RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To describe the development, implementation and initial evaluation of an initiative to improve glucose control in critically ill patients. DESIGN: Glucose control in critically ill patients was chosen by critical care leaders as a target for improvement. This was an observational study to document changes in processes and measures of glucose control in each intensive care unit (ICU). ICU nurse educators were interviewed to document relevant changes between April 2012 and April 2016. SETTING: 16 ICUs in British Columbia, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: ICU leaders. INTERVENTION(S): A community of practice (CoP) was formed, guidelines were adopted, two learning sessions were held, and an electronic system to collect data was created. Then, each ICU introduced their own educational and process interventions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Average hyperglycemic index (area under the curve of serum glucose concentration versus time above the upper limit (10 mmol/l) divided by time on insulin infusion), number of hypoglycemic events (<3.5 mmol/l) divided by time on insulin infusion and standardized mortality rate (actual/predicted hospital mortality) for each 3-month period. RESULTS: Although there were some isolated points and short trends that indicated special cause variation, there were no major trends over time and no obvious association with any of the process changes for each hospital. However, the average hyperglycemic index was higher in some of the smaller hospitals than in the larger hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: In this, 4-year observation of glucose control in ICUs within a CoP, the lack of sustained improvement suggests the need for more active and durable interventions.
Asunto(s)
Glucemia , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Colombia Británica , Enfermedad Crítica/mortalidad , Adhesión a Directriz , Humanos , Hiperglucemia/prevención & control , Hipoglucemia/prevención & control , Insulina/administración & dosificación , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Approaching change through seeking commitment rather than requiring compliance is an effective way to promote desired behaviours in healthcare. Gamification was explored as a technique to engage clinicians in the adoption of sepsis identification and management tools. Positive extrinsic (eg, feedback and rewards) and intrinsic (eg, mastery, autonomy, relatedness, and purpose) motivators were integrated into a campaign to save lives, leading to a significant reduction in severe sepsis mortality and improvement in processes of care.
Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud/métodos , Personal de Salud/psicología , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Sepsis/prevención & control , Retroalimentación , HumanosRESUMEN
Commissioned research was undertaken to explore the role of networks in supporting large-scale change and improvement. Participatory action research and social network analysis were used to study the BC Sepsis Network. Findings of this research include insights into distributed leadership, enablers and barriers within a network approach; the importance of relationships and trust; and the need for meaningful and timely data. Recommendations are made for health leaders who are considering utilizing networks for improving patient quality and safety.
Asunto(s)
Redes Comunitarias , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud , Liderazgo , Seguridad del Paciente , Humanos , Sepsis/prevención & control , ConfianzaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: High frequency oscillation is a safe and effective treatment for patients with ARDS, but poses a patient and caregiver risk when the circuit is disconnected. We modified the circuit to include a heated expiratory filter, eliminating the need for daily filter changes due to buildup of condensate. The purpose of the study was to determine if substitution of the filter resulted in a clinically important change in delivered tidal volume or amplitude. We additionally compared expiratory resistance and measured efficacy for the substituted filter. METHODS: This bench study measured tidal volume and amplitude using 5 of each filter type across 6 patient setting scenarios. Filter efficacy was tested through an independent laboratory, and expiratory resistance measurements were taken after prolonged use with humidification. RESULTS: The clinically important threshold value for tidal volume (defined as 5% difference) was excluded by the limits of agreement, confirming that use of the modified circuit does not result in alterations in tidal volume. The clinically important threshold for amplitude (defined as 10% difference) was the same as the lower confidence interval on the lower limit of agreement, indicating it is possible for amplitude values to be different between the 2 filters. Filter efficacy for the substituted filter was not affected. Expiratory resistance was unchanged in the substituted filter, but nearly doubled for the manufacturer's filter after 48 hours. CONCLUSIONS: Modifying the circuit to include a heated expiratory filter does not affect tidal volume, and the filter material remains efficacious during oscillation. Amplitude varies under some conditions. Preventing the need for daily filter changes reduces the risk of alveolar de-recruitment. This does not completely eliminate exposure to expired gases, but provides an additional layer of protection against occupational exposure and nosocomial spread of respiratory pathogens. Further testing in a clinical environment is necessary.
Asunto(s)
Filtración/instrumentación , Ventilación de Alta Frecuencia/instrumentación , Síndrome Respiratorio Agudo Grave/transmisión , Ventiladores Mecánicos , Diseño de Equipo , Calor , Humanos , Ensayo de Materiales , Síndrome Respiratorio Agudo Grave/prevención & controlRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pain, agitation, and delirium are associated with negative outcomes in critically ill patients. Reducing variation in pain, agitation, and delirium management among institutions could improve care. OBJECTIVES: To define opportunities to improve pain, agitation, and delirium management in intensive care units in British Columbia, Canada. METHODS: A 13-item survey was developed to determine practices for assessing and managing pain, agitation, and delirium. Target participants were persons designated as the most informed about pain, agitation, and delirium management at each of the 30 intensive care units in British Columbia. Main measures were protocol use, assessment tool(s) used and frequency, and management approaches. RESULTS: All 30 units responded; half of them had a unit-specific pain algorithm. The Behavioral Pain Scale and the numerical rating scale were the most common tools used to assess pain. Sites reported 15 different approaches to pain management: two-thirds used a sedation assessment tool, but some relied on physician diagnoses to identify sedation. Sites reported 18 different approaches to sedation management: most included an algorithm or order set for sedation management, but the most commonly used approach was individualized management by a clinician (17% for sedation and 30% for agitation). Sites reported 22 different approaches for delirium management: more than two-thirds used a delirium measurement instrument, but some relied on physician diagnoses to identify delirium. CONCLUSION: Variation in assessment and management of pain, agitation, and delirium in British Columbia intensive care units highlights opportunities to improve care.
Asunto(s)
Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Delirio/terapia , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Agitación Psicomotora , Algoritmos , Colombia Británica , Sedación Consciente/métodos , Sedación Consciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Delirio/diagnóstico , Humanos , Dimensión del Dolor , Pautas de la Práctica en Enfermería/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
Purpose - The British Columbia Ministry of Health's Clinical Care Management initiative was used as a case study to better understand large-scale change (LSC) within BC's health system. Using a complex system framework, the purpose of this paper is to examine mechanisms that enable and constrain the implementation of clinical guidelines across various clinical settings. Design/methodology/approach - Researchers applied a general model of complex adaptive systems plus two specific conceptual frameworks (realist evaluation and system dynamics mapping) to define and study enablers and constraints. Focus group sessions and interviews with clinicians, executives, managers and board members were validated through an online survey. Findings - The functional themes for managing large-scale clinical change included: creating a context to prepare clinicians for health system transformation initiatives; promoting shared clinical leadership; strengthening knowledge management, strategic communications and opportunities for networking; and clearing pathways through the complexity of a multilevel, dynamic system. Research limitations/implications - The action research methodology was designed to guide continuing improvement of implementation. A sample of initiatives was selected; it was not intended to compare and contrast facilitators and barriers across all initiatives and regions. Similarly, evaluating the results or process of guideline implementation was outside the scope; the methods were designed to enable conversations at multiple levels - policy, management and practice - about how to improve implementation. The study is best seen as a case study of LSC, offering a possible model for replication by others and a tool to shape further dialogue. Practical implications - Recommended action-oriented strategies included engaging local champions; supporting local adaptation for implementation of clinical guidelines; strengthening local teams to guide implementation; reducing change fatigue; ensuring adequate resources; providing consistent communication especially for front-line care providers; and supporting local teams to demonstrate the clinical value of the guidelines to their colleagues. Originality/value - Bringing a complex systems perspective to clinical guideline implementation resulted in a clear understanding of the challenges involved in LSC.