RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Surgically treated, stage I (T1N0 and T2N0) nonsmall cell lung cancer has a relatively favorable prognosis. Our aim was to determine whether performing a pneumonectomy in this group of patients has an impact on survival. METHODS: Four hundred eighty-five patients with stage I nonsmall cell lung cancer undergoing lung resection between 1991 and 2000 were studied. Three hundred seventy-four patients underwent a smaller resection than a pneumonectomy and 111 had a pneumonectomy. RESULTS: Patients undergoing less extensive resections were older (mean age, 65 vs 63 years) (p = 0.01); these patients were also more likely to have a history of chronic obstructive airway disease (9% vs 2%) (p = 0.01) or asthma (10% vs 3%) (p = 0.04), nonsquamous cell type (56% vs 27%) (p < 0.0001), and T1 tumor stage (66% vs 17%) (p = 0.002) than patients having a pneumonectomy. Operative mortality was 2.4% versus 8% (p = 0.01). Overall 1-, 3-, and 5-year Kaplan-Meier survival rates (95% confidence interval [CI]) after less extensive resections were 85% (CI, 82% to 90%), 63% (CI, 56% to 69%), and 50% (CI, 42% to 57%), respectively, and after pneumonectomy the survival rates were 66% (CI, 53% to 73%), 47% (CI, 35% to 57%), and 44% (CI, 32% to 55%), respectively (p = 0.0006). When the Cox proportional hazards model was applied to all study patients (n = 485), pneumonectomy (p = 0.001), T2 stage (p = 0.006), older age (p = 0.03), and male gender (p = 0.03) were independent adverse predictors of survival. When the analysis was limited to the patients having T1N0 disease (n = 145), pneumonectomy (p = 0.0008), older age (p = 0.05), and nonsquamous cell type (p = 0.02) were independent adverse determinants of survival. When only the patients with T2N0 disease were analyzed (n = 340), male gender (p = 0.0005) and pneumonectomy (p = 0.01) were independent negative predictors of survival. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the patients who underwent pneumonectomy for stage T1N0 or T2N0 nonsmall cell lung cancer had a significantly poorer survival than those patients who underwent smaller lung resections.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/cirugía , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirugía , Neumonectomía , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Asma/complicaciones , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neumonectomía/métodos , Pronóstico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/complicaciones , Factores Sexuales , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The significance of tumor cell type on survival after esophageal resection for carcinoma is uncertain. We reviewed our experience in order to compare the outcome in the two main histologic groups. METHODS: Between January 1987 and April 2000, 621 patients underwent esophagectomy with curative intention for squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma. The postoperative outcomes of patients with adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma were compared. RESULTS: Of the cohort, 424 patients had adenocarcinoma (group A) and 197 had squamous cell carcinoma (group B). The commonest approach in group A was a left thoracotomy (67%), while in group B, it was an Ivor Lewis resection (55%) (p < 0.0001). Operative mortality was 3.5% for group A and 8.1% for group B (p = 0.03). Cardiorespiratory complication rate was similar, but anastomotic leaks occurred more frequently in group B (4.2% vs 8.6%, p = 0.04). Patients in group B tended to have earlier pathologic tumor, node, metastasis (pTNM) stage (p = 0.06). Overall, survival was significantly better for group B (p = 0.003). Group B had a significantly better survival than group A in lymph node (LN) negative status (p = 0.01), and a relatively improved survival in LN positive status (p = 0.35). On multivariate analysis, squamous cell subtype (p = 0.034), pTNM stage (p = 0.005), LN status (p = 0.008), and completeness of resection (p = 0.028) were significant predictors of survival. CONCLUSIONS: After esophagectomy, patients with squamous cell carcinoma have a poorer perioperative outcome as compared with those with adenocarcinoma. However, in the longer term, squamous cell type appears to confer a significant survival advantage.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/cirugía , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Esofagectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Causas de Muerte , Electrocoagulación , Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Esofagectomía/mortalidad , Unión Esofagogástrica/cirugía , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Tablas de Vida , Metástasis Linfática , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Pronóstico , Análisis de Supervivencia , Toracotomía/mortalidadRESUMEN
The aim of this study was to analyse the outcome following oesophageal resection for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in a large volume unit. Between 1987 and 1997, 166 patients with SCC underwent oesophagectomy. The outcomes and pathological characteristics of this cohort were then analysed. Operative mortality was 6% (10 patients). Anastomotic leak occurred in 11 (6.6%). A history of previous respiratory disease and anastomotic leak were independent predictors of early mortality (P=0.02). Pathological examination demonstrated the presence of stage I disease in 8, stage IIa in 58, stage IIb in 14 and stage III in 87 patients. Kaplan-Meier survival at 1, 3 and 5 years for all patients was 71.6%, 44.6% and 33.5%. Five-year survival was 87.5% for stage I, 47.1% for stage IIa, 27.4% for stage IIb and 14.5% for stage III. On multivariate analysis, pathological stage (P=0.001) and presence of involved lymph nodes were independent adverse predictors of survival (P<0.0001). In conclusion, oesophagectomy for SCC carries an acceptable risk, which is higher for those having a respiratory disease and those developing an anastomotic leak. The good survival observed in early pathological stages and the presence of long-term survivors amongst those with locally advanced disease are encouraging.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Controlled reperfusion with terminal warm blood cardioplegia (TWBC) improves myocardial performance after global ischemia. However, the optimum volume required is unknown. METHODS: Fifty patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery were prospectively randomized to receive either 250 or 500 mL of TWBC. During TWBC delivery, and for 10 minutes after cross-clamp removal, samples were taken from the aorta and coronary sinus to measure the hydrogen ion, lactate, and oxygen content. RESULTS: At the end of TWBC delivery, the 500 mL group had significantly less hydrogen ion washout (p = 0.006) compared with the 250 mL group. Also, more hydrogen ions (p = 0.02) and lactate (p = 0.02) had been washed out during the entire period of TWBC delivery in the 500 mL group compared with the 250 mL, indicating better metabolic recovery. By 4 minutes after aortic cross-clamp removal, hydrogen ion and lactate washout, as well as oxygen extraction was similar in the two groups. However, the time to return to regular mechanical activity was prolonged in the 500 mL group, 5.8 (3) versus 4.6 (3) minutes in the 250 mL group (p = 0.05). Though there was no difference in postoperative Troponin T levels, eight patients in the 500 mL group versus four in the 250 mL group required ionotropic support (p = 0.1). CONCLUSIONS: A total of 500 mL of hotshot achieves a better metabolic state after hotshot delivery. However, there is no clinical benefit or improvement in the postoperative Troponin T release suggesting that in a short ischemic time, 500 mL TWCB has a limited clinical benefit.