Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 54
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Gastric Cancer ; 27(1): 155-163, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37989806

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 for 1 year (corresponding to eight courses) is the standard treatment for pathological stage II gastric cancer. The phase III trial (JCOG1104) investigating the non-inferiority of four courses of S-1 to eight courses was terminated due to futility at the first interim analysis. To confirm the primary results, we reported the results after a 5-years follow-up in JCOG1104. METHODS: Patients histologically diagnosed with stage II gastric cancer after radical gastrectomy were randomly assigned to receive S-1 for eight or four courses. In detail, 80 mg/m2/day S-1 was administered for 4 weeks followed by a 2-week rest as a single course. RESULTS: Between February 16, 2012, and March 19, 2017, 590 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to 8-course (295 patients) and 4-course (295 patients) regimens. After a 5-years follow-up, the relapse-free survival at 3 years was 92.2% for the 8-course arm and 90.1% for the 4-course arm, and that at 5 years was 87.7% for the 8-course arm and 85.6% for the 4-course arm (hazard ratio 1.265, 95% CI 0.846-1.892). The overall survival at 3 years was 94.9% for the 8-course arm, 93.2% for the 4-course arm, and that at 5 years was 89.7% for the 8-course arm, and 88.6% for the 4-course arm (HR 1.121, 95% CI 0.719-1.749). CONCLUSIONS: The survival of the four-course arm was slightly but consistently inferior to that of the eight-course arm. Eight-course S-1 should thus remain the standard adjuvant chemotherapy for pathological stage II gastric cancer.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Estudios de Seguimiento , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología
2.
Heart Vessels ; 39(6): 496-504, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38411631

RESUMEN

Limited data exist regarding drug-coated balloon (DCB) treatment in de novo large coronary arteries. We sought to demonstrate procedural characteristics, residual stenosis, and clinical outcomes following DCB angioplasty for de novo lesions in large versus small coronary arteries. The study included 184 consecutive patients with 223 de novo coronary lesions undergoing paclitaxel DCB angioplasty between January 2019 and August 2020, who were divided according to whether the DCB diameter was ≥ 3.0 mm (large group, n = 58) or < 3.0 mm (small group, n = 125). The large group had a higher proportion of acute coronary syndrome more commonly with ostial, bifurcation, and calcified lesions in large vessels and received lesion preparation with more frequent use of scoring or cutting balloons and atherectomy devices compared to the small group. Postprocedural angiographic diameter stenosis was smaller in the large group compared to the small group (31% [22-37] vs. 35% [26-42], p = 0.032), and intravascular ultrasound revealed no significant difference in postprocedural area stenosis between the groups (66.2 ± 7.7% vs. 67.9 ± 7.8%; p = 0.26). The median follow-up duration was 995 days. The incidence of a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or target lesion revascularization was similar between the groups (log-rank p = 0.41) and was influenced by the presence of acute coronary syndrome and anemia but not by DCB diameter. The rate of cardiovascular outcomes after DCB treatment was comparable in de novo large and small coronary arteries. Notably, well-planned lesion preparation with intravascular imaging guidance was prevalent in large vessels.


Asunto(s)
Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón , Materiales Biocompatibles Revestidos , Angiografía Coronaria , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Vasos Coronarios , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/efectos adversos , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/métodos , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/instrumentación , Anciano , Vasos Coronarios/diagnóstico por imagen , Resultado del Tratamiento , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Estudios de Seguimiento
3.
BMC Cancer ; 23(1): 987, 2023 Oct 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37845660

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) is considered a standard treatment for clinical stage I gastric cancer. Nevertheless, LG has some drawbacks, such as motion restriction and difficulties in spatial perception. Robot-assisted gastrectomy (RG) overcomes these drawbacks by using articulated forceps, tremor-filtering capability, and high-resolution three-dimensional imaging, and it is expected to enable more precise and safer procedures than LG for gastric cancer. However, robust evidence based on a large-scale randomized study is lacking. METHODS: We are performing a randomized controlled phase III study to investigate the superiority of RG over LG for clinical T1-2N0-2 gastric cancer in terms of safety. In total, 1,040 patients are planned to be enrolled from 46 Japanese institutions over 5 years. The primary endpoint is the incidence of postoperative intra-abdominal infectious complications, including anastomotic leakage, pancreatic fistula, and intra-abdominal abscess of Clavien-Dindo (CD) grade ≥ II. The secondary endpoints are the incidence of all CD grade ≥ II and ≥ IIIA postoperative complications, the incidence of CD grade ≥ IIIA postoperative intra-abdominal infectious complications, relapse-free survival, overall survival, the proportion of RG completion, the proportion of LG completion, the proportion of conversion to open surgery, the proportion of operation-related death, and short-term surgical outcomes. The Japan Clinical Oncology Group Protocol Review Committee approved this study protocol in January 2020. Approval from the institutional review board was obtained before starting patient enrollment in each institution. Patient enrollment began in March 2020. We revised the protocol to expand the eligibility criteria to T1-4aN0-3 in July 2022 based on the results of randomized trials of LG demonstrating non-inferiority of LG to open surgery for survival outcomes in advanced gastric cancer. DISCUSSION: This is the first multicenter randomized controlled trial to confirm the superiority of RG over LG in terms of safety. This study will demonstrate whether RG is superior for gastric cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The protocol of JCOG1907 was registered in the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry as UMIN000039825 ( http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm ). Date of Registration: March 16, 2020. Date of First Participant Enrollment: April 1, 2020.


Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Robótica , Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Gastrectomía/efectos adversos , Gastrectomía/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Ensayos Clínicos Fase III como Asunto
4.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 102(6): 969-978, 2023 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37855186

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data regarding the optimal duration of drug-coated balloon (DCB) inflation for coronary lesions. We sought to explore the effect of DCB angioplasty with versus without long inflation time on residual stenosis and clinical outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease. METHODS: This study included 314 consecutive patients with 445 lesions undergoing paclitaxel DCB angioplasty using different inflation time, divided according to whether the total inflation time of the DCB was ≥180 s (prolonged group) or <180 s (standard group). The primary clinical endpoint, defined as a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or target lesion revascularization, was examined in 92 propensity score matched pairs. RESULTS: In the matched cohort, the median clinical follow-up period was 947 days. Postprocedural angiographic diameter stenosis was smaller in the prolonged group than in the standard group (30.0% [22.0-37.0] vs. 33.5% [25.5-40.5]; p = 0.042). Intravascular ultrasound measurements revealed that longer DCB inflation time resulted in smaller area stenosis (66.6 ± 7.8% vs. 69.4 ± 7.0%; p = 0.044) and a less mean increase in percent atheroma volume (-11.2 ± 7.1% vs. -7.4 ± 5.9%; p = 0.004) after angioplasty. The rate of the primary endpoint was lower in the prolonged group than in the standard group (log-rank p = 0.025). The efficacy of prolonged DCB inflation was prominent in patients with in-stent restenosis and longer lesions. CONCLUSION: Prolonged DCB inflation was associated with reduced residual stenosis and improved clinical outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Prospective randomized trials are warranted to validate the benefits of DCB angioplasty with long inflation time.


Asunto(s)
Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria , Reestenosis Coronaria , Humanos , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/terapia , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/complicaciones , Constricción Patológica/complicaciones , Puntaje de Propensión , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Angioplastia Coronaria con Balón/efectos adversos , Materiales Biocompatibles Revestidos , Reestenosis Coronaria/etiología
5.
Circ J ; 87(11): 1661-1671, 2023 10 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37197941

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: There is a scarcity of data evaluating contemporary real-world dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) strategies after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).Methods and Results: In the OPTIVUS-Complex PCI study multivessel cohort enrolling 982 patients undergoing multivessel PCI, including left anterior descending coronary artery using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), we conducted 90-day landmark analyses to compare shorter and longer DAPT. DAPT discontinuation was defined as withdrawal of P2Y12inhibitors or aspirin for at least 2 months. The prevalence of acute coronary syndrome and high bleeding risk by the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium were 14.2% and 52.5%, respectively. The cumulative incidence of DAPT discontinuation was 22.6% at 90 days, and 68.8% at 1 year. In the 90-day landmark analyses, there were no differences in the incidences of a composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or any coronary revascularization (5.9% vs. 9.2%, log-rank P=0.12; adjusted hazard ratio, 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.32-1.08; P=0.09) and BARC type 3 or 5 bleeding (1.4% vs. 1.9%, log-rank P=0.62) between the off- and on-DAPT groups at 90 days. CONCLUSIONS: The adoption of short DAPT duration was still low in this trial conducted after the release of the STOPDAPT-2 trial results. The 1-year incidence of cardiovascular events was not different between the shorter and longer DAPT groups, suggesting no apparent benefit of prolonged DAPT in reducing cardiovascular events even in patients who undergo multivessel PCI.


Asunto(s)
Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria , Humanos , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/efectos adversos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Aspirina/efectos adversos , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
Support Care Cancer ; 32(1): 69, 2023 Dec 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38157081

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: We investigated whether twice-daily administration of a bilayer tablet formulation of tramadol (35% immediate-release [IR] and 65% sustained-release) is as effective as four-times-daily IR tramadol capsules for managing cancer pain. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-comparator, non-inferiority study enrolled opioid-naïve patients using non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or acetaminophen (paracetamol) to manage cancer pain and self-reported pain (mean value over 3 days ≥ 25 mm on a 100-mm visual analog scale [VAS]). Patients were randomized to either bilayer tablets or IR capsules for 14 days. The starting dose was 100 mg/day and could be escalated to 300 mg/day. The primary endpoint was the change in VAS (averaged over 3 days) for pain at rest from baseline to end of treatment/discontinuation. RESULTS: Overall, 251 patients were randomized. The baseline mean VAS at rest was 47.67 mm (range: 25.6-82.7 mm). In the full analysis set, the adjusted mean change in VAS was - 22.07 and - 19.08 mm in the bilayer tablet (n = 124) and IR capsule (n = 120) groups, respectively. The adjusted mean difference was - 2.99 mm (95% confidence interval [CI] - 7.96 to 1.99 mm). The upper 95% CI was less than the predefined non-inferiority margin of 7.5 mm. Other efficacy outcomes were similar in both groups. Adverse events were reported for 97/126 (77.0%) and 101/125 (80.8%) patients in the bilayer tablet and IR capsule groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Twice-daily administration of bilayer tramadol tablets was as effective as four-times-daily administration of IR capsules regarding the improvement in pain VAS, with comparable safety outcomes. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: JapicCTI-184143/jRCT2080224082 (October 5, 2018).


Asunto(s)
Dolor en Cáncer , Neoplasias , Tramadol , Humanos , Acetaminofén/uso terapéutico , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Dolor en Cáncer/tratamiento farmacológico , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada/uso terapéutico , Método Doble Ciego , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Comprimidos/uso terapéutico , Tramadol/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
BMC Surg ; 23(1): 181, 2023 Jun 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37386398

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Muscle mass loss after gastrectomy is associated with a negative impact on quality of life (QOL) and long-term prognosis following gastric cancer treatment, especially in elderly patients. We conducted a prospective study to examine short-term changes in body composition and QOL after gastrectomy in elderly patients with gastric cancer who received exercise and nutritional therapies. METHODS: Patients over aged 65 years of age who underwent gastrectomies for gastric cancer were enrolled in our study. Patients received exercise and nutritional therapies with branched-chain amino acid (BCAA)-rich supplements during 1 month after surgery. Body composition was evaluated using InBody S10 before surgery, and at 1 week and 1 month postoperatively. Other variables including QOL status (EQ-5D-5 L), serum albumin level, hand grip strength, and gait speed were evaluated at the same time. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were analyzed. The mean loss of skeletal muscle mass index (SMI) was 4.6% (1 week) and 2.1% (1 month) compared to the preoperative period. QOL scores showed almost the same degree of recovery at 1 month after gastrectomy as preoperative scores. Serum albumin levels, hand grip strength, and gait speed decreased at 1 week and then increased at 1 month after surgery, similar to the changes seen in SMI. CONCLUSIONS: Multidisciplinary approaches play key role in the surgical treatment of elderly patients. Postoperative exercise and nutritional therapies with BCAA-rich supplements may benefit elderly patients after gastrectomy by reducing loss of SMI and decreases in QOL. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry; UMIN000034374 (registration date: 10/10/2018).


Asunto(s)
Calidad de Vida , Neoplasias Gástricas , Anciano , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Fuerza de la Mano , Gastrectomía , Composición Corporal , Albúmina Sérica
8.
Br J Surg ; 110(1): 50-56, 2022 12 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36369984

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Bursectomy, the total resection of the bursa omentalis, is a standard procedure in gastrectomy for resectable gastric cancer. A phase III trial (JCOG1001) comparing bursectomy and omentectomy alone was terminated early at the interim analysis. The final results of the updated analysis after a minimum follow-up of 5 years are reported here. METHODS: Patients with histologically proven adenocarcinoma of the stomach (cT3-T4a) were randomized (1 : 1) during surgery to bursectomy or omentectomy-alone groups and then underwent D2 gastrectomy. The primary endpoint was overall survival, analysed on an intention-to-treat basis. RESULTS: A total of 1204 patients (602 bursectomy and 602 omentectomy alone) were enrolled between June 2010 and March 2015. The bursectomy group had a significantly higher incidence of Clavien-Dindo grade III-IV intra-abdominal abscess than the omentectomy-alone group (5.5 versus 2.5 per cent respectively; P = 0.008). The updated 5-year overall survival rates were 74.9 (95 per cent c.i. 71.2 to 78.2) per cent in the bursectomy group and 76.5 (72.8 to 79.7) per cent in the omentectomy-alone group; the adjusted HR for death in the bursectomy group was 1.03 (95 per cent c.i. 0.83 to 1.27) (1-sided P = 0.598). Bursectomy did not decrease peritoneal recurrence (12.1 versus 12.3 per cent respectively; P = 1.000). In a multivariable analysis, old age (above 65 years), tumour located in the lower third or posterior wall of the stomach, macroscopic type 3/5, total gastrectomy, and cT4a were independent predictors of poor overall survival, but omentectomy alone was not. CONCLUSION: In D2 gastrectomy, bursectomy is not recommended as a standard procedure for cT3-T4a gastric cancer. Registration number: UMIN000003688 (https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/).


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Gastrectomía , Cavidad Peritoneal , Neoplasias Gástricas , Anciano , Humanos , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Estudios de Seguimiento , Gastrectomía/métodos , Cavidad Peritoneal/cirugía , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía
9.
Surg Today ; 52(2): 231-238, 2022 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34286401

RESUMEN

PURPOSES: The spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has affected socioeconomic and healthcare systems in many countries. Accordingly, many individuals may have canceled their annual health-check programs, including esophagogastroduodenoscopy, which would have resulted in lower numbers of newly diagnosed patients with gastric cancer in comparison to other times. METHODS: Questionnaires were distributed to 62 hospitals every week from May 2020 to August 2020 (total 744) through mailing lists of the Stomach Cancer Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group. The number of patients with gastric cancer and hospital systems during the COVID-19 pandemic were surveyed. RESULTS: In total, 74% (551 out of 744) of the questionnaires were answered and analyzed. In early May, approximately 50% of hospitals had to restrict surgical slots due to the COVID-19 pandemic. However, they gradually loosened the restrictions thereafter. The number of gastrectomies was < 80% that of the same period in the previous year, and hospitals in Tokyo were seriously affected by a 50% decrease in the number of gastrectomies. CONCLUSIONS: The number of gastrectomies was lower than that in the previous year. Further multi-center follow-up studies are required to evaluate the long-term effects of COVID-19 on the clinical outcomes of patients with gastric cancer.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Atención a la Salud/organización & administración , Hospitales de Alto Volumen/estadística & datos numéricos , Control de Infecciones/organización & administración , Neoplasias Gástricas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Gástricas/terapia , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/transmisión , Endoscopía del Sistema Digestivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Utilización de Instalaciones y Servicios , Gastrectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Japón , Utilización de Procedimientos y Técnicas , Neoplasias Gástricas/epidemiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
10.
BMC Gastroenterol ; 20(1): 411, 2020 Dec 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33297976

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Stromal fibroblasts associated with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) play an important role in tumor progression through interactions with cancer cells. Our proposed combination strategies of in vitro and in silico biomarker screening through a cancer-stromal interaction model were previously identified several actin-binding proteins in human colon cancer stroma. The main aim of the present study was to identify novel prognostic markers in human PDAC stroma using our strategies. METHODS: Five primary cultivated fibroblasts from human pancreas were stimulated by two types of pancreatic cancer-cell-conditioned medium (Capan-1 and MIA PaCa-2) followed by gene expression analysis to identify up-regulated genes. Publicly available microarray data set concomitant with overall survival was collected and prognostic marker candidates were selected among the genes that were found to be up-regulated. The mRNA expression levels of the selected genes were evaluated in 5 human fresh PDAC tissues. Finally, survival analysis was performed based on immunohistochemical results on tissue microarrays consisting of 216 surgically resected PDAC tissues. RESULTS: The microarray data of the cancer-stromal interaction model revealed that 188 probes were significantly regulated in pancreatic fibroblasts. Further, six genes were selected using publicly available microarray data set, and a single Diaphanous-related formin-3 (DIAPH3), actin-binding protein, was identified as a stromal biomarker in PDAC fibroblasts by RNA validation analysis. DIAPH3 exhibited strong immunohistochemical expression in stromal fibroblasts. The high stromal expression of DIAPH3 was associated with shorter survival times of PDAC patients. CONCLUSIONS: DIAPH3 was identified as a prognostic marker in PDAC fibroblasts using our biomarker screening strategies through the cancer-stromal interaction model, indicating that stromal actin-binding proteins might have an important biological role in cancer progression. These strategies were also available in PDAC, and can be used for stromal biomarker screening in various cancers.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Biomarcadores , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/genética , Línea Celular Tumoral , Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Forminas , Regulación Neoplásica de la Expresión Génica , Humanos , Páncreas , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/genética
11.
Gastric Cancer ; 22(1): 130-137, 2019 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29799059

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In Japan, S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy for 1 year is the standard of care for the treatment of stage II and III patients under 80 years old with gastric cancer after curative operation. However, the feasibility of S-1 chemotherapy in patients over 80 years old has not yet been elucidated. METHODS: To clarify the current treatment situation and feasibility of S-1 treatment in patients over 80 years old, a questionnaire survey of the patients treated from January 2011 to December 2012 was conducted at 58 member institutions of the Stomach Cancer Study Group of the JCOG (Japan Clinical Oncology Group). RESULTS: Gastrectomy was performed in 15,573 patients of all ages, and 1,660 (10.7%) patients were over 80 years of age. Of these elderly patients, 661 (4.2%) were diagnosed as stage II and III. While S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy was recommended to 248 (37.5%) of the stageII/III patients, only 99 (15.0%) of them actually received S-1. Interestingly, the creatinine clearance rate was between 30 and 80 mL/min in 87 (87.9%) of the patients suggesting that S-1 dose modification should be considered. Moreover, S-1 compliance was poor in patients with more than 15% body weight loss. CONCLUSION: In general practice, surgery alone can be regarded as the standard of care for stage II and III gastric cancer patients over 80 years old. The feasibility and efficacy of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy should be elucidated in a randomized control trial considering the vulnerabilities of the elderly.


Asunto(s)
Antimetabolitos Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Ácido Oxónico/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Tegafur/uso terapéutico , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Combinación de Medicamentos , Femenino , Gastrectomía , Humanos , Masculino , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
12.
BMC Surg ; 19(1): 71, 2019 Jul 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31262275

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Dementia often adversely affects postoperative outcomes in surgical patients. This study evaluated postoperative outcomes among elderly patients with and without dementia undergoing early cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis (AC). METHODS: A total of 182 patients over 85 years of age who were diagnosed with AC and treated from January 2005 to March 2018 were reviewed retrospectively; 59 patients who underwent early cholecystectomy were enrolled. The complication rates, length of postoperative hospital stay, and rates of routine discharge (i.e., returning to their preoperative living location) were compared between two groups of patients with and without dementia. RESULTS: The overall complication rate after early cholecystectomy for AC in 59 patients was 11.9%, and there was no mortality in this series. The median postoperative hospital stay was 9.0 days, and the routine discharge rate was 89.8%. Of the 59 patients, 22 patients (37.3%) had a history of dementia. Complication rates were comparable between the groups, despite the rate of delirium development being significantly higher in the dementia group. The median length of postoperative hospital stay and routine discharge rates did not significantly differ between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Early cholecystectomy for patients with AC over 85 years of age was performed safely, and elderly patients with dementia had similar postoperative outcomes as compared with patients without dementia.


Asunto(s)
Colecistectomía/efectos adversos , Colecistitis Aguda/psicología , Colecistitis Aguda/cirugía , Demencia/complicaciones , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Colecistitis Aguda/complicaciones , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Alta del Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos
13.
Gastric Cancer ; 21(1): 68-73, 2018 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28194522

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by radical surgery is a promising strategy to improve survival of patients with stage III gastric cancer, but is associated with the risk of preoperative overdiagnosis by which patients with early disease may receive unnecessary intensive chemotherapy. METHODS: We assessed the validity of a preoperative diagnostic criterion in a prospective multicenter study. Patients with gastric cancer with a clinical diagnosis of T2/T3/T4, M0, except for diffuse large tumors and extensive bulky nodal disease, were eligible. Prospectively recorded clinical diagnoses (cT category, cN category) were compared with postoperative pathological diagnoses (pT category, pN category, and pathological stage). The primary endpoint was the proportion of pathological stage I tumors among those diagnosed as cT3/T4, which we expected to be 5% or less. RESULTS: Data from 1260 patients enrolled from 53 institutions were analyzed. The proportion of pathological stage I tumors in those with a diagnosis of cT3/T4 (primary endpoint) was 12.3%, which was much higher than the prespecified value. The positive predictive value and the sensitivity for pathological stage III tumors were 43.6% and 87.8% respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of contrast-enhanced CT for lymph node metastasis were 62.5% and 65.7% respectively. After exploring several diagnostic criteria, we propose, for future NAC trials in Japan, a diagnosis of "cT3/T4 with cN1/N2/N3," by which inclusion of pathological stage I tumors was reduced to 6.5%, although its sensitivity for pathological stage III tumors decreased to 64.5%. CONCLUSION: Clinical diagnosis of T3/T4 tumors was not an optimal criterion to select patients for intensive NAC trials because more than 10% of patients with pathological stage I disease were included. We propose the criterion "cT3/T4 and cN1/N2/N3" instead.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Estadificación de Neoplasias/métodos , Neoplasias Gástricas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Adenocarcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Estudios Prospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamiento farmacológico
14.
Jpn J Clin Oncol ; 48(12): 1101-1104, 2018 Dec 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30346560

RESUMEN

Adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 is a standard treatment for patients with stage II/III gastric cancer after D2 gastrectomy; however, this is not uniformly applicable in older patients. The Stomach Cancer Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group conducted a questionnaire survey on older patients aged ≥80 years and revealed wide heterogeneity among older patients of similar chronological age. This randomized trial aims to confirm the superiority of modified S-1 treatment (reduced initial dose of S-1 by ≥ 1 level compared with the standard dose) versus surgery alone in vulnerable older (≥80 years old) patients with pathological stage II/III gastric cancer after curative resection. A total of 370 patients will be enrolled from 62 institutions over 4.5 years. The primary endpoint of this study is overall survival. This trial has been registered in the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry with code UMIN000025742 [http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm].


Asunto(s)
Quimioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Gastrectomía/métodos , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Japón , Masculino , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología
15.
Heart Vessels ; 33(8): 837-845, 2018 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29464342

RESUMEN

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with thienopyridine and aspirin is the standard care for the prevention of stent thrombosis. However, the optimal duration and effect of the duration of DAPT on intra-stent thrombus (IS-Th) formation are unknown. The NIPPON study (Nobori Dual Antiplatelet Therapy as Appropriate Duration) was an open label, randomized multicenter, assessor-blinded, trial designed to demonstrate the non-inferiority of shorter (6-month) DAPT to prolonged (18-month) DAPT, after biolimus A9 eluting stent implantation in 3773 patients at 130 sites in Japan. Among them, 101 patients were randomly allocated for an optical coherence tomography (OCT) sub-study to assess the difference of local IS-Th formation between the two groups. In addition to standard OCT parameters, the number of IS-Th formed was counted in each target stent at 8 months. Baseline patient characteristics were not different between the 6- and 18-month groups. IS-Th was detected in 9.8% of the cases and the presence of IS-Th was not significantly different between the two groups (10.9% in 6-month vs. 9.1% in 12-month, P = 0.76). Furthermore, the number of IS-Th formed was not significantly different between the two groups. This OCT sub-study was in line with the main NIPPON study which demonstrated the non-inferiority of 6-month DAPT to 18-month DAPT. Shorter DAPT duration did not promote progressive IS-Th formation at the mid-term time point.


Asunto(s)
Aspirina/administración & dosificación , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/cirugía , Stents Liberadores de Fármacos , Piridinas/administración & dosificación , Sirolimus/análogos & derivados , Tomografía de Coherencia Óptica/métodos , Resistencia Vascular/efectos de los fármacos , Anciano , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/fisiopatología , Vasos Coronarios/diagnóstico por imagen , Vasos Coronarios/fisiopatología , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/farmacología , Masculino , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/administración & dosificación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Método Simple Ciego , Sirolimus/farmacología , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
16.
Surg Today ; 48(9): 865-874, 2018 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29721714

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This multicenter, randomized controlled study evaluates the safety of early oral feeding following gastrectomy, and its effect on the length of postoperative hospital stay. METHODS: The subjects of this study were patients who underwent distal gastrectomy (DG) or total gastrectomy (TG) for gastric cancer between January 2014 and December 2015. Patients were randomly assigned to the early oral feeding group (intervention group) or the conventional postoperative management group (control group) for each procedure. We evaluated the length of postoperative hospital stay and the incidence of postoperative complications in each group. RESULTS: No significant differences in length of postoperative stay were found between the intervention and control groups of the patients who underwent DG. The incidence of postoperative complications was significantly greater in the DG intervention group. In contrast, the length of postoperative stay was significantly shorter in the TG intervention group, although the TG group did not attain the established target sample size. CONCLUSION: Early oral feeding did not shorten the postoperative hospital stay after DG. The higher incidence of postoperative complications precluded the unselected adoption of early oral feeding for DG patients. Further confirmative studies are required to definitively establish the potential benefits of early oral feeding for TG patients.


Asunto(s)
Nutrición Enteral/métodos , Métodos de Alimentación , Gastrectomía , Tiempo de Internación , Cuidados Posoperatorios , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Gastrectomía/métodos , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Periodo Posoperatorio , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
17.
Int J Cancer ; 140(1): 188-196, 2017 Jan 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27521503

RESUMEN

Paclitaxel is a standard second-line gastric cancer treatment in Japan. Trastuzumab could be active as second-line chemotherapy for taxane/trastuzumab-naïve patients with epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-positive advanced gastric cancer. Patients aged ≥20 years with HER2-positive, previously treated (except for trastuzumab and taxane), unresectable or recurrent gastric adenocarcinoma underwent combined trastuzumab (first and subsequent doses of 8 and 6 mg kg-1 , respectively, every 3 weeks) and paclitaxel (days 1, 8, 15, every 4 weeks) treatment. Study endpoints were best overall response, progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety. From September 2011 to March 2012, 47 Japanese patients were enrolled. Forty patients discontinued treatment after a median of 128.5 (range 4-486) days. Complete and partial responses were obtained in one and 16 patients (response rate of 37% [95% CI 23-52]), respectively. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 5.1 (95% CI 3.8-6.5) and 17.1 (95% CI 13.5-18.6) months, respectively. Grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (32.6%), leukopenia (17.4%), anemia (15.2%) and hypoalbuminemia (8.7%). There was no clinically significant cardiotoxicity or cumulative toxicity. Three (disturbed consciousness, pulmonary fibrosis, and rapid disease progression) grade 5 events occurred. In conclusion, trastuzumab combined with paclitaxel was well tolerated and was a promising regimen for patients with HER2-positive, previously treated, advanced or recurrent gastric cancer.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastuzumab/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Japón , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/metabolismo , Paclitaxel/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Gástricas/metabolismo , Análisis de Supervivencia , Trastuzumab/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento
18.
Surg Today ; 47(6): 705-711, 2017 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27654454

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Pancreas-sparing duodenectomy (PSD) represents an alternative procedure to pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for patients with duodenal neoplasms. METHODS: The postoperative early and late complications of 21 patients who underwent PSD between 1992 and 2014 were compared with those of 44 patients with soft pancreatic parenchyma who underwent PD between 2009 and 2014. RESULTS: The median operation time and blood loss were less in the PSD group than in the PD group (P < 0.001). The overall incidence of early complications was less in the PSD group than in the PD group (PSD with ampullectomy vs. PSD without ampullectomy vs. PD; 45.5 vs. 20.0 vs. 56.8 %). The incidence of pancreatic fistula formation and overall incidence of late complications were also less in the PSD group than in the PD group (P = 0.031, 0.020). There were no complications related to the pancreatic endocrine or exocrine functions in the PSD group. CONCLUSION: PSD is a less-invasive procedure and has the advantage over PD of preserving the pancreas.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Duodenales/cirugía , Duodeno/cirugía , Tratamientos Conservadores del Órgano/estadística & datos numéricos , Páncreas , Pancreaticoduodenectomía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tempo Operativo , Fístula Pancreática/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo
19.
Am Heart J ; 173: 134-42, 2016 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26920606

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patients with established coronary artery disease are at increased risk for future ischemic events and require secondary prevention for systemic vascular disease. We performed a randomized clinical trial to evaluate the impact of cilostazol on cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. METHODS: A total of 514 patients who had undergone coronary stent implantation >6 months previously and were thought to no longer need dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and a thienopyridine were randomly assigned to receive aspirin plus cilostazol therapy or aspirin therapy alone after discontinuation of thienopyridine therapy. The primary efficacy end point was a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular or cerebrovascular revascularization at 2 years after randomization. The main safety end point was major or minor bleeding, according to the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction bleeding definition. RESULTS: At 2 years, follow-up clinical data were available for 98.1% of patients. The primary efficacy end point occurred in 13.9% of the aspirin plus cilostazol group versus 22.1% of the aspirin-only group (hazard ratio 0.61, 95% CI 0.40-0.93, P = .021). The rate of major or minor bleeding was not significantly different between the aspirin plus cilostazol and aspirin-only groups (1.6% and 4.0%, respectively, hazard ratio 0.40, 95% CI 0.13-1.28, P = .12). CONCLUSIONS: In patients who underwent coronary stent implantation, the addition of cilostazol to aspirin therapy was associated with lower rates of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events at 2 years compared with aspirin monotherapy.


Asunto(s)
Aspirina/administración & dosificación , Trastornos Cerebrovasculares/prevención & control , Infarto del Miocardio/cirugía , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/efectos adversos , Prevención Secundaria/métodos , Tetrazoles/administración & dosificación , Tromboembolia/prevención & control , Anciano , Trastornos Cerebrovasculares/epidemiología , Trastornos Cerebrovasculares/etiología , Cilostazol , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Incidencia , Japón/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/administración & dosificación , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Tromboembolia/epidemiología , Tromboembolia/etiología , Resultado del Tratamiento
20.
Gastric Cancer ; 19(1): 63-73, 2016 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25487305

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: EGFR overexpression is a prognostic biomarker and is expected to be a predictive biomarker for anti-EGFR therapies in gastric cancer. However, few studies have reported the clinical impact of EGFR gene copy number (GCN) and its correlation with EGFR overexpression. METHODS: We used dual in situ hybridization (DISH) to detect EGFR GCN and chromosome 7 centromere (CEN7) in a set of tissue microarrays representing 855 patients with gastric cancer. These data were compared with those of immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis of EGFR expression to evaluate prognostic value. RESULTS: EGFR GCN gain (≥ 2.5 EGFR signals per cell) was detected in 194 patients (22.7%) and indicated poor prognosis. Among 194 patients, EGFR amplification (EGFR/CEN7 ≥ 2.0) was observed in 29 patients (14.9%), which was almost identical to the IHC 3+ subgroup and worst prognostic subgroup. Patients with EGFR GCN gain but not amplification, including those exhibiting polysomy, also exhibited poorer prognosis than GCN non-gain patients and were distributed between IHC 0/1+ and 2+ subgroups. GCN gain was frequently observed in patients with more advanced disease, but served as an independent prognostic factor regardless of the pathological stage. CONCLUSIONS: EGFR GCN gain is a more accurate prognostic biomarker than EGFR overexpression in patients with gastric cancer.


Asunto(s)
Receptores ErbB/genética , Dosificación de Gen , Hibridación in Situ/métodos , Neoplasias Gástricas/genética , Anciano , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Receptores ErbB/metabolismo , Femenino , Regulación Neoplásica de la Expresión Génica , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Pronóstico , Neoplasias Gástricas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA