RESUMEN
Medulloblastomas (MBs) and glioblastomas (GBMs) are high-incidence central nervous system tumors. Different origin sites and changes in the tissue microenvironment have been associated with the onset and progression. Here, we describe differences between the extracellular matrix (ECM) signatures of these tumors. We compared the proteomic profiles of MB and GBM decellularized tumor samples between each other and their normal decellularized brain site counterparts. Our analysis revealed that 19, 28, and 11 ECM proteins were differentially expressed in MBs, GBMs, and in both MBs and GBMs, respectively. Next, we validated key findings by using a protein tissue array with 53 MB and 55 GBM cases and evaluated the clinical relevance of the identified differentially expressed proteins through their analysis on publicly available datasets, 763 MB samples from the GSE50161 and GSE85217 studies, and 115 GBM samples from RNAseq-TCGA. We report a shift toward a denser fibrillary ECM as well as a clear alteration in the glycoprotein signature, which influences the tumor pathophysiology. MS data have been submitted to the PRIDE repository, project accession: PXD023350.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas , Matriz Extracelular , Glioblastoma , Meduloblastoma , Neoplasias Encefálicas/genética , Matriz Extracelular/patología , Glioblastoma/genética , Humanos , Meduloblastoma/genética , Proteoma/genética , Proteómica , Microambiente TumoralRESUMEN
The disruption of mitochondrial activity has been associated with cancer development because it contributes to regulating apoptosis and is the main source of reactive oxygen species (ROS) production. Mitochondrial transcription factor A (TFAM) is a protein that maintains mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) integrity, and alterations in its expression are associated with mitochondrial damage and cancer development. In addition, studies have shown that mitochondria are a known target of melatonin, the pineal gland hormone that plays an important anti-tumorigenic role. Thus, we hypothesized that melatonin decreases the expression of TFAM (RNA and protein) in the human glioblastoma cell line U87MG, which disrupts mtDNA expression and results in cell death due to increased ROS production and mitochondrial damage. Our results confirm the hypothesis, and also show that melatonin reduced the expression of other mitochondrial transcription factors mRNA (TFB1M and TFB2M) and interfered with mtDNA transcription. Moreover, melatonin delayed cell cycle progression and potentiated the reduction of cell survival due to treatment with the chemotherapeutic agent temozolomide. In conclusion, elucidating the effect of melatonin on TFAM expression should help to understand the signaling pathways involved in glioblastoma progression, and melatonin could be potentially applied in the treatment of this type of brain tumor.
Asunto(s)
Proteínas de Unión al ADN/metabolismo , Glioma/patología , Melatonina/farmacología , Proteínas Mitocondriales/metabolismo , Terapia Molecular Dirigida , Factores de Transcripción/metabolismo , Apoptosis/efectos de los fármacos , Ciclo Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Línea Celular Tumoral , Proliferación Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Supervivencia Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Replicación del ADN/efectos de los fármacos , ADN Mitocondrial/genética , Dacarbazina/análogos & derivados , Dacarbazina/farmacología , Regulación Neoplásica de la Expresión Génica/efectos de los fármacos , Glioma/genética , Humanos , Potencial de la Membrana Mitocondrial/efectos de los fármacos , Proteínas de Neoplasias/genética , Proteínas de Neoplasias/metabolismo , ARN Mensajero/genética , ARN Mensajero/metabolismo , Especies Reactivas de Oxígeno/metabolismo , Temozolomida , Transcripción Genética/efectos de los fármacosRESUMEN
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive brain primary malignancy. Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) has a dual role in cell fate, promoting cell survival or death depending on the context. Here, we analyzed TLR4 expression in different grades of astrocytoma, and observed increased expression in tumors, mainly in GBM, compared to non-neoplastic brain tissue. TLR4 role was investigated in U87MG, a GBM mesenchymal subtype cell line, upon LPS stimulation. p65 nuclear translocation was observed in late phase, suggesting TLR4-non-canonical pathway activation. In fact, components of ripoptosome and inflammasome cascades were upregulated and they were significantly correlated in GBMs of the TCGA-RNASeq dataset. Moreover, an increased apoptotic rate was observed when the GBM-derived U87MG cells were co-treated with LPS and Temozolomide (TMZ) in comparison to TMZ alone. Increased TLR4 immunostaining was detected in nuclei of U87MG cells 12 h after LPS treatment, concomitant to activation of DNA repair genes. Time-dependent increased RAD51, FEN1 and UNG expression levels were confirmed after LPS stimulation, which may contribute to tumor cell fitness. Moreover, the combined treatment with the RAD51 inhibitor, Amuvatinib in combination with, TMZ after LPS stimulation reduced tumor cell viability more than with each treatment alone. In conclusion, our results suggest that stimulation of TLR4 combined with pharmacological inhibition of the DNA repair pathway may be an alternative treatment for GBM patients.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas/metabolismo , Núcleo Celular/metabolismo , Reparación del ADN , ADN de Neoplasias/metabolismo , Glioblastoma/metabolismo , Proteínas de Neoplasias/metabolismo , Transducción de Señal , Receptor Toll-Like 4/metabolismo , Factor de Transcripción ReIA/metabolismo , Transporte Activo de Núcleo Celular , Neoplasias Encefálicas/genética , Línea Celular Tumoral , Núcleo Celular/genética , ADN de Neoplasias/genética , Femenino , Glioblastoma/genética , Humanos , Masculino , Proteínas de Neoplasias/genética , Receptor Toll-Like 4/genética , Factor de Transcripción ReIA/genéticaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Glioblastoma, the most common and lethal brain tumor, is also one of the most defying forms of malignancies in terms of treatment. Integrated genomic analysis has searched deeper into the molecular architecture of GBM, revealing a new sub-classification and promising precision in the care for patients with specific alterations. METHOD: Here, we present the classification of a Brazilian glioblastoma cohort into its main molecular subtypes. Using a high-throughput DNA sequencing procedure, we have classified this cohort into proneural, classical and mesenchymal sub-types. Next, we tested the possible use of the overexpression of the EGFR and CHI3L1 genes, detected through immunohistochemistry, for the identification of the classical and mesenchymal subtypes, respectively. RESULTS: Our results demonstrate that genetic identification of the glioblastoma subtypes is not possible using single targeted mutations alone, particularly in the case of the Mesenchymal subtype. We also show that it is not possible to single out the mesenchymal cases through CHI3L1 expression. CONCLUSION: Our data indicate that the Mesenchymal subtype, the most malignant of the glioblastomas, needs further and more thorough research to be ensure adequate identification.
OBJETIVO: O glioblastoma (GBM), o tumor cerebral mais comum e mais letal, é também um dos tipos de tumores de mais difícil tratamento. Análises genômicas integradas têm contribuído para um melhor entendimento da arquitetura molecular dos GBMs, revelando uma nova subclassificação com a promessa de precisão no tratamento de pacientes com alterações específicas. Neste estudo, nós apresentamos a classificação de uma casuística brasileira de GBMs dentro dos principais subtipos do tumor. MÉTODO: Usando sequenciamento de DNA em larga escala, foi possível classificar os tumores em proneural, clássico e mesenquimal. Em seguida, testamos o possível uso da hiperexpressão de EGFR e CHI3L1 para a identificação dos subtipos clássico e mesenquimal, respectivamente. RESULTADOS: Nossos resultados deixam claro que a identificação genética dos subtipos moleculares de GBM não é possível utilizando-se apenas um único tipo de mutação, em particular nos casos de GBMs mesenquimais. Da mesma forma, não é possível distinguir os casos mesenquimais apenas com a expressão de CHI3L1. CONCLUSÃO: Nossos dados indicam que o subtipo mesenquimal, o mais maligno dos GBMs, necessita de uma análise mais aprofundada para sua identificação.