ePTFE soft tissue patch reconstruction of hemidiaphragmatic agenesis with late clinical presentation.

In this paper we describe a case of a 71-year-old man affected by left hemidiaphragm agenesis who presented an extensive enterothorax after an asymptomatic history for many years. The patient had late development of severe constipation and occasional episodes of bowel obstruction and vomiting. The surgical correction of this congenital anomaly consisted of restoring the continuity of the diaphragmatic barrier with a 2-mm-thick expanded polytetrafluoroethylene soft tissue patch(Gore-Tex) after the herniated viscera have been replaced into the abdominal cavity. At 26 months' follow-up no recurrence has been observed. We would suggest that this is the first known elderly patient surgically treated and the eighth case reported in the literature. The use of a single-layer ePTFE mesh allows a good anatomical and functional repair. An overview of the literature is also reported.

Extended criteria liver donation and transplant recipient consent: the European experience.

The organization known as ELPAT (Ethical, Legal and Psychological Aspects of Organ Transplantation) coordinated the distribution of an electronic questionnaire concerning the definition of extended criteria liver donation (ECD) and the implication for informed consent of transplant recipients to European liver transplant centers. Completed questionnaires were received from 30 centers in 13 countries. Twenty-eight centers accepted ECD liver donors. The criteria for defining a liver donor as ECD were: steatosis in 24 centers (85%); age up to 80 years in 23 centers (82%); serum sodium levels higher than 165 mmol/L in 17 centers (60%); intensive care unit stay with ventilation longer than 7 days in 16 centers (57%); serum glutamic oxalo-acitic transaminase levels higher than 90 U/L in 12 centers (42%); body mass indeces more than 30 in 10 centers (35%); serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase levels higher than 105 U/L in 10 centers (35%); serum bilirubin levels higher than 3 mg/dL in 10 centers (35%); and other criteria in 13 centers (46%). Twenty-three centers informed the transplant candidate of the ECD status of the donor: 10 centers (43%) when the patient registered for transplantation, 3 centers (14%) when an ECD liver became available, and 10 centers (43%) on both occasions. Ten centers required the liver transplant candidate to sign a special consent form. Ten centers informed the potential recipient of the donor's serology. Only three centers informed the potential recipient of any high risk behavior of the donor.