Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 203
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Mov Disord ; 39(4): 733-738, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38357797

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: SAGE-324/BIIB124 is an investigational positive allosteric modulator of GABAA receptors. OBJECTIVE: KINETIC (NCT04305275), a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study, evaluated SAGE-324/BIIB124 in individuals with essential tremor (ET). METHODS: Individuals aged 18 to 80 years were randomly assigned 1:1 to orally receive 60 mg of SAGE-324/BIIB124 or placebo once daily for 28 days. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in The Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale-Performance Subscale (TETRAS-PS) Item 4 (upper-limb tremor) at day 29 with SAGE-324/BIIB124 versus placebo. RESULTS: Between May 2020 and February 2021, 69 U.S. participants were randomly assigned to receive SAGE-324/BIIB124 (n = 34) or placebo (n = 35). There was a significant reduction from baseline in TETRAS-PS Item 4 at day 29 with SAGE-324/BIIB124 versus placebo (least squares mean [standard error]: -2.31 [0.401] vs. -1.24 [0.349], P = 0.0491). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events included somnolence, dizziness, fatigue, and balance disorder. CONCLUSION: These results support further development of SAGE-324/BIIB124 for potential ET treatment. © 2024 Sage Therapeutics, Inc and The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.


Asunto(s)
Temblor Esencial , Humanos , Temblor Esencial/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Anciano , Método Doble Ciego , Adulto , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Adulto Joven , Adolescente , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Mov Disord ; 38(12): 2308-2312, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37877478

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Carbidopa/levodopa enteral suspension (CLES) is indicated for the treatment of advanced Parkinson's disease (aPD) with severe motor fluctuations. OBJECTIVE: To determine the cost, quality-adjusted life years (QALY), and cost-effectiveness of CLES compared to the standard-of-care (SoC) for aPD patients in the United States (US), using real-world data. METHODS: A published Markov model, comprising of 25 health states and a death state, (defined by a combination of the Hoehn and Yahr scale and waking time spent in OFF-time) was adapted to estimate the benefits for CLES versus oral SoC over a patient's lifetime in the US healthcare setting. Clinical inputs were based on a clinical trial and a registry study; utility inputs were sourced from the Adelphi-Disease Specific Programmes. RESULTS: CLES compared to SoC was associated with incremental costs ($1,031,791 vs. $1,025,180) and QALY gain (4.61 vs. 3.76), resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $7711/QALY. CONCLUSION: CLES is a cost-effective treatment for aPD patients with medication resistant motor fluctuations. © 2023 AbbVie, Inc and The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.


Asunto(s)
Levodopa , Enfermedad de Parkinson , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Levodopa/uso terapéutico , Carbidopa/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad de Parkinson/tratamiento farmacológico , Antiparkinsonianos , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Combinación de Medicamentos , Geles/uso terapéutico
3.
Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract ; 27(1): 69-81, 2023 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35574992

RESUMEN

Dementia due to Parkinson's disease and Alzheimer's disease are associated with behavioural and psychological symptoms, including psychosis. Long-term management presents a challenge for health care providers and caregivers. Symptoms of psychosis include hallucinations and delusions; if untreated, these can lead to institutionalisation, decreased quality of life, and significant patient and caregiver distress. A critical step in the effective management of dementia-related psychosis (DRP) is the identification and diagnosis of affected patients. The lack of a standardised diagnostic approach presents a barrier to treatment and there are no consensus guidelines for DRP. Furthermore, there are no approved therapies for the treatment of DRP. Antipsychotic medications are often prescribed off-label, even though some are associated with an increased risk of adverse events or mortality. We present currently available screening tools and guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of Parkinson's disease psychosis and DRP in the context of what is needed for effective management of psychosis.KEY POINTSWe present currently available screening tools and guidelines for Parkinson's disease psychosis and dementia-related psychosis, and discuss the unmet need for simple clinical diagnostic tools and treatment guidelines.The identification of psychosis is variable across different settings and specialties, without a unified approach to screening, definition, or diagnosis.Currently used tools for defining and assessing psychosis in a research setting are usually too cumbersome for everyday clinical practice.The development of a standardised set of diagnostic criteria would provide clinicians the opportunity to improve the detection, treatment, and quality of life of patients and their caregivers.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Alzheimer , Antipsicóticos , Enfermedad de Parkinson , Trastornos Psicóticos , Humanos , Enfermedad de Parkinson/complicaciones , Enfermedad de Parkinson/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de Parkinson/terapia , Calidad de Vida , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Urea/efectos adversos , Trastornos Psicóticos/diagnóstico , Trastornos Psicóticos/etiología , Trastornos Psicóticos/terapia , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/tratamiento farmacológico , Antipsicóticos/efectos adversos
4.
Mov Disord ; 37(2): 410-415, 2022 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34709684

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) is a frequent and disabling symptom of Parkinson's disease (PD) without approved treatment. THN102 is a novel combination drug of modafinil and low-dose flecainide. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of THN102 in PD patients with EDS. METHODS: The method involved a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial testing two doses of THN102 (200 mg/d modafinil with 2 mg/d [200/2] or 18 mg/d flecainide [200/18]) versus placebo; 75 patients were exposed to treatment. The primary endpoint was safety. The primary efficacy outcome was the change in Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score. RESULTS: Both doses of THN102 were well tolerated. ESS significantly improved with THN102 200/2 (least square means vs. placebo [95% confidence interval, CI]: -1.4 [-2.49; -0.31], P = 0.012) but did not change significantly with the 200/18 dosage. CONCLUSIONS: THN102 was well tolerated and showed a signal of efficacy at the 200/2 dose, supporting further development for the treatment of EDS in PD. © 2021 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.


Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Somnolencia Excesiva , Flecainida , Modafinilo , Enfermedad de Parkinson , Trastornos de Somnolencia Excesiva/etiología , Método Doble Ciego , Combinación de Medicamentos , Flecainida/efectos adversos , Humanos , Modafinilo/efectos adversos , Enfermedad de Parkinson/tratamiento farmacológico
5.
Telemed J E Health ; 2022 Mar 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35297666

RESUMEN

Aim: To assess the overall satisfaction level of movement disorder specialists using a virtual platform during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: This was a multicenter cross-sectional survey for a 6-month period during the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. Movement disorder specialists, who utilized telehealth visits from March 2020 to August 2020, were included. The study surveys, including provider's satisfaction with the care that they were able to provide and visit quality, were completed by the provider after each visit. Results: A total of 206 visits, provided by movement disorder specialists, were analyzed. Zoom was the most popular platform used for remote visits (70, 34%). A backup platform was not needed in the majority of movement disorder visits (171, 83%). The majority of physicians were very satisfied or satisfied with the care provided (72.9%) and visit quality (61%). Conclusions: The satisfaction level of specialists using telemedicine during COVID-19 was high despite having encounters with elderly patients with cognitive impairment or lacking advanced skills with technology.

6.
Mov Disord ; 36(8): 1944-1949, 2021 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33764619

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Available essential tremor (ET) therapies have limitations. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate CX-8998, a selective T-type calcium channel modulator, in essential tremor. METHODS: Patients 18-75 years old with moderate to severe essential tremor were randomized 1:1 to receive CX-8998 (titrated to 10 mg twice daily) or placebo. The primary end point was change from baseline to day 28 in The Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale performance subscale scored by independent blinded video raters. Secondary outcomes included in-person blinded investigator rating of The Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale performance subscale, The Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale activities of daily living subscale, and Kinesia ONE accelerometry. RESULTS: The video-rated The Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale performance subscale was not different for CX-8998 (n = 39) versus placebo (n = 44; P = 0.696). CX-8998 improved investigator-rated The Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale performance subscale (P = 0.017) and The Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale activities of daily living (P = 0.049) but not Kinesia ONE (P = 0.421). Adverse events with CX-8998 included dizziness (21%), headache (8%), euphoric mood (6%), and insomnia (6%). CONCLUSIONS: The primary efficacy end point was not met; however, CX-8998 improved some assessments of essential tremor, supporting further clinical investigation. © 2021 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society. This article has been contributed to by US Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.


Asunto(s)
Temblor Esencial , Actividades Cotidianas , Método Doble Ciego , Temblor Esencial/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Resultado del Tratamiento
7.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 102(3): 448-455, 2021 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32950465

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the reliability and validity of pupillary response during dual-task balance conditions in individuals with Parkinson disease (PD). DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: University of Kansas Medical Center Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorder Center. PARTICIPANTS: Participants (N=68) included individuals with PD (n=33) and healthy controls (n=35). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pupillary response was the main outcome measure that was measured during the following conditions: single-task balance eyes open, single-task balance eyes occluded, dual-task eyes open, and dual-task eyes occluded. After each condition, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration-Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) was administered to assess self-reported cognitive workload. To examine the test-retest reliability of the pupillary response, the conditions were administered twice for each individual within 2 hours. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were used to analyze the test-retest reliability of pupillary response in each condition for both groups. Pearson's r correlation was used to assess the convergent validity of pupillary response against the NASA-TLX. RESULTS: The test-retest reliability was excellent for both groups in almost all conditions (ICC>0.75). There were no correlations between pupillary response and the NASA-TLX. However, increased mental demand (a subitem of the NASA-TLX) significantly correlated with increased pupillary response in individuals with PD (r=0.38; P=.03). CONCLUSIONS: Pupillary response showed excellent test-retest reliability and validity during dual-task balance for individuals with PD and healthy controls. Overall, these results suggest that pupillary response represents a stable index of cognitive workload during dual-task balance in individuals with PD.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Parkinson/fisiopatología , Enfermedad de Parkinson/rehabilitación , Equilibrio Postural/fisiología , Pupila/fisiología , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Análisis y Desempeño de Tareas
8.
Int J Neurosci ; 131(5): 504-510, 2021 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32202180

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pupillary response reflects cognitive workload during processing speed, working memory, and arithmetic tasks in Parkinson's disease (PD). Abstract reasoning, a higher-order cognitive function that relates different objects, events, or thoughts in a similar manner, may also be compromised in PD. The aim of this study was to compare pupillary response as a measure of cognitive workload while completing a verbal abstract reasoning test between patients with PD and age-matched controls. METHODS: Nineteen non-demented individuals with PD (66.6 ± 8.9 years) and 10 healthy controls (65.3 ± 7.3 years) were recruited. A remote eye tracker recorded the pupillary response at 60 Hz, while the participants were performing the Similarities test of Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-IV. Outcome measures included pupillary response, evaluated by the Index of Cognitive Activity (ICA), and behavioral responses of the Similarities test. RESULTS: The PD group (scaled scores = 8.9 ± 2.2) did not show impairment in behavioral performance on Similarities test compared with healthy controls (scaled scores = 8.8 ± 2.3; p = .91). However, the PD group (ICA = .32 ± .09) demonstrated significantly greater cognitive workload during the Similarities test compared to controls (ICA = .24 ± .08; p = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Non-demented individuals with PD exerted greater cognitive workload to complete a verbal abstract reasoning task despite similar behavioral performance compared to healthy controls. Clinical utilities of pupillary response to detect and monitor early impairment in higher-order executive function will be the subject of further study in the PD population.


Asunto(s)
Cognición/fisiología , Disfunción Cognitiva/fisiopatología , Enfermedad de Parkinson/fisiopatología , Pensamiento/fisiología , Anciano , Disfunción Cognitiva/etiología , Tecnología de Seguimiento Ocular , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad de Parkinson/complicaciones , Proyectos Piloto , Pupila/fisiología , Escalas de Wechsler
9.
Mov Disord ; 35(3): 392-396, 2020 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31872501

RESUMEN

Levodopa-induced dyskinesia (LID) represents a significant source of discomfort for people with Parkinson's disease (PD). It negatively affects quality of life, it is associated with both motor and nonmotor fluctuations, and it brings an increased risk of disability, balance problems, and falls. Although the prevalence of severe LID appears to be lower than in previous eras (likely owing to a more conservative use of oral levodopa), we have not yet found a way to prevent the development of this complication. Advanced surgical therapies, such as deep brain stimulation, ameliorate LID, but only a minority of PD patients qualify for these interventions. Although some have argued that PD patients would rather be ON with dyskinesia than OFF, the deeper truth is that patients would very much prefer to be ON without dyskinesia. As researchers and clinicians, we should aspire to make that goal a reality. To this end, translational research on LID is to be encouraged and persistently pursued. © 2019 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.


Asunto(s)
Discinesia Inducida por Medicamentos , Enfermedad de Parkinson , Antiparkinsonianos , Discinesia Inducida por Medicamentos/etiología , Humanos , Levodopa/efectos adversos , Enfermedad de Parkinson/tratamiento farmacológico , Calidad de Vida
10.
J Neuroeng Rehabil ; 17(1): 125, 2020 09 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32917244

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Parkinson's disease (PD) and essential tremor (ET) are movement disorders that can have similar clinical characteristics including tremor and gait difficulty. These disorders can be misdiagnosed leading to delay in appropriate treatment. The aim of the study was to determine whether balance and gait variables obtained with wearable inertial motion sensors can be utilized to differentiate between PD and ET using machine learning. Additionally, we compared classification performances of several machine learning models. METHODS: This retrospective study included balance and gait variables collected during the instrumented stand and walk test from people with PD (n = 524) and with ET (n = 43). Performance of several machine learning techniques including neural networks, support vector machine, k-nearest neighbor, decision tree, random forest, and gradient boosting, were compared with a dummy model or logistic regression using F1-scores. RESULTS: Machine learning models classified PD and ET based on balance and gait characteristics better than the dummy model (F1-score = 0.48) or logistic regression (F1-score = 0.53). The highest F1-score was 0.61 of neural network, followed by 0.59 of gradient boosting, 0.56 of random forest, 0.55 of support vector machine, 0.53 of decision tree, and 0.49 of k-nearest neighbor. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the utility of machine learning models to classify different movement disorders based on balance and gait characteristics collected from wearable sensors. Future studies using a well-balanced data set are needed to confirm the potential clinical utility of machine learning models to discern between PD and ET.


Asunto(s)
Temblor Esencial/diagnóstico , Aprendizaje Automático , Enfermedad de Parkinson/diagnóstico , Dispositivos Electrónicos Vestibles , Temblor Esencial/clasificación , Marcha/fisiología , Trastornos Neurológicos de la Marcha/clasificación , Trastornos Neurológicos de la Marcha/etiología , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Enfermedad de Parkinson/clasificación , Equilibrio Postural/fisiología , Estudios Retrospectivos
12.
Sensors (Basel) ; 19(23)2019 Nov 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31775289

RESUMEN

The response to levodopa (LR) is important for managing Parkinson's Disease and is measured with clinical scales prior to (OFF) and after (ON) levodopa. The aim of this study was to ascertain whether an ambulatory wearable device could predict the LR from the response to the first morning dose. The ON and OFF scores were sorted into six categories of severity so that separating Parkinson's Kinetigraph (PKG) features corresponding to the ON and OFF scores became a multi-class classification problem according to whether they fell below or above the threshold for each class. Candidate features were extracted from the PKG data and matched to the class labels. Several linear and non-linear candidate statistical models were examined and compared to classify the six categories of severity. The resulting model predicted a clinically significant LR with an area under the receiver operator curve of 0.92. This study shows that ambulatory data could be used to identify a clinically significant response to levodopa. This study has also identified practical steps that would enhance the reliability of this test in future studies.


Asunto(s)
Antiparkinsonianos/uso terapéutico , Levodopa/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad de Parkinson/tratamiento farmacológico , Articulación de la Muñeca/fisiopatología , Muñeca/fisiopatología , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Dispositivos Electrónicos Vestibles
13.
Neuromodulation ; 22(5): 537-545, 2019 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30701655

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a wrist-worn peripheral nerve stimulation device in patients with essential tremor (ET) in a single in-office session. METHODS: This was a randomized controlled study of 77 ET patients who received either treatment stimulation (N = 40) or sham stimulation (N = 37) on the wrist of the hand with more severe tremor. Tremor was evaluated before and immediately after the end of a single 40-minute stimulation session. The primary endpoint compared spiral drawing in the stimulated hand using the Tremor Research Group Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale (TETRAS) Archimedes spiral scores in treatment and sham groups. Additional endpoints included TETRAS upper limb tremor scores, subject-rated tasks from the Bain and Findley activities of daily living (ADL) scale before and after stimulation as well as clinical global impression-improvement (CGI-I) rating after stimulation. RESULTS: Subjects who received peripheral nerve stimulation did not show significantly larger improvement in the Archimedes spiral task compared to sham but did show significantly greater improvement in upper limb TETRAS tremor scores (p = 0.017) compared to sham. Subject-rated improvements in ADLs were significantly greater with treatment (49% reduction) than with sham (27% reduction; p = 0.001). A greater percentage of ET patients (88%) reported improvement in the stimulation group as compared to the sham group (62%) according to CGI-I ratings (p = 0.019). No significant adverse events were reported; 3% of subjects experienced mild adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Peripheral nerve stimulation in ET may provide a safe, well-tolerated, and effective treatment for transient relief of hand tremor symptoms.


Asunto(s)
Actividades Cotidianas , Temblor Esencial/diagnóstico , Temblor Esencial/terapia , Nervios Periféricos/fisiología , Estimulación Eléctrica Transcutánea del Nervio/métodos , Actividades Cotidianas/psicología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Temblor Esencial/fisiopatología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estimulación Eléctrica Transcutánea del Nervio/instrumentación , Muñeca/inervación , Muñeca/fisiología
14.
CNS Spectr ; 23(6): 402-413, 2018 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30588905

RESUMEN

Patients with Parkinson's disease psychosis (PDP) are often treated with an atypical antipsychotic, especially quetiapine or clozapine, but side effects, lack of sufficient efficacy, or both may motivate a switch to pimavanserin, the first medication approved for management of PDP. How best to implement a switch to pimavanserin has not been clear, as there are no controlled trials or case series in the literature to provide guidance. An abrupt switch may interrupt partially effective treatment or potentially trigger rebound effects from antipsychotic withdrawal, whereas cross-taper involves potential drug interactions. A panel of experts drew from published data, their experience treating PDP, lessons from switching antipsychotic drugs in other populations, and the pharmacology of the relevant drugs, to establish consensus recommendations. The panel concluded that patients with PDP can be safely and effectively switched from atypical antipsychotics used off label in PDP to the recently approved pimavanserin by considering each agent's pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, receptor interactions, and the clinical reason for switching (efficacy or adverse events). Final recommendations are that such a switch should aim to maintain adequate 5-HT2A antagonism during the switch, thus providing a stable transition so that efficacy is maintained. Specifically, the consensus recommendation is to add pimavanserin at the full recommended daily dose (34 mg) for 2-6 weeks in most patients before beginning to taper and discontinue quetiapine or clozapine over several days to weeks. Further details are provided for this recommendation, as well as for special clinical circumstances where switching may need to proceed more rapidly.


Asunto(s)
Antiparkinsonianos/administración & dosificación , Antipsicóticos/administración & dosificación , Sustitución de Medicamentos/métodos , Enfermedad de Parkinson/tratamiento farmacológico , Piperidinas/administración & dosificación , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Trastornos Psicóticos/tratamiento farmacológico , Urea/análogos & derivados , Antiparkinsonianos/efectos adversos , Antiparkinsonianos/uso terapéutico , Antipsicóticos/efectos adversos , Antipsicóticos/uso terapéutico , Consenso , Sustitución de Medicamentos/normas , Humanos , Uso Fuera de lo Indicado , Enfermedad de Parkinson/complicaciones , Piperidinas/efectos adversos , Piperidinas/uso terapéutico , Trastornos Psicóticos/etiología , Antagonistas del Receptor de Serotonina 5-HT2/administración & dosificación , Antagonistas del Receptor de Serotonina 5-HT2/efectos adversos , Antagonistas del Receptor de Serotonina 5-HT2/uso terapéutico , Urea/administración & dosificación , Urea/efectos adversos , Urea/uso terapéutico
15.
Mov Disord ; 32(12): 1701-1709, 2017 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28833562

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The treatment of levodopa-induced dyskinesia in Parkinson's disease (PD) is an unmet need with no approved drug therapy. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of 274 mg ADS-5102 (amantadine) extended-release capsules (equivalent to 340-mg amantadine HCl) for levodopa-induced dyskinesia in a randomized controlled trial. METHODS: PD patients with ≥1 hour of troublesome dyskinesia and at least mild functional impact were randomized to placebo or ADS-5102 once daily at bedtime for 13 weeks. The primary efficacy analysis was based on change from baseline to week 12 on the Unified Dyskinesia Rating Scale total score in the modified intent-to-treat population. OFF time was a key secondary measure. RESULTS: At week 12, least-squares mean change in the Unified Dyskinesia Rating Scale was -20.7 (standard error 2.2) for ADS-5102 (n = 37) and -6.3 (standard error 2.1) for placebo (n = 38; treatment difference -14.4, 95% confidence interval -20.4 to -8.3, P < .0001), indicating improvement in levodopa-induced dyskinesia. OFF time decreased 0.5 hours (standard error 0.3) for ADS-5102 from a baseline mean of 2.6 hours and increased 0.6 hours (standard error 0.3) for placebo from a baseline mean of 2.0 hours (treatment difference -1.1 hours, 95% confidence interval -2.0 to -0.2, P = .0199). The most common adverse events (ADS-5102 versus placebo) included dry mouth (13.5% versus 2.6%), nausea (13.5% versus 2.6%), decreased appetite (10.8% versus 0%), insomnia (10.8% versus 0%), orthostatic hypotension (10.8% versus 0%), constipation (8.1% versus 0%), falls (8.1% versus 5.3%), and visual hallucinations (8.1% versus 5.3%). Adverse events led to treatment discontinuation in 19% versus 8%, respectively. CONCLUSION: ADS-5102 274 mg is an oral pharmacotherapy demonstrating a significant decrease in levodopa-induced dyskinesia and improving OFF time. © 2017 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.


Asunto(s)
Amantadina/uso terapéutico , Antiparkinsonianos/uso terapéutico , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada/uso terapéutico , Discinesia Inducida por Medicamentos/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antiparkinsonianos/efectos adversos , Método Doble Ciego , Discinesia Inducida por Medicamentos/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Levodopa/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad de Parkinson/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
16.
Int J Neurosci ; 127(5): 459-465, 2017 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27222011

RESUMEN

Carbidopa/levodopa enteral suspension (CLES; Duopa) is a suspension or gel formulation of carbidopa/levodopa that is approved by the USA Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of advanced Parkinson's disease patients with motor fluctuations. CLES is delivered at a constant rate continuously throughout the day into the jejunum through an infusion pump via a PEG-J tube implanted surgically. The efficacy of CLES was established in the USA based on a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active controlled, parallel group and 12-week study, in which mean daily OFF time was reduced by 4.0 h, compared to 1.9 h with oral immediate release carbidopa/levodopa. The CLES hardware consists of a cassette containing the drug, a pump to deliver the drug and tubing to connect the PEG-J to the pump. It is critical to understand the appropriate conversion of the carbidopa/levodopa daily dosages to the CLES dosage and how to program the pump and titrate CLES to achieve the most effective dose. We describe one methodology for patient selection, outpatient titration and pump programming.


Asunto(s)
Antiparkinsonianos/administración & dosificación , Carbidopa/administración & dosificación , Levodopa/administración & dosificación , Enfermedad de Parkinson/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Antiparkinsonianos/farmacocinética , Carbidopa/farmacocinética , Combinación de Medicamentos , Humanos , Infusiones Parenterales , Levodopa/farmacocinética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Suspensiones , Resultado del Tratamiento
17.
Int J Neurosci ; 126(1): 25-9, 2016.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26134878

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine if the non-motor sections of the Movement Disorder Society's (MDS) version of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) could supplement the original UPDRS as a patient completed assessment of changes in non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients after bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS). METHODS: Thirty PD patients who underwent bilateral STN DBS were assessed using the total UPDRS and the non-motor sections of the MDS-UPDRS prior to surgery and one year following surgery. This study focuses on non-motor symptoms as assessed by Part I of the UPDRS and Part 1A and 1B of the MDS-UPDRS. RESULTS: One year following surgery, no individual non-motor symptoms or the total mentation score of the UPDRS were significantly changed. In comparison, the MDS-UPDRS showed significant improvements in sleep and urinary problems and a trend towards improvement in anxiety, constipation, daytime sleepiness, fatigue and pain. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence that the MDS-UPDRS non-motor sections, when completed by the patients, can supplement the original version of the UPDRS as an effective method of measuring changes in non-motor symptoms after DBS. It also reinforces the benefits of bilateral STN DBS on non-motor symptoms of PD.


Asunto(s)
Estimulación Encefálica Profunda , Enfermedad de Parkinson/terapia , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Núcleo Subtalámico , Evaluación de Síntomas/métodos , Anciano , Ansiedad/etiología , Ansiedad/terapia , Trastornos del Conocimiento/etiología , Trastornos del Conocimiento/terapia , Estreñimiento/etiología , Estreñimiento/terapia , Fatiga/etiología , Fatiga/terapia , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor/etiología , Enfermedad de Parkinson/complicaciones , Enfermedad de Parkinson/fisiopatología , Trastornos Intrínsecos del Sueño/etiología , Trastornos Intrínsecos del Sueño/terapia , Núcleo Subtalámico/fisiopatología , Resultado del Tratamiento
18.
Int J Neurosci ; 126(8): 713-22, 2016 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26371386

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to characterize the base-width neutral step (BNS) as the first step in a compensatory step response in persons with moderate Parkinson's disease (PD), and its effect on balance recovery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten PD and 10 healthy controls (HCs) responded to a posterior waist pull. A BNS was defined if the first step was less than 50 mm. The length, height, duration and velocity of the BNS and its effect on balance recovery time and center of mass location at recovery were compared to the first step within other stepping strategies (single step (SS), multiple step (MS)). A linear mixed model was used to compare across strategies. RESULTS: Six of ten persons with PD compared to zero HC used a BNS. The BNS was shorter in length and duration compared to MS responses in HC, and shorter in duration compared to MS responses in PD. The BNS was slower in velocity compared to every other strategy. BNS use resulted in a longer recovery time compared to all strategies in HC and SS responses in PD, and trended toward a longer recovery time compared to MS responses in PD. CONCLUSIONS: The BNS as the first step in a MS response may be an unreported strategy for compensatory stepping in PD. This study suggests that the cost of utilizing the BNS may be a longer time for recovery, but further work is necessary to understand the progression of the BNS as PD severity increases.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Parkinson/fisiopatología , Equilibrio Postural/fisiología , Anciano , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Prueba de Esfuerzo , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
19.
Telemed J E Health ; 22(7): 590-8, 2016 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26886406

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Delivering specialty care remotely directly into people's homes can enhance access for and improve the healthcare of individuals with chronic conditions. However, evidence supporting this approach is limited. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Connect.Parkinson is a randomized comparative effectiveness study that compares usual care of individuals with Parkinson's disease in the community with usual care augmented by virtual house calls with a Parkinson's disease specialist from 1 of 18 centers nationally. Individuals in the intervention arm receive four virtual visits from a Parkinson's disease specialist over 1 year via secure, Web-based videoconferencing directly into their homes. All study activities, including recruitment, enrollment, and assessments, are conducted remotely. Here we report on interest, feasibility, and barriers to enrollment in this ongoing study. RESULTS: During recruitment, 11,734 individuals visited the study's Web site, and 927 unique individuals submitted electronic interest forms. Two hundred ten individuals from 18 states enrolled in the study from March 2014 to June 2015, and 195 were randomized. Most participants were white (96%) and college educated (73%). Of the randomized participants, 73% had seen a Parkinson's disease specialist within the previous year. CONCLUSIONS: Among individuals with Parkinson's disease, national interest in receiving remote specialty care directly into the home is high. Remote enrollment in this care model is feasible but is likely affected by differential access to the Internet.


Asunto(s)
Visita Domiciliaria , Enfermedad de Parkinson/terapia , Consulta Remota/organización & administración , Comunicación por Videoconferencia , Estudios de Factibilidad , Humanos , Internet , Proyectos de Investigación , Factores Socioeconómicos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA