Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Gynecol Oncol ; 181: 60-67, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38134755

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Optimal management of obese patients with early-stage cervical cancer is debated despite evidence of non-inferior survival in obese patients undergoing radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy (RH) compared to primary radiation with or without radiosensitizing chemotherapy (RT). Objectives included describing patient factors affecting disposition to RH versus RT; comparing RH outcomes for obese (BMI >30 mg/m2) and non-obese patients; and comparing differences in recurrence free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). METHODS: This was a single institution cohort study of all cervical cancer patients who underwent RH or were candidates for RH based on clinical stage. Demographic, clinicopathologic and treatment outcomes were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: RT patients (n = 39, 15%) had a higher BMI (p = 0.004), older age (p < 0.001), more life-limiting comorbidities (LLC) (p < 0.001), larger tumor size (p = 0.001), and higher clinical stage (p = 0.013) compared to RH patients (n = 221, 85%). On multivariable survival analysis there was no difference in OS based on treatment modality; significant predictors of worse OS were larger tumor size, higher number of LLC and recurrence. Among the RH group, obese patients had a longer operative time (p = 0.01) and more LLC (p = 0.02); there were no differences in demographic or clinicopathologic characteristics, operative outcomes, RFS or OS compared to non-obese patients. CONCLUSION: In this cohort of RH-eligible cervical cancer patients, BMI was independently associated with disposition to RT. Studies demonstrate that RH is feasible and safe in obese patients with no difference in RFS or OS when compared to non-obese patients. Thus, the decision for disposition to RT should not be based on obesity alone.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios de Cohortes , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/cirugía , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Obesidad/complicaciones , Obesidad/patología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Histerectomía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad
2.
Gynecol Oncol Rep ; 42: 101029, 2022 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35747786

RESUMEN

CA-125 has long been utilized as a surveillance biomarker for gynecologic malignancies but can be elevated in other conditions, including infection. A study of tumor markers in non-cancer patients saw a rise in CA-125 values during severe COVID-19 infections. Given the potential confounding effect this could have on surveillance and treatment planning, we sought to describe the impact of COVID-19 on CA-125 trends in a gynecologic oncology patient population. We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients treated at a UPMC hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic from March of 2020 through September of 2021. Patients were included for analysis if they had confirmed uterine or ovarian malignancies, a COVID-19 infection and more than one CA-125 value drawn within one year of their COVID-19 diagnosis. The CA-125 values were plotted against the timeline of their COVID-19 infections to assess for trends in CA-125 during and after infection. There were 17 patients who met the above criteria. Of these 17 patients, three had a rise in their CA-125 trend at the time of their COVID-19 diagnosis. Another three had newly elevated CA-125 values, without a prior documented baseline level, at the time of their infection. In all six of these patients, their CA-125 elevations could be attributed to malignancy. The remaining 11 patients showed stable or decreasing CA-125 values coinciding with their COVID-19 infection. This case series illustrates that while CA-125 values may increase during an acute COVID-19 infection, cancer remains the most likely cause of a CA-125 increase. Clinical suspicion should remain high for a possible change in cancer status.

3.
Gynecol Oncol Rep ; 44: 101080, 2022 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36249905

RESUMEN

Objective: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping is a highly accurate surgical technique for detecting metastases in endometrial cancer. The objective of this study was to identify clinical factors associated with failed mapping. Methods: All patients with endometrial cancer undergoing minimally-invasive staging and planned SLN biopsy from 1/1/2017 to 12/31/2020 at a single institution were identified retrospectively. Demographic, clinicopathologic and treatment data were obtained. Data were compared using descriptive statistics. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression were performed to identify predictors of failed mapping. Results: 819 patients were identified with a mean age of 64.6 years (range 26-93) and mean BMI of 35.6 kg/m2 (range 18-68). Most (88.5 %, 725/819) had early-stage disease and endometrioid histology (82.3 %, 674/819). A majority (74.2 %, 608/819) had successful bilateral mapping, and 54 (6.6 %) had unsuccessful bilateral mapping. Increasing BMI was significantly associated with unsuccessful bilateral mapping: patients with BMI > 30 were more likely to have unsuccessful SLN mapping (p = 0.033). Among patients with known lymph node status (799/819), patients with macrometastases and micrometastases were more likely to have failed bilateral mapping compared to those with negative SLNs or isolated tumor cells (p = 0.013). On multivariable analysis, higher BMI and histology were associated with failed bilateral mapping (OR = 1.023, 95 % CI (1.005, 1.041) and OR = 1.678, 95 % CI (1.177, 2.394), respectively). Conclusion: SLN mapping has a high success in patients undergoing minimally-invasive surgical staging for endometrial cancer. Increasing BMI, high risk histology, and lymph node metastases are risk factors for failed mapping.

4.
Mol Diagn Ther ; 18(2): 175-83, 2014 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24297151

RESUMEN

Circulating melanoma cells (CMCs) are thought to be the foundation for metastatic disease, which makes this cancer especially lethal. Cancer cells contained in the primary tumor undergo genotypic and phenotypic changes leading to an epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, during which numerous changes occur in signaling pathways and proteins in the cells. CMCs are then shed off or migrate from the primary tumor and intravasate the vasculature system. A few CMCs are able to survive in the circulation through expression of a variety of genes and also by evading immune system recognition to establish metastases at distant sites after extravasating from the vessels. The presence of CMCs in the blood of a melanoma patient can be used for disease staging, predicting metastasis development, and evaluating the efficacy of therapeutic agents. Overall survival and disease-free duration can also be correlated with the presence of CMCs. Finally, analysis of CMCs for druggable therapeutic gene targets could lead to the development of personalized treatment regimens to prevent metastasis. Thus, the study of CMCs shows promise for the detection, staging, and monitoring of disease treatment, as well as for determination of prognosis and predicting overall disease-free survival. These are the areas reviewed in this article.


Asunto(s)
Melanoma/sangre , Melanoma/diagnóstico , Células Neoplásicas Circulantes/metabolismo , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Humanos , Melanoma/patología , Terapia Molecular Dirigida , Células Neoplásicas Circulantes/patología , Medicina de Precisión , Pronóstico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA