Three-year incidence of pacemaker implantation in patients with atrial fibrillation and sinus node dysfunction receiving ablation versus antiarrhythmic drugs.

BACKGROUND: Sinus node dysfunction (SND) is commonly seen in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence of pacemaker implantation among patients with SND and AF treated with catheter ablation (CA) versus anti-arrhythmic drugs (AADs). METHODS: The 2013-2022 Optum Clinformatics database, an administrative claims database for commercially insured individuals in the United States (US), was used for this study. Patients with AF and SND and a history of at least one AAD prescription were identified and classified into CA or AAD cohorts based on subsequent treatment received. Inverse probability treatment weighting was applied to balance socio-demographic and clinical characteristics between the cohorts. Weighted Cox regression modeling was used to evaluate the differential risk of incident permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation. Sub-analyses were performed by AF type (paroxysmal versus persistent). RESULTS: A total of 1206 patients in the AAD cohort and 1624 patients in the CA cohort were included. Study cohorts were well-balanced post-weighting. The incidence rate of PPM implantation (per 1000 person-year) was 55.8 for the CA cohort and 117.8 for the AAD cohort. Regression analysis demonstrated that the CA cohort had 42% lower risk of incident PPM implantation than those treated with AADs (hazard ratio [HR], 0.58; 95% CI, 0.46-0.72, p < 0.001). CA-treated patients had lower risks of PPM implantation versus AAD-treated patients among those with paroxysmal AF (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.34-0.69, p < 0.001) and persistent AF (HR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.40-0.81, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with AF and SND treated with CA have significantly lower risks of incident PPM implantation compared with those treated with an AAD.

Antinuclear antibody testing in a Turkish pediatrics clinic: is it always necessary?

INTRODUCTION: The term anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) is used to define a large group of autoantibodies which specifically bind to nuclear elements. Although healthy individuals may also have ANA positivity, the measurement of ANA is generally used in the diagnosis of autoimmune disorders. However, various studies have shown that ANA testing may be overused, especially in pediatrics clinics. Our aim was to investigate the reasons for antinuclear antibody (ANA) testing in the general pediatrics and pediatric rheumatology clinics of our hospital and to determine whether ANA testing was ordered appropriately by evaluating chief complaints and the ultimate diagnoses of these cases. METHODS: The medical records of pediatric patients in whom ANA testing was performed between January 2014 and June 2016 were retrospectively evaluated. Subjects were grouped according to the indication for ANA testing and ANA titers. RESULTS: ANA tests were ordered in a total of 409 patients during the study period, with 113 positive ANA results. The ANA test was ordered mostly due to joint pain (50% of the study population). There was an increased likelihood of autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs) with higher ANA titer. The positive predictive value of an ANA test was 16% for any connective tissue disease and 13% for lupus in the pediatric setting. CONCLUSION: in the current study, more than one-fourth of the subjects were found to have ANA positivity, while only 15% were ultimately diagnosed with ARDs. Our findings underline the importance of an increased awareness of correct indications for ANA testing.

Evaluation of subclinical inflammation in familial Mediterranean fever patients: relations with mutation types and attack status: a retrospective study.

Familial Mediterranean fever (FMF) is an autosomal recessive autoinflammatory disease of childhood and adulthood. Development of systemic amyloidosis and frequent attack influence quality of life and survival. There is sporadic evidence indicating subclinical inflammation in patients with FMF. We aimed to assess subclinical inflammation using neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and C-reactive protein (CRP) in pediatric patients with FMF in the attack-free period. In this retrospective study, we reviewed the files of all FMF patients in our pediatric rheumatology outpatient clinic in a tertiary center and enrolled those with sufficient clinical and laboratory data. We also enrolled 73 controls. We grouped the patients according to being in attack period or attack-free period. We compared CRP, NLR, PLR, and WBC (white blood cell) levels between different mutations and polymorphisms. We also compared patients in the attack period with those in attack-free period. We enrolled 61 patients in attack period, 509 patients in attack-free period, and 73 controls. There was no difference between patients with different mutations with respect to NLR or PLR levels in the attack-free period. However, CRP levels were higher in patients with homozygous exon 10 mutations, especially those with homozygous M694V mutations compared with other mutations. However, CRP levels were mostly normal in these patients. Our data are against the reported fact that patients with FMF have higher NLR or PLR levels in attack-free periods. However, CRP levels were higher in the presence of homozygous exon 10 mutations (in particular homozygous M694V mutations).