Clinical signatures of genetic epilepsies precede diagnosis in electronic medical records of 32,000 individuals.

PURPOSE: An early genetic diagnosis can guide the time-sensitive treatment of individuals with genetic epilepsies. However, most genetic diagnoses occur long after disease onset. We aimed to identify early clinical features suggestive of genetic diagnoses in individuals with epilepsy through large-scale analysis of full-text electronic medical records. METHODS: We extracted 89 million time-stamped standardized clinical annotations using Natural Language Processing from 4,572,783 clinical notes from 32,112 individuals with childhood epilepsy, including 1925 individuals with known or presumed genetic epilepsies. We applied these features to train random forest models to predict SCN1A-related disorders and any genetic diagnosis. RESULTS: We identified 47,774 age-dependent associations of clinical features with genetic etiologies a median of 3.6 years before molecular diagnosis. Across all 710 genetic etiologies identified in our cohort, neurodevelopmental differences between 6 to 9 months increased the likelihood of a later molecular diagnosis 5-fold (P < .0001, 95% CI = 3.55-7.42). A later diagnosis of SCN1A-related disorders (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.91) or an overall positive genetic diagnosis (AUC = 0.82) could be reliably predicted using random forest models. CONCLUSION: Clinical features predictive of genetic epilepsies precede molecular diagnoses by up to several years in conditions with known precision treatments. An earlier diagnosis facilitated by automated electronic medical records analysis has the potential for earlier targeted therapeutic strategies in the genetic epilepsies.

The sixth sense: how much does interictal intracranial EEG add to determining the focality of epileptic networks?

Intracranial EEG is used for two main purposes: to determine (i) if epileptic networks are amenable to focal treatment and (ii) where to intervene. Currently, these questions are answered qualitatively and differently across centres. There is a need to quantify the focality of epileptic networks systematically, which may guide surgical decision-making, enable large-scale data analysis and facilitate multi-centre prospective clinical trials. We analysed interictal data from 101 patients with drug-resistant epilepsy who underwent pre-surgical evaluation with intracranial EEG at a single centre. We chose interictal data because of its potential to reduce the morbidity and cost associated with ictal recording. Sixty-five patients had unifocal seizure onset on intracranial EEG, and 36 were non-focal or multi-focal. We quantified the spatial dispersion of implanted electrodes and interictal intracranial EEG abnormalities for each patient. We compared these measures against the '5 Sense Score,' a pre-implant prediction of the likelihood of focal seizure onset, assessed the ability to predict unifocal seizure onset by combining these metrics and evaluated how predicted focality relates to subsequent treatment and outcomes. The spatial dispersion of intracranial EEG electrodes predicted network focality with similar performance to the 5-SENSE score [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.68 (95% confidence interval 0.57, 0.78)], indicating that electrode placement accurately reflected pre-implant information. A cross-validated model combining the 5-SENSE score and the spatial dispersion of interictal intracranial EEG abnormalities significantly improved this prediction [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.79 (95% confidence interval 0.70, 0.88); P < 0.05]. Predictions from this combined model differed between surgical- from device-treated patients with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.81 (95% confidence interval 0.68, 0.85) and between patients with good and poor post-surgical outcome at 2 years with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.70 (95% confidence interval 0.56, 0.85). Spatial measures of interictal intracranial EEG abnormality significantly improved upon pre-implant predictions of network focality by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and increased sensitivity in a single-centre study. Quantified focality predictions related to ultimate treatment strategy and surgical outcomes. While the 5-SENSE score weighed for specificity in their multi-centre validation to prevent unnecessary implantation, sensitivity improvement found in our single-centre study by including intracranial EEG may aid the decision on whom to perform the focal intervention. We present this study as an important step in building standardized, quantitative tools to guide epilepsy surgery.

Quantitative EEG Spectral Features Differentiate Genetic Epilepsies and Predict Neurologic Outcomes.

EEG plays an integral part in the diagnosis and management of children with genetic epilepsies. Nevertheless, how quantitative EEG features differ between genetic epilepsies and neurological outcomes remains largely unknown. Here, we aimed to identify quantitative EEG biomarkers in children with epilepsy and a genetic diagnosis in STXBP1, SCN1A, or SYNGAP1, and to assess how quantitative EEG features associate with neurological outcomes in genetic epilepsies more broadly. We analyzed individuals with pathogenic variants in STXBP1 (95 EEGs, n=20), SCN1A (154 EEGs, n=68), and SYNGAP1 (46 EEGs, n=21) and a control cohort of individuals without epilepsy or known cerebral disease (847 EEGs, n=806). After removing artifacts and epochs with excess noise or altered state from EEGs, we extracted spectral features. We validated our preprocessing pipeline by comparing automatically-detected posterior dominant rhythm (PDR) to annotations from clinical EEG reports. Next, as a coarse measure of pathological slowing, we compared the alpha-delta bandpower ratio between controls and the different genetic epilepsies. We then trained random forest models to predict a diagnosis of STXBP1, SCN1A, and SYNGAP1. Finally, to understand how EEG features vary with neurological outcomes, we trained random forest models to predict seizure frequency and motor function. There was strong agreement between the automatically-calculated PDR and clinical EEG reports (R 2=0.75). Individuals with STXBP1-related epilepsy have a significantly lower alpha-delta ratio than controls (P<0.001) across all age groups. Additionally, individuals with a missense variant in STXBP1 have a significantly lower alpha-delta ratio than those with a protein-truncating variant in toddlers (P<0.001), children (P=0.02), and adults (P<0.001). Models accurately predicted a diagnosis of STXBP1 (AUC=0.91), SYNGAP1 (AUC=0.82), and SCN1A (AUC=0.86) against controls and from each other in a three-class model (accuracy=0.74). From these models, we isolated highly correlated biomarkers for these respective genetic disorders, including alpha-theta ratio in frontal, occipital, and parietal electrodes with STXBP1, SYNGAP1, and SCN1A, respectively. Models were unable to predict seizure frequency (AUC=0.53). Random forest models predicted motor scores significantly better than age-based null models (P<0.001), suggesting spectral features contain information pertinent to gross motor function. In summary, we demonstrate that STXBP1-, SYNGAP1-, and SCN1A-related epilepsies have distinct quantitative EEG signatures. Furthermore, EEG spectral features are predictive of some functional outcome measures in patients with genetic epilepsies. Large-scale retrospective quantitative analysis of clinical EEG has the potential to discover novel biomarkers and to quantify and track individuals' disease progression across development.

Disparities in seizure outcomes revealed by large language models.

OBJECTIVE: Large-language models (LLMs) can potentially revolutionize health care delivery and research, but risk propagating existing biases or introducing new ones. In epilepsy, social determinants of health are associated with disparities in care access, but their impact on seizure outcomes among those with access remains unclear. Here we (1) evaluated our validated, epilepsy-specific LLM for intrinsic bias, and (2) used LLM-extracted seizure outcomes to determine if different demographic groups have different seizure outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We tested our LLM for differences and equivalences in prediction accuracy and confidence across demographic groups defined by race, ethnicity, sex, income, and health insurance, using manually annotated notes. Next, we used LLM-classified seizure freedom at each office visit to test for demographic outcome disparities, using univariable and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: We analyzed 84 675 clinic visits from 25 612 unique patients seen at our epilepsy center. We found little evidence of bias in the prediction accuracy or confidence of outcome classifications across demographic groups. Multivariable analysis indicated worse seizure outcomes for female patients (OR 1.33, P ≤ .001), those with public insurance (OR 1.53, P ≤ .001), and those from lower-income zip codes (OR ≥1.22, P ≤ .007). Black patients had worse outcomes than White patients in univariable but not multivariable analysis (OR 1.03, P = .66). CONCLUSION: We found little evidence that our LLM was intrinsically biased against any demographic group. Seizure freedom extracted by LLM revealed disparities in seizure outcomes across several demographic groups. These findings quantify the critical need to reduce disparities in the care of people with epilepsy.

Interictal intracranial EEG asymmetry lateralizes temporal lobe epilepsy.

Patients with drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy often undergo intracranial EEG recording to capture multiple seizures in order to lateralize the seizure onset zone. This process is associated with morbidity and often ends in postoperative seizure recurrence. Abundant interictal (between-seizure) data are captured during this process, but these data currently play a small role in surgical planning. Our objective was to predict the laterality of the seizure onset zone using interictal intracranial EEG data in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. We performed a retrospective cohort study (single-centre study for model development; two-centre study for model validation). We studied patients with temporal lobe epilepsy undergoing intracranial EEG at the University of Pennsylvania (internal cohort) and the Medical University of South Carolina (external cohort) between 2015 and 2022. We developed a logistic regression model to predict seizure onset zone laterality using several interictal EEG features derived from recent publications. We compared the concordance between the model-predicted seizure onset zone laterality and the side of surgery between patients with good and poor surgical outcomes. Forty-seven patients (30 female; ages 20-69; 20 left-sided, 10 right-sided and 17 bilateral seizure onsets) were analysed for model development and internal validation. Nineteen patients (10 female; ages 23-73; 5 left-sided, 10 right-sided, 4 bilateral) were analysed for external validation. The internal cohort cross-validated area under the curve for a model trained using spike rates was 0.83 for a model predicting left-sided seizure onset and 0.68 for a model predicting right-sided seizure onset. Balanced accuracies in the external cohort were 79.3% and 78.9% for the left- and right-sided predictions, respectively. The predicted concordance between the laterality of the seizure onset zone and the side of surgery was higher in patients with good surgical outcome. We replicated the finding that right temporal lobe epilepsy was harder to distinguish in a separate modality of resting-state functional MRI. In conclusion, interictal EEG signatures are distinct across seizure onset zone lateralities. Left-sided seizure onsets are easier to distinguish than right-sided onsets. A model trained on spike rates accurately identifies patients with left-sided seizure onset zones and predicts surgical outcome. A potential clinical application of these findings could be to either support or oppose a hypothesis of unilateral temporal lobe epilepsy when deciding to pursue surgical resection or ablation as opposed to device implantation.

Resting-state background features demonstrate multidien cycles in long-term EEG device recordings.

Background: Longitudinal EEG recorded by implanted devices is critical for understanding and managing epilepsy. Recent research reports patient-specific, multi-day cycles in device-detected epileptiform events that coincide with increased likelihood of clinical seizures. Understanding these cycles could elucidate mechanisms generating seizures and advance drug and neurostimulation therapies. Objective/Hypothesis: We hypothesize that seizure-correlated cycles are present in background neural activity, independent of interictal epileptiform spikes, and that neurostimulation may disrupt these cycles. Methods: We analyzed regularly-recorded seizure-free data epochs from 20 patients implanted with a responsive neurostimulation (RNS) device for at least 1.5 years, to explore the relationship between cycles in device-detected interictal epileptiform activity (dIEA), clinician-validated interictal spikes, background EEG features, and neurostimulation. Results: Background EEG features tracked the cycle phase of dIEA in all patients (AUC: 0.63 [0.56 - 0.67]) with a greater effect size compared to clinically annotated spike rate alone (AUC: 0.55 [0.53-0.61], p < 0.01). After accounting for circadian variation and spike rate, we observed significant population trends in elevated theta and beta band power and theta and alpha connectivity features at the cycle peaks (sign test, p < 0.05). In the period directly after stimulation we observe a decreased association between cycle phase and EEG features compared to background recordings (AUC: 0.58 [0.55-0.64]). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that seizure-correlated dIEA cycles are not solely due to epileptiform discharges but are associated with background measures of brain state; and that neurostimulation may disrupt these cycles. These results may help elucidate mechanisms underlying seizure generation, provide new biomarkers for seizure risk, and facilitate monitoring, treating, and managing epilepsy with implantable devices.

The seizure severity score: a quantitative tool for comparing seizures and their response to therapy.

Objective.Epilepsy is a neurological disorder characterized by recurrent seizures which vary widely in severity, from clinically silent to prolonged convulsions. Measuring severity is crucial for guiding therapy, particularly when complete control is not possible. Seizure diaries, the current standard for guiding therapy, are insensitive to the duration of events or the propagation of seizure activity across the brain. We present a quantitative seizure severity score that incorporates electroencephalography (EEG) and clinical data and demonstrate how it can guide epilepsy therapies.Approach.We collected intracranial EEG and clinical semiology data from 54 epilepsy patients who had 256 seizures during invasive, in-hospital presurgical evaluation. We applied an absolute slope algorithm to EEG recordings to identify seizing channels. From this data, we developed a seizure severity score that combines seizure duration, spread, and semiology using non-negative matrix factorization. For validation, we assessed its correlation with independent measures of epilepsy burden: seizure types, epilepsy duration, a pharmacokinetic model of medication load, and response to epilepsy surgery. We investigated the association between the seizure severity score and preictal network features.Main results.The seizure severity score augmented clinical classification by objectively delineating seizure duration and spread from recordings in available electrodes. Lower preictal medication loads were associated with higher seizure severity scores (p= 0.018, 97.5% confidence interval = [-1.242, -0.116]) and lower pre-surgical severity was associated with better surgical outcome (p= 0.042). In 85% of patients with multiple seizure types, greater preictal change from baseline was associated with higher severity.Significance.We present a quantitative measure of seizure severity that includes EEG and clinical features, validated on gold standard in-patient recordings. We provide a framework for extending our tool's utility to ambulatory EEG devices, for linking it to seizure semiology measured by wearable sensors, and as a tool to advance data-driven epilepsy care.

Quantifying interictal intracranial EEG to predict focal epilepsy.

Introduction: Intracranial EEG (IEEG) is used for 2 main purposes, to determine: (1) if epileptic networks are amenable to focal treatment and (2) where to intervene. Currently these questions are answered qualitatively and sometimes differently across centers. There is a need for objective, standardized methods to guide surgical decision making and to enable large scale data analysis across centers and prospective clinical trials. Methods: We analyzed interictal data from 101 patients with drug resistant epilepsy who underwent presurgical evaluation with IEEG. We chose interictal data because of its potential to reduce the morbidity and cost associated with ictal recording. 65 patients had unifocal seizure onset on IEEG, and 36 were non-focal or multi-focal. We quantified the spatial dispersion of implanted electrodes and interictal IEEG abnormalities for each patient. We compared these measures against the "5 Sense Score (5SS)," a pre-implant estimate of the likelihood of focal seizure onset, and assessed their ability to predict the clinicians' choice of therapeutic intervention and the patient outcome. Results: The spatial dispersion of IEEG electrodes predicted network focality with precision similar to the 5SS (AUC = 0.67), indicating that electrode placement accurately reflected pre-implant information. A cross-validated model combining the 5SS and the spatial dispersion of interictal IEEG abnormalities significantly improved this prediction (AUC = 0.79; p<0.05). The combined model predicted ultimate treatment strategy (surgery vs. device) with an AUC of 0.81 and post-surgical outcome at 2 years with an AUC of 0.70. The 5SS, interictal IEEG, and electrode placement were not correlated and provided complementary information. Conclusions: Quantitative, interictal IEEG significantly improved upon pre-implant estimates of network focality and predicted treatment with precision approaching that of clinical experts. We present this study as an important step in building standardized, quantitative tools to guide epilepsy surgery.

Disparities in seizure outcomes revealed by large language models.

Objective: Large-language models (LLMs) in healthcare have the potential to propagate existing biases or introduce new ones. For people with epilepsy, social determinants of health are associated with disparities in access to care, but their impact on seizure outcomes among those with access to specialty care remains unclear. Here we (1) evaluated our validated, epilepsy-specific LLM for intrinsic bias, and (2) used LLM-extracted seizure outcomes to test the hypothesis that different demographic groups have different seizure outcomes. Methods: First, we tested our LLM for intrinsic bias in the form of differential performance in demographic groups by race, ethnicity, sex, income, and health insurance in manually annotated notes. Next, we used LLM-classified seizure freedom at each office visit to test for outcome disparities in the same demographic groups, using univariable and multivariable analyses. Results: We analyzed 84,675 clinic visits from 25,612 patients seen at our epilepsy center 2005-2022. We found no differences in the accuracy, or positive or negative class balance of outcome classifications across demographic groups. Multivariable analysis indicated worse seizure outcomes for female patients (OR 1.33, p = 3×10-8), those with public insurance (OR 1.53, p = 2×10-13), and those from lower-income zip codes (OR ≥ 1.22, p ≤ 6.6×10-3). Black patients had worse outcomes than White patients in univariable but not multivariable analysis (OR 1.03, p = 0.66). Significance: We found no evidence that our LLM was intrinsically biased against any demographic group. Seizure freedom extracted by LLM revealed disparities in seizure outcomes across several demographic groups. These findings highlight the critical need to reduce disparities in the care of people with epilepsy.

Resting-state background features demonstrate multidien cycles in long-term EEG device recordings.

BACKGROUND: Longitudinal EEG recorded by implanted devices is critical for understanding and managing epilepsy. Recent research reports patient-specific, multi-day cycles in device-detected epileptiform events that coincide with increased likelihood of clinical seizures. Understanding these cycles could elucidate mechanisms generating seizures and advance drug and neurostimulation therapies. OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesize that seizure-correlated cycles are present in background neural activity, independent of interictal epileptiform spikes, and that neurostimulation may temporarily interrupt these cycles. METHODS: We analyzed regularly-recorded seizure-free data epochs from 20 patients implanted with a responsive neurostimulation (RNS) device for at least 1.5 years, to explore the relationship between cycles in device-detected interictal epileptiform activity (dIEA), clinician-validated interictal spikes, background EEG features, and neurostimulation. RESULTS: Background EEG features tracked the cycle phase of dIEA in all patients (AUC: 0.63 [0.56-0.67]) with a greater effect size compared to clinically annotated spike rate alone (AUC: 0.55 [0.53-0.61], p < 0.01). After accounting for circadian variation and spike rate, we observed significant population trends in elevated theta and beta band power and theta and alpha connectivity features at the cycle peaks (sign test, p < 0.05). In the period directly after stimulation we observe a decreased association between cycle phase and EEG features compared to background recordings (AUC: 0.58 [0.55-0.64]). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that seizure-correlated dIEA cycles are not solely due to epileptiform discharges but are associated with background measures of brain state; and that neurostimulation may temporarily interrupt these cycles. These results may help elucidate mechanisms underlying seizure generation, provide new biomarkers for seizure risk, and facilitate monitoring, treating, and managing epilepsy with implantable devices.

Interictal intracranial EEG asymmetry lateralizes temporal lobe epilepsy.

Patients with drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy often undergo intracranial EEG recording to capture multiple seizures in order to lateralize the seizure onset zone. This process is associated with morbidity and often ends in postoperative seizure recurrence. Abundant interictal (between-seizure) data is captured during this process, but these data currently play a small role in surgical planning. Our objective was to predict the laterality of the seizure onset zone using interictal (between-seizure) intracranial EEG data in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy. We performed a retrospective cohort study (single-center study for model development; two-center study for model validation). We studied patients with temporal lobe epilepsy undergoing intracranial EEG at the University of Pennsylvania (internal cohort) and the Medical University of South Carolina (external cohort) between 2015 and 2022. We developed a logistic regression model to predict seizure onset zone laterality using interictal EEG. We compared the concordance between the model-predicted seizure onset zone laterality and the side of surgery between patients with good and poor surgical outcomes. 47 patients (30 women; ages 20-69; 20 left-sided, 10 right-sided, and 17 bilateral seizure onsets) were analyzed for model development and internal validation. 19 patients (10 women; ages 23-73; 5 left-sided, 10 right-sided, 4 bilateral) were analyzed for external validation. The internal cohort cross-validated area under the curve for a model trained using spike rates was 0.83 for a model predicting left-sided seizure onset and 0.68 for a model predicting right-sided seizure onset. Balanced accuracies in the external cohort were 79.3% and 78.9% for the left- and right-sided predictions, respectively. The predicted concordance between the laterality of the seizure onset zone and the side of surgery was higher in patients with good surgical outcome. In conclusion, interictal EEG signatures are distinct across seizure onset zone lateralities. Left-sided seizure onsets are easier to distinguish than right-sided onsets. A model trained on spike rates accurately identifies patients with left-sided seizure onset zones and predicts surgical outcome.

Demonstration of an Optimized Large-scale Optogenetic Cortical Interface for Non-human Primates.

Optogenetics is a powerful neuroscientific tool which allows neurons to be modulated by optical stimulation. Despite widespread optogenetic experimentation in small animal models, optogenetics in non-human primates (NHPs) remains a niche field, particularly at the large scales necessary for multi-regional neural research. We previously published a large-scale, chronic optogenetic cortical interface for NHPs which was successful but came with a number of limitations. In this work, we present an optimized interface which improves upon the stability and scale of our previous interface while using more easily replicable methods to increase our system's availability to the scientific community. Specifically, we (1) demonstrate the long-term (~3 months) optical access to the brain achievable using a commercially-available transparent artificial dura with embedded electrodes, (2) showcase large-scale optogenetic expression achievable with simplified (magnetic resonance-free) surgical techniques, and (3) effectively modulated the expressing areas at large scales (~1 cm2) by light emitting diode (LED) arrays assembled in-house.

Improving the Efficacy and Accessibility of Intracranial Viral Vector Delivery in Non-Human Primates.

Non-human primates (NHPs) are precious resources for cutting-edge neuroscientific research, including large-scale viral vector-based experimentation such as optogenetics. We propose to improve surgical outcomes by enhancing the surgical preparation practices of convection-enhanced delivery (CED), which is an efficient viral vector infusion technique for large brains such as NHPs'. Here, we present both real-time and next-day MRI data of CED in the brains of ten NHPs, and we present a quantitative, inexpensive, and practical bench-side model of the in vivo CED data. Our bench-side model is composed of food coloring infused into a transparent agar phantom, and the spread of infusion is optically monitored over time. Our proposed method approximates CED infusions into the cortex, thalamus, medial temporal lobe, and caudate nucleus of NHPs, confirmed by MRI data acquired with either gadolinium-based or manganese-based contrast agents co-infused with optogenetic viral vectors. These methods and data serve to guide researchers and surgical team members in key surgical preparations for intracranial viral delivery using CED in NHPs, and thus improve expression targeting and efficacy and, as a result, reduce surgical risks.

A MRI-Based Toolbox for Neurosurgical Planning in Nonhuman Primates.

In this paper, we outline a method for surgical preparation that allows for the practical planning of a variety of neurosurgeries in NHPs solely using data extracted from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This protocol allows for the generation of 3D printed anatomically accurate physical models of the brain and skull, as well as an agarose gel model of the brain modeling some of the mechanical properties of the brain. These models can be extracted from MRI using brain extraction software for the model of the brain, and custom code for the model of the skull. The preparation protocol takes advantage of state-of-the-art 3D printing technology to make interfacing brains, skulls, and molds for gel brain models. The skull and brain models can be used to visualize brain tissue inside the skull with the addition of a craniotomy in the custom code, allowing for better preparation for surgeries directly involving the brain. The applications of these methods are designed for surgeries involved in neurological stimulation and recording as well as injection, but the versatility of the system allows for future expansion of the protocol, extraction techniques, and models to a wider scope of surgeries.