RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Approximately 15% of women who receive ovarian function suppression (OFS) as adjuvant treatment for high-risk, localized hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer may have inadequate estradiol suppression which can require therapeutic modification when used in combination with an aromatase inhibitor (AI). We previously reported that abemaciclib may interfere with the estradiol Abbott Alinity chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA) commonly used to monitor estradiol levels and suggested liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) is preferred in this setting. The aim of this study was to determine discrepancies in estradiol levels using CMIA compared to LC-MS/MS and subsequent treatment changes in a larger patient population. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of premenopausal women with early-stage HR+ breast cancer at our institution who received adjuvant OFS and abemaciclib with at least 1 CMIA estradiol level drawn during abemaciclib therapy from October 2021 to April 2023. RESULTS: Of the 22 women who met criteria for review, 20 (90.9%) had CMIA estradiol levels in the premenopausal range, of whom 9 also had estradiol measured by LC-MS/MS. All 9 women receiving OFS and abemaciclib with estradiol measurements by both methods had premenopausal range CMIA estradiol levels and postmenopausal range LC-MS/MS estradiol levels. Of the 20 patients with premenopausal estradiol levels by CMIA estradiol, treatment changes included increased OFS dosage or preparation (n = 7), change from AI to tamoxifen (n = 3), and surgical oophorectomy (n = 7). CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest the likely interference of abemaciclib with the Abbott Alinity immunoassay which may lead to unnecessary treatment changes. It is recommended that the LC-MS/MS assay be used when monitoring estradiol levels in patients receiving abemaciclib concurrently with OFS.
RESUMEN
Amyloidosis is a disease characterized by local and systemic extracellular deposition of amyloid protein fibrils where its excessive accumulation in tissues and resistance to degradation can lead to organ failure. Diagnosis is challenging because of approximately 36 different amyloid protein subtypes. Imaging methods like immunohistochemistry and the use of Congo red staining of amyloid proteins for laser capture microdissection combined with liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LMD/LC-MS/MS) are two diagnostic methods currently used depending on the expertise of the pathology laboratory. Here, we demonstrate a streamlined in situ amyloid peptide spatial mapping by Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Mass Spectrometry Imaging (MALDI-MSI) combined with Trapped Ion Mobility Spectrometry for potential transthyretin (ATTR) amyloidosis subtyping. While we utilized the standard LMD/LC-MS/MS workflow for amyloid subtyping of 31 specimens from different organs, we also evaluated the potential introduction in the MS workflow variations in data acquisition parameters like dynamic exclusion, or testing Data Dependent Acquisition combined with High-Field Asymmetric Waveform Ion Mobility Spectrometry (DDA FAIMS) versus Data Independent Acquisition (DIA) for enhanced amyloid protein identification at shorter acquisition times. We also demonstrate the use of Mascot's Error Tolerant Search and PEAKS de novo sequencing for the sequence variant analysis of amyloidosis specimens.
RESUMEN
Passive transfer of antibodies from COVID-19 convalescent patients is being used as an experimental treatment for eligible patients with SARS-CoV-2 infections. The United States Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) guidelines for convalescent plasma initially recommended target antibody titers of 160. We evaluated SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies in sera from recovered COVID-19 patients using plaque reduction neutralization tests (PRNT) at moderate (PRNT50) and high (PRNT90) stringency thresholds. We found that neutralizing activity significantly increased with time post symptom onset (PSO), reaching a peak at 31-35 days PSO. At this point, the number of sera having neutralizing titers of at least 160 was approximately 93% (PRNT50) and approximately 54% (PRNT90). Sera with high SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels (>960 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay titers) showed maximal activity, but not all high-titer sera contained neutralizing antibody at FDA recommended levels, particularly at high stringency. These results underscore the value of serum characterization for neutralization activity.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/sangre , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , COVID-19/terapia , Pruebas de Neutralización , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática , Humanos , Inmunización Pasiva , Sueroterapia para COVID-19Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , Betacoronavirus/inmunología , Infecciones por Coronavirus , Personal de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral , Inmunidad Adaptativa/inmunología , Adulto , COVID-19 , Prueba de COVID-19 , Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones por Coronavirus/sangre , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Ciudad de Nueva York/epidemiología , Exposición Profesional/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/sangre , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Prevalencia , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
Objectives: Soluble B-Cell Maturation Antigen (sBCMA) is a degradation product of plasma cell-bound BCMA found in serum. Serum sBCMA concentrations correlate with bone marrow plasma cellularity, making it an attractive biomarker for monitoring plasma cell disorders, such as multiple myeloma. Here we evaluated the automated BCMA immunoassay for the ProteinSimple ELLA, for the analysis of sBCMA. Design & methods: Inter and intra-run precision was assessed through replicate sBCMA measurements at 3 different concentration levels. Linearity was determined through serial dilution of a high sBMCA patient sample. Accuracy was assessed through split specimen analysis on two separate lots of reagents. Stability was assessed at 3 temperature levels over 14 days. Cross-reactivity was assessed on BCMA targeting and non-targeting chemotherapeutics. A reference range was established through the analysis of 146 healthy donor samples. The effect of endogenous interferents was assessed through spiking and recovery studies. Results: Inter and intra-run precision studies afforded CVs of <10% at all three concentration levels. Analytical measurement range was confirmed from 0.1 to 7 ng/mL. Accuracy studies afforded a slope of 0.976, intercept of 1.22, R2 of 0.996. Assayed sBCMA values were unaffected by endogenous interferents and non-BMCA targeting antibodies. BCMA targeting therapeutics negatively affected assayed sBCMA concentrations. The reference range was established at 19-58 ng/mL sBCMA is analytically stable. Conclusions: The ProteinSimple ELLA sBCMA assay shows acceptable performance for the clinical assessment of sBCMA. The assay was highly affected by BCMA targeting therapeutics, thereby patients undergoing this therapy should not have their sBCMA levels assessed by this method.
RESUMEN
A child with chronic granulomatous disease on vancomycin treatment had V trough levels that became undetectable, as measured in our hospital's clinical laboratory by a commonly employed particle-enhanced turbidometric inhibition assay. An alternative laboratory method yielded appropriate results. Recognizing and resolving erroneously low V trough levels could prevent needless adjustments in dosing that could increase risk for acute kidney injury.
Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda , Enfermedad Granulomatosa Crónica , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Niño , Femenino , Enfermedad Granulomatosa Crónica/complicaciones , Enfermedad Granulomatosa Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Vancomicina/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
In October 2020, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Serological Sciences Network (SeroNet) was established to study the immune response to COVID-19, and "to develop, validate, improve, and implement serological testing and associated technologies" (https://www.cancer.gov/research/key-initiatives/covid-19/coronavirus-research-initiatives/serological-sciences-network). SeroNet is comprised of 25 participating research institutions partnering with the Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (FNLCR) and the SeroNet Coordinating Center. Since its inception, SeroNet has supported collaborative development and sharing of COVID-19 serological assay procedures and has set forth plans for assay harmonization. To facilitate collaboration and procedure sharing, a detailed survey was sent to collate comprehensive assay details and performance metrics on COVID-19 serological assays within SeroNet. In addition, FNLCR established a protocol to calibrate SeroNet serological assays to reference standards, such as the U.S. severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) serology standard reference material and first WHO international standard (IS) for anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin (20/136), to facilitate harmonization of assay reporting units and cross-comparison of study data. SeroNet institutions reported development of a total of 27 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) methods, 13 multiplex assays, and 9 neutralization assays and use of 12 different commercial serological methods. FNLCR developed a standardized protocol for SeroNet institutions to calibrate these diverse serological assays to reference standards. In conclusion, SeroNet institutions have established a diverse array of COVID-19 serological assays to study the immune response to SARS-CoV-2 and vaccines. Calibration of SeroNet serological assays to harmonize results reporting will facilitate future pooled data analyses and study cross-comparisons. IMPORTANCE SeroNet institutions have developed or implemented 61 diverse COVID-19 serological assays and are collaboratively working to harmonize these assays using reference materials to establish standardized reporting units. This will facilitate clinical interpretation of serology results and cross-comparison of research data.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Anticuerpos Antivirales , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Prueba de COVID-19 , Humanos , SARS-CoV-2 , Pruebas Serológicas/métodosRESUMEN
Background: In October 2020, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Serological Sciences Network (SeroNet) was established to study the immune response to COVID-19, and "to develop, validate, improve, and implement serological testing and associated technologies." SeroNet is comprised of 25 participating research institutions partnering with the Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research (FNLCR) and the SeroNet Coordinating Center. Since its inception, SeroNet has supported collaborative development and sharing of COVID-19 serological assay procedures and has set forth plans for assay harmonization. Methods: To facilitate collaboration and procedure sharing, a detailed survey was sent to collate comprehensive assay details and performance metrics on COVID-19 serological assays within SeroNet. In addition, FNLCR established a protocol to calibrate SeroNet serological assays to reference standards, such as the U.S. SARS-CoV-2 serology standard reference material and First WHO International Standard (IS) for anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin (20/136), to facilitate harmonization of assay reporting units and cross-comparison of study data. Results: SeroNet institutions reported development of a total of 27 ELISA methods, 13 multiplex assays, 9 neutralization assays, and use of 12 different commercial serological methods. FNLCR developed a standardized protocol for SeroNet institutions to calibrate these diverse serological assays to reference standards. Conclusions: SeroNet institutions have established a diverse array of COVID-19 serological assays to study the immune response to SARS-CoV-2 virus and vaccines. Calibration of SeroNet serological assays to harmonize results reporting will facilitate future pooled data analyses and study cross-comparisons.
RESUMEN
Current severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) serological tests are based on the full-length spike (S), the receptor-binding domain (RBD), or the nucleoprotein (NP) as substrates. Here, we used samples from healthcare workers (HCWs) to perform a longitudinal analysis of the antibody responses using a research-grade RBD and spike-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), a commercial RBD and spike-based ELISA, and a commercial NP-based chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay. Seroprevalence ranged around 28% early during the pandemic and a good correlation was observed between RBD and spike-based ELISAs. Modest correlations were observed between NP and both RBD and spike-based assays. The antibody levels in HCWs declined over time; however, the overall seroprevalence measured by RBD and spike-based assays remained unchanged, while the seroprevalence of NP-reactive antibodies significantly declined. Moreover, RBD and spike-based assays effectively detected seroconversion in vaccinees. Overall, our results consolidate the strength of different serological assays to assess the magnitude and duration of antibodies to SARS-CoV-2.
RESUMEN
Background: Biotin has been reported to interfere with several commonly used laboratory assays resulting in misleading values and possible erroneous diagnosis and treatment. This report describes a prospective study of possible biotin interference in thyroid-related laboratory assays, with a comparison of different commonly used assay platforms. Materials and Methods: Thirteen adult subjects (mean age 45 ± 13 years old) were administered biotin 10 mg/day for eight days. Blood specimens were collected at three time points on day 1 and on day 8 (baseline, two, and five hours after biotin ingestion). Thyrotropin (TSH), free triiodothyronine (fT3), free thyroxine (fT4), total triiodothyronine (TT3), total thyroxine (TT4), thyroxine binding globulin (TBG), and thyroglobulin (Tg) levels were analyzed with four different platforms: Abbott Architect, Roche Cobas 6000, Siemens IMMULITE 2000, and liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). TSH, fT3, fT4, TT3, and TT4 were measured with Abbott Architect and Roche Cobas 6000. fT3, fT4, TT3, and TT4 were also measured by LC-MS/MS. Tg was measured by Siemens IMMULITE 2000. TBG was assessed with Siemens IMMULITE 2000. Results: Significant changes in TSH, fT4, and TT3 measurements were observed after biotin exposure when the Roche Cobas 6000 platform was used. Biotin intake resulted in a falsely lower Tg level when measurements were performed with Siemens IMMULITE 2000. At the time points examined, maximal biotin interference was observed two hours after biotin exposure both on day 1 and day 8. Conclusions: A daily dose of 10 mg was shown to interfere with specific assays for TSH, fT4, TT3, and Tg. Physicians must be aware of the potential risk of erroneous test results in subjects taking biotin supplements. Altered test results for TSH and Tg can be particularly problematic in patients requiring careful titration of levothyroxine therapy such as those with thyroid cancer.
Asunto(s)
Biotina/análisis , Biotina/farmacología , Tiroglobulina/análisis , Hormonas Tiroideas/análisis , Tirotropina/análisis , Adulto , Anciano , Cromatografía Líquida de Alta Presión , Reacciones Falso Negativas , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Espectrometría de Masas , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Pruebas de Función de la TiroidesRESUMEN
A novel clinical assay for the detection and quantitation of antibodies against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was adapted from an in-house, research-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Development and validation were performed under regulatory guidelines, and the test obtained emergency use authorization (EUA) from the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The Mount Sinai coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) antibody assay is an orthogonal, quantitative direct ELISA test which detects antibodies reactive to the receptor binding domain (RBD) and the spike protein of the novel SARS-CoV-2. The assay is performed on 96-well plates coated with either SARS-CoV-2 recombinant RBD or spike proteins. The test is divided into two stages, a qualitative screening assay against RBD and a quantitative assay against the full-length spike protein. The test uses pooled high titer serum as a reference standard. Negative pre-COVID-19 and positive post-COVID-19, PCR-confirmed specimens were incorporated in each ELISA test run, and the assays were performed independently at two different locations. The Mount Sinai COVID-19 serology performed with high sensitivity and specificity, 92.5% (95% CI: 0.785-0.980) and 100% (CI: 0.939-1.000) respectively. Between-run precision was assessed with a single run repeated over 22 days; and within-run precision was assessed with 10 replicates per day over 22 days. Both were within reported acceptance criteria (CV ≤ 20%). This population-based study reveals the applicability and reliability of this novel orthogonal COVID-19 serology test for the detection and quantitation of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2, allowing a broad set of clinical applications, including the broad evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence and antibody profiling in different population subsets.
RESUMEN
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has caused a global pandemic with millions infected and more than 1 million fatalities. Questions regarding the robustness, functionality, and longevity of the antibody response to the virus remain unanswered. Here, on the basis of a dataset of 30,082 individuals screened at Mount Sinai Health System in New York City, we report that the vast majority of infected individuals with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 experience robust immunoglobulin G antibody responses against the viral spike protein. We also show that titers are relatively stable for at least a period of about 5 months and that anti-spike binding titers significantly correlate with neutralization of authentic SARS-CoV-2. Our data suggest that more than 90% of seroconverters make detectable neutralizing antibody responses. These titers remain relatively stable for several months after infection.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/inmunología , Anticuerpos Antivirales/inmunología , COVID-19/inmunología , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/sangre , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , COVID-19/sangre , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina G/sangre , Inmunoglobulina G/inmunología , Pruebas de NeutralizaciónRESUMEN
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), is a new human disease with few effective treatments1. Convalescent plasma, donated by persons who have recovered from COVID-19, is the acellular component of blood that contains antibodies, including those that specifically recognize SARS-CoV-2. These antibodies, when transfused into patients infected with SARS-CoV-2, are thought to exert an antiviral effect, suppressing virus replication before patients have mounted their own humoral immune responses2,3. Virus-specific antibodies from recovered persons are often the first available therapy for an emerging infectious disease, a stopgap treatment while new antivirals and vaccines are being developed1,2. This retrospective, propensity score-matched case-control study assessed the effectiveness of convalescent plasma therapy in 39 patients with severe or life-threatening COVID-19 at The Mount Sinai Hospital in New York City. Oxygen requirements on day 14 after transfusion worsened in 17.9% of plasma recipients versus 28.2% of propensity score-matched controls who were hospitalized with COVID-19 (adjusted odds ratio (OR), 0.86; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.75-0.98; chi-square test P value = 0.025). Survival also improved in plasma recipients (adjusted hazard ratio (HR), 0.34; 95% CI, 0.13-0.89; chi-square test P = 0.027). Convalescent plasma is potentially effective against COVID-19, but adequately powered, randomized controlled trials are needed.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/patología , COVID-19/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Anticuerpos Antivirales/sangre , COVID-19/epidemiología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunización Pasiva , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , Puntaje de Propensión , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Sueroterapia para COVID-19RESUMEN
Several studies have revealed that the hyper-inflammatory response induced by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a major cause of disease severity and death. However, predictive biomarkers of pathogenic inflammation to help guide targetable immune pathways are critically lacking. We implemented a rapid multiplex cytokine assay to measure serum interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and IL-1ß in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) upon admission to the Mount Sinai Health System in New York. Patients (n = 1,484) were followed up to 41 d after admission (median, 8 d), and clinical information, laboratory test results and patient outcomes were collected. We found that high serum IL-6, IL-8 and TNF-α levels at the time of hospitalization were strong and independent predictors of patient survival (P < 0.0001, P = 0.0205 and P = 0.0140, respectively). Notably, when adjusting for disease severity, common laboratory inflammation markers, hypoxia and other vitals, demographics, and a range of comorbidities, IL-6 and TNF-α serum levels remained independent and significant predictors of disease severity and death. These findings were validated in a second cohort of patients (n = 231). We propose that serum IL-6 and TNF-α levels should be considered in the management and treatment of patients with COVID-19 to stratify prospective clinical trials, guide resource allocation and inform therapeutic options.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/inmunología , Interleucina-1beta/inmunología , Interleucina-6/inmunología , Interleucina-8/inmunología , Neumonía Viral/inmunología , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/inmunología , Anciano , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/mortalidad , Infecciones por Coronavirus/fisiopatología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/terapia , Citocinas/inmunología , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/mortalidad , Neumonía Viral/fisiopatología , Neumonía Viral/terapia , SARS-CoV-2 , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
The COVID-19 pandemic caused by infection with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has led to more than 100,000 deaths in the United States. Several studies have revealed that the hyper-inflammatory response induced by SARS-CoV-2 is a major cause of disease severity and death in infected patients. However, predictive biomarkers of pathogenic inflammation to help guide targetable immune pathways are critically lacking. We implemented a rapid multiplex cytokine assay to measure serum IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α, and IL-1ß in hospitalized COVID-19 patients upon admission to the Mount Sinai Health System in New York. Patients (n=1484) were followed up to 41 days (median 8 days) and clinical information, laboratory test results and patient outcomes were collected. In 244 patients, cytokine measurements were repeated over time, and effect of drugs could be assessed. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to compare survival by cytokine strata, followed by Cox regression models to evaluate the independent predictive value of baseline cytokines. We found that high serum IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α levels at the time of hospitalization were strong and independent predictors of patient survival. Importantly, when adjusting for disease severity score, common laboratory inflammation markers, hypoxia and other vitals, demographics, and a range of comorbidities, IL-6 and TNF-α serum levels remained independent and significant predictors of disease severity and death. We propose that serum IL-6 and TNF-α levels should be considered in the management and treatment of COVID-19 patients to stratify prospective clinical trials, guide resource allocation and inform therapeutic options. We also propose that patients with high IL-6 and TNF-α levels should be assessed for combinatorial blockade of pathogenic inflammation in this disease.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Levetiracetam (Keppra) is a novel antiepileptic drug recently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration as an add-on therapy in the treatment of partial onset seizures in patients. We developed and describe a simple and rapid high performance liquid chromatography-electrospray tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-ESI-MS/MS) assay for the determination of levetiracetam in human matrix (plasma, serum, or saliva). METHODS: An API-3000 or API-4000 triple-quadrupole mass spectrometer (Sciex, Concord, Canada) coupled with the IonSpray source and Shimadzu HPLC system (Shimadzu Scientific Instruments, Columbia, MD) was used employing ritonavir as internal standard (IS) for levetiracetam. One hundred microliters of serum (or plasma, saliva) was deproteinized by adding 150 microl of acetonitrile containing internal standard. After centrifugation, 100 microl of supernatant was diluted with 300 microl of water and 10 microl aliquot was injected onto a C-18 column. After a 2.5 min wash the valve was activated to initiate the isocratic elution program which eluted the levetiracetam and internal standard into the MS/MS system. Quantitation by MRM analysis was performed in the positive ion mode. Within-day and between-day imprecision were evaluated for levetiracetam using three levels of in-house controls. Reliability and accuracy of this method were assessed by comparison of targets with external QC material (ChromSystems), between laboratory comparisons and by recovery studies. RESULTS: Within-day coefficients of variation (CVs) were <6.1% and between-day CVs were <8.2%. The average spiked recoveries of levetiracetam added to the drug-free human plasma samples were 108% at low concentration level and 103% at high concentration level. CONCLUSIONS: The method was found both specific and sensitive for the rapid and accurate measurement of levetiracetam in human matrices and correlated well with the Quest/Chantilly tandem mass spectrometric method (r=0.983).
Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes/análisis , Piracetam/análogos & derivados , Saliva/química , Anticonvulsivantes/sangre , Cromatografía Líquida de Alta Presión , Humanos , Levetiracetam , Piracetam/análisis , Piracetam/sangre , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Espectrometría de Masa por Ionización de Electrospray , Espectrometría de Masas en TándemRESUMEN
Application of statistical experimental designs for optimization of fermentation parameters to enhance ethanol production, which is an economical and renewable energy source using Saccharomyces cerevisiae NCIM 3090 from palmyra jaggery, was studied in a batch fermentor. Using Plackett-Burman design, impeller speed, concentrations of CoCl2 and KH2PO4 were identified as significant variables, which highly influenced ethanol production, and these variables were further optimized using a central composite design (CCD). The ethanol production was adequately approximated with a full quadratic equation obtained from three factors and five levels of CCD. Maximum ethanol concentration of 132.56 g/l (16.8% [v/v]) was obtained for an impeller speed of 247.179 ( approximately 250) rev/min, CoCl2 of 0.263 g/l and KH2PO4 of 2.39 g/l. A second-order polynomial regression model was fitted and was found adequate with R 2 of 0.8952. This combined statistical approach enables rapid identification and investigation of significant parameters for improving the ethanol production and could be very useful in optimizing processes.
Asunto(s)
Arecaceae/química , Reactores Biológicos , Etanol/metabolismo , Fermentación , Extractos Vegetales/química , Saccharomyces cerevisiae/metabolismo , Cobalto/química , Modelos BiológicosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Chyluria is a medical condition with presence of chyle in urine. The disease is most prevalent in South East Asian countries mostly caused by parasitic (Wuchereria bancrofti) infections. Our objective was to investigate the spontaneous remission of non-parasitic chyluria. DESIGN AND METHODS: The spontaneous remission of non-parasitic chyluria cases were worked up with diagnostic investigations, clinical assessment and studied in detail with respect to their natural evolution. RESULTS: We present two patients who were evaluated in the nephrology clinic with symptoms of milky urine and painless hematuria. Midnight blood smear was negative for filarial parasites. Urine culture was without mycobacteria. Urine cytology and IgG western blot for cysticercus were negative. Imaging for a lymphatic leak by lymphoscintigraphy was unrevealing. Chyluria resolved spontaneously in both patients. CONCLUSIONS: In our cases, radiologic visualization via lymphoscintigraphy was unrevealing. The patients were managed conservatively and fortunately underwent spontaneous remission marked by the disappearance of chyluria within several months of her initial diagnosis. In our opinion this spontaneous remission could be due to unrevealed lymphatico-renal fistula collapse or sclerosis of lymphatics caused by contrast media.