Prevalence and characteristics of and risk factors for impacted teeth with ankylosis and replacement resorption - a retrospective, 3D-radiographic assessment.

BACKGROUND: Large variation in the prevalence of ankylosis and replacement resorption (ARR) is reported in the literature and most studies have relatively small patient numbers. The present retrospective study aimed to provide an overview on prevalence, location of, and associated risk factors with ARR based on a large sample of computed tomography (CT) / cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of impacted teeth. The results should allow clinicians to better estimate the risk of ARR at impacted teeth. METHODS: The CT/CBCT scans of 5764 patients of a single center in Central Europe were screened with predefined eligibility criteria. The following parameters were recorded for the finally included population: gender, age, tooth type/position, number of impacted teeth per patient, and presence/absence of ARR. For teeth with ARR the tooth location in reference to the dental arch, tooth angulation, and part of the tooth affected by ARR were additionally registered. RESULTS: Altogether, 4142 patients with 7170 impacted teeth were included. ARR was diagnosed at 187 impacted teeth (2.6%) of 157 patients (3.7%); 58% of these patients were female and the number of teeth with ARR per patient ranged from 1 to 10. Depending on the tooth type the prevalence ranged from 0 (upper first premolars, lower central and lateral incisors) to 41.2% (upper first molars). ARR was detected at the crown (57.2%), root (32.1%), or at both (10.7%). After correcting for confounders, the odds for ARR significantly increased with higher age; further, incisors and first/second molars had the highest odds for ARR, while wisdom teeth had the lowest. More specifically, for 20-year-old patients the risk for ARR at impacted incisors and first/second molars ranged from 7.7 to 10.8%, but it approximately tripled to 27.3-35.5% for 40-year-old patients. In addition, female patients had significantly less often ARR at the root, while with increasing age the root was significantly more often affected by ARR than the crown. CONCLUSION: ARR at impacted teeth is indeed a rare event, i.e., only 2.6% of 7170 impacted teeth were ankylosed with signs of replacement resorption. On the patient level, higher age significantly increased the odds for ARR and on the tooth level, incisors and first/second molars had the highest odds for ARR, while wisdom teeth had the lowest.

Effects of the Saliva of Patients Undergoing Orthodontic Treatment with Invisalign and Brackets on Human Gingival Fibroblasts and Oral Epithelial Cells.

The transient worsening of oral health sometimes accompanies orthodontic treatment (OT), and the extent of this effect might depend on whether the patients are treated with traditional brackets or clear aligners. Saliva is an important tool for monitoring oral health and influences the functional properties of various oral cells. This study aimed to compare the effects of saliva from patients undergoing OT with Invisalign aligners and brackets on human gingival fibroblasts and oral epithelial cells in vitro. Unstimulated saliva was collected from 15 patients treated with Invisalign and 16 patients treated with brackets before and 3 and 6 months after therapy began. The saliva was used to stimulate primary human gingival fibroblasts and the oral epithelial Ca9-22 cell line, and the resulting cell response was investigated. Saliva did not exhibit any toxic effect on investigated cells, as shown by the proliferation/viability assay with the MTT method. In human gingival fibroblasts, saliva increased gene expression of various proinflammatory mediators, such as interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, assessed by qPCR. In epithelial cells, saliva increased the production of IL-8 measured by ELISA and decreased gene expression of various proteins involved in the barrier function. During the therapy, the saliva-induced production of IL-8 tended to be decreased, and the saliva-induced decrease in the expression of barrier protein was partially improved. No difference between aligners and brackets was observed in either cell type. Saliva affects the functional properties of oral cells, but this effect is not influenced by the type of OT.

Does the time-point of orthodontic space closure initiation after tooth extraction affect the incidence of gingival cleft development? A randomized controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Gingival clefts (GCs) develop frequently during orthodontic space closure and may compromise the treatment outcome. This study assessed whether the time-point of orthodontic space closure initiation, after permanent tooth extraction, affects the incidence of GC. METHODS: In 25 patients requiring bilateral premolar extraction because of orthodontic reasons, one premolar, chosen at random, was extracted 8 weeks before space closure initiation ("delayed movement," DM), whereas the contralateral premolar was extracted 1 week before ("early movement," EM) ("treatment group"). Presence or absence of GC after 3 and 6 months ("time-point") was recorded and any association with various parameters (i.e., treatment group, time-point, gender, jaw, craniofacial growth, gingival biotype, buccal bone dehiscence after extraction, space closure) was statistically assessed. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients contributing with 26 jaws were finally included in the analysis. Overall, GCs were frequent after 3 (DM: 53.9%; EM: 69.2%) and 6 months (DM: 76.9%; EM: 88.5%). EM (P = 0.014) and larger space closure within the study period (P = 0.001) resulted in a significantly higher incidence of GC. Further, there was a tendency for GC development in the presence of buccal bone dehiscence (P = 0.052) and thin gingival biotype (P = 0.054). "Fast movers" (herein cases with a tooth movement ≥1 mm per month) developed a GC in >90% of the cases already after 3 months. "Slow movers" developed a GC in 25% and 70% after 3 months and final evaluation, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: GC development is a frequent finding during orthodontic space closure and seems to occur more frequently with early tooth movement initiation and in "fast movers."