-label, repeat-dose, safety study of diazepam nasal spray enrolled patients (6-65 years) with epilepsy and need of benzodiazepine rescue. Patients were stratified by average number of doses/month (<2, moderate frequency; 2-5, high frequency; >5, very-high frequency). Safety was evaluated based on treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), assessed nasal irritation, and olfaction. The proportion of treatments given as a second dose was used as an exploratory proxy for effectiveness. RESULTS: Of 175 enrolled patients (data cutoff, October 31, 2019), 158 received ≥1 dose of diazepam nasal spray. Frequency of use was moderate in 43.7% of patients, high in 50.6% of patients, and very high in 5.7% of patients. Patients treated 3397 seizure episodes (moderate frequency, 14.2%; high frequency, 59.9%; very high frequency, 25.8%). Nasal discomfort was the most common treatment-related TEAE in all groups. No notable changes in nasal irritation or olfaction were observed. Second doses represented only 2.5%, 7.5%, and 17.2% of all doses in the moderate-, high-, and very-high-frequency groups, respectively. Overall retention rate was 82.9%, without an observed relationship to frequency of use. SIGNIFICANCE: Frequency of dosing diazepam nasal spray had little impact on the safety/tolerability profile across a range of <2 to >5 doses/month. Effectiveness was suggested for all dosing frequencies by the high proportion of seizure clusters not treated with a second dose. These results support the utility, safety profile, and effectiveness of diazepam nasal spray across frequencies of seizure cluster burden.


Asunto(s)
Epilepsia , Rociadores Nasales , Administración Intranasal , Diazepam/efectos adversos , Epilepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Convulsiones/tratamiento farmacológico
3.
Bol Asoc Med P R ; 101(2): 17-20, 2009.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19954095

RESUMEN

Asthma morbidity and mortality have increased in the past two decades; Puerto Rican children have the highest prevalence of asthma in the United States. An asthma admission to PICU is a marker of asthma severity. This study describes the profile of the pediatric population admitted with status asthmaticus during a three year period to PICU at Hospital Episcopal San Lucas. An ambispective cohort chart review of 46 cases was performed; there was a mean average age of 6.2 years, male predominance (70%) and a strong family and personal history of asthma and allergies. 48% were classified as persistent asthmatics, only 19% of these received preventive mediation regimens. 72% of patients were covered under Puerto Rico's Health Care Reform and 28% had private insurance. Of the patients covered by Puerto Rico's Health Care Reform, classified as persistent asthmatics, 79% did not receive preventive treatment medication compared to 46% in private insurance. Background asthma management remains suboptimal in children needing hospitalization. Lack of preventive medication appears to be related to the type of health insurance.


Asunto(s)
Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Estado Asmático/epidemiología , Antiasmáticos/uso terapéutico , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Niño , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Utilización de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Reforma de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Cobertura del Seguro/estadística & datos numéricos , Seguro de Salud/clasificación , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Puerto Rico/epidemiología , Estado Asmático/prevención & control
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA