Reassessing HIV Detection Strategies: An Analysis of Opportunistic Screening vs. Indicator-Condition-Driven Diagnosis in Valencia, Spain.

Our study assessed the characteristics of people living with HIV (PLWH) detected via opportunistic screening in Valencia (Spain) to determine diagnoses potentially missed under a more restrictive, indicator-condition diagnostic strategy. We conducted a retrospective analysis of electronic health records of 97 PLWH diagnosed between April 2019 and August 2022. The main outcomes reported were patient CD4+ T cell count, known HIV risk factors at diagnosis, and missed opportunities for diagnosis, defined as the failure of a previously untested patient to undergo HIV testing despite attending previous visits to healthcare facilities prior to diagnosis. Successful linkage to care was achieved for 95.9% of diagnosed patients. Half of the PLWH were diagnosed late, while 47.8% did not meet the criteria for indicator-condition-driven HIV diagnosis at the time of their diagnosis. Additionally, 52.2% did not receive HIV testing despite an average of 5.1 ± 6.0 healthcare visits in the 12 months prior to diagnosis. Spaniards had more missed opportunities for diagnosis than foreigners (64% vs. 40%, p = 0.02). Depending solely on an indicator-condition-driven HIV diagnosis approach could result in 47.8% of cases being missed. Including "migrants" as a testing criterion could lower missed diagnoses to 25.3% but might create inequities in prevention access. In conclusion, our findings provide valuable insights to enhance HIV testing, early diagnosis, and linkage to care. While it is crucial to uphold the indicator-condition-driven HIV diagnosis as baseline practice, improving screening strategies will decrease late diagnoses and missed opportunities, thereby effectively contributing to end the epidemic.

One-step diagnosis strategy together with multidisciplinary telematics referral perform an effective approach for identifying and treating patients with active Hepatitis C infection.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Implementation of a one-step strategy for diagnosis of active Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection would encourage the early diagnosis and reduce the time to access antiviral treatments. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a HCV one-step diagnosis compared to the traditional two-step protocol in terms of the time required for patients to be seen by specialists and the time taken to start antiviral treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A comparative study was carried out to assess two diagnostic algorithms (one-step and two-step) for active HCV infection. Serological markers were quantified using the same serum sample to determine both anti-HCV antibodies (HCV-Ab) and HCV core antigen (HCV-cAg) by Architect i2000 SR kit. In this period, a multidisciplinary procedure was started for telematics referral of viremic patients. RESULTS: One-step approach reduced the time required for patient HCV diagnosis, referral to a specialist, access to treatment, and eliminated the loss of patients to follow-up. Significant differences were observed between one-step and two-step diagnosis methods in the time required for patients to be seen by a specialist (18 days [Interquartile range (IQR) = 14-42] versus 107 days [IQR = 62-148]) and for the initiation of treatment (54 days [IQR = 43-75] versus 200 days [IQR = 116-388]), mainly for patients with advanced fibrosis (35 days [IQR = 116-388] versus 126 days [IQR = 152-366]). CONCLUSIONS: Use of HCV-cAg has proven to be a useful tool for screening patients with active hepatitis C. The development of a multidisciplinary protocol for the communication of results improved the efficiency of the care process.

Missing Cases of Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV) Infection of the Central Nervous System When the Reller Criteria Are Applied for HSV PCR Testing: a Multicenter Study.

Previous studies suggested that herpes simplex virus (HSV) PCR testing can be safely deferred in patients with normal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) white blood cell (WBC) counts and protein levels as long as they are older than 2 years of age and are not immunocompromised, the so-called Reller criteria. In this multicenter study, we retrospectively assessed the validity of these screening criteria in our setting. A total of 4,404 CSF specimens submitted for HSV PCR testing to the respective microbiology laboratories at the participating hospitals between 2012 and 2018 were included. Six commercially available HSV PCR assays were used across the participating centers. Ninety-one of the 4,404 CSF specimens (2.1%) tested were positive for HSV DNA (75 samples for HSV-1 and 16 for HSV-2). Nine patients failed to meet the Reller criteria, of whom seven were deemed to truly have HSV encephalitis. Overall, no significant correlation between HSV PCR cycle threshold (CT ) values and WBC counts or total protein levels was found. In addition, median HSV PCR CT s were comparable between patients who met the Reller criteria and those who did not (P = 0.531). In summary, we show that HSV DNA may be detected in CSF specimens with normal WBC and protein levels collected from immunocompetent individuals older than 2 years with HSV encephalitis. Nevertheless, the data also indicate that the number of cases detected could be lowered at least by half if CSF specimens with borderline WBC counts (4 cells/mm3) as well as children of any age are systematically tested.

Evaluation of the Luminex xTAG®-GPP (Gastrointestinal Pathogen Panel) in the diagnosis of diseases with acute diarrhoea. / Evaluación del panel gastrointestinal xTAG®-GPP de Luminex en el diagnóstico de las gastroenteritis agudas.

INTRODUCTION: Most Microbiology laboratories use different techniques for the diagnosis of gastrointestinal infections. Some of which require at least 72 hours to obtain final results. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The gastrointestinal panel Luminex (xTAG-GPP, Luminex Molecular Diagnostics, Toronto, Canada) is a qualitative multiplex fast and sensitive assay able to detect and to identify the 15 most common pathogens causing gastrointestinal infection simultaneously. We evaluated this multiplex panel comparing it with conventional methods used in our laboratory. RESULTS: We analyzed 225 samples of feces. Through the conventional methods were positive 74 samples (32.9%). Through the Luminex method were positive 137 samples (60.9%). CONCLUSIONS: The use of the xTAG® GPP system in Clinical Microbiology can improve the diagnosis of gastrointestinal infectious because it provides results in less than 8 hours. Some pathogens should be applied with caution and should be interpreted based on the patient́s clinical data.

GEHEP 010 study: Prevalence and distribution of hepatitis B virus genotypes in Spain (2000-2016).

OBJECTIVE: To study the prevalence and distribution of HBV genotypes in Spain for the period 2000-2016. METHODS: Retrospective study recruiting 2559 patients from 17 hospitals. Distribution of HBV genotypes, as well as sex, age, geographical origin, mode of transmission, HDV-, HIV- and/or HCV-coinfection, and treatment were recorded. RESULTS: 1924 chronically HBV native Spanish patients have been recruited. Median age was 54 years (IQR: 41-62), 69.6% male, 6.3% HIV-coinfected, 3.1% were HCV-coinfected, 1.7% HDV-co/superinfected. Genotype distribution was: 55.9% D, 33.5% A, 5.6% F, 0.8% G, and 1.9% other genotypes (E, B, H and C). HBV genotype A was closely associated with male sex, sexual transmission, and HIV-coinfection. In contrast, HBV genotype D was associated with female sex and vertical transmission. Different patterns of genotype distribution and diversity were found between different geographical regions. In addition, HBV epidemiological patterns are evolving in Spain, mainly because of immigration. Finally, similar overall rates of treatment success across all HBV genotypes were found. CONCLUSIONS: We present here the most recent data on molecular epidemiology of HBV in Spain (GEHEP010 Study). This study confirms that the HBV genotype distribution in Spain varies based on age, sex, origin, HIV-coinfection, geographical regions and epidemiological groups.

Evaluación del panel gastrointestinal xTAG(R)-GPP de Luminex en el diagnóstico de las gastroenteritis agudas / Evaluation of the Luminex xTAG(R)-GPP (Gastrointestinal Pathogen Panel) in the diagnosis of diseases with acute diarrhoea

Introducción: La mayoría de laboratorios de microbiología utilizan diferentes técnicas para el diagnóstico de las infecciones gastrointestinales. Algunas requieren hasta 72 h para obtener resultados definitivos. Material y métodos: El panel gastrointestinal de Luminex (xTAG-GPP, Luminex Molecular Diagnostics, Toronto, Canadá) se trata de un ensayo cualitativo multiplex rápido y sensible capaz de detectar e identificar simultáneamente los 15 patógenos más frecuentes causantes de gastroenteritis. Nuestro objetivo ha sido evaluar este panel multiplex comparándolo con los métodos habituales empleados en nuestro laboratorio. Resultados: Se analizaron 225 muestras de heces. A través de los métodos convencionales fueron 74 las muestras positivas (32,9%). A través de Luminex fueron 137 las muestras positivas (60,9%). Conclusión: El uso del panel gastrointestinal de Luminex puede mejorar el diagnóstico de las infecciones gastrointestinales principalmente porque proporciona resultados en menos de 8 h. Determinados microorganismos deben interpretarse con precaución y basándose en datos clínicos y epidemiológicos del paciente (AU)

Introduction: Most Microbiology laboratories use different techniques for the diagnosis of gastrointestinal infections. Some of which require at least 72 hours to obtain final results. Material and Methods: The gastrointestinal panel Luminex (xTAG-GPP, Luminex Molecular Diagnostics, Toronto, Canada) is a qualitative multiplex fast and sensitive assay able to detect and to identify the 15 most common pathogens causing gastrointestinal infection simultaneously. We evaluated this multiplex panel comparing it with conventional methods used in our laboratory. Results: We analyzed 225 samples of feces. Through the conventional methods were positive 74 samples (32.9%). Through the Luminex method were positive 137 samples (60.9%). Conclusions: The use of the xTAG(R) GPP system in Clinical Microbiology can improve the diagnosis of gastrointestinal infectious because it provides results in less than 8 hours. Some pathogens should be applied with caution and should be interpreted based on the patients clinical data (AU)