RESUMEN
The role of laparoscopic appendectomy remains controversial since many authors have suggested that overall morbidity is primarily a function of the degree of appendicitis rather than the operative approach. We have reviewed our appendectomy experience to determine the advantages and/or disadvantages of the laparoscopic technique in cases of acute appendicitis, and furthermore to ascertain whether the extent of disease should affect the surgical approach used. Data were accumulated for all 1158 patients who underwent appendectomy at a single institution during the following three time periods that span the pre- and postlaparoscopic eras: period I (1987 to 1990), period II (1991 to 1993), and period III (1994 to 1997). Cases were categorized with regard to pathologic findings and operative approach (i.e., open or laparoscopic appendectomy). The percentage of appendectomies performed laparoscopically increased with time (0%, 27%, and 79% for periods I, II, and III, respectively). Overall, the total operating room time was slightly shorter for laparoscopic compared to open appendectomy (99 vs. 102 minutes; P<0.05). Operating room times for open appendectomy remained unchanged, but the times for laparoscopic appendectomy decreased from period II to period III (119 to 94 minutes; P<0.001). In cases of gangrenous/perforated appendicitis, the times for laparoscopic appendectomy were significantly shorter than those for open appendectomy (98/115 vs. 120/125 minutes; P<0.001 for both). Overall, the hospital stay was shorter for patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy (1.63 vs. 4.21 days; P<0.001), and the difference was maintained in all three time periods. The differences in length of hospital stay for lap-aroscopic vs. open appendectomy were most dramatic in gangrenous/perforated cases (1.8/3.0 vs. 4.0/9.0 days; P<0.001), whereas there was only a slight difference in cases of simple appendicitis, for example, 1.6 vs. 2.1 days (laparoscopic vs. open appendectomy, period III). There was a significant decrease in the percentage of perforated cases in which surgical treatment had been delayed (>8 hours) (21%, 5%, and 5%) over the three time periods, but the rate of "negative" appendectomies was similar (10%, 8%, and 8%). The complication rates following laparoscopic and open appendectomies during period II were 5.4% and 7.5%, respectively (P>0.05). Laparoscopic appendectomy results in a marked decrease in the length of hospital stay and similar postoperative morbidity compared to open appendectomy. In cases of gangrenous or perforated appendicitis, laparoscopic appendectomy appears to be especially worthwhile in regard to both operating room time and hospital stay.
Asunto(s)
Apendicectomía , Apendicitis/cirugía , Laparoscopía , Tiempo de Internación , Enfermedad Aguda , Adulto , Apendicitis/clasificación , Apendicitis/patología , Boston , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Morbilidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
In the acute setting, patients with periappendiceal masses generally improve with broad-spectrum antibiotics with or without percutaneous catheter drainage, but whether or not to perform an interval appendectomy remains controversial. We have analyzed our experience over the past decade, comparing results from interval laparoscopic appendectomy (ILA) and interval open appendectomy (IOA). Medical records were reviewed for 56 patients who initially presented with the diagnosis of periappendiceal mass or abscess and who subsequently underwent interval appendectomy. Data were accumulated for both the initial hospitalization and interval appendectomy. Comparisons were made between period 1 (1987 to 1993) and period 2 (1994 to 1997). Follow-up data were obtained via telephone conversations with the patients. Patient characteristics with regard to age, sex, and comorbidities did not differ between the ILA and IOA groups. The number of patients undergoing CAT scan increased from 33% to 55%, whereas the initial hospital stay decreased from 7. 42 to 4.61 days (P<0.001). The percentage of interval appendectomies performed by the laparoscopic method increased from 30% to 85%. The total operating room time did not differ (95 vs. 103 minutes), but the hospital stay was much shorter in the ILA group (0.55 vs. 3.07 days, P<0.001). There were no instances of intra-abdominal or wound infections in either group. In the later time period the mean hospital stay decreased to 0.38 days, with 59% of the operations performed on an outpatient basis. Following ILA, narcotic pain medication was used for an average of 1.3 days and the reported "time to return to full activities" was 2.5 days. ILA is a simple and safe procedure that can usually be performed on an outpatient basis. Given the minimal morbidity of the procedure, we believe that ILA should be considered for most patients who initially present with periappendiceal masses.
Asunto(s)
Apendicectomía , Apendicitis/cirugía , Laparoscopía , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Apendicectomía/métodos , Boston , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Registros Médicos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
The radiation-response characteristics of agarose gels prepared with Fricke dosemeter solution have been studied. The response mechanism is an increase in the NMR longitudinal relaxation rate of protons caused by ferric ions. It has been observed that: (i) oxygen saturation assures consistent and maximum sensitivity; (ii) agarose concentrations in the range 1.0-2.0% have no effect upon sensitivity; (iii) the initial G value is 150 Fe3+/100 eV for gels containing 0.5 mM Fe2+ ions; (iv) increasing NMR frequencies only causes a moderate increase in sensitivity; (v) the gel dosemeters are dose rate independent in the range 4.7-24.2 Gy min-1; (vi) sensitivity is pH dependent, being zero at pH 7; (vii) freshly prepared gels are slightly more sensitive than those more than 24 h old; and (ix) the diffusion coefficient for ferric ions in a 1.0% agarose gel containing 0.0125 M H2SO4 is 1.83 x 10(-2) cm2 h-1, and this will require consideration for the NMR imaging of dose distributions.
Asunto(s)
Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Radiometría/métodos , Relación Dosis-Respuesta en la Radiación , Compuestos Ferrosos/efectos de la radiación , Geles , Humanos , Modelos Estructurales , Sefarosa/efectos de la radiaciónRESUMEN
Congenital absence of the breast is a rare condition. The literature shows that there is much heterogeneity in its presentation as well as its inheritance. We described a mother and daughter with the condition and how the mother underwent breast reconstruction with use of bilateral transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps.
Asunto(s)
Anomalías Múltiples/genética , Mama/anomalías , Mamoplastia , Pezones/anomalías , Anomalías Múltiples/cirugía , Adulto , Síndrome Branquio Oto Renal/genética , Síndrome Branquio Oto Renal/cirugía , Preescolar , Aberraciones Cromosómicas/genética , Trastornos de los Cromosomas , Femenino , Genes Dominantes/genética , Humanos , Pezones/cirugía , Colgajos QuirúrgicosRESUMEN
Impaction of dental prostheses is frequently encountered in psychiatric patients. These patients may present an especially challenging problem because the diagnosis may be delayed, resulting in increased morbidity and mortality. Delay in diagnosis in such patients has been attributed to their inability to give a reliable clinical history. In addition, radiolucent dentures cannot be easily detected by radiographic examination. The purpose of this report is to describe a psychiatric patient with an impacted radiopaque dental prosthesis that was refractory to endoscopic intervention. An esophagotomy was needed to successfully remove the foreign body.
Asunto(s)
Prótesis Dental , Esófago , Cuerpos Extraños/cirugía , Trastornos Mentales/complicaciones , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Esofagoscopía/métodos , Cuerpos Extraños/complicaciones , Cuerpos Extraños/diagnóstico , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos/métodos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
SUMMARY: This cross-sectional study showed that peak bone mineral density in Vietnamese women is comparable to that in Caucasian women; however, the prevalence of osteoporosis in post-menopausal Vietnamese women was slightly higher than in Caucasian women. The age of achieving peak bone mass in Vietnamese women was between 26 and 30 years. INTRODUCTION: While peak bone mass and its determinants have been well-documented in Caucasian populations, little has been studied in Asian populations. The present study was designed to estimate the peak bone mineral density (BMD), age of its attainment, and to examine the prevalence of osteoporosis in Vietnamese women aged 50+. METHODS: The study was designed as a cross-sectional study with 328 women aged between 10 and 65 years (average age: 41) who were randomly selected from two districts around Hanoi city according to a stratified sampling scheme. BMD at the lumbar spine, femoral neck and total hip was measured by a DXA instrument (GE Lunar Prodigy, WI, USA). BMD was modeled as a cubic function of age, from which peak BMD and age at peak BMD were estimated. Bootstrap method was utilized to estimate the 95% confidence interval of peak BMD and age at peak BMD. From the peak BMD, T-score was calculated for each woman, and using the World Health Organization criteria, any woman with femoral neck BMD T-score = -2.5 was classified as having osteoporosis. RESULTS: Peak BMD was estimated at 1.16 g/cm(2) (standard deviation [SD]: 0.13 g/cm(2)) at the lumbar spine, 1.02 g/cm(2) (SD 0.12) at the total hip, and 0.94 g/cm(2) (SD 0.11) at the femoral neck. In the cubic polynomial model, the age at peak BMD was estimated to range between 27 and 29 years. The prevalence of osteoporosis among those aged between 50 and 65 years was 23%. This prevalence was higher than in Chinese, Japanese, Korean and Caucasian populations. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that although the peak BMD in Vietnamese women is comparable to, the prevalence of osteoporosis is higher than, in some other Asian and Caucasian women. It seems that osteoporosis is an important public health burden in Vietnam.