Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 49
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Pediatr ; 185: 99-105.e2, 2017 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28209292

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To determine pediatricians' practices, attitudes, and barriers regarding screening for and treatment of pediatric dyslipidemias in 9- to 11-year-olds and 17- to 21-year-olds. STUDY DESIGN: American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) 2013-2014 Periodic Survey of a national, randomly selected sample of 1627 practicing AAP physicians. Pediatricians' responses were described and modeled. RESULTS: Of 614 (38%) respondents who met eligibility criteria, less than half (46%) were moderately/very knowledgeable about the 2008 AAP cholesterol statement; fewer were well-informed about 2011 National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Guidelines or 2007 US Preventive Service Task Force review (both 26%). Despite published recommendations, universal screening was not routine: 68% reported they never/rarely/sometimes screened healthy 9- to 11-year-olds. In contrast, more providers usually/most/all of the time screened based on family cardiovascular history (61%) and obesity (82%). Screening 17- to 21-year-olds was more common in all categories (P?

Asunto(s)
Dislipidemias/diagnóstico , Dislipidemias/terapia , Tamizaje Masivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Pediatras , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Niño , Consejo/estadística & datos numéricos , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz , Humanos , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/uso terapéutico , Estilo de Vida , Lípidos/sangre , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Factores de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos
2.
J Pediatr ; 171: 294-9, 2016 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26795679

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To examine trends in pediatricians working part-time and residents seeking part-time work and to examine associated characteristics. STUDY DESIGN: The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Periodic Survey of Fellows and the AAP Annual Survey of Graduating Residents were used to examine part-time employment. Fourteen periodic surveys were combined with an overall response rate of 57%. Part-time percentages were compared for surveys conducted from 2006-2009 and 2010-2013. The AAP Annual Surveys of Graduating Residents (combined response rate = 60%) from 2006-2009 were compared with 2010-2013 surveys for residents seeking and obtaining part-time positions following training. Multivariable logistic regression models identified characteristics associated with part-time work. RESULTS: Comparable percentages of pediatricians worked part-time in 2006-2009 (23%) and 2010-2013 (23%). There was similarly no statistically significant difference in residents seeking part-time work (30%-28%), and there was a slight decline in residents accepting part-time work (16%-13%, aOR .75, 95% CI .56-.96). Increases in working part-time were not found for any subgroups examined. Women consistently were more likely than men to work part-time (35% vs 9%), but they showed different patterns of part-time work across age. Women in their 40s (40%) were more likely than other women (33%) and men in their 60s (20%) were more likely than other men (5%) to work part-time. CONCLUSIONS: There has been a levelling off in the number of pediatricians working part-time and residents seeking part-time work. Overall, women remain more likely to work part-time, although 1 in 5 men over 60 work part-time.


Asunto(s)
Pediatría/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Adulto , Anciano , Recolección de Datos , Empleo , Femenino , Humanos , Internado y Residencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Pediatría/organización & administración , Médicos Mujeres/estadística & datos numéricos , Distribución por Sexo , Sociedades Médicas , Estados Unidos , Recursos Humanos
3.
Inj Prev ; 18(1): 10-5, 2012 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21606471

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Motor vehicle crashes (MVCs) are the leading cause of death among teenagers. Little is known about the content of US paediatrician counselling about teen driving. OBJECTIVE: To examine US paediatrician knowledge, attitudes, and counselling patterns regarding teen driving. METHODS: A random sample questionnaire was mailed to American Academy of Pediatrics members in 2009 (n=1606; response=875 (55%)). Analysis was limited to 596 paediatricians who provide adolescent checkups. Questions addressed counselling and attitudes towards roles in promoting safe driving. Logistic regression assessed the relationship between counselling topics and practice characteristics. RESULTS: Most (89%) respondents provide some counselling about driving. Two topics commonly discussed by paediatricians were seatbelts (87%) and alcohol use (82%). Less frequently discussed were: cell phones (47%), speeding (43%), and dangers of transporting teen passengers (41%). Topics rarely discussed were: night driving (21%), graduated driver licensing laws (13%), safe cars (9%), driver education (9%), fatigue (25%), and parental limit setting (23%). Only 10% ever recommend a parent-teen driver agreement. Paediatricians who had a patient injured or killed in an MVC were more likely to discuss night driving (OR=2.86). Physicians caring for a high proportion of adolescents (OR=1.83) or patients with private insurance (OR=1.85) counsel more about the risks of driving with teen passengers. CONCLUSIONS: Paediatricians in the USA support counselling on teen driving during routine office visits, but omit many important risk factors. Few recommend parent-teen driver agreements. Methods that help clinicians efficiently and effectively counsel families about teen driving should be developed.


Asunto(s)
Accidentes de Tránsito/prevención & control , Conducción de Automóvil/psicología , Consejo , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Pediatría , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Accidentes de Tránsito/psicología , Adolescente , Adulto , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/métodos , Seguridad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
4.
J Pediatr ; 156(6): 1011-1015.e1, 2010 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20227727

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To compare satisfaction with specialty care by primary care pediatricians (PCPs), perceived barriers to care, and adequacy of specialist supply. STUDY DESIGN: A survey of U.S. pediatricians was conducted in 2007. PCPs were asked about satisfaction with specialty care for their patients, as well as supply of specific pediatric subspecialists. Responses of rural and nonrural PCPs were compared regarding 10 potential barriers to care. RESULTS: Most PCPs are satisfied with the quality of subspecialty care. However, they were not satisfied with wait times for appointments, and the availability of many pediatric medical subspecialties and several pediatric surgical specialties. Rural PCPs were significantly more likely to report these shortages compared with nonrural pediatricians; these included 9 of the 18 medical and 5 of the 7 surgical specialties. In addition to wait times for appointments, PCPs reported that subspecialists' nonparticipation in health insurance plans and lack of acceptance of uninsured patients were also barriers to obtaining subspecialty care for their patients. CONCLUSIONS: PCPs provide valuable insight into access to the pediatric subspecialty workforce. This survey of PCPs raises significant concerns about the adequacy of children's access to pediatric subspecialists, especially in rural communities.


Asunto(s)
Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Pediatría/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos/provisión & distribución , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Especialización/estadística & datos numéricos , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Niño , Recolección de Datos , Femenino , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/organización & administración , Humanos , Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pediatría/normas , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Servicios de Salud Rural/provisión & distribución , Estados Unidos , Listas de Espera
5.
Clin Pediatr (Phila) ; 47(7): 670-8, 2008 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18441316

RESUMEN

Pediatric residency reforms have increased emphasis on psychosocial issues, but we do not know whether this has changed pediatricians' perceptions of barriers to addressing maternal depression. A survey of 1600 members of the American Academy of Pediatrics investigated whether training in adult mental health issues and perceived barriers to addressing maternal depression differed for current pediatric residents, pediatricians in practice <5 years, and those in practice >or=5 years. Training did not differ for respondents who were currently in training, in practice <5 years, or in practice >or=5 years. Those in practice >or=5 years reported more barriers to addressing maternal depression compared with current residents. Current residents with training in adult mental techniques reported fewer barriers to the care of maternal depression. However, in spite of residency reforms, 81% of current residents reported no training in adult mental health issues.


Asunto(s)
Depresión/diagnóstico , Internado y Residencia , Madres/psicología , Pediatría/educación , Adulto , Competencia Clínica , Becas/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Internado y Residencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Modelos Lineales , Masculino , Salud Mental , Estados Unidos
6.
Acad Pediatr ; 18(1): 111-118, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28428097

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Youth with special health care needs (YSHCN) require assistance from their pediatricians to transition to adult care. There are few data on what transition resources pediatricians have. In this article we discuss whether care coordination and/or comprehensive electronic health record (CEHR) implementation are associated with improved transition processes. METHODS: Using the American Academy of Pediatrics Periodic Survey #79, we report whether practices generated written transition plans, assisted in finding adult providers, and discussed confidentiality issues. Descriptive statistics and a logistic regression model were done to evaluate whether CEHR, care coordination, or practice and physician characteristics were associated with improved transition planning. RESULTS: Transition planning support in practices is low. Pediatricians with any care coordinator report more written transition plans for YSHCN (23% vs 6%; P < .001), assistance identifying adult providers (59% vs 39%; P < .001), and discussing confidentiality issues (50% vs 33%; P < .001). Pediatricians with a CEHR compared with those without are more likely to report written transition plans for YSHCN (24% vs 12%; P < .05) and discussing confidentiality issues (51% vs 39%; P < .05). In the logistic regression model, having care coordination (adjusted odds ratio, 11.1; 95% confidence interval, 5.9-21.3) and CEHR (adjusted odds ratio, 2.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-5.0) were independently associated with higher odds of having a written transition plan. CONCLUSIONS: Only 1 in 5 pediatricians have a transition coordinator in their practice and just 15% have a CEHR, even as these resources are associated with improved transition processes for YSHCN. Policy decisions should be made to help practices with supports, such as care coordination and electronic health record implementation, to improve transitions to adulthood.


Asunto(s)
Registros Electrónicos de Salud , Planificación de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Pediatras , Transición a la Atención de Adultos/organización & administración , Adulto , Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
7.
Ambul Pediatr ; 7(3): 239-46, 2007.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17512885

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Pediatricians are in a good position to identify women who struggle with depression, but studies show low rates of pediatrician identification and management. It is likely that pediatricians' management of maternal depression may vary on the basis of their attitudes, but no instrument has been developed to measure these attitudes. We sought to develop a measure of pediatricians' attitudes about managing maternal depression and to identify characteristics associated with pediatricians' attitudes about managing maternal depression. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of data provided by 651 practicing, nontrainee pediatricians (response rate 57.5%) surveyed through an American Academy of Pediatrics 2004 Periodic Survey. An exploratory principal components analysis was used to investigate the interrelationships among the attitudinal items. Multivariable linear regression was used to assess the adjusted associations between physician and practice characteristics and attitudes. RESULTS: The attitudinal measure consisted of 3 subscales: acknowledging maternal depression, perceptions of mothers' beliefs, and treating maternal depression. Clinical approaches (eg, interest in further education on identifying or treating maternal depression) and training and work characteristics were significantly related to pediatricians' attitudes; patient characteristics (eg, type of insurance and ethnicity/race) were not significantly associated with pediatricians' attitudes. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a measure to assess pediatricians' attitudes about managing maternal depression. The findings from this study can be used to develop and assess interventions that improve pediatricians' attitudes about acknowledging maternal depression, perceptions of mothers' beliefs, and treating maternal depression.


Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Trastorno Depresivo/diagnóstico , Trastorno Depresivo/terapia , Madres/psicología , Pediatría , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Rol del Médico
8.
Acad Pediatr ; 17(5): 504-514, 2017 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28104489

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) advises pediatricians to counsel parents and patients who use tobacco to quit. This study assesses changes in counseling between 2004 and 2010, and factors associated with counseling in 2010. METHODS: In 2004 and 2010, the Periodic Survey, a national survey of AAP members, inquired about tobacco counseling. Chi-square tests were performed to compare responses by survey year. Bivariate and multivariable analyses examined factors associated with counseling. RESULTS: Similar proportions of pediatricians in both years (N2004 = 535 and N2010 = 549) advised adolescents who smoke to quit (85% vs 81%), discussed quitting techniques (34% vs 32%), and recommended nicotine replacement medications (17% vs 18%). More pediatricians in 2010 reported helping patients assess reasons for and against continuing to smoke (56% vs 48%), providing quitting materials (20% vs 15%), and referring patients to cessation programs (18% vs 13%). More pediatricians in 2010 reported providing quitting materials to parents who smoke (14% vs 10%) and referring to smoking cessation programs (16% vs 11%) (all P < .05). Pediatricians' confidence in their ability to counsel, with more tobacco prevention training, and routine documentation of patients' tobacco smoke exposure were associated with counseling about cessation. CONCLUSIONS: Most pediatricians advised patients and parents who smoke to quit, and these percentages did not change from 2004 to 2010. Although percentages for assisting with cessation did increase for several activities, most pediatricians still do not do so. Opportunities exist to improve clinicians' protection of children from tobacco and tobacco smoke through quit-line referrals, motivational interviewing, and offering medications.


Asunto(s)
Consejo Dirigido , Pediatría , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Cese del Hábito de Fumar , Adolescente , Adulto , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Padres
9.
Acad Pediatr ; 17(1): 61-67, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27476496

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Since 1997 pediatric residencies have been required to provide a 4-week block rotation in developmental and behavioral pediatrics (DBP), but it is not known whether this has altered the care and management of children by practicing pediatricians. The objective of this study was to compare the self-reported practice patterns of pediatricians who were trained with 4 or more weeks of DBP with the practice patterns of those who were trained for <4 weeks. METHODS: We used self-reported practices from the American Academy of Pediatrics Periodic Survey 85. Pediatricians were asked whether they never, sometimes, or usually inquired about and screened for, and whether they treated/managed/comanaged attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, depression, anxiety, behavior problems and learning problems. They were also asked about a series of barriers to care. Analyses were weighted to account for low response rates. RESULTS: Those with more DBP training were significantly more likely to treat/manage/co-manage depression, anxiety, behavior problems and learning problems, but were still doing so less than one third of the time. There were no differences in the care of patients with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder or in screening or inquiring about mental health conditions. Those with more training were more likely to perceive somewhat fewer barriers and to report more specific familiarity with some Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders criteria and some treatment modalities. CONCLUSIONS: Longer length of training is associated with more treatment, but significant deficits in self-reported practice remain, leaving much room for additional improvement in the training of clinicians in DBP.


Asunto(s)
Curriculum , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/métodos , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Pediatras , Pediatría/educación , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Adulto , Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Ansiedad/terapia , Trastornos de Ansiedad/terapia , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/terapia , Depresión/diagnóstico , Depresión/terapia , Trastorno Depresivo/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Discapacidades para el Aprendizaje/terapia , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo , Trastornos Mentales/diagnóstico , Problema de Conducta , Derivación y Consulta , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Factores de Tiempo
10.
Acad Pediatr ; 17(7): 697-705, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27890781

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Efforts to promote early brain and child development (EBCD) include initiatives to support healthy parent-child relationships, tools to identify family social-emotional risk factors, and referrals to community programs to address family risk factors. We sought to examine if pediatricians perceive barriers to implementing these activities, and if they utilize resources to address those barriers. METHODS: Data were analyzed from 304 nontrainee pediatricians who practice general pediatrics and completed a 2013 American Academy of Pediatrics Periodic Survey. Sample weights were used to decrease nonresponse bias. Bivariate comparisons and multivariable regression analyses were conducted. RESULTS: At least half of the pediatricians agreed that barriers to promoting EBCD include: a lack of tools to promote healthy parent-child relationships, a lack of tools to assess the family environment for social-emotional risk factors, and a lack of local resources to address family risks. Endorsing a lack of tools to assess the family environment as a barrier was associated with using fewer screening tools and community resources. Endorsing a lack of local resources as a barrier was associated with using fewer community resources and fewer initiatives to promote parent-child relationships. Interest in pediatric mental health was associated with using more initiatives to promote healthy parent-child relationships, screening tools, and community resources. CONCLUSIONS: Although the majority of pediatricians perceive barriers to promoting EBCD, few are routinely using available resources to address these barriers. Addressing pediatricians' perceived barriers and encouraging interest in pediatric mental health may increase resource utilization and enhance efforts to promote EBCD.


Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud , Trastornos Mentales/psicología , Relaciones Padres-Hijo , Padres , Pediatras/psicología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Desarrollo Infantil , Preescolar , Femenino , Promoción de la Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/diagnóstico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Padres/psicología , Atención Dirigida al Paciente , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Análisis de Regresión , Factores de Riesgo , Sociedades Médicas , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos
11.
Acad Pediatr ; 17(5): 479-486, 2017 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28279638

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Given the prevalence of mental health (MH) conditions (MHC) in children, pediatricians should initiate treatment alone or in collaboration with a specialist for children with MHC. However, the majority of pediatricians do not manage or comanage common MHC even with an on-site MH provider. We examined which physician, practice, and training characteristics are associated with pediatricians' comanaging at least half of their patients with MHC. METHODS: We analyzed responses of general pediatricians (n = 305) from the American Academy of Pediatrics 2013 Periodic Survey. Practice characteristics include presence of an on-site MH provider and perceived access to services. Independent variables included sociodemographics, training experiences, and interest in further training. The outcome was comanagement of ≥50% of patients with MHC. Weighted univariate, bivariate, and multivariable analyses were performed. RESULTS: Of the pediatricians who reported comanaging ≥50% of their patients with MHC, logistic regression analysis showed that pediatricians who completed ≥4 weeks of developmental behavioral pediatrics training had 1.8 increased odds (95% confidence interval 1.06, 3.08, P = .03) of comanagement, those very interested in further education in managing/treating MHC had 2.75 increased odds (95% confidence interval 1.63, 3.08, P < .001), and those with more training in MH treatment with medications had 1.4 increased odds (95% confidence interval 1.12, 1.75, P = .004) of comanaging children with MHC. CONCLUSIONS: Specific educational experiences and interest in further education in managing or treating MHC were significantly associated with comanaging ≥50% of patients, suggesting that enhanced MH training among pediatricians could increase the comanagement of children with MHC.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Pediatría , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Adulto , Competencia Clínica , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Rol del Médico , Derivación y Consulta
12.
Ambul Pediatr ; 6(2): 105-9, 2006.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16530148

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Early intervention (EI) programs provide services to children with developmental conditions, regardless of whether such children have an underlying medical diagnosis. We aim to (1) Determine the proportion of general pediatricians who believe an established diagnosis is important when considering EI referral; and (2) Determine whether this perception is associated with lower reported likelihood of referral. METHODS: Mailed survey to random sample of pediatricians. We used multivariable logistic regression to study the association between the perception that a medical diagnosis is important when referring to EI, and the reported likelihood of EI referral for children with common developmental conditions. RESULTS: Response rate was 55% (894 of 1617). A total of 64% of respondents considered an established diagnosis important for EI referral. Likelihood of referral for delayed speech was lower among those who considered a diagnosis important than among those who did not (77% vs 87%; P = .02). Similar patterns held for global delay (91% vs 97%; P = .02), loss of developmental milestones (80% vs 88%; P = .03), and parental concern for inappropriate development (45% vs 60%; P = .002). In multivariable models, perception of the importance of an established diagnosis was associated with lower likelihood of referral for children with delayed speech (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.26-0.87) and for parental concern for inappropriate development (aOR 0.46; 95% CI 0.30-0.72). CONCLUSIONS: A majority of general pediatricians believe that an established diagnosis is important when considering EI referral. This perception is associated with decreased reported referral for children with speech delay and those whose parents express concern for inappropriate development.


Asunto(s)
Discapacidades del Desarrollo/diagnóstico , Intervención Educativa Precoz , Derivación y Consulta/normas , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Niño , Preescolar , Intervalos de Confianza , Atención a la Salud , Niños con Discapacidad , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Lactante , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo/normas , Tamizaje Masivo/tendencias , Análisis Multivariante , Oportunidad Relativa , Pediatría/normas , Pediatría/tendencias , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Derivación y Consulta/tendencias , Medición de Riesgo , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos
13.
Child Maltreat ; 11(4): 361-9, 2006 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17043321

RESUMEN

Pediatrician experience with child protective services (CPS) and factors associated with identifying and reporting suspected child physical abuse were examined by a survey of members of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP). Respondents provided information about their demographics and experience, attitudes and practices with child abuse. They indicated their diagnosis and management of a child in a purposely ambiguous clinical vignette. Pediatricians who had received recent child abuse education were more confident in their ability to identify and manage child abuse. High confidence in ability to manage child abuse and positive attitude about domestic violence screening and value of anticipatory guidance predicted that pediatricians would have high suspicion that the child in the vignette was abused and that they would report the child to CPS. Future efforts to improve medical intervention in child abuse should focus on physician attitudes and experience, as well as cognitive factors.


Asunto(s)
Maltrato a los Niños/diagnóstico , Competencia Clínica , Notificación Obligatoria , Pediatría , Actitud , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Niño , Toma de Decisiones , Demografía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Servicio Social/normas , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
14.
Acad Pediatr ; 16(4): 366-72, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26523634

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To examine primary care pediatricians' (PCPs) beliefs about whether the family-centered medical home (FCMH) should be in primary or subspecialty care for children with different degrees of complexity; and to examine practice characteristics associated with these beliefs. METHODS: Data from the American Academy of Pediatrics Periodic Survey (PS 79) conducted in 2012 were analyzed. Outcomes were agreement/strong agreement that 1) primary care should be the FCMH locus for most children with special health care needs (CSHCN) and 2) subspecialty care is the best FCMH locus for children with rare or complex conditions. In multivariate models, we tested associations between outcomes and practice barriers (eg, work culture, time, cost) and facilitators (eg, having a care coordinator) to FCMH implementation. RESULTS: Among 572 PCPs, 65% agreed/strongly agreed primary care is the best FCMH setting for most CSHCN, and 43% agreed/strongly agreed subspecialty care is the best setting for children with complexity. Cost and time as barriers to FCMH implementation were oppositely associated with the belief that primary care was best for most CSHCN (cost: adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 2.31, 1.36-3.90; time: AOR 0.48, 0.29-0.81). Lack of skills to communicate and coordinate care was associated with the belief that specialty care was the best FCMH for children with complexity (AOR 1.99, 1.05-3.79). CONCLUSIONS: A substantial minority endorsed specialty care as the best FCMH locus for children with medical complexity. Several barriers were associated with believing primary care to be the best FCMH for most CSHCN. Addressing medical complexity in FCMH implementation may enhance perceived value by pediatricians.


Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Niños con Discapacidad , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/organización & administración , Pediatras , Médicos de Atención Primaria , Atención Primaria de Salud/organización & administración , Atención Terciaria de Salud/organización & administración , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
15.
Acad Pediatr ; 16(7): 668-75, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27157045

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Cumulative adverse childhood experiences (ACE) can have profound and lasting effects on parenting. Parents with a history of multiple ACE have greater challenges modulating their own stress responses and helping their children adapt to life stressors. We examined pediatric practice in inquiring about parents' childhood adversities as of 2013. METHODS: Using data from the 85th Periodic Survey of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), we restricted analyses to the 302 pediatricians exclusively practicing general pediatrics who answered questions regarding their beliefs about childhood stressors, their role in advising parents, and whether they asked about parents' ACEs. Weighted descriptive and logistic regression analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Despite endorsing the influence of positive parenting on a child's life-course trajectory (96%), that their advice can impact parenting skills (79%), and that screening for social-emotional risks is within their scope of practice (81%), most pediatricians (61%) did not inquire about parents' ACE. Pediatricians who believed that their advice influences positive parenting skills inquired about more parents' ACE. CONCLUSIONS: As of 2013, few pediatricians inquired about parents' ACEs despite recognizing their negative impact on parenting behaviors and child development. Research is needed regarding the best approaches to the prevention and amelioration of ACEs and the promotion of family and child resilience. Pediatricians need resources and education about the AAP's proposed dyadic approach to assessing family and child risk factors and strengths and to providing guidance and management.


Asunto(s)
Adultos Sobrevivientes de Eventos Adversos Infantiles , Anamnesis , Padres , Pediatras , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Responsabilidad Parental , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
16.
Acad Pediatr ; 16(2): 115-21, 2016 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26514649

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: There has been increasing emphasis on the role of the pediatrician with respect to behavioral, learning, and mental health (MH) issues, and developmental behavioral rotations are now required in pediatric residency programs. We sought to examine whether this newer emphasis on MH is reflected in pediatricians' reports of their current practices. METHODS: Data from 2 periodic surveys conducted in 2004 and 2013 by the American Academy of Pediatrics were examined to see whether there were differences in self-reported behaviors of usually inquiring/screening, treating/managing/comanaging, or referring patients for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), anxiety, depression, behavioral problems, or learning problems. We examined patterns for all practicing members and for those who practiced general pediatrics exclusively. RESULTS: There were few changes over the decade in the percentage who inquired or screened among all clinicians; among those exclusively practicing general pediatrics, the percentage who inquired or screened increased about 10% for ADHD and depression. ADHD remained the only condition for which the majority of respondents treated/managed/comanaged (57%). While there was some increase in the percentages who treated other conditions, the other conditions were usually treated by <30% of respondents. A similar pattern of results was observed in analyses adjusted for physician, practice, and patient characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the changing nature of pediatric practice and increased efforts to emphasize the importance of behavior, learning, and MH, the pediatric community appears to be making little progress toward providing for the long-term behavioral, learning, and MH needs of children and adolescents in its care.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Ansiedad/terapia , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/terapia , Trastorno Depresivo/terapia , Discapacidades para el Aprendizaje/terapia , Pediatría , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Problema de Conducta , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Ansiedad/terapia , Trastornos de Ansiedad/diagnóstico , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/diagnóstico , Depresión/diagnóstico , Depresión/terapia , Trastorno Depresivo/diagnóstico , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Discapacidades para el Aprendizaje/diagnóstico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
17.
Acad Pediatr ; 16(2): 154-60, 2016 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26530850

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The stress associated with adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) has immediate and long-lasting effects. The objectives of this study were to examine 1) how often pediatricians ask patients' families about ACEs, 2) how familiar pediatricians are with the original ACE study, and 3) physician/practice characteristics, physicians' mental health training, and physicians' attitudes/beliefs that are associated with asking about ACEs. METHODS: Data were collected from 302 nontrainee pediatricians exclusively practicing general pediatrics who completed the 2013 American Academy of Pediatrics Periodic Survey. Pediatricians indicated whether they usually, sometimes, or never inquired about or screened for 7 ACEs. Sample weights were used to reduce nonresponse bias. Weighted descriptive and logistic regression analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Only 4% of pediatricians usually asked about all 7 ACEs; 32% did not usually ask about any. Less than 11% of pediatricians reported being very or somewhat familiar with the ACE study. Pediatricians who screened/inquired about ACEs usually asked about maternal depression (46%) and parental separation/divorce (42%). Multivariable analyses showed that pediatricians had more than twice the odds of usually asking about ACEs if they disagreed that they have little effect on influencing positive parenting skills, disagreed that screening for social emotional risk factors within the family is beyond the scope of pediatricians, or were very interested in receiving further education on managing/treating mental health problems in children and adolescents. CONCLUSIONS: Few pediatricians ask about all ACEs. Pediatric training that emphasizes the importance of social/emotional risk factors may increase the identification of ACEs in pediatric primary care.


Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Maltrato a los Niños/diagnóstico , Hijo de Padres Discapacitados , Trastorno Depresivo , Exposición a la Violencia , Pediatría , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Atención Primaria de Salud , Adolescente , Adulto , Niño , Psiquiatría Infantil/educación , Preescolar , Divorcio , Violencia Doméstica , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Madres/psicología , Análisis Multivariante , Pediatría/educación , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
18.
Pediatrics ; 138(3)2016 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27573091

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Parental noncompliance with the American Academy of Pediatrics and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention immunization schedule is an increasing public health concern. We examined the frequency of requests for vaccine delays and refusals and the impact on US pediatricians' behavior. METHODS: Using national American Academy of Pediatrics Periodic Surveys from 2006 and 2013, we describe pediatrician perceptions of prevalence of (1) vaccine refusals and delays, (2) parental reasons for refusals and/or delays, and (3) physician dismissals. Questions about vaccine delays were asked only in 2013. We examined the frequency, reasons for, and management of both vaccine refusals and delays by using bivariate and multivariable analyses, which were controlled for practice characteristics, demographics, and survey year. RESULTS: The proportion of pediatricians reporting parental vaccine refusals increased from 74.5% in 2006 to 87.0% in 2013 (P < .001). Pediatricians perceive that parents are increasingly refusing vaccinations because parents believe they are unnecessary (63.4% in 2006 vs 73.1% in 2013; P = .002). A total of 75.0% of pediatricians reported that parents delay vaccines because of concern about discomfort, and 72.5% indicated that they delay because of concern for immune system burden. In 2006, 6.1% of pediatricians reported "always" dismissing patients for continued vaccine refusal, and by 2013 that percentage increased to 11.7% (P = .004). CONCLUSIONS: Pediatricians reported increased vaccine refusal between 2006 and 2013. They perceive that vaccine-refusing parents increasingly believe that immunizations are unnecessary. Pediatricians continue to provide vaccine education but are also dismissing patients at higher rates.


Asunto(s)
Pediatras , Negativa al Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Negativa a la Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacunas/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Esquemas de Inmunización , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Padres , Cooperación del Paciente , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Ubicación de la Práctica Profesional , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos
19.
Pediatrics ; 138(3)2016 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27507894

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pediatricians are central in leading the family-centered medical home (FCMH), yet little is known about how provider-perceived barriers to and attitudes toward the FCMH affect implementation. This study aims to assess the relationship between pediatrician-perceived barriers to and attitudes toward FCMH and reported care coordination. METHODS: Pediatricians working in ambulatory care responded to the American Academy of Pediatrics Periodic Survey of Fellows #79 (N = 572, response rate, 59%). Our primary care coordination outcomes were whether pediatricians were: (1) leading a multidisciplinary team; (2) developing care plans; and (3) connecting with support services. Independent variables included barriers to FCMH implementation (lack of communication skills, support services, and time). Associations between outcomes and barriers were assessed by multivariate logistic regression, controlling for pediatrician and practice characteristics. RESULTS: Lack of sufficient personnel was significantly associated with fewer care coordination activities: leading a multidisciplinary team (odds ratio [OR], 0.53), developing care plans (OR, 0.51), and connecting with support services (OR, 0.42). Lacking communication skills was significantly associated with lower odds of development of care plans (OR, 0.56) and assistance with support services (OR, 0.64). Lack of time was significantly associated with lower odds of leading a multidisciplinary team (OR, 0.53). A pediatrician's belief that the FCMH encourages the use of preventive services was significantly associated with increased support services (OR, 2.06). CONCLUSIONS: Pediatricians report a need for sufficient personnel and communication skills to provide care coordination, a core component of the FCMH. Interventions to boost FCMH implementation should focus on providing resources to develop these characteristics.


Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/organización & administración , Pediatras/psicología , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Relaciones Interprofesionales , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Planificación de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Pediatras/organización & administración , Estados Unidos
20.
Acad Pediatr ; 16(7): 676-83, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27064141

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the availability of on-site mental health professionals (MHPs) in primary care; to examine practice/pediatrician characteristics associated with on-site MHPs; and to determine whether the presence of on-site MHPs is related to pediatricians' comanaging or more frequently identifying, treating/managing, or referring mental health (MH) problems. METHODS: Analyses included American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) members who participated in an AAP Periodic Survey in 2013 and who practiced general pediatrics (n = 321). Measures included sociodemographics, practice characteristics, questions about on-site MHPs, comanagement of MH problems, and pediatricians' behaviors in response to 5 prevalent MH problems. Weighted univariate, bivariate, and multivariable analyses were performed. RESULTS: Thirty-five percent reported on-site MHPs. Practice characteristics (medical schools, universities, health maintenance organizations, <100 visits per week, <80% of patients privately insured) and interactions of practice location (urban) with visits and patient insurance were associated with on-site MHPs. There was no overall association between colocation and comanagement, or whether pediatricians usually identified, treated/managed, or referred 5 common child MH problems. Among the subset of pediatricians who reported comanaging, there was an association with comanagement when the on-site MHP was a child psychiatrist, substance abuse counselor, or social worker. CONCLUSIONS: On-site MHPs are more frequent in settings where low-income children are served and where pediatricians train. Pediatricians who comanage MH problems are more likely to do so when the on-site MHP is a child psychiatrist, substance abuse counselor, or social worker. Overall, on-site MHPs were not associated with comanagement or increased likelihood of pediatricians identifying, treating/managing, or referring children with 5 common child MH problems.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Pediatras , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Atención Primaria de Salud , Derivación y Consulta , Adulto , Femenino , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales/diagnóstico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Psiquiatría , Psicología , Trabajadores Sociales
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA