RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and toxicity of CHOP-14, with rituximab (R-CHOP-14), supported by pegfilgrastim, in untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). DESIGN AND METHODS: This study included 50 patients with DLBCL with a median age of 55 years (range: 22-70). Sixty-two percent had an International Prognostic Index score >1, 40% had bulky disease and 52% had stage IV disease. CHOP was administered every 14 days, preceded on day 1 by rituximab (375 mg/m2) and followed on day 3 by pegfilgrastim (6 mg per cycle). Toxicity was calculated over 277 cycles administered; feasibility was calculated over 227, since the first cycle in each patient was not susceptible to delay or dose-reduction. RESULTS: Therapy was delivered on time in 92% of cycles, with the relative dose intensity being 95% for doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide. Grade 4 neutropenia developed in 19% of cycles and neutropenic fever in 4% of cycles (16% of patients), with a median duration of 3 days (range: 2-10). The program was completed in 40 of 50 patients (80%); reasons for withdrawal included progression in three patients, interstitial pneumonia in four, prolonged severe neutropenia in two and septic shock in one patient. Severe adverse events occurred on 12 occasions (4% of cycles), involving 11 patients (22% of total); the most frequent severe adverse event was interstitial pneumonia which occurred in seven patients (14% of total). In three cases, Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia was documented; no cotrimoxazole prophylaxis had been given and a correlation with hypogammaglobulinemia was observed. The complete remission rate was 74%; the 2-year event-free and overall survival rates were 72% and 68%, respectively. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: A single dose of pegfilgrastim per cycle of R-CHOP allowed on-time delivery of this chemotherapy in DLBCL, with a low incidence of febrile neutropenia; the risk of P. carinii pneumonia makes cotrimoxazole prophylaxis essential in this setting.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos/administración & dosificación , Linfoma de Células B/tratamiento farmacológico , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/toxicidad , Anticuerpos Monoclonales de Origen Murino , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/toxicidad , Ciclofosfamida/administración & dosificación , Ciclofosfamida/toxicidad , Doxorrubicina/administración & dosificación , Doxorrubicina/toxicidad , Filgrastim , Humanos , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/complicaciones , Linfoma de Células B Grandes Difuso/mortalidad , Persona de Mediana Edad , Polietilenglicoles , Prednisona/administración & dosificación , Prednisona/toxicidad , Proteínas Recombinantes , Rituximab , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vincristina/administración & dosificación , Vincristina/toxicidadRESUMEN
The aim of this phase II trial was to investigate the efficacy of bortezomib plus dexamethasone (Vel-Dex) as induction therapy in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) and to define the role of intensification before transplantation. Fifty-seven patients were treated with four courses of Vel-Dex, two cycles of dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide, etoposide and cisplatin (DCEP), and a single autologous transplant. Fourteen patients (25%) went off-study: seven after Vel-Dex, seven after DCEP. All patients yielded high numbers of stem cells (median CD34+ cells 7.5 x 106/kg); 54 of the 57 patients (94%) collected > or =4 x 106/kg CD34+ cells, 60% with a single leukapheresis. The overall response rate (ORR) after Vel-Dex was 86% (70% had a very good partial response [VGPR] or better) regardless of cytogenetic abnormalities and International Staging System stage (ISS). The response at the end of the two DCEP cycles remained unchanged in 35 patients (70%), worsened in 15 (20%), and improved in 5 (10%). Because of the consistent drop-out, the ORR in intention-to-treat analysis decreased significantly from 86% after Vel-Dex to 76% after DCEP, and 73% after transplantation. However, when considering the subset of 43 patients who completed the program, the ORR was 96% (complete response 39%, VGPR 41%, partial response 16%). In conclusion, Vel-Dex produces high response rates, improves stem cell collection, and overcomes the need for intensification before autologous transplantation.